Abstract
Background
Chronic inflammation may play an etiologic role in ovarian and endometrial cancer, and it is hypothesized that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) decrease the risk of developing these malignancies. No prospective study with a large multiethnic population has explored this hypothesis.
Methods
We investigated whether NSAID use was associated with risks of ovarian and endometrial cancer in the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Medication use of at least twice a week for ≥ 1 month was assessed at baseline. Multivariable relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
During an 13.3 years of follow up, 275 ovarian and 620 endometrial incident cases were identified among ~64,000 women included in this analysis (16.5% African Americans, 30.8% Japanese, 7.7% Native Hawaiians, 18.9%, Latinas and 26.0% whites). The RR (95% CI) for ovarian cancer associated with aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen were 0.87 (0.68, 1.14), 0.97 (0.74, 1.26), and 0.86 (0.67, 1.12), respectively. The RR (95% CI) for endometrial cancer associated with aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen were 0.93 (0.79, 1.10), 0.88 (0.74, 1.05), 0.96 (0.81, 1.13), respectively. No heterogeneity across ethnic groups (P’s ≥0.29) or dose-response relation with increased duration of use (P’s for trend ≥0.16) was observed. The results did not differ by tumor histology.
Conclusions
We found no compelling evidence to support an association between use of NSAIDs and risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers in a multiethnic population.
Impact
It is unlikely that NSAID involves in the etiology of endometrial and ovarian cancer.
Keywords: NSAID, aspirin, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, multiethnic
Introduction
Chronic inflammation has been postulated to contribute to ovarian and endometrial carcinogenesis through various pathophysiological pathways (1–3). Chronic inflammation, including elevations in cytokines, prostaglandins and cyclooxygenase (COX) with concomitant oxidative stress, induces rapid cell division and DNA damage which increase the risk of malignancy (1). Specific exposures, such as perineal talc use or medical conditions associated with inflammation, including endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease, have been reported to increase ovarian cancer risk (4–10). Elevated serum levels of C-reactive protein, a biological marker of chronic systemic inflammation, has likewise been associated with increased risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers (11–13). These epidemiologic observations are supported by in vitro studies showing that aspirin and other analgesic drugs with anti-inflammatory properties inhibit tumor growth and induce apoptosis in ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines (14–20).
Several epidemiologic studies have tested the hypothesis that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers. Although there is a richer body of literature in this regard for ovarian cancer (21–37) than for endometrial cancer (24, 38–43), results supporting the chemopreventive potential of these agents are nonetheless contradictory and inconclusive for both malignancies. The majority of published studies have been conducted in white women and only a few have been prospective in nature. Based on these considerations, we took advantage of existing data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC), a large prospective study, to assess whether aspirin, non-aspirin NSAID and acetaminophen use are associated with endometrial and ovarian cancer risk in a diverse population of women.
Materials and Methods
Study population
The MEC is a prospective cohort study established to investigate the association of lifestyle and genetic factors with chronic disease. Details of the study design, recruitment, response rates, and baseline characteristics of the MEC have been previously published (44). Briefly, the cohort consists of 215,251 men and women between the ages of 45 to 75 selected from five racial/ethnic populations: African Americans, Japanese Americans, Latinos, Native Hawaiians, and whites. Potential participants were identified through drivers’ license files from the Department of Motor Vehicles, voter registration lists, and Health Care Financing Administration data files primarily from Los Angeles County, California and the state of Hawaii. During the period of 1993–1996 participants completed a 26-page baseline questionnaire that included items on demographic and lifestyle factors, physical activity, tobacco smoking history, diet, anthropometric measures, personal history of medical conditions, family history of cancer, as well as reproductive history and hormone use (women only). The institutional review boards at the University of Hawaii and the University of Southern California have approved the study protocol.
NSAID use assessment
The use of pain medication in the cohort was assessed at baseline by means of the question, “Have you ever taken any of the following medications at least 2 times a week (for 1 month or longer)?” Queries for specific medications included the three categories of pain medication - aspirin, other NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, indomethacin, or others), and acetaminophen. The respondent could specify never, former or current use. If a participant responded affirmatively regarding use of a medication, she was asked to classify the duration of use as 1 year or less, 2–3 years, 4–5 years, 6–10 years, or 11 years or more.
Exclusion criteria
The MEC included over 118,000 women at baseline. However, we excluded women if they did not belong to one of the five major ethnic groups listed above (n=8,050), if they had invalid dietary data as a marker of quality for the questionnaire (n=4,611), if they were diagnosed with ovarian, endometrial, cervical, or breast cancer before the date of the baseline questionnaire because their cancer treatment may affect their subsequent risk of ovarian or endometrial cancer (n=8,426), if they had missing menopausal status (n=8,750), or if they did not answer the questions about use of aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, or acetaminophen (n=8,287). In addition, women who reported a bilateral oophorectomy (n=11,907) and were missing ovarian cancer covariate data (i.e. age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, menopausal hormone use, and parity) (n=4,000) were excluded in the ovarian cancer analysis; and women with hysterectomy (n=12,530) and missing endometrial cancer covariate data (i.e. body mass index, smoking status, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, menopausal hormone use, and parity) (n=3,386) were excluded in the endometrial cancer analysis. After all exclusions, 64,387 women were available for the ovarian cancer analysis and 64,828 women were available for the endometrial cancer analysis.
Follow-up and case identification
Participants’ follow-up time began at the completion of the baseline questionnaire and continued to one of the following endpoints: 1) diagnosis of endometrial or ovarian cancer, 2) death, or 3) end of follow-up (December 31, 2007, for Los Angeles and December 31, 2008, for Hawaii). All incident cases of ovarian cancer [International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) code C56.9 8010–8580) or endometrial [(ICD-O-3) code C54] were identified through record linkage to the Hawaii Tumor Registry, the Cancer Surveillance Program for Los Angeles County, and the California State Cancer Registry; these cancer registries are part of the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. Deaths within the cohort were determined through annual linkage to state death certificate files in California and Hawaii and periodically to the National Death Index. The follow-up rate in the cohort is 95%; National Death Index information was available for the remaining 5% of the cohort. Cohort participants were followed for an average 13.3 years. A total of 275 women with incident epithelial ovarian cancer and 620 women with incident endometrial cancer were identified during the follow-up period. In the ovarian cancer analysis, non-epithelial ovarian cancer cases (n=22) were censored at the corresponding dates at diagnosis. In the endometrial cancer analysis, uterine sarcomas (n=66) were censored at the corresponding dates at diagnosis.
Statistical analysis
The use of aspirin, non-aspirin NSAID, and acetaminophen was coded as never or ever (past or current). We also created four categories for duration of use: never, ≤1 year, 2–5 years, or ≥6 years. Women who reported using analgesic medication but did not indicate the number of years of use were treated as missing duration (2.3% for aspirin, 3.8% for non-aspirin NSAID, and 4.2% for acetaminophen). A NSAID user was defined as a user of aspirin and/or non-aspirin NSAIDs. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Age (in days) was the underlying time variable in the Cox regression, starting with a participant’s age at entry to one of the endpoints. For ovarian cancer, Cox models were adjusted for the following variables: race/ethnicity (African American, Native Hawaiian, Japanese, Latina and white) as a strata variable, age at cohort entry (continuous), age at menarche (≤12, 13–14, ≥15), oral contraceptive use (never, ≥ one month use), menopausal hormone use (never, past, current estrogen, current estrogen-progestin), and parity (nulliparous, 1, 2–3, ≥4 children). For endometrial cancer, Cox models were adjusted for race/ethnicity as a strata variable, age at cohort entry (continuous), body mass index in kg/m2 (continuous), smoking status (never, past, current), age at menarche (≤12, 13–14, ≥15), oral contraceptive use (never, ≥ one month use), menopausal hormone use (never, past, current estrogen, current estrogen-progestin), and parity (nulliparous, 1, 2–3, ≥4 children). Further adjustment for duration of use for both oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone did not change the results, thus they were not included in the final model. The proportional hazards assumption was tested by examining the Kaplan-Meier curves and by assessing the Schoenfeld residuals; no major violations were observed. Linear trend tests were conducted by treating the categorical variable of interest as a continuous term (0,1,2,3) in the model. The likelihood ratio test was used to assess statistical interactions between drug use and ethnicity or other risk factors with the risk for ovarian or endometrial cancers. Interaction models compared a model with main effects only to a saturated model containing main effects and appropriate interaction terms. To compare our results with Viswanathan et al (40), who reported that current use of aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer among obese women, we further divided the ever use of analgesics into past or current in the interaction analysis. Secondary analyses were conducted to investigate the association of analgesics with the risk of major ovarian cancer subtypes (serous, non-serous) and endometrial cancer histological subtypes (Type I, including endometrioid adenocarcinoma, tubular papillary adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinoma with squamous metaplasia, mucinous adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinoma NOS; and Type II, including serous, clear cell, squamous cell, adenosquamous, small cell carcinoma, mixed cell adenocarcinoma). In the subgroup analyses, duration of use was re-categorized as never, ≤5 years, or ≥6 years because of the limited number of cases. All statistical analyses were performed in SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All P values were two-sided.
Results
More than half of cohort participants were NSAID users (Table 1). NSAID users were slightly older than non-users. African-American and Latina women were more likely to use NSAIDs than white, Japanese-American, or Native Hawaiian women. Postmenopausal, heavy, and parous women tended to use NSAIDs more than premenopausal, lean and nulliparous women. OC and menopausal hormone users and tobacco smokers also reported a higher prevalence of NSAID use.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics and prevalence of ovarian and endometrial cancer risk factors by NSAID use among women in the Multiethnic Cohort 1993–2008
| Characteristics | NSAID |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nonusers | Ever users | P** | |
| Number of women | 31,938 | 32,890 | |
| Age at cohort entry, mean | 58.3 | 58.8 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2), mean | 25.2 | 27.2 | <0.0001 |
| Race/ethnicity, % | |||
| African American | 33.8 | 66.2 | <0.0001 |
| Japanese American | 67.0 | 33.0 | |
| Latina | 38.9 | 61.1 | |
| Native Hawaiian | 54.1 | 45.9 | |
| White | 44.1 | 55.9 | |
| Menopausal status, % | |||
| Premenopausal | 54.7 | 45.3 | <0.0001 |
| Postmenopausal | 47.9 | 52.1 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2), % | |||
| <25 | 57.2 | 42.8 | <0.0001 |
| 25–<30 | 45.4 | 54.6 | |
| 30+ | 36.1 | 63.9 | |
| Age at menarche (years), % | |||
| ≤12 | 48.8 | 51.2 | 0.004 |
| 13–14 | 50.1 | 49.9 | |
| ≥15 | 48.6 | 51.4 | |
| Parity, % | |||
| Nulliparous | 52.4 | 47.6 | <0.0001 |
| Parous | 48.8 | 51.2 | |
| Menopausal hormone use*, % | |||
| Never | 50.4 | 49.6 | <0.0001 |
| Past | 41.9 | 58.1 | |
| Current estrogen | 45.9 | 54.1 | |
| Current estrogen-progestin | 49.1 | 50.9 | |
| Ever used oral contraceptive, % | |||
| Never | 50.6 | 49.4 | <0.0001 |
| Ever | 47.7 | 52.3 | |
| Smoking status | |||
| Never | 53.3 | 46.7 | <0.0001 |
| Past | 45.0 | 55.0 | |
| Current | 42.3 | 57.7 | |
Among postmenopausal women only.
Significance tested using χ2 or using two tailed-Student's t test, as appropriate.
Percentages showed are horizontal percentages.
Table 2 shows the associations between any NSAIDs, aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, acetaminophen and risk of ovarian cancer. We did not observe associations between any NSAIDs, aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, or acetaminophen use with the risk of ovarian cancer in whites, African Americans, Native Hawaiians, Japanese Americans or Latinas. The tests of heterogeneity of risk across the five racial/ethnic groups were not statistically significant (P’s ≥0.45). Risk did not vary significantly by duration of use for any of the medications under study (P’s trend ≥0.07). The lack of association of NSAID use with the risk of ovarian cancer was consistent between serous and non-serous subtypes (Supplemental Table 1). To address the effect of latent disease on analgesic intake, we lagged exposure time by 2 years; the results were similar. Mutual adjustment for all three drugs in the model and using never users of any of the three drugs as the reference category also produced similar results (data not shown).
Table 2.
Association between aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, acetaminophen and risk of ovarian cancer in the Multiethnic Cohort Study 1993–2008
| Exposure | White | African American | Native Hawaiian | Japanese | Latina | All women | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR*(95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | Phet** | |
| NSAIDs use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 28 | 1.00 | 19 | 1.00 | 13 | 1.00 | 66 | 1.00 | 21 | 1.00 | 147 | 1.00 | |
| Ever | 41 | 1.16 (0.72, 1.89) | 22 | 0.60 (0.32, 1.11) | 12 | 1.09 (0.50, 2.41) | 24 | 0.76 (0.47, 1.21) | 29 | 0.86 (0.49, 1.52) | 128 | 0.87 (0.68, 1.11) | 0.51 |
| Aspirin use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 41 | 1.00 | 27 | 1.00 | 17 | 1.00 | 72 | 1.00 | 30 | 1.00 | 187 | 1.00 | |
| Ever | 28 | 0.94 (0.58, 1.53) | 14 | 0.64 (0.34, 1.23) | 8 | 1.04 (0.45, 2.42) | 18 | 0.87 (0.52, 1.46) | 20 | 0.99 (0.56, 1.75) | 88 | 0.87 (0.68, 1.14) | 0.76 |
| Duration of aspirin use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 41 | 1.00 | 27 | 1.00 | 17 | 1.00 | 72 | 1.00 | 30 | 1.00 | 187 | 1.00 | |
| ≤ 1 year | 8 | 1.34 (0.63, 2.86) | 4 | 0.65 (0.23, 1.85) | 2 | 1.05 (0.24, 4.57) | 6 | 1.17 (0.51, 2.68) | 6 | 0.95 (0.39, 2.28) | 26 | 1.02 (0.67, 1.54) | |
| 2–5 years | 4 | 0.48 (0.17, 1.35) | 6 | 0.94 (0.39, 2.29) | 3 | 1.39 (0.41, 4.76) | 4 | 0.63 (0.23, 1.73) | 8 | 1.46 (0.67, 3.18) | 25 | 0.87 (0.57, 1.33) | |
| ≥ 6 years | 15 | 1.07 (0.59, 1.93) | 2 | 0.28 (0.07, 1.17) | 3 | 0.99 (0.29, 3.37) | 7 | 0.86 (0.39, 1.86) | 3 | 0.45 (0.14, 1.49) | 30 | 0.76 (0.52, 1.13) | 0.87 |
| P trend | 0.81 | 0.10 | 0.84 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.16 | |||||||
| Non-aspirin NSAID use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 42 | 1.00 | 25 | 1.00 | 16 | 1.00 | 77 | 1.00 | 28 | 1.00 | 188 | 1.00 | |
| Ever | 27 | 1.25 (0.77, 2.04) | 16 | 0.68 (0.36, 1.28) | 9 | 1.35 (0.59, 3.11) | 13 | 0.81 (0.45, 1.46) | 22 | 0.96 (0.54, 1.68) | 87 | 0.97 (0.74, 1.26) | 0.65 |
| Duration of non-aspirin NSAID use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 42 | 1.00 | 25 | 1.00 | 16 | 1.00 | 77 | 1.00 | 28 | 1.00 | 188 | 1.00 | |
| ≤ 1 year | 9 | 1.16 (0.56, 2.39) | 7 | 0.74 (0.32, 1.72) | 5 | 1.73 (0.63, 4.76) | 6 | 0.87 (0.38, 1.99) | 12 | 1.23 (0.62, 2.43) | 39 | 1.08 (0.76, 1.54) | |
| 2–5 years | 10 | 1.29 (0.64, 2.58) | 2 | 0.24 (0.06, 1.02) | 2 | 0.88 (0.20, 3.92) | 4 | 0.74 (0.27, 2.02) | 9 | 1.24 (0.58, 2.65) | 27 | 0.89 (0.59, 1.34) | |
| ≥ 6 years | 6 | 1.60 (0.68, 3.79) | 2 | 0.65 (0.15, 2.74) | 0 | ~ | 2 | 0.91 (0.22, 3.71) | 0 | ~ | 10 | 0.80 (0.42, 1.52) | 0.45 |
| P trend | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.48 | |||||||
| Acetaminophen use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 49 | 1.00 | 24 | 1.00 | 18 | 1.00 | 74 | 1.00 | 27 | 1.00 | 192 | 1.00 | |
| Ever | 20 | 0.94 (0.55, 1.58) | 17 | 0.93 (0.50, 1.74) | 7 | 0.65 (0.27, 1.56) | 16 | 0.67 (0.39, 1.14) | 23 | 1.16 (0.66, 2.03) | 83 | 0.86 (0.67, 1.12) | 0.89 |
| Duration of acetaminophen use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 49 | 1.00 | 24 | 1.00 | 18 | 1.00 | 74 | 1.00 | 27 | 1.00 | 192 | 1.00 | |
| ≤ 1 year | 1 | 0.21 (0.03, 1.54) | 2 | 0.36 (0.09, 1.54) | 4 | 1.39 (0.47, 4.13) | 2 | 0.37 (0.09, 1.51) | 6 | 0.92 (0.38, 2.24) | 15 | 0.59 (0.35, 1.00) | |
| 2–5 years | 6 | 0.89 (0.38, 2.08) | 5 | 0.85 (0.32, 2.25) | 0 | ~ | 5 | 0.78 (0.32, 1.93) | 11 | 1.90 (0.93, 3.85) | 27 | 0.96 (0.64, 1.45) | |
| ≥ 6 years | 11 | 1.44 (0.75, 2.78) | 6 | 1.35 (0.55, 3.30) | 2 | 0.53 (0.12, 2.32) | 8 | 0.85 (0.41, 1.76) | 4 | 0.91 (0.32, 2.62) | 31 | 1.04 (0.71, 1.52) | 0.82 |
| P trend | 0.52 | 0.81 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.89 | |||||||
RRs were adjusted for age, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, menopausal hormone use, and parity. Further adjusted for race/ethnicity as a strata variable for all women combined.
P heterogeneity across the five racial/ethnic groups.
The associations of any NSAIDs, aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen use with the risk for endometrial cancer are shown in Table 3. No significant relation was observed between endometrial cancer and either aspirin or acetaminophen use separately within each racial/ethnic group; nor was there evidence for decreasing risk with increasing duration of use (P’s for trend ≥0.09). In Native Hawaiians, non-aspirin NSAID use was associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer (RR=0.56; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.99), which may have been due to chance given the many comparisons in the table, and especially since no significant heterogeneity of the analgesic-endometrial cancer association across the five racial/ethnic groups was found (P’s ≥0.16). In all women combined, none of the analgesic drugs was associated with endometrial cancer risk. Additional analyses using a 2-year lag, mutual adjustment for the three drugs in the same model and using never users of any of the three drugs as the reference group produced similar results (data not shown). Further, results for Type I and Type II tumors did not vary substantially (Supplemental Table 2).
Table 3.
Association between aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, acetaminophen and risk of endometrial cancer in the Multiethnic Cohort Study 1993–2008
| Exposure | White | African American | Native Hawaiian | Japanese | Latina | All women | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% C I) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | Phet** | |
| NSAID use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 80 | 1.00 | 35 | 1.00 | 41 | 1.00 | 116 | 1.00 | 33 | 1.00 | 305 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
| Ever | 111 | 1.01 (0.75, 1.35) | 54 | 0.71 (0.46, 1.09) | 28 | 0.67 (0.41, 1.09) | 51 | 0.84 (0.60, 1.17) | 71 | 1.28 (0.84, 1.94) | 315 | 0.91 (0.77, 1.07) | |
| Aspirin use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 106 | 1.00 | 48 | 1.00 | 51 | 1.00 | 133 | 1.00 | 63 | 1.00 | 401 | 1.00 | 0.29 |
| Ever | 85 | 1.06 (0.79, 1.41) | 41 | 0.96 (0.63, 1.46) | 18 | 0.70 (0.41, 1.21) | 34 | 0.84 (0.58, 1.23) | 41 | 0.92 (0.62, 1.37) | 219 | 0.93 (0.79, 1.10) | |
| Duration of aspirin use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 106 | 1.00 | 48 | 1.00 | 51 | 1.00 | 133 | 1.00 | 63 | 1.00 | 401 | 1.00 | 0.16 |
| ≤ 1 year | 17 | 1.09 (0.65, 1.82) | 9 | 0.68 (0.33, 1.39) | 5 | 0.76 (0.30, 1.91) | 10 | 1.00 (0.52, 1.90) | 8 | 0.56 (0.27, 1.16) | 49 | 0.82 (0.61, 1.11) | |
| 2–5 years | 16 | 0.73 (0.43, 1.25) | 16 | 1.30 (0.74, 2.30) | 6 | 0.81 (0.35, 1.91) | 12 | 0.97 (0.54, 1.76) | 13 | 1.11 (0.61, 2.02) | 63 | 0.96 (0.73, 1.25) | |
| ≥ 6 years | 48 | 1.23 (0.87, 1.73) | 12 | 0.92 (0.49, 1.74) | 7 | 0.71 (0.32, 1.58) | 11 | 0.68 (0.37, 1.26) | 13 | 0.92 (0.50, 1.67) | 91 | 0.98 (0.78, 1.23) | |
| P trend | 0.48 | 0.88 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.82 | 0.72 | |||||||
| Non-aspirin NSAID use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 119 | 1.00 | 49 | 1.00 | 54 | 1.00 | 140 | 1.00 | 55 | 1.00 | 417 | 1.00 | 0.97 |
| Ever | 72 | 1.02 (0.76, 1.38) | 40 | 0.80 (0.52, 1.22) | 15 | 0.56 (0.31, 0.99) | 27 | 0.79 (0.52, 1.20) | 49 | 1.07 (0.73, 1.58) | 203 | 0.88 (0.74, 1.05) | |
| Duration of non-aspirin NSAID use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 119 | 1.00 | 49 | 1.00 | 54 | 1.00 | 140 | 1.00 | 55 | 1.00 | 417 | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| ≤ 1 year | 32 | 1.28 (0.86, 1.90) | 10 | 0.55 (0.28, 1.08) | 8 | 0.78 (0.37, 1.66) | 12 | 0.82 (0.45, 1.48) | 21 | 1.08 (0.65, 1.78) | 83 | 0.93 (0.73, 1.18) | |
| 2–5 years | 22 | 0.81 (0.51, 1.28) | 23 | 1.30 (0.78, 2.16) | 5 | 0.62 (0.25, 1.56) | 12 | 1.04 (0.57, 1.88) | 15 | 1.00 (0.56, 1.78) | 77 | 0.93 (0.73, 1.21) | |
| ≥ 6 years | 13 | 1.09 (0.61, 1.93) | 4 | 0.53 (0.19, 1.49) | 0 | ~ | 3 | 0.60 (0.19, 1.89) | 7 | 1.41 (0.64, 3.12) | 27 | 0.80 (0.54, 1.18) | |
| P trend | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.02 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.25 | |||||||
| Acetaminophen use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 124 | 1.00 | 50 | 1.00 | 47 | 1.00 | 127 | 1.00 | 59 | 1.00 | 407 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| Ever | 67 | 1.11 (0.82, 1.50) | 39 | 0.98 (0.64, 1.50) | 22 | 0.67 (0.40, 1.12) | 40 | 0.90 (0.63, 1.29) | 45 | 1.04 (0.71, 1.54) | 213 | 0.96 (0.81, 1.13) | |
| Duration of acetaminophen use | |||||||||||||
| Never | 124 | 1.00 | 50 | 1.00 | 47 | 1.00 | 127 | 1.00 | 59 | 1.00 | 407 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| ≤ 1 year | 9 | 0.65 (0.33, 1.27) | 14 | 1.20 (0.66, 2.18) | 6 | 0.79 (0.33, 1.85) | 11 | 1.14 (0.62, 2.11) | 10 | 0.73 (0.37, 1.42) | 50 | 0.88 (0.66, 1.19) | |
| 2–5 years | 29 | 1.65 (1.10, 2.48) | 15 | 1.15 (0.64, 2.06) | 6 | 0.78 (0.33, 1.84) | 10 | 0.85 (0.45, 1.62) | 19 | 1.50 (0.90, 2.52) | 79 | 1.24 (0.97, 1.58) | |
| ≥ 6 years | 24 | 1.03 (0.66, 1.60) | 4 | 0.42 (0.15, 1.17) | 6 | 0.48 (0.20, 1.13) | 17 | 0.94 (0.56, 1.56) | 8 | 0.80 (0.38, 1.68) | 59 | 0.80 (0.61, 1.06) | |
| P trend | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.55 | |||||||
RRs were adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, menopausal hormone use, and parity. Further adjusted for race/ethnicity as a strata variable for all women combined.
P heterogeneity across the five racial/ethnic groups.
We examined the potential modifying effects of BMI and menopausal hormone use on the analgesic-endometrial cancer association (Table 4). There was no notable difference in the association of aspirin and non-aspirin NSAID use with endometrial cancer risk in obese or non-obese women (P’s interaction ≥0.71) or in postmenopausal women who never used or ever used menopausal hormones (P’s interaction ≥0.10). Although there was some variation in the direction and size of associations between acetaminophen use and endometrial cancer according to menopausal hormone use (P interaction=0.03), none of the associations was statistically significant.
Table 4.
Association between use of aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen and risk of endometrial cancer stratified by BMI and menopausal hormone use
| Exposure | BMI <30 kg/m2 | BMI ≥30 kg/m2 | Never use hormone** | Ever use hormone** | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases |
RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases | RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases | RR* (95% CI) | No. of cases | RR* (95% CI) | |
| Aspirin use | ||||||||
| Never | 254 | 1.00 | 147 | 1.00 | 135 | 1.00 | 165 | 1.00 |
| Past | 53 | 0.89 (0.66, 1.21) | 48 | 0.92 (0.66, 1.28) | 48 | 1.15 (0.82, 1.61) | 35 | 0.74 (0.51, 1.07) |
| Current | 65 | 0.96 (0.73, 1.27) | 53 | 1.09 (0.79, 1.49) | 46 | 1.12 (0.80, 1.58) | 49 | 0.88 (0.64, 1.22) |
| Non-aspirin NSAID use | ||||||||
| Never | 270 | 1.00 | 147 | 1.00 | 157 | 1.00 | 156 | 1.00 |
| Past | 54 | 0.86 (0.64, 1.15) | 48 | 0.78 (0.56, 1.08) | 45 | 0.97 (0.69, 1.36) | 43 | 0.87 (0.61, 1.22) |
| Current | 48 | 1.05 (0.77, 1.43) | 53 | 1.05 (0.77, 1.45) | 27 | 0.81 (0.53, 1.22) | 50 | 1.25 (0.90, 1.74) |
| Acetaminophen use | ||||||||
| Never | 261 | 1.00 | 146 | 1.00 | 141 | 1.00 | 172 | 1.00 |
| Past | 59 | 1.00 (0.75, 1.33) | 51 | 0.95 (0.69, 1.30) | 47 | 1.21 (0.86, 1.69) | 36 | 0.73 (0.51, 1.06) |
| Current | 52 | 1.00 (0.74, 1.35) | 51 | 1.03 (0.75, 1.42) | 41 | 1.20 (0.84, 1.71) | 41 | 0.84 (0.60, 1.19) |
RRs were adjusted for race/ethnicity (as a strata variable) and when appropriate were adjusted for age, BMI, smoking status, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, menopausal hormone use, and parity.
Among postmenopausal women only.
Discussion
In this large multiethnic prospective study, we found no significant association of ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer risk with the use of aspirin, non-aspirin NSAID, or acetaminophen. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in these risk associations across racial/ethnic groups, nor was there evidence for decreasing risk with increasing duration of use.
Results of several epidemiological studies of NSAID use and risk of ovarian cancer are inconsistent. Some investigators have reported significant inverse associations of ovarian cancer risk with the use of aspirin/non-aspirin NSAID (24, 32–34, 36, 37) or acetaminophen (27, 31), but more investigators have found no risk association with aspirin/non-aspirin NSAID use (21–23, 25–27, 29–31) or acetaminophen use (23, 29, 32, 33, 37), and results from one study suggested an increased risk of ovarian cancer associated with long-term use of aspirin and acetaminophen (28). The only randomized trial that investigated aspirin use in relation to cancer risk found no association between low-dose aspirin taken every other day for an average of 10 years and ovarian cancer (45).
Lack of consistent findings in the published studies could reflect heterogeneity across study design, geographic locations, and/or potential biases due to selection of subjects, misclassification of exposures, and unmeasured confounders. A meta-analysis of ten ovarian cancer studies published between 1998 and 2004 found no evidence for an association of ovarian cancer risk with either aspirin or non-aspirin NSAID use (46). This lack of evidence suggests that neither study design (cohort vs. case-control) nor method used to elicit analgesic use (questionnaire/interview vs. medication database) influenced the study results. Since the publication of the meta analysis, seven more studies [five case-control (28, 30, 33, 36, 37) and two cohort (23, 24)] have been published. Results from the two cohort studies are inconsistent (23, 24), with the study with a much larger number of cases and longer follow up found no association with aspirin, NSAID or acetaminophen (23). The case-control studies are more likely to report protective effects of NSAIDs (33, 36, 37), but this may also reflect biases inherent in case-control design. Our null findings in the MEC are consistent with the majority of published data.
Six of seven studies exploring the association of NSAID use with endometrial cancer risk have found no overall association (24, 38–41, 43). Results from the Nurses’ Health Study cohort suggest that BMI and menopausal hormone use may modify the association of aspirin with endometrial cancer risk (40), but this finding was not replicated within the MEC nor was it in agreement with results from other investigators (24, 38, 41–43).
The strengths of our study include its prospective design, multiethnic population, exclusion of prevalent cancer cases at baseline, and the ability to control for potential confounding factors. The main limitation of this study is that our analyses were based on exposures collected at baseline and we did not consider changes in exposure during follow up. Furthermore, self-reported NSAID use is susceptible to misclassification error, which may have biased the results toward the null. We had no information on reasons for NSAID use, and we had not collected frequency of use and dosage, thus we could not distinguish consistent from sporadic users. Lastly, we had limited power in the interaction analysis.
In summary, our cohort data, combined with existing epidemiologic literature, do not support the hypothesis that NSAID use plays a role in the chemoprevention of ovarian or endometrial cancers.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Kristine Monroe and Ms. Peggy Wan at University of Southern California for assistance with data management and analysis.
Grant Support
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute grant CA54281 (to L.N.K). V.W.S. was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Career Development K-Award CA116543.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: none
References
- 1.Modugno F, Ness RB, Chen C, Weiss NS. Inflammation and endometrial cancer: a hypothesis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2840–2847. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ness RB, Cottreau C. Possible role of ovarian epithelial inflammation in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1459–1467. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.17.1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wallace AE, Gibson DA, Saunders PT, Jabbour HN. Inflammatory events in endometrial adenocarcinoma. J Endocrinol. 2010;206:141–157. doi: 10.1677/JOE-10-0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Langseth H, Hankinson SE, Siemiatycki J, Weiderpass E. Perineal use of talc and risk of ovarian cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:358–360. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.047894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rosenblatt KA, Weiss NS, Cushing-Haugen KL, Wicklund KG, Rossing MA. Genital powder exposure and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:737–742. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9746-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Somigliana E, Vigano P, Parazzini F, Stoppelli S, Giambattista E, Vercellini P. Association between endometriosis and cancer: a comprehensive review and a critical analysis of clinical and epidemiological evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sayasneh A, Tsivos D, Crawford R. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a systematic review. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:140310. doi: 10.5402/2011/140310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Risch HA, Howe GR. Pelvic inflammatory disease and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:447–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Moroni S, dal Pino D, Fedele L. Pelvic inflammatory disease and risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5:667–669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lin HW, Tu YY, Lin SY, Su WJ, Lin WL, Lin WZ, et al. Risk of ovarian cancer in women with pelvic inflammatory disease: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:900–904. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70165-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McSorley MA, Alberg AJ, Allen DS, Allen NE, Brinton LA, Dorgan JF, et al. C-reactive protein concentrations and subsequent ovarian cancer risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:933–941. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000257126.68803.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dossus L, Rinaldi S, Becker S, Lukanova A, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, et al. Obesity, inflammatory markers, and endometrial cancer risk: a prospective case-control study. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17:1007–1019. doi: 10.1677/ERC-10-0053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Toriola AT, Grankvist K, Agborsangaya CB, Lukanova A, Lehtinen M, Surcel HM. Changes in pre-diagnostic serum C-reactive protein concentrations and ovarian cancer risk: a longitudinal study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1916–1921. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Denkert C, Furstenberg A, Daniel PT, Koch I, Kobel M, Weichert W, et al. Induction of G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in ovarian carcinoma cells by the anti-inflammatory drug NS-398, but not by COX-2-specific RNA interference. Oncogene. 2003;22:8653–8661. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Drake JG, Becker JL. Aspirin-induced inhibition of ovarian tumor cell growth. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:677–682. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02214-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rodriguez-Burford C, Barnes MN, Oelschlager DK, Myers RB, Talley LI, Partridge EE, et al. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) on ovarian carcinoma cell lines: preclinical evaluation of NSAIDs as chemopreventive agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:202–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim JS, Baek SJ, Sali T, Eling TE. The conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac sulfide arrests ovarian cancer cell growth via the expression of NAG-1/MIC-1/GDF-15. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:487–493. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rodriguez GC, Turbov JM, Berchuck A, Stack MS, Hurteau JA, Thaete LG, et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and progestins synergistically enhance cell death in ovarian epithelial cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arango HA, Icely S, Roberts WS, Cavanagh D, Becker JL. Aspirin effects on endometrial cancer cell growth. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:423–427. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gao J, Niwa K, Sun W, Takemura M, Lian Z, Onogi K, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit cellular proliferation and upregulate cyclooxygenase-2 protein expression in endometrial cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:901–907. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02200.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fairfield KM, Hunter DJ, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. Aspirin, other NSAIDs, and ovarian cancer risk (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:535–542. doi: 10.1023/a:1016380917625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lacey JV, Jr, Sherman ME, Hartge P, Schatzkin A, Schairer C. Medication use and risk of ovarian carcinoma: a prospective study. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:281–286. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pinheiro SP, Tworoger SS, Cramer DW, Rosner BA, Hankinson SE. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents and incidence of ovarian cancer in 2 large prospective cohorts. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:1378–1387. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Prizment AE, Folsom AR, Anderson KE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk for ovarian and endometrial cancers in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:435–442. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tavani A, Gallus S, La Vecchia C, Conti E, Montella M, Franceschi S. Aspirin and ovarian cancer: an Italian case-control study. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:1171–1173. doi: 10.1023/a:1008373616424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Akhmedkhanov A, Toniolo P, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Kato I, Koenig KL, Shore RE. Aspirin and epithelial ovarian cancer. Prev Med. 2001;33:682–687. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cramer DW, Harlow BL, Titus-Ernstoff L, Bohlke K, Welch WR, Greenberg ER. Over-the-counter analgesics and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1998;351:104–107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08064-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hannibal CG, Rossing MA, Wicklund KG, Cushing-Haugen KL. Analgesic drug use and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:1430–1437. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Meier CR, Schmitz S, Jick H. Association between acetaminophen or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of developing ovarian, breast, or colon cancer. Pharmacotherapy. 2002;22:303–309. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.5.303.33189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Merritt MA, Green AC, Nagle CM, Webb PM. Talcum powder, chronic pelvic inflammation and NSAIDs in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:170–176. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moysich KB, Mettlin C, Piver MS, Natarajan N, Menezes RJ, Swede H. Regular use of analgesic drugs and ovarian cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:903–906. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Rao RS, Coogan PF, Strom BL, Zauber AG, et al. A case-control study of analgesic use and ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:933–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schildkraut JM, Moorman PG, Halabi S, Calingaert B, Marks JR, Berchuck A. Analgesic drug use and risk of ovarian cancer. Epidemiology. 2006;17:104–107. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000190538.55645.f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sorensen HT, Friis S, Norgard B, Mellemkjaer L, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, et al. Risk of cancer in a large cohort of nonaspirin NSAID users: a population-based study. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1687–1692. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tzonou A, Polychronopoulou A, Hsieh CC, Rebelakos A, Karakatsani A, Trichopoulos D. Hair dyes, analgesics, tranquilizers and perineal talc application as risk factors for ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 1993;55:408–410. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910550313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wernli KJ, Newcomb PA, Hampton JM, Trentham-Dietz A, Egan KM. Inverse association of NSAID use and ovarian cancer in relation to oral contraceptive use and parity. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:1781–1783. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lo-Ciganic WH, Zgibor JC, Bunker CH, Moysich KB, Edwards RP, Ness RB. Aspirin, Nonaspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, or Acetaminophen and Risk of Ovarian Cancer. Epidemiology. 2012 doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182456ad3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Danforth KN, Gierach GL, Brinton LA, Hollenbeck AR, Katki HA, Leitzmann MF, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and endometrial cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009;2:466–472. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moysich KB, Baker JA, Rodabaugh KJ, Villella JA. Regular analgesic use and risk of endometrial cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2923–2928. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Viswanathan AN, Feskanich D, Schernhammer ES, Hankinson SE. Aspirin, NSAID, and acetaminophen use and the risk of endometrial cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:2507–2513. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bosetti C, Bravi F, Talamini R, Montella M, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Aspirin and risk of endometrial cancer: a case-control study from Italy. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010;19:401–403. doi: 10.1097/cej.0b013e32833b4871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fortuny J, Sima C, Bayuga S, Wilcox H, Pulick K, Faulkner S, et al. Risk of endometrial cancer in relation to medical conditions and medication use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1448–1456. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bodelon C, Doherty JA, Chen C, Rossing MA, Weiss NS. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of endometrial cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:1512–1517. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, Nomura AM, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:346–357. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cook NR, Lee IM, Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, et al. Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: the Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:47–55. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bonovas S, Filioussi K, Sitaras NM. Do nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs affect the risk of developing ovarian cancer? A meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60:194–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02386.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.