Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Aug 25;68(Pt 9):i70. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812036434

Diaqua­tetra­bromidotin(IV) trihydrate

Fei Ye a, Hans Reuter a,*
PMCID: PMC3435566  PMID: 22969439

Abstract

The title compound, [SnBr4(H2O)2]·3H2O, forms large colourless crystals in originally sealed samples of tin tetra­bromide. It constitutes the first structurally characterized hydrate of SnBr4 and is isostructural with the corresponding ­hydrate of SnCl4. It is composed of SnIV atoms octa­hedrally coordinated by four Br atoms and two cis-related water mol­ecules. The octa­hedra exhibit site symmetry 2. They are arranged into columns along [001] via medium–strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds involving the two lattice water mol­ecules (one situated on a twofold rotation axis) while the chains are inter­connected via longer O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network.

Related literature  

For background information on hydrates of SnBr4, see: Pfeiffer (1914); Pickering (1895); Rayman & Preis (1884). For the isostructural compound [SnCl4(H2O)2]·3H2O, see: Shihada et al. (2004). For structural information on other hydrates of SnCl4, see: Semenov et al. (2005); Genge et al. (2004).

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [SnBr4(H2O)2]·3H2O

  • M r = 528.41

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 12.6484 (5) Å

  • b = 10.1647 (4) Å

  • c = 8.8683 (4) Å

  • β = 104.462 (1)°

  • V = 1104.04 (8) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 16.77 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.18 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009) T min = 0.148, T max = 0.234

  • 16999 measured reflections

  • 1618 independent reflections

  • 1523 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.033

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.013

  • wR(F 2) = 0.028

  • S = 1.10

  • 1618 reflections

  • 51 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.41 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812036434/fj2592sup1.cif

e-68-00i70-sup1.cif (14.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812036434/fj2592Isup2.hkl

e-68-00i70-Isup2.hkl (79.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Sn1—O1 2.1378 (12)
Sn1—Br2 2.5420 (2)
Sn1—Br1 2.5439 (2)

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3—H3⋯Br2i 0.96 2.67 3.5239 (16) 148
O2—H22⋯Br2ii 0.96 2.92 3.6365 (14) 133
O2—H22⋯Br1ii 0.96 2.58 3.4004 (13) 144
O2—H21⋯O3iii 0.96 1.82 2.7595 (19) 167
O1—H12⋯O2iv 0.96 1.82 2.7182 (18) 155
O1—H11⋯O2 0.96 1.80 2.7318 (18) 164

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In contrast to tin(IV) chloride, SnCl4, from which the crystal structures of hydrates, SnCl4.nH2O, with n = 2 (Semenov et al., 2005), n = 3 (Genge et al., 2004; Semenov et al., 2005), n = 4 (Genge et al., 2004; Shihada et al., 2004), and n = 5 (Shihada et al., 2004) are known in detail, no structural data are available concerning the hydrates of tin(IV) bromide, SnBr4.nH2O, although there are some hints in the older literature that a tetrahydrate, n = 4, (Rayman & Preis, 1884; Pfeiffer, 1914) and octahydrate, n = 8, (Pickering, 1895) exist. By chance, we found near the neck of some several years old, originally sealed bottles of tin(IV) bromide some large, colorless, transparent single-crystal in shape totally different from those of SnBr4 at the bottom of the flask. From single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments we were able to confirm their composition to correspond to a so far unknown pentahydrate of tin tetrabromide, SnBr4.5H2O, 1.

