Abstract
Spatial magnitude and phase profiles for inner hair cell (IHC) depolarization throughout the chinchilla cochlea were inferred from responses of auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs) to threshold- and moderate-level tones and tone complexes. Firing-rate profiles for frequencies ≤2 kHz are bimodal, with the major peak at the characteristic place and a secondary peak at 3–5 mm from the extreme base. Response-phase trajectories are synchronous with peak outward stapes displacement at the extreme cochlear base and accumulate 1.5 period lags at the characteristic places. High-frequency phase trajectories are very similar to the trajectories of basilar-membrane peak velocity toward scala tympani. Low-frequency phase trajectories undergo a polarity flip in a region, 6.5–9 mm from the cochlear base, where traveling-wave phase velocity attains a local minimum and a local maximum and where the onset latencies of near-threshold impulse responses computed from responses to near-threshold white noise exhibit a local minimum. That region is the same where frequency-threshold tuning curves of ANFs undergo a shape transition. Since depolarization of IHCs presumably indicates the mechanical stimulus to their stereocilia, the present results suggest that distinct low-frequency forward waves of organ of Corti vibration are launched simultaneously at the extreme base of the cochlea and at the 6.5–9 mm transition region, from where antiphasic reflections arise.
Introduction
Hearing in mammals begins when vibrations of the middle-ear ossicles or the skull introduce acoustic waves into the fluids of the cochlea, which in turn generate displacement waves that travel on the basilar membrane (BM), the organ of Corti, and the tectorial membrane (TM). Those waves deflect the stereocilia of IHCs, depolarizing them and causing excitation of ANFs (Robles and Ruggero, 2001). Cochlear waves are thought to travel from base to apex with decreasing speed and initially increasing amplitudes, reaching amplitude maxima and stopping nearby at sites laid out tonotopically, with high- and low-frequency waves peaking, respectively, near the base and apex (von Békésy, 1947; Lighthill, 1981). The increasing phase lag of vibrations as a function of distance, the key feature of traveling waves, has been directly observed in short stretches of the BM or TM in a few species (von Békésy, 1947; Rhode, 1971; Cooper and Rhode, 1996; Russell and Nilsen, 1997; Rhode and Recio, 2000; Ren, 2002). Vibrations of the organ of Corti, arguably of even greater interest than those of the BM because they are the mechanical input for transduction in IHC stereocilia, have been recorded at isolated spots of the cochlea (Chen et al., 2011; Ren and He, 2011) but seldom directly observed as a function of distance (Cooper and Rhode, 1996). Here we describe the spatial trajectories of IHC-depolarization phases, normalized to middle-ear motion and calibrated against BM vibrations at the base of the cochlea, inferred from large populations of ANF responses to tones and to tone complexes recorded in many chinchillas. Since depolarization of IHCs indicates the mechanical stimulus to their stereocilia, the present results suggest that, contrary to the classical description of cochlear traveling waves, distinct forward mechanical waves are launched simultaneously at the extreme base of the cochlea and at the 6.5–9 mm transition region, from where antiphasic reflections arise.
Materials and Methods
ANF recordings were obtained in deeply anesthetized male chinchillas, using conventional methods fully described previously (Temchin et al., 2008; Temchin and Ruggero, 2010) and approved by the Animal Use and Care Committee of Northwestern University. Phase-frequency curves for ANF responses to tones presented at 70 dB sound pressure level (SPL) were measured from 434 ANFs in 63 chinchillas. Average rates (see Fig. 5) were computed from the same population within 1/6-oct characteristic frequency (CF) bands and then smoothed using three-point averaging. Average phase trajectories (see Figs. 2, 5) were drawn according to the following procedure. First, phase means were computed. If the SD from the mean was <0.25 period, the mean phase was considered unambiguous (see Fig. 2, thick red traces; Fig. 5B–D, open black symbols). In the case of SDs ≥0.25 period, phases with values higher and lower than the overall mean were averaged separately and two traces were drawn (see Fig. 2, thin red lines; Fig. 5B–D, black lines without symbols). Phase-frequency curves for frequencies >2 kHz were measured from 65 ANFs in 17 chinchillas by anchoring the phases of responses to tone complexes (“zwuis stimuli”) (van der Heijden and Joris, 2003), which do not yield absolute phases, with the phase of responses to tones with frequency <2 kHz (van der Heijden and Joris, 2005; Cai et al., 2009). The computation of second-order Wiener kernels from ANF responses to white noise (303 ANFs from 40 chinchillas) has also been fully described (Recio-Spinoso et al., 2005; Temchin et al., 2005). Latencies (see Fig. 4) are those of the (2D) first-rank vectors obtained by singular value decomposition of the second-order kernels, which are 3D objects (Recio-Spinoso et al., 2005). IHC phases were derived from ANF responses by subtracting at each frequency a phase equivalent to 0.96 ms, the estimated sum of CF-independent neural and synaptic delays (Ruggero and Rich, 1987). Local phase velocities of BM or IHC stereociliar vibration were computed from phase-frequency curves for two flanking cochlear sites. At any given frequency the phase delay (expressed in periods) divided by the distance between the two sites (expressed in millimeters) yields the wave number (with units of mm−1). Frequency (in kilohertz) divided by the wave number yields a local phase velocity (meters per second) (Lighthill, 1981) corresponding to a position with CF equal to the geometric mean of the CFs of the flanking sites. The dotted traces of Figure 3, local phase velocities for single frequencies, were computed using wave numbers obtained by computing the negative slopes of the phase versus distance curves of Figure 2. Distances were determined from the CFs using the chinchilla cochlear map of (Müller et al., 2010).
Results
Phase-frequency curves for IHC depolarization inferred from responses of ANFs
Figure 1 shows averages of phase-frequency curves of chinchilla IHC depolarization, inferred from phase-locked ANF responses to tones presented at 70 dB SPL (red traces) or to near-threshold tone complexes (blue traces), which permit extracting relative phases for frequencies at which ANFs do not phase lock (van der Heijden and Joris, 2003, 2005). To obtain absolute phases, the responses to tone complexes (frequencies >2 kHz) have been anchored to the responses to tones (frequencies <2 kHz). For responses to tones, each average trace (except those for the two highest CFs) represents 10–38 ANFs with CFs within a 1/3-octave band and center CF indicted by a red circle for CFs ≤3 kHz or text labels. Each trace for responses to tone complexes represents responses of 4–10 ANFs with individual CFs flanking the indicated center CF (blue circle). For CFs >2 kHz, the IHC phase-frequency curves include two segments: one, shallow, for low frequencies and another, steeper, around CF (Temchin and Ruggero, 2010). For the lowest CFs (<600 Hz), the curves have slight but opposite curvature, with steeper slopes around CF than at higher frequencies. For mid-CFs, the curves transition between the two forms of curvature and are (very roughly) straight. At the lowest frequencies (<500 Hz), phase-frequency curves for apical and basal regions of the cochlea are nearly antiphasic (Ruggero and Rich, 1983, 1987). However, the CF phases are nearly the same, ∼1 period in reference to inward stapes displacement, for both apical and basal sites with CFs 0.6–12 kHz. The red dotted traces in Figure 1A indicate average phases for sites within or near the 6.5–9 mm region (Fig. 1B, gray band), where phases are highly variable (Temchin and Ruggero, 2010) as a result of a polarity transition in ANF responses to low-frequency tones (Ruggero and Rich, 1983, 1987).
For comparison with the IHC data inferred from ANF responses, Figure 1, A and B, also present phase-frequency curves (black traces) for chinchilla BM and TM vibrations, specifically for peak velocity toward scala tympani. These curves, several of their averages encompassing different cochleae, summarize the entire literature on BM/TM responses in chinchilla ears from which middle-ear vibrations were also measured. Apical TM and basal BM phase-frequency curves converge at the lowest frequencies and nearly coincide with stapes outward displacement. On average, peak velocity toward scala tympani at CF lags peak inward stapes displacement by 0.97 period for BM basal recordings (Fig. 1B, black circles) and 0.54 period for TM recordings near the 600-Hz characteristic place (Fig. 1A,B, black squares). The shapes of phase-frequency curves for IHCs closely resemble those of their BM or TM counterparts at both basal and apical sites (Fig. 1A,B, respectively), demonstrating that the two types of ANF phase-frequency curves are counterparts of corresponding BM/TM vibrations and undergo a transition in a limited region of the cochlea with CFs of ∼2.4–4.8 kHz (gray band). This is the same CF region where tuning-curve shapes transition between a “V” shape at apical sites and “tip-and-tail” at basal sites (Temchin et al., 2008).
At basal sites, IHC phase curves are approximately synchronous with phase curves for peak BM velocity toward scala tympani (Fig. 1B, compare black and blue curves). This IHC velocity sensitivity is consistent with the proportionality of ANF thresholds and BM velocity magnitudes at a basal site of the chinchilla cochlea (Narayan et al., 1998; Ruggero et al., 2000; Temchin et al., 2008). Since, as shown in Figure 1A, the polarities of IHC responses to low-frequency tones (red traces) are nearly opposite at basal and apical sites (Ruggero and Rich, 1983, 1987; Ruggero et al., 1996, 2000), it is likely that IHC depolarization at apical sites coincides with BM/TM velocity toward scala vestibuli.
Traveling waves of ANF excitation and IHC depolarization
Chinchilla ANF responses to near-threshold low-frequency tones undergo 180° phase shifts in the cochlear region between 6.5 and 9 mm from the extreme base, depending on frequency (Ruggero and Rich, 1983, 1987). For 200-Hz tones presented at near-threshold levels, the phase flip of ANF excitation, which follows IHC depolarization, occurs within a narrow region, 7.3–9 mm (Figure 2A, shaded pink area) [Ruggero and Rich (1987), their Fig. 11)]. Figure 2A also shows that both polarities coexist over a wider region in the case of responses to 200-Hz tones presented at 70 dB SPL (open circles). In the basal-most 5 mm, phases are clustered around a single locus (thick red trace at base), synchronous with peak outward stapes displacement. In the region of the cochlea spanning 5–11 mm, ANF responses tend to fire in synchrony with either of two different phases, ∼180° apart. One phase trajectory is a continuation of the basal-most locus and nearly vanishes at ∼11 mm, i.e., several millimeters basal to the characteristic place (18 mm). The other trajectory (thick red trace at apical sites), initially synchronous with peak inward stapes displacement, remains flat up to about the 14 mm site, where it starts to systematically accumulate phase lags. At the characteristic place, the accumulated lag for the 200-Hz wave amounts to 0.5 period (filled red circle). Except for quantitative details, the spatial distributions of response phases for tones with frequencies ≤2 kHz presented at 70 dB SPL are similar to those shown in Figure 2A in that they exhibit antiphasic trajectories at basal and apical sites, which overlap in the central cochlear region. More examples of the depolarization phases of individual IHCs as a function of cochlear place, for 300-, 600-, and 1200-Hz tones, are shown in Fig. 5B–D.
Figure 2B presents the data of Figure 1 as a collection of single-frequency phase-place curves for peak BM velocity toward scala tympani (black traces) and for IHC depolarization, derived from ANF responses to tones presented at 70 dB SPL (red) and near-threshold tone complexes (blue). For responses to tones (200–2000 Hz), red traces indicate the modes of the two phase loci. Thick traces indicate segments dominated by a single response phase, e.g., 2–5 mm and <10 mm for 200 Hz. Regardless of frequency, all phase curves (for both BM vibrations and for IHC depolarization derived from ANF responses to 70 dB tones or near-threshold tone complexes) exhibit the classical signatures of cochlear traveling waves. First, at sites basal to their characteristic places, all curves asymptotically approach flat loci, which indicate fast wave propagation. Second, at sites closer to the characteristic place, curves exhibit monotonically increasing phase-lag accumulation, as waves slow down. The trajectories of high-frequency waves fan out from sites near the extreme base of the cochlea, where they are synchronous with peak outward stapes displacement. In the basal-most 5 mm, low-frequency IHC waves also have flat trajectories synchronous with the same asymptotes as high-frequency waves, synchronous with peak outward stapes displacement. However, these initial low-frequency trajectories vanish before reaching the characteristic places. The trajectories of phase accumulation that do reach low-frequency characteristic places originate in asymptotes synchronous with peak stapes inward displacement. IHC waves then accumulate phase lags of one period at the characteristic places for frequencies >600 Hz but somewhat less for the lowest frequencies. Thus, Figure 2 demonstrates that, differing from the classical description of BM traveling waves, high- and low-frequency IHC-depolarization waves (and, hence, the mechanical waves that provide stimulus) have antiphasic trajectories over a large segment of the cochlea.
For high-frequency stimuli, the spatial trajectories for IHC depolarization and BM velocity toward scala tympani (Fig. 2B, blue and black traces, respectively) are similar, as exemplified by the near overlap between the traces for frequencies ∼5.5 kHz, with characteristic places near 5 mm. Both IHC and BM curves nearly coincide with outward stapes displacement at the extreme basal end of the cochlea and then increasingly and continuously lag as a function of distance, reaching approximately the same phase value, −1 period in reference to inward stapes displacement, at the characteristic places. In other words, IHC-depolarization phases at basal sites are synchronous with peak vibration velocity toward scala tympani throughout their trajectories. IHC-depolarization responses to tones with frequency 600–2000 Hz presented at 70 dB SPL (red traces) also lag stapes inward displacement by ∼1 period at the characteristic places. Taking into account the opposite polarities of the two asymptotes, and the fact that basal IHC trajectories are synchronous with peak BM velocity toward scala tympani, apical IHC trajectories should be synchronous with peak BM or TM velocity toward scala vestibuli.
The IHC-depolarization phase at the 600-Hz characteristic place (red circle in Fig. 2B) can be directly compared with existing TM data (black square in Fig. 2B) for the same site (Rhode and Cooper, 1996). This comparison, which suggests that IHC depolarization at the 600 Hz site actually leads TM peak velocity toward scala vestibuli by 90°, should be viewed with greater caution than the BM/IHC comparisons for basal sites. One source of uncertainty is that the phases of apical TM vibrations were recorded in a single study and solely in cochleae impaired by surgical penetration of Reissner's membrane. Another is that precise estimation of CF is difficult at apical sites, due to broad tuning; even a 100-Hz error in CF could result in a large phase error.
As the level of tone stimuli is increased beyond 85–90 dB SPL, ANF responses throughout the chinchilla cochlea undergo abrupt phase shifts approaching 180°, usually accompanied by bimodality of period histograms and, sometimes, by sharply decreased rates of discharge (Ruggero and Rich, 1983; Ruggero et al., 1996). Comparable phase shifts do not exist for BM vibrations at basal sites (Ruggero et al., 2000). Figure 2B illustrates stimulus level-dependent dual spatial trajectories, nearly antiphasic, for IHC depolarization inferred from ANF responses to 600-Hz tones: compare the open red circles, for responses to tones presented at 70 dB SPL, and the open violet circles, which indicate basal (CFs 6–12 kHz) and apical (CFs 0.75–1.5 kHz) IHC responses to tones presented, respectively, at 90–100 and 100–110 dB SPL.
Local phase velocities of IHC depolarization
Pairs of phase-frequency functions for known locations, such as those of Figure 1, can be used to compute local phase velocities (Lighthill, 1981). This has been done previously only for short segments of the BM or TM in chinchilla (Cooper and Rhode, 1996; Narayan and Ruggero, 2000) and a few other species (Rhode, 1971; Lighthill, 1981; Russell and Nilsen, 1997; Ren, 2002). It is now possible to compute local phase velocities throughout most of the chinchilla cochlea (Fig. 3) on the basis of the BM and IHC phase data available for this species as functions of both frequency (Fig. 1) and place (Fig. 2). Each dotted trend line in Figure 3 shows the spatial velocity profile of the traveling wave for a single stimulus frequency. Wave velocities for BM vibrations (6.6–11.1 kHz) are indicated by the black traces. Wave velocities for IHC depolarization were derived from ANF responses to tones (200–2121 Hz; red traces) and tone complexes (3.2–4.4 kHz; blue traces). Regardless of frequency, BM and IHC wave velocities are high basal to the characteristic places but decelerate rapidly. At sites basal to the 8-mm place, deceleration continues at high rates even beyond the characteristic places (open circles). In contrast, at sites apical to the 6.5–9 mm transition region (gray band) deceleration decreases substantially basal to the characteristic places and reach velocity minima nearby.
The spatial profile of velocities at the characteristic places (Fig 3, open symbols) is markedly non-monotonic, exhibiting a minimum around the 7-mm site and a maximum around the 8–9 mm site, both within the transition region. At sites basal to the transition region, both BM and IHC velocities at CF decrease steeply with distance, from >10 m/s near the extreme base to ∼4 m/s around the 7-mm site. At sites apical to the transition region, IHC-depolarization velocities (red symbols) also decrease monotonically, but at lower rates, from ∼6 m/s around the 8- to 9-mm place to ∼1 m/s near the apex. At 14 mm, the 600 Hz place, TM velocity is also ∼1 m/s.
It is worth noting that the local velocities at the characteristic places depicted in Figure 3, although based on the data of Figure 1, provide information largely independent of the phase trajectories of Figure 2, also derived from Figure 1. This is because velocities are computed from the differences between pairs of phase-frequency traces with CFs corresponding to characteristic places bracketing narrow cochlear spans. Thus, the crucial result of Figure 3, namely that CF velocity is maximal at the site 8–9 mm from the base, nonredundantly complements the salient finding of Figure 2, namely that antiphasic spatial trajectories exist for responses to low-frequency tones in a region of the cochlea with much higher CFs.
Onset latencies of IHC impulse responses
The existence of a local velocity minimum and a local velocity maximum at sites of the transition region near its basal and apical edges (Fig. 3) suggests that travel time should exhibit a local maximum and a local minimum at those sites. This is confirmed in Figure 4, which presents onset latencies of IHC impulse responses (filled color symbols) inferred from time-domain Wiener kernels for ANF responses to near-threshold noise (Recio-Spinoso et al., 2005; Temchin et al., 2005). Also shown in Figure 4 are BM signal-front delays (black trace) inferred from the latencies of ANF and BM responses to intense rarefaction clicks [Temchin et al. (2005), their Fig. 13A]. Both the time-domain Wiener kernels for noise stimuli presented near threshold and the responses to intense clicks are approximations to impulse responses but, whereas the latter are relatively wide band, the former are largely determined by near-CF spectral components. Therefore, due to cochlear frequency dispersion (i.e., different frequencies travel at different velocities), the latencies of time-domain Wiener-kernels obtained with near-threshold stimuli and signal-front delays generally are different. At basal sites (<8 mm), signal-front delays are shorter because the earliest BM responses are determined by frequencies lower than CF (Recio et al., 1998). At apical sites (>16 mm), signal-front latencies are also shorter because the earliest BM responses are determined by frequencies higher than CF (Temchin et al., 2005). In the 8–16 mm region, the latencies of near-threshold impulse responses and signal-front delays are similar because dispersion is minimal in that region (Temchin et al., 2005, 2011). Near-threshold impulse-response latencies reach a local maximum at, ∼400 μs, near the mid-point of the transition region but are almost nil both near the base and around the 9 mm location. Such a latency profile is consistent with dual traveling waves launched simultaneously at the extreme base of the cochlea and in the transition region, but it contradicts the classical view of traveling waves that decelerate monotonically as they progress from base to apex.
Figure 4 also demonstrates that the main features of the spatial profile of near-threshold impulse-response latencies are consistent with the phase-frequency trajectories of Figure 1, the phase-place trajectories of Figure 2, and the velocity-place trajectories of Figure 3. The blue trend lines of Figure 4 are phase delays at CF computed from Figures 1 and 2. The CF phase-lag accumulations were measured from the time of peak outward displacement for basal sites and from the time of peak inward displacement for apical sites. Therefore, for example, phase delays are 150 μs for the 10-kHz site (i.e., 1.5 periods/CF) and 1 ms for the 1-kHz site (i.e., 1 period/CF). The good match between the blue trend lines thus computed and the near-threshold impulse-response latencies supports the interpretation of Figure 2 as illustrating dual waves launched simultaneously at the extreme base and at the transition region. The red trend lines correspond to delays computed by spatial integration of the velocity curves of Figure 3 between the extreme base and the characteristic places. The delays computed from Figures 1–3 are similar and match the near-CF impulse-response latencies excellently at basal (<8 mm) and apical (>15 mm) sites, where dispersion is large, but less well at intermediate sites, where dispersion is small.
Bimodal spatial profiles of ANF response rates
ANF and IHC-depolarization responses to low-frequency tones presented at 70 dB SPL are in-phase and antiphase with outward stapes displacement, respectively, in the segments of the cochlea basal and apical to the transition region (Figs. 2, 5B). In the transition region and in the regions immediately flanking it, individual ANFs lock to either stimulus phase. Thus, locking to a particular stimulus phase appears to be determined by the summation of two antiphasic waves, leading to the prediction that when both waves have identical magnitudes, cancellation should occur and response rate should be sharply reduced. This prediction is consistent with spatial profiles of average rates of ANF responses to low-frequency tones (<2 kHz), examples of which are shown in Figure 5A for 300, 600, and 1200 Hz. In the apical region of the cochlea, the spatial profiles of average rate respond to the classical description of traveling waves: increasing magnitudes as a function of increasing distance from the base culminating in absolute maxima around the characteristic places, and sharper apical slopes than basal slopes. In the basal region, however, the spatial rate profiles also include local maxima at 3–5 mm, as well as minima ∼6 mm. The local rate minima nearly coincide with the basal edge of the transition region (gray band), where antiphasic waves coexist. The local maxima at 3–5 mm correspond to responses dominated by waves that asymptote in synchrony with stapes outward displacement, whereas those at the characteristic places correspond to responses dominated by waves that asymptote in synchrony with stapes inward displacement (Fig. 5A, compare B–D).
Summary of results
We have presented fairly complete descriptions of the phases of IHC depolarization as functions of both frequency and place (Figs. 1, 2, 5B–D), and of local phase velocities throughout most of the chinchilla cochlea (Fig. 3). These descriptions are unique among all species. For frequencies ≤2–3 kHz phase accumulation starts from an asymptote synchronous with stapes inward displacement. For frequencies ≥3–4 kHz phase accumulation starts from a baseline synchronous with stapes outward displacement. Accumulated phase lags at the characteristic places are approximately the same, 1 period in reference to inward stapes displacement, throughout the cochlea except the extreme apex, where it is less. Near-threshold impulse responses exhibit a latency minimum (Fig. 4), phase velocities at CF attain a local minimum and a local maximum (Fig. 3), and the phases of IHC depolarization flip (Fig. 2) in the same region, 6.5–9 mm from the extreme base, where ANF frequency-threshold tuning curves transition in shape. Rate-place profiles for ANF responses to low-frequency tones are bimodal, including peaks near the characteristic place and the 3- to 5-mm region (Fig. 5A).
Discussion
Interpretation of results
Sound-induced vibrations of the stapes or the skull generate (fast) acoustic waves that reach everywhere in the cochlea within a few microseconds. In the classical view, (slow) differential pressure waves between scala vestibuli and scala tympani (Olson, 1998) generate (slow) vibration traveling waves of the BM, the organ of Corti, and the TM, which begin to accumulate phase lags immediately adjacent to the stapes. In contrast, the spatial profiles of IHC-depolarization phase (Fig. 2), phase velocity (Fig. 3), and latencies (Fig. 4) imply that the mechanical stimuli that deflect IHC stereocilia start accumulating phase lags simultaneously at two sites: one immediately adjacent to the stapes, which dominates IHC-depolarization responses to high-frequency stimuli at the base of the cochlea, and the other at the transition region, which dominates IHC-depolarization responses to low-frequency stimuli in the apical half of the cochlea. In addition, the basal IHC-depolarization responses synchronous with outward stapes displacement suggest that low-frequency IHC-depolarization waves are also reflected at the transition region. Specifically, the minimum near 6 mm in the ANF rate profiles for low-frequency stimulation (Fig. 5A) is consistent with destructive interference between a forward wave launched at the extreme base and an antiphasic backward wave arising in the transition region. Overall, the spatial profiles of phase, phase velocity, latencies, and rate, as well as the shapes of ANF tuning curves, suggest that the cochlea consists of two largely independent basal and apical segments that meet at the transition region.
Connection between spatial phase profiles and active processes
The changeover in shape of IHC phase-frequency functions (Fig. 1) [Temchin and Ruggero (2010), their Fig. 17], which underlies the non-monotonic spatial profiles of velocities and onset latencies (Figs. 3, 4), occurs in the same region where ANF frequency-threshold tuning curves change their shape (Temchin et al., 2008), V-like in apical regions but including low-frequency tails in basal regions (Figs. 2–4, gray shading) [Temchin et al. (2008), their Figs. 2, 5, 7]. It is probable that the spatial transitions in frequency-threshold tuning curves and phase-frequency curves are intimately linked since, when measured in the same ANFs, they exhibit inflections at the same frequencies [Temchin and Ruggero (2010), their Figs. 13, 14]. The relation between magnitude and phase spectra is so strict that it permits computing the main features of the phase-frequency curves and their changes at the 6.5- to 9-mm transition region from the tuning curves (Temchin et al., 2011).
The transition region also coincides with spatial changeovers in the effects of furosemide on ANF tuning curves (Sewell, 1984), which closely parallel the effects on BM tuning at basal sites (Ruggero and Rich, 1991), and of the relation between the rate-level functions of ANF responses to CF and low-frequency tones (Cooper and Yates, 1994). Since those effects are linked to the active processes that boost BM vibrations, their changeovers in the transition region suggests that the polarity flip and the non-monotonic features of traveling waves are also linked to active processes. Furthermore, given that the TM profoundly affects BM vibrations (Legan et al., 2000; Russell et al., 2007), TM/organ of Corti interactions might influence outer hair cells and hence, via feedback, BM vibrations. In other words, the response polarity flip in the central region of the cochlea might also be present in BM or TM vibrations. The spatial correlation between active processes, frequency-threshold tuning curves, and the phases of IHC responses suggests that the anatomical relations and functional interactions between the organ of Corti and the TM differ at sites basal and apical to the transition region of the chinchilla cochlea.
Generality across mammalian species of findings in chinchilla
Bimodal distributions of the phases of IHC depolarization, such as shown in Figures 2A, 5B–D, and, especially, 2B (compare violet and dashed red traces for 600 Hz curves) in chinchilla (Ruggero and Rich, 1983; Ruggero et al., 1996), were first adumbrated by the level-dependent “peak splitting” in period histograms first discovered in cat ANF responses to tones (Liberman and Kiang, 1984; Kiang et al., 1986). Similarly, the existence of distinct apical and basal cochlear segments, joined by a central transition region, is unlikely to be a peculiarity of the chinchilla species. In cat, the shape of phase-frequency curves change with CF (Pfeiffer and Molnar, 1970; van der Heijden and Joris, 2003) much as they do in chinchilla. In both cat and gerbil, ANF frequency-threshold tuning curves undergo changes in shape (Liberman, 1978; Schmiedt, 1989; Ohlemiller and Echteler, 1990) at CFs similar to those in chinchilla. The most direct antecedents of the present investigation in chinchilla are studies that presented spatial phase-place and/or rate-place plots for cat ANF responses to tones (Kim et al., 1980; van der Heijden and Joris, 2006). One of the phase-plots [Kim et al. (1980), their Fig. 5] includes a jog reminiscent of the phase transition in chinchilla (Figs. 2, 5B). Another cat study presented bimodal rate-place plots (Kim and Molnar, 1979) strongly resembling the bimodal rate profiles in chinchilla (Fig. 5A).
However, no evidence for a transition in response polarity was found in another study in cat (van der Heijden and Joris, 2006). That study suggested that the accumulated ANF phase lags at CF increased monotonically from 1 period at the 200-Hz place to 2.5 periods at the 4-kHz place (van der Heijden and Joris, 2006), contrasting with our finding of ∼1 period over most of the chinchilla cochlea excepting the extreme apex (Fig. 2B). It is difficult to evaluate the discrepancies between results for chinchilla with those of the cat study by van der Heijden and Joris (2006). They may involve species differences, the fact that IHC responses were normalized to middle-ear motion in chinchilla but not in cat and, perhaps most importantly, the fact that the convergence of spatial phase trajectories at the extreme base of the cat cochlea was an assumption not ascertained by measurements.
Forward and reflected traveling waves
The possibility of dual cochlear traveling waves, first postulated on theoretical grounds (Hubbard, 1993), has received empirical support (Ghaffari et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2011). One interpretation of the transition region in chinchilla is that it is the boundary between cochlear regions, apical and basal, where distinct waves dominate. Another interpretation, not necessarily contradictory, is that the transition region contains a mechanical impedance irregularity. In transmission lines, which often serve as models of cochlear mechanics, impedance irregularities interrupt forward waves and cause reflections. For example, in a tube open at one end and closed at the other, standing acoustic waves are generated by the interaction between forward waves and antiphasic backward waves reflected from the closed end. In the cochlea, low-frequency waves may bounce off the transition region. Such reflections might give rise to otoacoustic emissions, which emanate from the inner ears in many tetrapod species, including humans (Kemp, 1978). The path of propagation of the antecedents of otoacoustic emissions in mammalian cochleae is a controversial subject, with some experiments supporting “slow” BM backward traveling waves (Dong and Olson, 2008) and others “fast” acoustic waves in the cochlear fluids (Ren, 2004; Siegel et al., 2005; Ren et al., 2006). Whether or not the transition region is confined to the organ of Corti or also involves BM vibration, it could well play a role in the generation of otoacoustic emissions, since these exist even in amphibians, whose hearing organs lack BMs (Palmer and Wilson, 1982; van Dijk et al., 1996). Interestingly, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas exhibit frequency dependencies consistent with the existence of basal and apical segments of the cochlea, which transition in the 6.5–9 mm region. Their average magnitudes exhibit a conspicuous minimum at ∼3 kHz (Siegel et al., 2005), whose characteristic place lies in the transition region, and their suppression tuning curves differ drastically for probe frequencies 4 and 12 kHz, which closely resemble ANF tuning curves, versus 1-kHz probes, which have high-frequency arms that are nearly flat over a two-octave range, as might be expected from basal emission sources due to reflections at the transition region (Charaziak and Siegel, 2012).
Tentative conclusions
(1) In contrast with high-frequency IHC and BM forward waves, which start their travel from an extreme-base asymptote synchronous with stapes outward displacement, low-frequency forward waves of IHC depolarization are launched at the transition region from a baseline synchronous with stapes inward displacement. (2) Antiphasic “backward” low-frequency IHC-depolarization waves also arise at the transition region; coexist with the dominant forward waves in the central region of the cochlea, depending on stimulus frequency and level; and are dominant in the basal-most 5 mm of the cochlea, where forward low-frequency waves are weak. (3) If the polarity of IHC stimulation in reference to BM vibration is the same throughout the cochlea, then points 1 and 2 also apply to BM vibrations: distinct and antiphasic BM traveling waves exist in the apical and basal segments of the chinchilla cochlea. Alternatively, the polarity of IHC stimulation in reference to BM flips in the transition region, as previously suggested (Ruggero and Rich, 1987).
Footnotes
This work was supported by Grant DC-00419 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. M. van der Heijden generously helped us to implement the “zwuis” technique.
References
- Cai H, Temchin AN, Ruggero MA. Phase-frequency functions for chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers with characteristic frequencies beyond the phase locking range. Paper presented at 32nd Association for Research in Otolaryngology Midwinter Meeting; February; San Diego, CA. 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Charaziak K, Siegel J. Evaluating frequency selectivity in humans and chinchillas with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission tuning curves. Paper presented at 35th Association for Research in Otolaryngology Midwinter Meeting; February; San Diego, CA. 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Chen F, Zha D, Fridberger A, Zheng J, Choudhury N, Jacques SL, Wang RK, Shi X, Nuttall AL. A differentially amplified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:770–774. doi: 10.1038/nn.2827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper NP, Rhode WS. Fast travelling waves, slow travelling waves and their interactions in experimental studies of apical cochlear mechanics. Audit Neurosci. 1996;2:289–299. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper NP, Yates GK. Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: variations with characteristic frequency. Hear Res. 1994;78:221–234. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong W, Olson ES. Supporting evidence for reverse cochlear traveling waves. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123:222–240. doi: 10.1121/1.2816566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghaffari R, Aranyosi AJ, Freeman DM. Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:16510–16515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703665104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubbard A. A traveling-wave amplifier model of the cochlea. Science. 1993;259:68–71. doi: 10.1126/science.8418496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64:1386–1391. doi: 10.1121/1.382104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiang NYS, Liberman MC, Sewell WF, Guinan JJ. Single unit clues to cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res. 1986;22:171–182. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim DO, Molnar CE. A population study of cochlear nerve fibers: comparison of spatial distributions of average-rate and phase-locking measures of responses to single tones. J Neurophysiol. 1979;42:16–30. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.1.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim DO, Molnar CE, Matthews JW. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980;67:1704–1721. doi: 10.1121/1.384297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Goodyear RJ, Kössi M, Russell IJ, Richardson GP. A targeted deletion in alpha-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback. Neuron. 2000;28:273–285. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00102-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liberman MC. Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;63:442–455. doi: 10.1121/1.381736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liberman MC, Kiang NY. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. IV. Stereocilia damage and alterations in rate-level and phase-level functions. Hear Res. 1984;16:75–90. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lighthill J. Energy-flow in the cochlea. J Fluid Mech. 1981;106:149–213. [Google Scholar]
- Müller M, Hoidis S, Smolders JW. A physiological frequency-position map of the chinchilla cochlea. Hear Res. 2010;268:184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narayan SS, Ruggero MA. Basilar-membrane mechanics at the hook region of the chinchilla cochlea. In: Wada H, Takasaka T, Ikeda K, Ohyama K, Koike T, editors. Recent developments in auditory mechanics. Singapore: World Scientific; 2000. pp. 95–101. [Google Scholar]
- Narayan SS, Temchin AN, Recio A, Ruggero MA. Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae. Science. 1998;282:1882–1884. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohlemiller KK, Echteler SM. Functional correlates of characteristic frequency in single cochlear nerve fibers of the Mongolian gerbil. J Comp Physiol A. 1990;167:329–338. doi: 10.1007/BF00192568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson ES. Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:3445–3463. doi: 10.1121/1.423083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer AR, Wilson JP. Spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions in the frog Rana esculenta. J Physiol. 1982;324:66. [Google Scholar]
- Pfeiffer RR, Molnar CE. Cochlear nerve fiber discharge patterns: relationship to the cochlear microphonic. Science. 1970;167:1614–1616. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3925.1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Recio A, Rhode WS. Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108:2281–2298. doi: 10.1121/1.1318898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Recio A, Rich NC, Narayan SS, Ruggero MA. Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:1972–1989. doi: 10.1121/1.421377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Recio-Spinoso A, Temchin AN, van Dijk P, Fan YH, Ruggero MA. Wiener-kernel analysis of responses to noise of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3615–3634. doi: 10.1152/jn.00882.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren T. Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:17101–17106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262663699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren T. Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:333–334. doi: 10.1038/nn1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren T, He W. Measurement of basilar membrane, reticular lamina, and tectorial membrane vibrations in the intact mouse cochlea. In: Shera CA, Olson ES, editors. What fire is in mine ears: progress in auditory biomechanics. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics; 2011. pp. 423–428. [Google Scholar]
- Ren T, He W, Scott M, Nuttall AL. Group delay of acoustic emissions in the ear. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:2785–2791. doi: 10.1152/jn.00374.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhode WS. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971;49:1218–1231. doi: 10.1121/1.1912485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhode WS, Cooper NP. Nonlinear mechanics in the apical turn of the chinchilla cochlea in vivo. Audit Neurosci. 1996;3:101–121. [Google Scholar]
- Rhode WS, Recio A. Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;107:3317–3332. doi: 10.1121/1.429404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robles L, Ruggero MA. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:1305–1352. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Chinchilla auditory-nerve responses to low-frequency tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983;73:2096–2108. doi: 10.1121/1.389577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Timing of spike initiation in cochlear afferents: dependence on site of innervation. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:379–403. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.2.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci. 1991;11:1057–1067. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-04-01057.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Robles L, Shivapuja BG. Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;87:1612–1629. doi: 10.1121/1.399409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Shivapuja BG, Temchin AN. Auditory-nerve responses to low-frequency tones: intensity dependence. Audit Neurosci. 1996;2:159–185. [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Recio A, Narayan SS, Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;101:2151–2163. doi: 10.1121/1.418265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero MA, Narayan SS, Temchin AN, Recio A. Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11744–11750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell IJ, Nilsen KE. The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:2660–2664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell IJ, Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Lukashkin AN, Goodyear RJ, Richardson GP. Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:215–223. doi: 10.1038/nn1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmiedt RA. Spontaneous rates, thresholds and tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in the gerbil: comparisons to cat data. Hear Res. 1989;42:23–35. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90115-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sewell WF. The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats. Hear Res. 1984;14:305–314. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90057-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegel JH, Cerka AJ, Recio-Spinoso A, Temchin AN, van Dijk P, Ruggero MA. Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:2434–2443. doi: 10.1121/1.2005867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temchin AN, Ruggero MA. Phase-locked responses to tones of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers: implications for apical cochlear mechanics. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010;11:297–318. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0197-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temchin AN, Recio-Spinoso A, van Dijk P, Ruggero MA. Wiener kernels of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers: verification using responses to tones, clicks, and noise and comparison with basilar-membrane vibrations. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3635–3648. doi: 10.1152/jn.00885.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temchin AN, Rich NC, Ruggero MA. Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:2889–2898. doi: 10.1152/jn.90637.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temchin AN, Recio-Spinoso A, Ruggero MA. Timing of cochlear responses inferred from frequency-threshold tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers. Hear Res. 2011;272:178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Heijden M, Joris PX. Cochlear phase and amplitude retrieved from the auditory nerve at arbitrary frequencies. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9194–9198. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09194.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Heijden M, Joris PX. Reconstructing the traveling wave from auditory nerve responses. In: Pressnitzer D, De Cheveigne A, McAdams S, Collet L, editors. auditory signal processing: physiology, psychoacoustics, and models. New York: Springer; 2005. pp. 7–13. [Google Scholar]
- van der Heijden M, Joris PX. Panoramic measurements of the apex of the cochlea. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11462–11473. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1882-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk P, Narins PM, Wang J. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in seven frog species. Hear Res. 1996;101:102–112. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00140-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- von Békésy G. The variation of phase along the basilar membrane with sinusoidal vibrations. J Acoust Soc Am. 1947;19:452–460. [Google Scholar]