Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012 Fall;52(4):45–54. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e3182662ee9

Use of fundus autofluorescence in the diagnosis and management of uveitis

Annal Dhananjayan Meleth, H Nida Sen
PMCID: PMC3437035  NIHMSID: NIHMS396273  PMID: 22954928

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) represents a relatively new imaging modality that has been investigated in a variety of uveitic disease processes. Autofluorescence was first described in the setting of fluorescein angiography (FA) as “pseudofluorescence” prior to injection of fluorescein dye (1). FAF relies on the presence of innate fluorophores within ocular tissues, which can be induced to emit light when stimulated with specific frequencies of light. Using a fundus spectrophotometer, Delori et al showed that the dominant fluorophore in the retina is lipofuscin (2). Initial quantitative assessment of autofluorescence was done using fluorophotometry in the late 1980s (3). Lipofuscin can contain different fluorophores with varying emission characteristics from green to orange-red range. Lipofuscin is thought to represent the breakdown product of various retinal proteins. The accumulation of lipofuscin in tissues has been described in a number of hereditary or degenerative retinal diseases, and likely reflects a common mechanism resulting from cumulative oxidative damage (4, 5). Autofluorescence in the RPE depends on the outer segment renewal and can be affected by the RPE's ability to clear lipofuscin. Accumulation of lipofuscin leads to reduced phagocytic capacity of the RPE which in turn can lead to RPE cell death and photoreceptor loss (6). While lipofuscin accumulates in response to various types of damage, its accumulation in the RPE is shown to decrease in animal models with light-induced loss of photoreceptor cells or when RPE cells fail to phagocytose outer segments (7). Hence, an increased autofluorescence is seen with RPE dysfunction and a decreased autofluorescence is seen with loss of photorecptors or the RPE. Lipofuscin has also been shown to accumulate in experimental models of autoimmune uveitis (8). Oxidative damage to various ocular tissues is also thought to play a role in uveitic diseases. A primary target of oxidative damage in the setting of uveitis appears to be the retinal pigment epithelium (9). The RPE is also the primary site of accumulation of lipofuscin. As such, the visualization of lipofuscin accumulation in the RPE using fundus autofluorescence may reflect disease activity in the setting of uveitis.

Lipofuscin has a broad excitation and emission range with excitation spectrum ranging from 300 to 600 and emission spectrum ranging from 480 to 800 with maximal emission at 600-640nm. Two common fundus cameras used in autofluorescence imaging utilize differing excitation and barrier filters; 488 nm excitation with a 500nm barrier filter in HRA2 laser scanning ophthalmoscope (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), and 550 to 600 nm excitation and 660 nm barrier filter in Topcon fundus camera (Topcon medical systems, Paramus, New Jersey, USA). In addition to HRA 2 and Spectralis, Rodenstock cSLO (RcSLO; Rodenstock, Weco, Dusseldorf, Germany) and the Zeiss prototype SM 30 4024 (ZcSLO; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) are the confocal SLO (cSLO) devices capable of producing FAF images whereas Topcon is a fundus camera based system (10).

FAF intensity is generally significantly lower than the background of an FA. A number of structures anterior to the retina also possess autofluorescent properties, most significantly the lens. Confocal optics can help reduce the signal coming from the lens. Longer wavelength of excitation and barrier filters can also decrease the effect contributed by nuclear sclerosis and macular pigment. Each imaging system normalizes the pixel value to allow for better visualization of relative distribution of autofluorescence resulting in “averaged” or “normalized” image. While this makes evaluation of an image easier by accounting for topographic differences within an individual image it can not be used for quantitative calculation or comparison between different images even within the same patient. It is important to remember that lipofuscin is a combination of multiple fluorophores with different excitation characteristics and the different wavelengths in different imaging systems may indeed be recording fluorescence from different components of the lipofuscin.

In normal autofluorescence imaging the optic nerve head appears dark due to the absence of RPE and lipofuscin. Retinal vessels typically block FAF that would otherwise originate from the underlying RPE. The fovea also shows reduced signal due to absorption of light by luteal pigment. In general, the parafoveal region shows a slightly increased FAF signal. The contrast between the vessels and the background is less in fundus camera based FAF images than in images acquired by cSLO mainly owing to the fact that wavelengths used in fundus cameras are absorbed less by blood than wavelengths used in cSLO (11, 12). There are a number of causes for increased or decreased FAF signals as outlined in the table which may be relevant in the context of uveitic diseases (Table). In the clinical setting, it is important to take into account the normalization done by each imaging system, the difference in contrast, brightness and image quality (10, 11, 12).

Table.

Abnormal fundus autofluorescence signals in uveitic disease processes

Reduced FAF signal
    • Absence of or reduction in RPE lipofuscin density
    • Loss of RPE (e.g., AZOOR, VKH)
    • Increased RPE melanin content
    • Absorption from extracellular material, cells or fluid anterior to RPE
    • Intraretinal fluid (e.g., macular edema)
    • Intraretinal hemorrhage
    • Fibrosis, scar tissue or borders of laser scars
    • Media opacities (e.g., cataract)

Increased FAF signal
    • Excessive RPE lipofuscin accumulation
    • Fluorophores anterior or posterior to the RPE monolayer
    • Intraretinal fluid (e.g. macular edema)
    • Subretinal fluid (e.g., VKH)
    • Macrophages containing lipofuscin in the subretinal space
    • Older intraretinal and subretinal hemorrhages
    • Choroidal vessel underlying RPE atrophy
    • Displacement of luteal pigment (e.g cystoid macular edema)

Adapted from Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Holz FG, Bird AC, Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence imaging: review and perspectives. Retina. 2008 Mar;28(3):385-409. Review. PubMed PMID: 18327131.

Fundus autofluorescence findings in specific uveitic diseases

Abnormal autofluorescence patterns have been described in a number of infectious and non-infectious uveitides. Most reports of abnormal FAF in patients with uveitis belong to the spectrum of white-dot-syndromes. Below are examples of utility of FAF in the setting of uveitis.

Serpiginous choroidopathy

In serpiginous choroidopathy, prior areas of activity with chorioretinal atrophy are associated with hypoautofluorescence. Disease exacerbations at the borders of pre-existing atrophy have been associated with hyperautofluorescence (13). New lesions are often hyperautofluorescent initially throughout the area of involved RPE/choroid. These autofluorescence findings can be preceded by changes on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) testing and with resolution of active lesions hypofluorescence ensues (14) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

In serpiginous choroiditis areas of activity at the margins of the lesion show hyperautofluorescence (arrows) (A) which correspond to yellowish elevated areas o fundus photography (B) and early blockage (C) followed by late staining on fluorescein angiogram (D).

Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy

Round, placoid, gray-white lesions in APMPPE at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) show hypoautofluorescence which is attributed to presumably inflamed or swollen retinal cells overlying the RPE. An increase in autofluorescence is typically seen at the borders or as the lesions evolve. Eventually hypoautoflorescence is seen as the lesions are replaced by atrophy and RPE loss (15,16)

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome and acute zonal occult outer retinopathy

Similar to other white dots syndromes, abnormal autofluorescence is noted in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) and acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR) (17,18). Hyperautofluorescence of lesions in MEWDS correspond to areas of hypofluorescence on indocyanine green angiography (ICG) and decreased sensitivity on visual fields. Peripapillary hypoautofluorescence and granular mixture of hyper- and hypoautofluorescence described in AZOOR are associated with thinning in photoreceptor layer and defects in visual field, and are progressive in most patients (19) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fundus photograph of the left eye of a patient with AZOOR shows zonal loss of RPE in the peripapillary area into the arcades (A, arrow represents line scan for OCT) which corresponds to hypoautofluorescence on FAF imaging (B) and hyperfluorescence caused by window defect on FA (C). These areas also correspond to visual field defects (D) and loss of reflective band representing inner-outer segment junction on SD-OCT (between arrows, E).

Multifocal choroiditis and Punctate inner choroidopathy

The predominant autofluorescence finding in multifocal choroiditis is hypoautofluorescence associated with areas of chorioretinal atrophy. Numerous areas of punctate hypoautofluorescence (less than 125 microns) not associated with ophthalmoscopically visible lesions have also been noted (20). Areas of active chorioretinitis are associated with hyperautofluorescent signal which resolve with institution of immunosuppressive therapy (13). However, in PIC hyperautofluorescent halo surrounding active PIC lesions do not always change with therapy (21). Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with multifocal choroiditis or PIC appears to be associated with hyperautofluorescence surrounding the CNV lesion (20, 21). This is consistent with autofluorescence findings in AMD associated with classic CNV lesions (22). Scarring also appears to be associated with hypoautofluorescent signal (20).