The asymmetric unit of the title compound consists of half a {SnBr4(H2O)2} octahedron with tin at a twofold rotation axes, and one and a half water molecule in general position, respectively, on a twofold rotation axes, too. The {SnBr4(H2O)2} octahedron (Fig. 1) belongs to point group C2 with the two coordinated water molecules in a cis position, a structural feature that is common to all the hydrates of SnCl4, mentioned above. Since the title compound is isostructural to the corresponding pentahydrate of SnCl4, 2, the influence of the larger bromine atom on bond angles and bond lengths can be studied in more detail. Both different tin-bromine distances are very similar and differ by only 0.0002 (2) Å, the mean value being 2.5435 (2) Å. The corresponding tin-chlorine distances were found to be 2.3824 (6) and 2.3826 (7) Å. The tin-oxygen distance of 2.135 (1) Å in 1 is somewhat longer than in 2 [2.115 (2) Å] but in the range [2.106 (5), tetrahydrate, T = 130 K, - 2.168 (2), dihydrate, T = 150 K] found in the other hydrates of SnCl4. Influence of the larger bromine atom on the structural parameters of the coordination polyhedron becomes more evident with respect to bond angles. Thus, the angle between the two water molecules [78.26 (7)°, Hal = Br] is slightly reduced [79.9 (1)°, Hal = Cl]. This is also valid for the angle between the bromine atoms being trans to each other [170.32 (1)°, 1, 171.47 (3)°, 2]. In contrast, the angle [99.84 (1)°] between the bromine atoms trans to the water molecules is significantly enlarged in comparison to the corresponding angle between the chlorine atoms [93.54 (2)°] of 2.

Between the {SnBr4(H2O)2} octahedrons and the uncoordinated water molecules an extended array of hydrogen bonds of different strengths (Tab. 2) exist. The strongest ones are those of type O—H···O between the three different water molecules giving rise to a tube-like arrangement (Fig. 2) of these components. Within these tubes, the coordinated water molecule 1 acts as acceptor for one and donor for two hydrogen bonds. From the two other uncoordinated water molecules, molecule 2 serves as donor for one and acceptor for two hydrogen bonds, whereas molecule 3 is only acceptor for two hydrogen bonds. In addition, the hydrogen atoms of these two molecules not involved into O—H···O hydrogen bridges form weaker (longer) hydrogen bonds to bromine atoms. The shortest one of these O—H···Br hydrogen bridges interconnects neighboring tubes (Fig. 3) in the third dimension.

Experimental

A suitable single-crystal was selected under a polarization microscope and mounted on a 50 µm MicroMesh MiTeGen Micromount TM using FROMBLIN Y perfluoropolyether (LVAC 16/6, Aldrich).

Refinement

All H atoms of the water molecules were found in a difference Fourier synthesis. Their positions were first refined with respect to a O—H distance of 0.96 Å and an H—O—H angle of 104.95°. Thereafter their positions were constrained to ride on their parent oxygen atoms, with three common isotropic displacement parameter for the three different water molecules.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Ball-and-stick model of the {SnBr4(H2O)2} octahedron showing the atom labeling scheme used and the orientation of the twofold (C2) rotation axes. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Symmetry code: 1) -x, y, 1/2 - z.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Schematic representation of the O—H···O hydrogen bonds (red broken lines) beetween the {SnBr4(H2O)2} octahedrons and the uncoordinated water molecules. (a) View perpendicular to, (b) into their tubelike arrangement. Symmetry codes: 1) -1 + x, y, z; 2) 1 - x, y, 3/2 - z.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Tube packing as capped sticks model with the shortest O—H···Br hydrogen bridges (green broken lines) interconnecting neighboring tubes in the third dimension.

Crystal data

[SnBr4(H2O)2]·3H2O F(000) = 960
Mr = 528.41 Dx = 3.179 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 8700 reflections
a = 12.6484 (5) Å θ = 2.6–30.0°
b = 10.1647 (4) Å µ = 16.77 mm1
c = 8.8683 (4) Å T = 100 K
β = 104.462 (1)° Block, colourless
V = 1104.04 (8) Å3 0.18 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 1618 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1523 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.033
φ and ω scans θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009) h = −17→16
Tmin = 0.148, Tmax = 0.234 k = −12→14
16999 measured reflections l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.013 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.028 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0089P)2 + 1.3814P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1618 reflections Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
51 parameters Δρmin = −0.41 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.00035 (4)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Sn1 0.0000 0.259481 (16) 0.2500 0.00769 (5)
Br1 0.143871 (16) 0.280603 (17) 0.09578 (2) 0.01115 (5)
Br2 0.117864 (16) 0.098459 (17) 0.43896 (2) 0.01257 (5)
O1 0.07836 (11) 0.42263 (12) 0.38481 (14) 0.0123 (3)
H11 0.1025 0.4275 0.4963 0.048 (6)*
H12 0.1063 0.5008 0.3480 0.048 (6)*
O2 0.13528 (11) 0.39033 (13) 0.70061 (15) 0.0134 (3)
H21 0.0954 0.3121 0.7118 0.038 (5)*
H22 0.2103 0.3632 0.7231 0.038 (5)*
O3 1.0000 0.19063 (19) 0.7500 0.0170 (4)
H3 0.9756 0.1311 0.6643 0.056 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Sn1 0.00819 (9) 0.00818 (8) 0.00695 (8) 0.000 0.00236 (6) 0.000
Br1 0.01097 (10) 0.01404 (9) 0.00975 (8) 0.00156 (7) 0.00504 (7) 0.00131 (6)
Br2 0.01312 (10) 0.01227 (9) 0.01191 (9) 0.00208 (6) 0.00235 (7) 0.00356 (6)
O1 0.0151 (7) 0.0124 (6) 0.0087 (6) −0.0042 (5) 0.0017 (5) −0.0013 (5)
O2 0.0131 (7) 0.0143 (6) 0.0126 (6) 0.0033 (5) 0.0027 (5) 0.0009 (5)
O3 0.0250 (12) 0.0150 (9) 0.0102 (9) 0.000 0.0026 (8) 0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Sn1—O1i 2.1378 (12) O1—H11 0.9600
Sn1—O1 2.1378 (12) O1—H12 0.9600
Sn1—Br2i 2.5420 (2) O2—H21 0.9600
Sn1—Br2 2.5420 (2) O2—H22 0.9600
Sn1—Br1 2.5439 (2) O3—H3 0.9602
Sn1—Br1i 2.5439 (2)
O1i—Sn1—O1 78.26 (7) O1i—Sn1—Br1i 86.63 (4)
O1i—Sn1—Br2i 90.98 (4) O1—Sn1—Br1i 85.86 (4)
O1—Sn1—Br2i 169.06 (4) Br2i—Sn1—Br1i 91.620 (7)
O1i—Sn1—Br2 169.06 (4) Br2—Sn1—Br1i 94.613 (7)
O1—Sn1—Br2 90.98 (4) Br1—Sn1—Br1i 170.317 (10)
Br2i—Sn1—Br2 99.837 (10) Sn1—O1—H11 126.8
O1i—Sn1—Br1 85.86 (4) Sn1—O1—H12 127.6
O1—Sn1—Br1 86.63 (4) H11—O1—H12 105.0
Br2i—Sn1—Br1 94.612 (7) H21—O2—H22 105.0
Br2—Sn1—Br1 91.621 (7)

Symmetry code: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O3—H3···Br2ii 0.96 2.67 3.5239 (16) 148
O2—H22···Br2iii 0.96 2.92 3.6365 (14) 133
O2—H22···Br1iii 0.96 2.58 3.4004 (13) 144
O2—H21···O3iv 0.96 1.82 2.7595 (19) 167
O1—H12···O2v 0.96 1.82 2.7182 (18) 155
O1—H11···O2 0.96 1.80 2.7318 (18) 164

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iv) x−1, y, z; (v) x, −y+1, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FJ2592).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Genge, A. R. J., Levason, W., Patel, R., Reid, G. & Webster, M. (2004). Acta Cryst. C60, i47–i49. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  5. Pfeiffer, P. (1914). Z. Anorg. Chem 87, 235–247.
  6. Pickering, S. U. (1895). Phil. Mag. 39, 510–528.
  7. Rayman, B. & Preis, K. (1884). Liebigs Ann. Chem. 223, 323–334.
  8. Semenov, S. N., Maltsev, E. Y., Timokhin, I. G., Drozdov, A. A. & Troyanov, S. I. (2005). Mendeleev Commun. pp. 205–207.
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Shihada, A.-F., Abushamleh, A. S. & Weller, F. (2004). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 630, 841–847.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812036434/fj2592sup1.cif

e-68-00i70-sup1.cif (14.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812036434/fj2592Isup2.hkl

e-68-00i70-Isup2.hkl (79.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES