Skip to main content
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences : MJMS logoLink to The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences : MJMS
. 2012 Jan-Mar;19(1):4–14.

The Impact of Nutrition Education Interventions on the Dietary Habits of College Students in Developed Nations: A Brief Review

Pei Lin Lua 1, Wan Dali Wan Putri Elena 1,
PMCID: PMC3436500  PMID: 22977369

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of studies on the effectiveness nutrition education interventions used by college students. Electronic databases such as Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Google Scholar were explored for articles that involved nutrition education interventions for college students and that were published between 1990 and 2011. Fourteen studies, which involved a total of 1668 college students as respondents, were identified and met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that there were 3 major forms of nutrition education interventions: web-based education, lectures, and supplement provisions. Dietary intake measures were used in almost all studies and were primarily collected with food records, recall, food frequency questionnaires, and dietary habit questionnaires. The outcome measures varied among the studies, with indicators such as consumption of food, nutrition knowledge, dietary habits, physical activity, and quality of life. Methodological issues were also identified. In general, college students experienced significant changes in their dietary habits after the interventions were employed. The highlighted methodological issues should be considered to improve the quality of similar research in future.

Keywords: dietary habits, education, intervention studies, nutrition, programme effectiveness, young adult

Introduction

College students between the ages of 18 and 24 years gain new experiences and personal freedom as well as develop a sense of identity as they ascend from adolescence to adulthood (1). Unfortunately, during this phase, the tendency to engage in unhealthy dieting, meal skipping, and fast food consumption is rather common. Minimal physical activity is also a norm (1). Poor eating habits and limited physical activity can likely increase the risk for osteoporosis, obesity, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, and cancer later in life (1). Such an unhealthy lifestyle is further linked to health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which is related to an individual’s nutritional status (2). All of these associations suggest that it is important to establish good eating habits at an early age (3).

Nutrition education is widely used for a range of population groups as a medium to deliver healthy diet and nutrition information; however, this type of intervention is still rarely implemented for college students. While there are various modes of nutrition education interventions, their effectiveness on eating habits remains unclear. This review thus intends to describe the impact of different nutrition education interventions on the dietary habits of college students by reviewing previous studies from developed nations.

Materials and Methods

Articles were identified through relevant databases (i.e., Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL [EBSCOhost], and Google Scholar) from 1990 until 2011 using the following keywords: nutrition education, effectiveness, college/university students, and dietary habits.

The keyword-based screening strategy alone generated 52 articles, but only 14 met the specified inclusion criteria: 1) the participants were 18 to 25 years (college/university students), 2) the study design was cross-sectional, exploratory, longitudinal, or randomised controlled trials (RCT), and 3) they were available in full-text form. Studies published in languages other than English, reviews, and abstracts were excluded. The included studies were subsequently reviewed based on the study design, year, country, sample size, duration, type of nutrition intervention, and outcome measures. The selection method is summarised in Figure 1.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

The process of article selection

Results

The 14 studies included 1668 participants (Table 1). These studies involved more female college students (n = 1113) than males (n = 555) and that many of the studies were conducted in the United States of America. Only 2 studies were conducted elsewhere: in Korea and in Israel.

Table 1:

Studies using nutrition education as interventions for college students

1. Ha and Caine-Bish, 2011 (20)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States An interactive, introductory nutrition course focusing on disease prevention
  • • Increased whole-grain intake

  • • A cost-effective way to modify eating habits

  • • Use of a convenience sample

  • • No control group

Design
Longitudinal
Duration
15 weeks
Sample
80 college students
2. Gow et al., 2010 (21)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States An online intervention to reduce adult obesity rates with 4 modalities:
  • • no treatment (CG)

  • • online intervention (OI)

  • • weight and caloric feedback (FI)

  • • combined feedback and online intervention (CI)

  • • CI group had lowest body mass index at post-test than the other groups

  • • Online intervention for weight gain prevention was feasible and effective

  • • The use of self-report measures of diet and exercise is less ideal than direct measures

Design
RCT
Duration
3 months
Sample
159 first year college students (CG = 40, OI = 40, FI = 39, CI = 40)
3. Poddar et al., 2010 (22)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States A web-based intervention using an online course system (email messages, posted information, and behaviour checklists with tailored feedback)
  • • Increased self regulation and selfefficacy in consuming 3 servings/day of dairy products

  • • Short length of the Design intervention

Design
Experimental
Duration
5 weeks
Sample
294 college students (IG = 148, CG = 146)
4. Ha and Caine-Bish, 2009 (9)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States Class lectures covered nutrition knowledge related to prevention of chronic diseases, healthful dietary choices, increasing fruits and vegetables, promoting active lifestyles, and interactive hands-on activities
  • • Increased fruits and vegetables consumption

  • • More than half of respondents were female (88%), which may bias outcomes

  • • No control group

  • • No long-term effect of intervention explored

  • • Heterogeneous group of students (i.e., different majors)

Design
Longitudinal
Duration
15 weeks
Sample
80 college students
5. Ha et al., 2009 (8)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States A class-based nutrition intervention combined with traditional lectures, interactive hands-on activities, and dietary feedback
  • • Decreased soft drink consumption

  • • Increased total milk and fat-free milk consumption

  • • Decreased whole milk and low-fat milk consumption

  • • More than half of respondents are female (88%), which may bias outcomes

  • • No control group

  • • No long-term effect of intervention explored

  • • Heterogeneous groups of students (i.e., different majors)

Design
Longitudinal
Duration
15 weeks
Sample
80 college students
6. White et al., 2009 (3)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States
  • • The Students Teaching Alcohol and Drug Responsibility peer health educators target alcohol- and drug-related topics

  • • Healthy Eating and Living peer health educators target eating and nutrition topics

  • • Sexual Health and Relationship peer health educators target sexual health topics

  • • Peer health education plays an important role in promoting healthy behaviours concerning alcohol and drug use, as well as eating and nutrition

  • • No control group

  • • Long study duration

Design
Randomised and longitudinal
Duration
3 years
Sample
144 college students
7. You et al., 2009 (4)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
Korea Nutrition education (diet therapy, exercise, and behavioural modification) and supplementation (sea tangle)
  • • Significant reductions in body weight, body fat mass, percentage of body fat, waist-hip ratio, and body mass index

  • • No control group (i.e., without supplementation)

  • • Small sample size

Design
Longitudinal
Duration
8 weeks
Sample
22 Korean female college students
8. Franko et al., 2008 (1)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States MyStudentBody.com- Nutrition (MSB-N) Internet-based nutrition and physical activity education program
  • • Effective Internet based nutrition education for promoting changes in health behaviours

Design
RCT
Duration
6 months
Sample
College students from 6 universities in the States (Experimental I = 139, Experimental II = 148)
9. Endevelt et al., 2006 (11)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
Israel Four topics:
  • • nutritional policy

  • • dietary assessment

  • • nutritional recommendations

  • • obesity

Method: dietary intake interviews, debates regarding nutritional treatments, and in-class activities
  • • It appeared to be beneficial to work with the students on personal issues as a way to enhance their nutritional experiences

  • • No nutrition knowledge test before and after workshop

Design
Cross-sectional
Duration
10-hour nutrition workshop (2 days) in 2003 and 2004
Sample
122 second-year medical students (1st and 2nd class)
10. Abood et al., 2004 (23)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States Focused on nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy in making healthful dietary choices, and dietary practices to demonstrate treatment effect
  • Social Cognitive Theory in 8 educational sessions (1 hour per session)

  • • Significant improvement in nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy and the overall number of positive dietary changes

  • • Small sample size

Design
Longitudinal
Duration
8 weeks
Sample
30 college female athletes (IG = 15, CG = 15)
11. Levy and Auld, 2004 (24)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States Demonstration versus hands-on cooking classes
  • • Significant improvement in attitudes and cooking related knowledge and behaviours

  • • Cooking classes can be an effective tool for improving participants’ attitudes, behaviours and knowledge regarding cooking

  • • Small sample size

  • • An effective costsaving strategy to enhance attitudes and knowledge

Design
Exploratory
Duration
3 months
Sample
65 first-semester college students (IG = 33, CG = 32)
12. Matvienko et al., 2001 (25)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States • College course composed of both lectures and laboratory exercises
  • • Weight gain was prevented for at-risk college students

  • • Small sample size

Design
RCT
Duration
16 months
Sample
40 first-year female college students (IG = 21, CG = 19)
13. Winzelberg et al., 2000 (26)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States Internet-based, computer-assisted health education programme
  • • This programme improved women’s body satisfaction

  • • Small sample size

  • • No long-term evaluation of effects

Design
RCT
Duration
3 months
Sample
43 female students (IG = 23, CG = 20)
14. Aaron et al., 1995 (27)
Country Intervention Result/conclusion(s) Comment(s)
United States Provision of nutrient intake information at lunch at college
  • • IG respondents had significantly increased total energy, fat, and carbohydrates, but decreased protein intake and proteinbased energy over time

  • • Short duration of intervention exposure

Design
Experimental
Duration
2 weeks
Sample
90 college students (IG = 65, CG = 25)

Abbreviation: RCT = randomised controlled trial, IG = intervention group, CG = control group

Only 1 study was cross-sectional by design, 4 were RCTs, and 9 were longitudinal studies. Sample sizes varied greatly across the studies, ranging from 22 to 294 participants. Nine out of 14 studies reported the questionnaire validity and reliability. Survey feasibility was reported in 1 study, but the validity of other self-report measures was not indicated. The overall study duration ranged from 2 days to 3 years.

The modes of intervention also differed among the studies (Table 1). As the delivery mode, 3 studies used web-based education, 1 study provided dietary supplements, and the other studies used educational lectures. The methods of lecture differed: some studies used traditional lectures combined with handson activities, while others utilised debates on nutritional treatments and cooking classes. Only 2 studies employed social cognitive theory (SCT) as a theory-based intervention. In another study, sea tangle (20 g/day) was distributed as a supplement to a combination of diet therapy, exercise, and behavioural modification (4).

To measure dietary changes before and after the intervention, most studies used the food frequency questionnaire, 3-day dietary record, and 24-hour food recall questionnaire (Table 2). Data were analysed and presented as nutrient intake. In addition, dietary habit questionnaires were used, and the results showed that the total score significantly increased after an 8-week body weight control programme (4).

Table 2:

Measurement instruments and corresponding outcomes

No. Authors Measurement instrument Outcomes
1. Ha and Caine-Bish (20)
  • • Anthropometry

  • • 3-day dietary records (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day)

  • • Social Cognitive Theory concepts

  • • Whole-grain consumption

2. Gow et al. (21)
  • • Anthropometry

  • • International Physical Activity Questionnaire

  • • Three Factor Eating Questionnaire

  • • Eating Behaviours Questionnaire

  • • Binge Eating Scale

  • • Block Food Screener

  • • Body Rating Scale

  • • Eating Disorder Inventory

  • • Eating Disorder Screening Questions

  • • Smoking Items

  • • Body mass index

  • • Eating and weight-related attitudes and behaviours

3. Poddar et al. (22)
  • • 7-day food records

  • • Social Cognitive Theory questionnaires

  • • Self-efficacy, self- regulation, and intake of dairy products

4. Ha and Caine-Bish (9)
  • • Anthropometry

  • • 3-day dietary records (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day)

  • • Social Cognitive Theory concepts

  • • Fruit and vegetable consumption

  • • Effectiveness of 15-week basic nutrition class

5. Ha et al. (8)
  • • Anthropometry

  • • 3-day dietary records (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day)

  • • Social Cognitive Theory concepts

  • • Soft drink and milk consumption

  • • Beverage choice alteration

6. White et al. (3) Questionnaires based on the following health behaviours:
  • • Alcohol and drug consumption

  • • Negative consequences of alcohol and drug use

  • • Weight management

  • • Fat talk

  • • Safer sex behaviour

  • • Sex under the influence of alcohol/drug

  • • Health behaviours (knowledge, attitudes and behaviours)

7. You et al. (4)
  • • Anthropometry (anthropometer and bioelectrical impedance)

  • • Dietary habit questionnaires (10 items)

  • • 24-hour dietary recall

  • • 3-day records

  • • Short Form-36

  • • Effectiveness in body composition

  • • Dietary habits

  • • Serum lipid profiles

  • • Nutrient intake

  • • Quality of life

8. Franko et al. (1)
  • • The Food Frequency Questionnaire

  • • Stages of dietary and physical activity change

  • • Nutrition knowledge test

  • • International Physical Activity Questionnaire

  • • Social support, encouragement, and selfefficacy for dietary changes

  • • Exercise benefits and barriers

  • • Nutrition knowledge

  • • Health behaviours

  • • Physical activity

  • • Social support and attitudes

9. Endevelt et al. (11)
  • • Multiple-choice questionnaire (knowledge of nutritional issues)

  • • Mark Spilsbury’s Measuring The Effectiveness of Training

  • • Nutrition knowledge

  • • Perception of programme effectiveness

10. Abood et al. (23)
  • • Nutrition knowledge and self-efficacy

  • • 3-day diet record

  • • Social Cognitive Theory concepts

  • • Nutrition knowledge

  • • Self-efficacy

  • • Dietary practices

11. Levy and Auld (24)
  • • Eating habits survey

  • • Cooking survey

  • • 72-hour food preparation recall

  • • Changes in attitudes, knowledge, and behaviours regarding cooking

12. Matvienko et al. (25)
  • • Anthropometry

  • • Food Frequency Questionnaire (116 items)

  • • Multiple choice and short answer questions (overall knowledge, nutrition knowledge, physiologic knowledge, and metabolic knowledge)

  • • Body weight

  • • Nutrient intakes

  • • Knowledge

13. Winzelberg et al. (26)
  • • Body Shape Questionnaire

  • • Eating Disorder Inventory: Drive for thinness and bulimia subscales

  • • Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: Weight concerns and shape concerns subscales

  • • Body image

  • • Eating disorder

14. Aaron et al. (27)
  • • Dutch eating behaviour questionnaire

  • • Debriefing questions

  • • Changes in energy and fat content

Only 1 study highlighted HRQoL issues in relation to nutrition education, which was assessed using the generic Short Form-36 (SF-36) (4). However, SF-36 is an instrument that has been widely used for population-based HRQoL rating (5).

Discussion

This brief review compiles evidence on the effectiveness of nutrition education interventions that have been used for college/university students in developed countries. Methodological issues, types of nutrition education interventions, dietary habits, related outcomes, and suggestions for future investigations are highlighted.

Because females out-numbered the males with a ratio of 2:1 across all studies, the overall sample composition may be imbalanced. This higher rate of female participation may be related to the increasing proportion of women in tertiary institutions (6). A recent report in Malaysia indicates that the proportion of female to male students has increased to a current ratio of 65:35 (7), and the same trend is believed to occur in other countries. Regarding attitudes toward nutrition, females exceeded their male counterparts. Similar findings have been previously discovered, such that females reported more positive attitudes towards healthy eating and greater health-consciousness than males did (8,9). These results imply that female students are highly motivated and are more interested in their health, body weight, and body image than male students are. Furthermore, the transition from home to college has often been identified to be a potentially critical period for weight gain among young adults, and in comparison to men, women have especially been eager to change their body shape and weight to conform with current fashion trends (10). Consequently, female students are more likely to be respondents in weight- and body shape–related programmes involving nutrition education interventions.

Regarding the methodological issues, most techniques seem to require several improvements. The common usage of cross-sectional design (11) in most investigations has its drawbacks, such that group differences can only be gauged at one time point and temporal changes could not be assessed. This methodological challenge may prevent experimentally conclusive and sustainable evidence. The sample sizes in several studies were also rather small, ranging from 22 to 43 participants. Thus, the findings may be limited and may lack generalisability because the data could only be analysed using less powerful statistical techniques and the study samples were likely not representative of the more general population . In addition, the reliability and validity of the assessment tools were not comprehensively reported, which is a methodological weakness because these indicators are essential for determining the effectiveness of the interventions (12).

A variety of outcomes have been reported across the interventions studied. Encouraging and positive results with improved health outcomes have been demonstrated in most studies. Nonetheless, more than half of the studies have not reported any preliminary evaluations of newly developed interventions. Such initial evaluations are crucial because they can facilitate subsequent modifications to ensure that an intervention is feasible and acceptable for use in an actual study (12). As a result, later experimental investigations may be less exposed to methodological flaws and may thus provide stronger outcomes.

The results for dietary habits showed that the combination of nutrition education and supplement provision was significantly beneficial in improving body composition, dietary habits, daily nutrient intake, and quality of life in a sample of Korean students (4). Supplements have been commonly administered to either healthy or unhealthy Korean populations (13). Furthermore, a few studies have also reported changes in dietary habits after interventions involving educational lectures as a nutrition improvement tool. For instance, Ha and Caine-Bish (9) have successfully showed an increased consumption of fruits and vegetables after nutrition interventions. Because dietary habits could worsen during university years, any undesirable dietary norm should be addressed at earlier ages and preferably through individuals’ routine learning environments (9). Hence, nutrition education is a well-suited technique to improve both students’ dietary habits and their awareness of overall health.

HRQoL data have been universally used to assess populations with illness and disability, to identify health disparities and needs and to monitor health changes over time (5). HRQoL refers to an individual’s satisfaction or happiness with the domains of life that are affected by health (5). Based on our review, HRQoL as related to dietary habits was not directly or extensively studied among college students. Because HRQoL represents a vital and holistic parameter for population healthcare needs, future investigations should include nutrition-related HRQoL as an outcome measure.

Additionally, research should focus on the development of nutrition education tools, which are not only effective but also interesting and practical for the current generation of students. For example, the effectiveness of the short messaging system has been demonstrated in smokers, diabetics, and bulimia nervosa patients (14). Another recommendation is to target nutrition education for first-year university students, who may still be adjusting to the collegiate environment and experiencing independence in life for the first time.

Several drawbacks of this review deserve attention. In particular, our limited accessible online databases generated only 14 articles that met the inclusion criteria from Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Google Scholar. With a small number of reported RCTs and lacking studies from developing countries, we could not provide a more comprehensive, potentially less-biased review. We did find 5 investigations from developing countries, which included Malaysia and Indonesia, but they unfortunately did not conform to the aims of our review. These studies were either focused on primary school children (1517) or the elderly (18,19), which did not meet our main target sample of college/university students. Future studies should also enrol larger samples, with the provision of sample size calculations, and a more balanced gender representation. With the majority of respondents being women across the studies, we acknowledge that this review may be biased toward female nutritional habits. Because publications in languages other than English were excluded, additional information from these studies could complement the existing research findings.

Conclusion

Despite several methodological limitations, we found that significant and beneficial changes in dietary habits have been found for college students after the implementation of nutrition interventions via various techniques. In particular, nutrition education and its combination with supplement provision appeared to be the best methods for enhancing students’ eating habits and promoting healthier diets and lifestyles. Nonetheless, these findings are more representative of the female populations in developed nations, and we suggest that further trials of similar nature, with improved methodology and in less-developed countries, are highly important.

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design, critical revision of the article: LPP

Collection, assembly, analysis, and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article: WPEWD

Final approval of the article: LPP, WPEWD

References

  • 1.Franko DL, Cousineau TM, Trant M, Green TC, Rancourt D, Thompson D, et al. Motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program. Prev Med. 2008;47(4):369–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Campbell KL, Ash S, Bauer JD. The impact of nutrition intervention on quality of life in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(4):537–544. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.White S, Park YS, Isreal T, Cordero ED. Longitudinal evaluation of peer health education on a college campus: Impact on health behaviors. J Am Coll Health. 2009;57(5):497–505. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.5.497-506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.You JS, Sung MJ, Chang KJ. Evaluation of 8-week body weight control program including sea tangle (Laminaria japonica) supplementation in Korean female college students. Nutr Res Prac. 2009;3(4):307–314. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2009.3.4.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):903–912. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goldin C, Katz LF, Kuziemko I. The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. J Econ Perspect. 2006;20(4):133–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kapoor C, Au E. University gender gap. New Straits Times. 2011 Sep 8; Main:1 (col. 1)
  • 8.Ha EJ, Caine-Bish N, Holloman C, Lowry-Gordon K. Evaluation of effectiveness of class-based nutrition intervention on changes in soft drink and milk consumption among young adults. J Nutr. 2009;8:50. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ha EJ, Caine-Bish N. Effect of nutrition intervention using a general nutrition course for promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among college students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41(2):103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grogan S. Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women and children. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Endevelt R, Shahar DR, Henkin Y. Development and implementation of a nutrition education program for medical students: A new challenge. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2006;19(3):321–330. doi: 10.1080/13576280600938232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Contento IR, Randell JS, Basch CE. Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002;34(1):2–25. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ock SM, Hwang SS, Lee JS, Song CH, Ock CM. Dietary supplement use by South Korean adults: Data from the national complementary and alternative medicine use survey (NCAMUS) in 2006. Nutr Res Prac. 2010;4(1):69–74. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2010.4.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krishna S, Boren SA. Diabetes self-management care via cell phone: A systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(3):509–517. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zalilah MS, Siti Sabariah B, Norlijah O, Normah H, Maznah I, Zubaidah J, et al. Nutrition education intervention improves nutrition knowledge, attitude and practices of primary school children: A pilot study. Int Elect J Health Educ. 2008;11:119–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tatik M, Endy PP, Toto S. Effect of nutrition education for mother on the food consumption and nutrion status of the children that infected by primary tubercolusis at Dokter Kariadi Hospital Semarang. Indones J Clin Nutr. 2004;1(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zulkarnaini, Toto C, Untung SW. Pengaruh pendidikan gizi pada murid sekolah dasar terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan, sikap dan perilaku ibu keluarga mandiri sadar gizi di Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. Indones J Clin Nutr. 2006;3(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zaitun Y, Low TS. Assessment of nutrition education needs among a sample of elderly Chinese in an urban area. Mal J Nutr. 1995;1:41–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Siti Nur Asyura A, Suzana A, Suriah AR, Noor Aini MY, Zaitun Y, Fatimah A, et al. Proceedings of the 7th National Symposium on Health Sciences. 2008 Jun 18—19. Kuala Lumpur (MY): Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; 2008. Effectiveness of an intervention programme for promotion of healthy ageing and risk reduction of chronic diseases; pp. 172–177. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ha EJ, Caine-Bish N. Interactive introductory nutrition course focusing on disease prevention increased whole-grain consumption by college students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43(4):263–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gow RW, Trace SE, Mazzeo SE. Preventing weight gain in first year college students: An online intervention to prevent the “freshmen fifteen”. Eat Behav. 2010;11(1):33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Poddar KH, Hosig KW, Anderson ES, Nickols-Richardson SM, Duncan SE. Web-based nutrition education intervention improves self-efficacy and selfregulation related to increased dairy intake in college students. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(11):1723–1727. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abood DA, Black DR, Birnbaum RD. Nutrition education intervention for college female athletes. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004;36(3):135–137. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60150-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levy J, Auld G. Cooking classes outperform cooking demonstrations for college sophomores. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004;36(4):197–203. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60234-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matvienko O, Lewis DS, Schafer E. A college nutrition science course as an intervention to prevent weight gain in female college freshman. J Nutr Educ. 2001;33(2):95–101. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60172-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Winzelberg AJ, Eppstein D, Eldredge KL, Wilfley D, Dasmahapatra R, Dev P, et al. Effectiveness of an internet-based program for reducing risk factors for eating disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(2):346–350. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.68.2.346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aaron JI, Evans RE, Mela DJ. Parodoxical effect of a nutrition labeling scheme in a student cafeteria. Nutr Res. 1995;15(9):1251–1261. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences : MJMS are provided here courtesy of School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia

RESOURCES