Birdshot chorioretinopathy

Discrete areas of hypoautofluorescence have been noted in patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR), some of which do not correspond to clinically visible birdshot lesions (23, 24). Additionally, larger and more diffuse areas of hypoautofluorescence compared to visible lesions on exam or fundus photography have been shown in BCR patients. The presence of these areas of hypoautofluorescence may reflect a more wide-spread damage than what is visible in BCR and may explain vision and field loss in these patients (25) (Figure 3). Hyperautofluorescence has also been noted in BCR associated with vessels in regions of vasculitis and in association with CNV, likely a non-specific finding (23).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Areas of hypoautofluorescence in birdshot chorioretinopathy (A) correspond to the typical lesions in most part but appear more widespread than the ophthalmologically visible area of involvement (B).

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease

Autofluorescence findings in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) are variable with both increased and decreased levels of autofluorescence (26, 27). Hypoautofluorescent signals in VKH are associated with peripapillary atrophy, atrophic retinal scars and old pigmented scars. Additionally, areas of serous retinal detachment can also show hypoautofluorescence on both blue-light and near-infrared FAF which is likely due to blockage by the serous fluid of the reflectance from the RPE. However, this finding is not consistent in all areas of serous detachment (28). Hyperautofluorescent signals have been noted in association with cystoid macular edema, and areas of normal fundus. Interestingly the sunset glow fundus feature of chronic VKH is not associated with any significant change in autofluorescent signal, perhaps reflecting a loss of choroidal melanocytes instead of RPE pigment loss (26).

Uveitic macular edema

Increased hyperautofluorescence at the fovea has been noted in the setting of uveitic cystoid macular edema (CME). Presence of hyperautofluorescence in eyes with uveitic macular edema is associated with loss of reflective band representing inner-outer segment junction on SD-OCT and poor visual acuity. However, an abnormal autofluorescence was noted only in 50% of eyes with uveitic macular edema and lacked a distinctive pattern, highlighting the weakness of this technique in detecting macular edema (29). An increase in autofluorescent signal can be found in non-uveitic cases of CME and is thought to be due to the displacement of macular pigment by cystic changes causing the unmasking of underlying lipofuscin signal from the RPE (30) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Uveitic CME can lead to foveal and perifoveal hyperautofluorescence (B) consistent with area of perifolveal leakage on FA (A) and cystic changes on OCT (C).

Primary intraocular lymphoma (Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma)

Primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL/PVRL) is an important masquerade syndrome that can present with clinical findings similar to posterior and intermediate uveitis. There are a number of clinically distinctive autofluorescence patterns associated with PIOL. Hypopigmented areas of subretinal infiltration are associated with hypoautofluorescent signal whereas the brown clumps overlying the subretinal masses are associated with hyperautofluorescent signal (31). Additionally, an alternating pattern of granular hypo- and hyperautofluorescence has also been described in eyes with PIOL (31,32). This gives rise to a reverse of the characteristic “leopard spot” pattern seen on FA (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The right eye of a patient with PIOL/PVRL shows subtle pattern of leopard skin-like changes (arrows, A). These changes are more readily seen throughout the entire retina on FAF images as granular hyper- and hypoautofluorescence (B).

Infectious uveitides

Recurrent activity in cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis can sometimes be subtle and difficult to detect. Autofluorescence can be helpful in detecting areas of activity in CMV retinitis via demonstration of a hyperautofluorescent signal along the advancing edge of the lesions (33) (Figure 6). Inactive areas of CMV retinitis are often associated with stippled areas of autofluorescence. Progressive outer retinal necrosis demonstrates large areas of hypoautofluorescence which progress, reflective of the widespread RPE dysfunction in this disease (34). Hyperautofluorescence is also described in syphilitic chorioretinitis corresponding to yellowish placoid lesions. These lesions showed early hypofluorescence with late staining on FA with corresponding areas of hypofluorescent spots on ICG (35).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Extensive areas of active CMV retinitis seen on fundus photography (A) show hyperautofluorescence, particularly at the advancing borders, as well as staining and leakage on FA (C).

Conclusion

In many posterior uveitides, active disease is often reflected by a hyperautofluorescent signal. It is possible that an increase in the size, number, or fluorophore content of the RPE during acute inflammatory phase leads to an increase in autofluorescence. Inactive disease and areas of chorioretinal atrophy are generally associated with a hypoautofluorescent signal. Interestingly in some conditions, FAF imaging has also revealed more widespread areas of disease involvement than can be seen ophthalmoscopically, as noted in BCR, AZOOR and MFC (17, 20, 23, 24). In most white dot syndromes areas of increased autofluorescence corresponds to areas of abnormal fluorescence on FA, hypofluorescent spots on ICG and decreased sensitivity on visual fields. While autofluorescence patterns are not particularly distinctive in some cases, it is valuable in the presence of other imaging modalities and can be helpful in following recurrences in a number of uveitic syndromes. Hypoautofluorescence at the fovea has been associated with decreased visual acuity in a number of uveitic diseases (13, 28), and may be a valuable prognostic indicator. As the use of fundus autofluorescence becomes more common we may be better able to identify the pathophysiology underlying abnormal autofluorescence in uveitis and understand how the hyperautofluorescent lesions evolve during the course of a particular uveitic syndrome. Overall, FAF imaging, used in concert with clinical exam and other ancillary testing provides a clinically useful and non-invasive modality that plays a role in both diagnosis and management of many uveitides.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Machemer R, Norton EW, Gass JD, Choromokos E. Pseudofluorescence--a problem in interpretation of fluorescein angiograms. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970 Jul;70(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(70)90658-6. PubMed PMID: 4987088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Delori FC, Dorey CK, Staurenghi G, Arend O, Goger DG, Weiter JJ. In vivo fluorescence of the ocular fundus exhibits retinal pigment epithelium lipofuscin characteristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Mar;36(3):718–29. PubMed PMID: 7890502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kitagawa K, Nishida S, Ogura Y. In vivo quantitation of autofluorescence in human retinal pigment epithelium. Ophthalmologica. 1989;199:116–121. doi: 10.1159/000310027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence and age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2003 Feb;110(2):392–9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01756-6. PubMed PMID: 12578786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eldred GE, Katz ML. Fluorophores of the human retinal pigment epithelium: separation and spectral characterization. Exp Eye Res. 1988;47:71–86. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(88)90025-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nilsson SE, Sundelin SP, Wihlmark U, Brunk UT. Aging of cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells: oxidative reactions, lipofuscin formation and blue light damage. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;106(1):13–6. doi: 10.1023/a:1022419606629. PubMed PMID: 12675480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Katz ML, Drea CM, Eldred GE, et al. Influence of early photoreceptor degeneration on lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium. Exp Eye Res. 1986;43:561–573. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(86)80023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Okada AA, Goto H, Mizusawa T, Morimoto K, Ebihara Y, Usui M. Angiography of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis with ultrastructural correlation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;236(11):865–72. doi: 10.1007/s004170050172. PubMed PMID: 9825263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rao NA, Wu GS. Free radical mediated photoreceptor damage in uveitis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000 Jan;19(1):41–68. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(99)00003-8. Review. PubMed PMID: 10614680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Holz FG, Bird AC, Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence imaging: review and perspectives. Retina. 2008 Mar;28(3):385–409. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318164a907. Review. PubMed PMID: 18327131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Luong V, Fitzke FW, Holz FG. How to obtain optimal fundus autofluorescence image with the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope. In: Holz FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Spaide RF, Bird AC, editors. Atlas of Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging. Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg New York: 2007. pp. 37–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spaide RF. Autofluorescence imaging with the fundus camera. In: Holz FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Spaide RF, Bird AC, editors. Atlas of Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging. Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg New York: 2007. pp. 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yeh S, Forooghian F, Wong WT, Faia LJ, Cukras C, Lew JC, Wroblewski K, Weichel ED, Meyerle CB, Sen HN, Chew EY, Nussenblatt RB. Fundus autofluorescence imaging of the white dot syndromes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;128(1):46–56. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.368. PubMed PMID: 20065216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cardillo Piccolino F, Grosso A, Savini E. Fundus autofluorescence in serpiginous choroiditis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;247(2):179–85. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0951-z. Epub 2008 Sep 19. PubMed PMID: 18802719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Spaide RF. Autofluorescence imaging of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Retina. 2006 Apr;26(4):479–82. doi: 10.1097/01.iae.0000238557.06907.de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee GE, Lee BW, Rao NA, Fawzi AA. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence in a case of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy mimicking Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: case report and review of literature. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2011 Feb;19(1):42–7. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2010.521610. Epub 2010 Oct 31. Review PubMed PMID: 21034311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yenerel NM, Kucumen B, Gorgun E, Dinc UA. Atypical presentation of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS). Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2008 May-Jun;16(3):113–5. doi: 10.1080/09273940802026060. PubMed PMID: 18569800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Silva RA, Albini TA, Flynn HW., Jr Multiple evanescent white dot syndromes. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2011 Nov 26; doi: 10.1007/s12348-011-0051-9. PubMed PMID:22120934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fujiwara T, Imamura Y, Giovinazzo VJ, Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomographic findings in acute zonal occult outer retinopathy. Retina. 2010 Sep;30(8):1206–16. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e097f0. PubMed PMID: 20661173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haen SP, Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence in multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 May;145(5):847–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 10. PubMed PMID: 18329623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Turkcuoglu P, Chang PY, Rentiya ZS, Channa R, Ibrahim M, Hatef E, Sophie R, Sadaka A, Wang J, Sepah YJ, Do DV, Foster CS, Nguyen QD. Mycophenolate mofetil and fundus autofluorescence in the management of recurrent punctate inner choroidopathy. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2011 Aug;19(4):286–92. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2011.580072. PubMed PMID: 21770809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Fleckenstein M, Scholl HP, Holz FG. Fundus autofluorescence and progression of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan-Feb;54(1):96–117. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.10.004. Review. PubMed PMID: 19171212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC, Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence in birdshot chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):e15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.01.025. Epub 2008 Apr 18. PubMed PMID: 18378316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Giuliari G, Hinkle DM, Foster CS. The spectrum of fundus autofluorescence findings in birdshot chorioretinopathy. J Ophthalmol. 2009;2009:567693. doi: 10.1155/2009/567693. Epub 2010 Feb 8. PubMed PMID: 20339461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seidensticker F, Neubauer AS, Wasfy T, Stumpf C, Thurau SR, Kampik A, Kernt M. Wide-field fundus autofluorescence corresponds to visual fields in chorioretinitis patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1667–71. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S26224. Epub 2011 Nov 29. PubMed PMID: 22174575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Sohn EH, Sadda S, Rao NA. Retinal pigment epithelial changes in chronic Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography findings. Retina. 2010 Jan;30(1):33–41. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c5970d. PubMed PMID: 20010321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Heussen FM, Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Pappuru RR, Walsh AC, Rao NA, Sadda SR. Ultra-wide-field green-light (532-nm) autofluorescence imaging in chronic Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Jul-Aug;42(4):272–7. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20110505-01. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20110505-01. Epub 2011 May 12. PubMed PMID: 21553702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Koizumi H, Maruyama K, Kinoshita S. Blue light and near-infrared fundus autofluorescence in acute Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;94(11):1499–505. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.164665. PubMed PMID: 19965835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Roesel M, Henschel A, Heinz C, Dietzel M, Spital G, Heiligenhaus A. Fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in uveitic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;247(12):1685–9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1149-8. Epub 2009 Aug 11. PubMed PMID: 19669782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McBain VA, Forrester JV, Lois N. Fundus autofluorescence in the diagnosis of cystoid macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;92(7):946–9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.129957. PubMed PMID:18577647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ishida T, Ohno-Matsui K, Kaneko Y, Tobita H, Shimada N, Takase H, Mochizuki M. Fundus autofluorescence patterns in eyes with primary intraocular lymphoma. Retina. 2010 Jan;30(1):23–32. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181b408a2. PubMed PMID: 19834356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nazemzadeh M, Casady M, Moriarty E, Larson T, Smith W, Chan CC, Nussenblatt R, Sen HN. Fundus Autofluorescence Patterns in Primary Intraocular Lymphoma. ARVO Meeting Abstracts. 2011 Apr 22;52:4305. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yeh S, Forooghian F, Faia LJ, Weichel ED, Wong WT, Sen HN, Chan-Kai BT, Witherspoon SR, Lauer AK, Chew EY, Nussenblatt RB. Fundus autofluorescence changes in cytomegalovirus retinitis. Retina. 2010 Jan;30(1):42–50. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181bfbdb2. PubMed PMID: 19996825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yeh S, Wong WT, Weichel ED, Lew JC, Chew EY, Nussenblatt RB. Fundus Autofluorescence and OCT in the Management of Progressive Outer Retinal Necrosis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Mar;9:1–4. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100216-14. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100216-14. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 20337261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bellmann C, Holz FG, Breitbart A, Völcker HE. Bilateral acute syphilitic posterior placoid chorioretinopathy--angiographic and autofluorescence characteristics. Ophthalmologe. 1999 Aug;96(8):522–8. doi: 10.1007/s003470050448. German. PubMed PMID: 10509084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES