Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2012 Aug 18;89(4):759–763. doi: 10.1007/s00128-012-0788-3

Mercury Bio-Concentration by Puffballs (Lycoperdon perlatum) and Evaluation of Dietary Intake Risks

Jerzy Falandysz 1,, Innocent C Nnorom 2, Grażyna Jarzyńska 1, Dominika Romińska 1, Kamila Damps 1
PMCID: PMC3437224  PMID: 22898887

Abstract

In the present study, Hg bioconcentration by Puffball (Lycoperdon perlatum) mushroom was investigated. Total Hg content of fruiting bodies and topsoil (0–10 cm layer) were determined by cold-vapour atomic absorption spectroscopy. For ten geographically distant sampling sites of Poland, Hg ranged from 0.91 ± 0.28 to 2.4 ± 0.4 (overall range 0.57–4.5) μg/g dry weight in the carpophores and 0.012 ± 0.002 to 0.063 ± 0.024 (overall range 0.0077–0.12) μg/g dw in topsoil. The mean values of the bioconcentration factor ranged from 28 ± 11 to 110 ± 36 (range 9.6–280) indicating that L. perlatum effectively accumulates Hg and could be classified as a Hg accumulator. Total Hg content of L. perlatum to some degree seems to be determined both by degree of soil contamination and metal bioavailability to mycelium and also the rate of transfer and accumulation in fruiting bodies at the sites surveyed. Summarized and discussed are published data available on total Hg and methylmercury in L. perlatum.

Keywords: Bioconcentration, Foods, Forest, Mushrooms, Soils, Wild foods


Mercury is a global pollutant and remains as one of the most hazardous compounds that contaminate foods and hence impose a high risk to human health (JECFA 2010; USEPA 1987). Mushrooms are a highly biodiverse group of organisms that belong to the kingdom of fungi, and many of them are know as effective accumulators of trace elements (Brzostowski et al. 2011; Falandysz 2008 and 2012; Řanda and Kučera 2004). Mercury is toxic chemical element that is accumulated in mushrooms to great concentration and methylmercury seems even better accumulated that other chemical form of this metal (Alonso et al. 2000; Falandysz et al. 2002a, b; 2003; 2007a, b; 2012a, b; Stijve and Roshhnik 1974).

The puffballs (Lycoperdales) comprises of three groups, the Calvatia (Giant Puffballs), the Lycoperdon (Common Puffballs), and the Bovista (Tumbling Puffballs). Puffball Lycoperdon perlatum is also known as the Common Puffball, Warted Puffball, Gem-studded Puffball or Devil’s Snuff-box. It is a species of puffball mushroom in the Agaricaceae family. The Common Puffballs—the young specimens with white flesh—has long been considered edible and is a culinary favourite in some countries, while the brownish or darker ones are inedible but not poisonous. It is reported to have higher protein content than many other fungi. Mercury contaminations of wild edible mushrooms could pose toxicological risk to consumers because of the toxic nature of Hg species (JECFA 2010).

Total mercury content of mushrooms could be species dependent and varies amongst their ecological groups (saprophytic, symbiotic etc.), and this is what makes data interpretation difficult for different species and areas (Alonso et al. 2000).

The aim of this study was to investigate the contamination with Hg of topsoil and L. perlatum collected from ten background and spatially distant sites at the northern part of Poland and to estimate possible Hg intake by consumers. The bioconcentration factor (BCF) values were calculated to estimate the potential of this species to accumulate Hg.

Materials and Methods

Fruiting bodies (carpophores) of L. perlatum and beneath surface layer (0–10 cm) of soils (ca. 100 g) were collected. Sampling of 10 cm-depth horizon was aimed at understand-ing the spatial difference in Hg distribution in the soil substrate. The samples were collected from ten sites in Poland, i.e.: Krokowa, Lębork, Lipusz, Kartuzy, Miracho-wo and Łapino at the Pomorskie Voivodeshisp (Pomerania); Kiwity at the Warmia Land (Warmia), Piska forests at the Mazury Land (Masuria), Ciechocinek at Kujawy Land (Kujawsko-Pomorskie Viovodeship) and Poniatowa at the Chodelska Dale (Lubelskie Voivodeship) in 2001–2008 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Mercury in L. perlatum and soils (μg/g dw) and values of the BCF (arithmetic mean, SD, range and median, respectively)

Site and year Hg BCF
Caprophores Soils
Krokowa, Pomerania, 2003 2.4 ± 0.4 0.057 ± 0.018 46 ± 14
n = 15 (85)a (1.5–2.8) 2.5 (0.027–0.090) 0.055 (19–70) 44
Lębork, Pomerania, 2007 1.3 ± 0.4 0.043 ± 0.020 36 ± 15
n = 15 (84) (0.69–2.2) 1.3 (0.025–0.096) 0.039 (9.8–55) 39
Lipusz, Pomerania, 2007 2.0 ± 0.4 0.020 ± 0.007 110 ± 36
n = 15 (47) (1.2–2.8) 2.0 (0.012–0.040) 0.018 (31–160) 120
Kartuzy, Pomerania, 2007/2008 1.9 ± 0.8 0.047 ± 0.034 100 ± 100
n = 13 (75) (1.3–3.6) 2.6 (0.010–0.080) 0.049 (25–280) 68
Mirachowo, Pomerania 2007 1.1 ± 0.2 0.046 ± 0.016 28 ± 11
n = 8 (16) (0.92–1.5) 1.1 (0.031–0.073) 0.037 (13–42) 31
Łapino, Pomerania, 2006/2007 2.0 ± 0.8 0.025 ± 0.007 83 ± 34
n = 13 (105) (1.3–3.9) 1.7 (0.020–0.045) 0.023 (29–170) 78
Kiwity, Warmia, 2003 2.4 ± 1.1 0.049 ± 0.036 77 ± 47
n = 13 (53) (1.1–4.5) 2.0 (0.012–0.12) 0.042 (9.6–140) 83
Piska forests, Mazury, 2003 1.3 ± 0.3 0.023 ± 0.005 65 ± 27
n = 15b (0.70–1.8) 1.4 (0.013–0.032) 0.022 (22–140) 60
Ciechocinek, Kujawy, 2004 0.91 ± 0.28 0.012 ± 0.002 75 ± 24
n = 15 (58) (0.57–1.4) 0.82 (0.0077–0.015) 0.013 (47–120) 66
Poniatowa, Chodelska Dale, 2001 1.8 ± 0.5 0.063 ± 0.024 35 ± 23
n = 11 (1.1–2.9) 1.7 (0.029–0.10) 0.066 (12–90) 30

aNumber of samples and number of fruiting bodies (in parentheses)

bNumber of fruiting bodies

Fruiting bodies after cleanup from the plant material and particles of soil with a plastic knife were initially air-dried at room temperature in a well-ventilated place for two–three days, and then further oven dried at 65°C for 48–96 h. The specimens were next crushed and ground in an agate mortar to fine powder. Soil substrate samples, after removal of visible organisms, small stones, sticks and leaves were air dried at room temperature for approximately 4–6 weeks and then sieved through a pore size of 2 mm.

Total Hg content of materials was determined by cold-vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CV–AAS) after thermal decomposition of sample matrix and further amalgamation and desorption of element from gold wool (Mercury analyzer type MA–2000, Nippon Instruments Corporation, Takatsuki, Japan). Analytical control and quality assurance (AC/QA) were performed through the analysis of certified reference material CS-M-1 (dried fruiting bodies of mushroom Cow Bolete Suillus bovinus) produced by the Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology in Warsaw, Poland. Declared content Hg in these certified reference material was 0.174 ± 0.018, while our measurements showed 0.171 ± 0.008 μg/g dw (n = 3). In addition, with every set of 10 mushroom or soil samples examined, one blank sample was included. For mushroom fruiting bodies and soil substrate the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.005 μg Hg/g dw, and the quantitation limit (LOQ) was 0.003 μg Hg/g dw (Jarzyńska and Falandysz 2011).

Results and Discussion

The results of this study showed varying Hg concentrations in L. perlatum ranging from 0.57 to 4.5 μg/g dw with the mean values for the sites investigated ranging from 0.91 ± 0.28 μg/g dw for Ciechocinek to 2.4 ± 0.4 μg/g dw for the sites Krokowa and Kiwity. The range of the median values according to site is 0.82–2.5 μg/g dw for Ciechocinek and Krokowa, respectively (Table 1).

The results of this study are comparable to earlier reports for Hg in L. perlatum for specimens from background areas of Sweden, Poland, Slovakia, Switzerland, and Italy (Table 2).

Table 2.

Mercury in Puffball and soils (μg/g dw) in Europe and values of the BCF (arithmetic mean, SD, range and median, respectively)

Site and year Hg References
Caprophore Soils BCF
Sweden, Umeå, 1995 n-6(30)a 1.6 ± 0.7 (0.77–2.8) 0.10 ± 0.13 (0.018–0.25) 65 ± 29 (11–110) Falandysz et al. (2001)
Poland, Rogóźno, 1984/85 n-1 1.4 Lasota and Witusik (1987)
Poland, Łubiana, Kościerzyna county, 1993 n = 15 1.1 ± 0.4 (0.48–1.9) 1.1 Falandysz et al. (1996)
Poland, Zaborski Landscape Park, 1997/98 n = 16 3.7 ± 1.7 (1.5–6.8) 0.031 ± 0.021 (0.0091–0.072) 160 ± 120 (46–420) Falandysz et al. (2002a)
3.3 0.025 120
Poland, Borecka Forest, 1998 n = 16(146)a 3.4 ± 1.3 (1.3–6.1) 3.2 0.020 ± 0.019 (0.009–0.040) 200 ± 91 Falandysz et al. (2002b)
0.018 190
Poland, Łukta and Morąg, 1997/98 n = 16(168)a 2.8 ± 0.5 (1.3–3.1) 2.2 0.054 ± 0.12 (0.012–0.41) 0.026 89 ± 48 (6.6–210) 78 Falandysz et al. (2003)
Poland, 2001–2007 n = 133(549)a 0.91 ± 0.28–2.4 ± 1.1 0.012 ± 0.002–0.063 ± 0.024 28 ± 11–110 ± 36 b
(0.57–4.5); 0.82–2.6 (0.0077–0.12) (9.6–280)
Germany n = 2 3.3 (1.5–5.1) Seeger (1976)
Slovakia 2.0 ± 0.6 (0.3–3.2) Svoboda et al. (2006)
Bohemia, Precambrian shales 3.5 ± 0.1 Řanda and Kučera (2004)
Bohemia, vicinity of multi-metal smelting plant 4.0 ± 0.1
Switzerland, Lausanne, contaminated site 16 (6.6–22) 8.6 Quinche (1979)
Switzerland, Lausanne, background site 2.6 (2.3–5.8) 3.8 Quinche (1979)
Switzerland 0.58 [MeHg: 0.012] 6.3 [MeHg: 12] Reider et al. (2011)
Slovenia n = 2 2.2 (2.1–2.3) Byrne et al. (1979)
Slovenja, Idrija, Hg melting site n = 1 41 Stegnar et al. (1973)
Slovenja, 5 km from Idrija Hg melting site n = 1 32 [MeHg 3.5] Stegnar et al. (1973)
Slovenja, Podljubelj n = 6 27 (20–34) [MeHg: 0.35] 11 (7.1–19) Stegnar et al. (1973)
Slovenja, Podljubelj n = 7 25 (17–28) [MeHg: 0.35] Stegnar et al. (1973)
Slovenja, background area n = 3 8.4 (5.3–14) [MeHg: 0.36] 0.55 (0.53–0.58) n = 2 Stegnar et al. (1973)
Italy, Siena n = 1 2.8 0.31 9.0 Bargagli and Baldi (1984)
Italy, Regino di Emilia 1.9 (1.2–2.6) Cocchi et al. (2006)

aNumber of samples and number of fruiting bodies (in parentheses)

bPresent study

Total Hg content of topsoil depending on the site, revealed low contamination with this element and mean concentrations varied between 0.012 ± 0.002 and 0.063 ± 0.024 (overall range 0.0077–0.12) μg/g dry weight in soils (Table 1). The greatest Hg in soil at 0.12 μg/g was observed in a sample from Kiwity, site. None of the surveyed sites was recognized as being under the influence of any point Hg pollution source. These soils Hg data of the present study imply background levels since the range of concentration values reported for forest soils in a boarder study conducted in Poland revealed values usually well below 0.5 μg/g dw (Drewnowska et al. 2012; Falandysz et al. 1996, 2002a, b; 2003; 2007a, b; 2012a, b). Higher soil Hg concentrations of 0.53–0.58, and 7.1–19 μg/g were reported for some soils from Slovenia while 0.31 μg/g in soils from Italy (Table 2).

Based on calculated values of BCF L. perlatum could be classified as a good accumulator of Hg as all samples showed very high BCF values (BCF ≥ 10; range 9.6–280) (Table 1). The highest BCF of this study (280), though higher than the maximum BCF values reported by some earlier studies (maximum up to 110 or 210), it is however lower than the maximum BCF of 420 reported for Zaborski Landscape Park (Table 2).

To assess the health risk to consumers due to Hg contained in the L. perlatum the mean, median and range concentrations in (Table 1) and reference dose (RfD: 0.0003 mg/kg bw daily) were used in estimating the Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake (PTWI: 0.004 mg/kg bw) values (JECFA 2010; USEPA 1987). A meal consisting of 300 g of fresh puffball would expose a consumer to Hg dose ranging from 27 μg Hg at the Ciechocinek site to 72 μg Hg at the Krokowa and Kiwity, considering the mean concentration of Hg contents of Puffballs collected from these sites. And these values are 130 % and 340 % of the daily Hg reference doses respectively. The amount of fresh caps needed so as not to exceed this Hg limit for 70 kg body weight individual would be 0.23 kg at Ciechocinek and 0.087 kg at both the Krokowa and the Kiwity sites. Considering the established PTWI value and the mean mushroom Hg contents for the various sites investigated, consumption of a meal made of 300 g of L. perlatum for a week could provide depending on the site from 191 μg Hg at Ciechocinek to 504 μg Hg at both the Krokowa and Kiwity, respectively, and this would comprise from 1,900 % to 5,300 % of PTWI. This shows that the consumption of this mushroom could pose health risks to consumers.

Acknowledgments

Technical support by Anna Dryżałowska, Dorota Górska, Aleksandra Jabłońska, Edyta Kułdo, Damroka Reglińska and Justyna Wenta is acknowledged. This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education under project DS-8130-4-0092-1.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

References

  1. Alonso J, Salgado MJ, Garcia MA, Melgar MJ. Accumulation of mercury in edible macrofungi, influence of some factors. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2000;38:158–162. doi: 10.1007/s002449910020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bargagli R, Baldi F. Mercury and methyl mercury in higher fungi and their relation with substrata in a cinnabar mining area. Chemosphere. 1984;13:1059–1071. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(84)90065-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brzostowski A, Falandysz J, Jarzyńska G, Zhang D. Bioconcentration potential of metallic elements by poison pax (Paxillus involutus) mushroom. J Environ Sci Health A. 2011;46:378–393. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2011.542387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne AR, Dermelj M, Vakselj T. Silver accumulation by fungi. Chemosphere. 1979;10:815–821. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(79)90043-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cocchi L, Vescovi L, Petrini LE, Petrini O. Heavy metals in edible mushrooms in Italy. Food Chem. 2006;98:277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drewnowska M, Jarzyńska G, Kojta AK, Falandysz J. Mercury in European Blusher, Amanita rubescens, mushroom and soil. Bioconcentration potential and intake assessment. J Environ Sci Health B. 2012;47:466–474. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2012.663609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falandysz J. Selenium in edible mushrooms. J Environ Sci Health C. 2008;26:256–299. doi: 10.1080/10590500802350086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Falandysz J. Comments on “Determination of mercury, cadmium, lead, zinc, selenium and iron by ICP-OES in mushroom samples from around thermal power plant in Muğla, Turkey”. doi:10.1007/s00128-011-0357-1. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;88:651–653. doi: 10.1007/s00128-012-0566-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Falandysz J, Marcinowicz A, Chwir A. Rtęć w jadalnych grzybach z terenu lasów kościerskich i Mierzei Wiślanej. Roczn Państw Zakł Hig. 1996;47:206–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Falandysz J, Gucia M, Frankowska A, Kawano M, Skwarzec B. Total mercury in wild mushrooms and underlying soil substrate from the city of Umeå and its surroundings, Sweden. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001;67:763–770. doi: 10.1007/s001280188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Falandysz J, Lipka K, Gucia M, Kawano M, Strumnik K, Kannan K. Accumulation factors of mercury in mushrooms from Zaborski Landscape Park, Poland. Environ Intern. 2002;28:421–427. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00067-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Falandysz J, Gucia M, Skwarzec B, Frankowska A, Klawikowska K. Total mercury in mushrooms and underlying soil from the Borecka Forest, Northeastern Poland. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002;42:145–154. doi: 10.1007/s00244-001-0026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Falandysz J, Kawano M, Świeczkowski A, Brzostowski A, Dadej M. Total mercury in wild-grown higher mushrooms and underlying soil from Wdzydze Landscape Park, Northern Poland. Food Chem. 2003;81:21–26. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00344-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Falandysz J, Gucia M, Mazur A. Content and bioconcentration factors of mercury by Parasol Mushroom Macrolepiota procera. J Environ Sci Health B. 2007;42:735–740. doi: 10.1080/03601230701466005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Falandysz J, Frankowska A, Mazur A. Mercury and its bioconcentration factors in King Bolete (Boletus edulis) Bull Fr J Environ Sci Health A. 2007;42:2089–2095. doi: 10.1080/10934520701627058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Falandysz J, Widzicka E, Kojta AK, Jarzyńska G, Drewnowska M, Danisiewicz-Czupryńska D, Dryżałowska A, Lenz E, Nnorom IC. Mercury in Common Chanterelles mushrooms: Cantharellus spp. update. Food Chem. 2012;133:842–850. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Falandysz J, Kojta AK, Jarzyńska G, Drewnowska A, Dryżałowska A, Wydmańska D, Kowalewska I, Wacko A, Szlosowska M, Kannan K, Szefer P. Mercury in Bay Bolete Xerocomus badius: bioconcentration by fungus and assessment of element intake by humans eating fruiting bodies. Food Addit Contam A. 2012;29:951–961. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2012.662702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jarzyńska G, Falandysz J. The determination of mercury in mushrooms by CV-AAS and ICP-AES techniques. J Environ Sci Health A. 2011;46:569–573. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2011.562816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. JECFA (2010) Joint FAO/WHO Expert committee on food additives. Seventy-second meeting. Rome, 16–25 February 2010. Summary and conclusions. JECFA/72/SC. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Health Organization. Issued 16th March 2010
  20. Lasota W, Witusik M. Zawartość rtęci w grzybach dziko rosnących i podłożu. Problemy Higieny. 1987;1:125–134. [Google Scholar]
  21. Quinche JP. Tenur en quelques ėlėmentes traces du Lycoperdon perlatum. Bull Romand de Mycol. 1979;10:13–14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Řanda Z, Kučera J. Trace elements in higher fungi (mushrooms) determined by activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2004;259:99–107. doi: 10.1023/B:JRNC.0000015813.27926.32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reider SR, Brunner I, Horvat M, Jacobs A, Frey B. Accumulation of mercury and methylmercury by mushrooms and earthworms from forest soils. Environ Pollut. 2011;159:2861–2869. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Seeger R. Quecksilber gehalt der Pilze. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1976;160:303–312. doi: 10.1007/BF01132296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stegnar P, Kosta L, Byrne AR, Ravnik V. The accumulation of mercury by, and the occurrence of methyl mercury in, some fungi. Chemosphere. 1973;2:57–63. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(73)90058-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stijve T, Roschnik R. Mercury and methyl mercury content of different species of fungi. Travaux de chimie alimentaire et d’hygiène. 1974;65:209–220. [Google Scholar]
  27. Svoboda L, Havličková B, Kalač P. Contents of cadmium, mercury and lead in edible mushrooms growing in a historical silver-mining area. Food Chem. 2006;96:580–585. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. USEPA (1987) United States Environmental Protection Agency peer review workshop on mercury issues. Summary report. Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH, October 26–27

Articles from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES