Abstract
Exposure to microbes during early childhood is associated with protection from immune-mediated diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and asthma. Here, we show that in germ-free (GF) mice, invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells accumulate in the colonic lamina propria and lung, resulting in increased morbidity in models of IBD and allergic asthma as compared with that of specific pathogen-free mice. This was associated with increased intestinal and pulmonary expression of the chemokine ligand CXCL16, which was associated with increased mucosal iNKT cells. Colonization of neonatal—but not adult—GF mice with a conventional microbiota protected the animals from mucosal iNKT accumulation and related pathology. These results indicate that age-sensitive contact with commensal microbes is critical for establishing mucosal iNKT cell tolerance to later environmental exposures.
The mammalian host immune system is broadly stimulated with the first exposure to microorganisms during neonatal life (1). The inner surfaces of the gastrointestinal tract and lungs are particularly affected because they are predominant sites of microbial contact (2). Epidemiologic observations further suggest that the immune effects of early-life microbial exposure are durable and persist into later life because they can be associated with prevention of diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and asthma (3–5).
Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells probably play an important role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC)—a major form of IBD—and in asthma (6, 7). Such cells recognize endogenous and exogenous lipid antigens presented by the nonpolymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I–like protein CD1d and secrete abundant amounts of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 upon activation (8, 9). We therefore investigated age-dependent regulation of iNKT cells by use of microbes in mouse models of IBD and asthma.
We first examined the appearance of iNKT cells in tissues of 8-week-old germ-free (GF) and specific pathogen-free (SPF) Swiss-Webster (SW) mice. Relative and absolute numbers of iNKT cells were increased in GF mice in colonic lamina propria (LP) (Fig. 1, A to C). These differences in colonic iNKT cell numbers between GF and SPF mice were detectable after weaning and stable for life, suggesting early and persistent effects of the microbiota (Fig. 1D). iNKT cells were not increased in the ileal LP (ileum) of GF mice, and the liver, spleen, and thymus contained even fewer iNKT cells under GF relative to SPF conditions (fig. S1), which is consistent with a recent report (10). GF C57BL/6 mice (B6) exhibited similar increases of iNKT cells in the colonic LP as well as the liver, in contrast to GF SW mice (fig. S2). Although increased in number, the iNKT cell expression of several activation and memory markers was unaltered in GF SW, relative to SPF, mice (fig. S3).
To examine the relevance of these findings, we investigated the susceptibility of GF and SPF mice to oxazolone-induced colitis, a model of intestinal inflammation that possesses features of UC and is dependent on IL-13 production by CD1d-restricted iNKT cells (11, 12). Although GF or germ-reduced mice exhibit exacerbated inflammation in an innate mouse model of colitis (13, 14), colitis is typically prevented under GF conditions in models dependent on an adaptive immune response (15). Surprisingly, GF mice were more sensitive to oxazolone-induced colitis, as revealed by severe weight loss, pathology, and a high mortality rate in contrast to SPF mice (Fig. 1, E to H). This was not due to overexpression of cell-surface CD1d expression on intestinal epithelial (fig. S4A) and hematopoietic cells (fig. S4B). Consistent with previous studies (11), the colitis in GF mice was characterized by a marked increase in production of IL-13 and IL-1β in comparison with SPF mice (Fig. 1I).
To confirm the CD1d-restriction of this colitis in GF mice, we investigated the effects of CD1d blockade. Adult (8- to 9-week-old) GF and SPF mice were treated with a blocking monoclonal antibody (Ab) specific for CD1d (19G11) or an isotype control Ab (16). Treatment of GF mice with 19G11, but not the isotype control, protected against colitis-induced mortality and associated pathology (Fig. 2, A to C, and fig. S4, C and D). Furthermore, CD1d blockade of GF or SPF mice did not lead to significant functional changes in dendritic cells (17) or B cells (18) as demonstrated by stable IL-12 or IL-10 production (fig. S4, E and F), respectively.
We next examined whether reestablishing microbiota in adult GF mice would normalize iNKT cell levels in the colon. Quite surprisingly, exposure of adult GF mice to SPF conditions (GF/a) did not restore iNKT cells in the colon to the levels observed in SPF mice or reverse the mortality and severe pathology after oxazolone administration (Fig. 2, D to F). We therefore considered whether the ability to normalize iNKT cell levels and function in the colon was dependent on the age at which microbial contact occurred. Indeed, when we colonized pregnant GF female mice just before delivery and therefore exposed neonatal GF mice to SPF conditions on their first day of life (GF/n), we observed a complete normalization of iNKT cell levels that persisted even two months after colonization (Fig. 2D). Consistent with this, GF/n exhibited reduced susceptibility to oxazolone-induced colitis (relative to that of GF mice) two months after colonization, with a degree of severity identical to that observed in SPF animals, as shown by an analysis of mortality, weight loss, pathology, and cytokine production (Fig. 2, E and F, and fig. S5).
To verify that the early life events associated with the absence of normal microbial colonization on iNKT cell homeostasis were CD1d-dependent, we treated GF mice with 19G11 Ab for their first 6 weeks of life. 19G11, but not control Ab, treatment blocked accumulation of iNKT cells in all tissues examined and susceptibility to oxazolone-induced colitis in later life (fig. S6). Similar to GF mice, SPF mice (B6) born under germ-reduced conditions exhibited an increase in colonic iNKT cells and excessive oxazolone-induced colitis at 4 weeks of life (fig. S7). As predicted (11), Cd1d–/– and Ja18–/– mice, both of which lack iNKT cells, were not susceptible to oxazolone-induced colitis either under SPF or germ-reduced conditions (fig. S7).
Animal models of asthma demonstrate an important role for iNKT cells (19, 20), although the contribution to human disease remains controversial (21). We found that the lungs of GF SW and B6 mice contained significantly higher relative and absolute numbers of iNKT cells in comparison with that of the lungs of the respective SPF mice (Fig. 3, A to C, and fig. S8). Because commensal microbes may affect the induction of experimental asthma (22), we tested an ovalbumin (OVA)–driven allergic-asthma mouse model in GF mice. We observed that similar to the colon, GF mice developed an allergic airway response to OVA significantly greater than that observed in SPF mice, as demonstrated by increases in airway resistance, total bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cell numbers, BALF eosinophilia, serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, proinflammatory cytokine production in the BALF, and lung tissue eosinophil infiltration (Fig. 3, D to F, and fig. S9). The asthma in GF mice was CD1d- and antigen-dependent because elimination of the asthmatic response was only observed with 19G11, but not control, Ab treatment (Fig. 3, D to F, and fig. S9) of OVA-sensitized mice but not mice exposed to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), which did not induce allergic asthma (fig. S10).
We therefore next investigated whether early-life exposure to a conventional microbiota also protects animals from CD1d-restricted inflammation in the lungs. As observed in the intestinal mucosa, neonatal (GF/n)—but not adult-life (GF/a)—exposure of GF mice to a conventional microbiota abrogated the increased accumulation of iNKT cells in the lungs and protected adult mice in the allergic asthma model from the pathology (Fig. 3, G to I, and fig. S11).
The chemokine receptor CXCR6 on iNKT cells (23) and its ligand CXCL16, which is expressed at high levels by human epithelial cells (24) and increased in inflammation (25), plays an important role in iNKT cell homeostasis. Therefore, we examined the serum of GF and GF/a mice for the presence of CXCL16 and observed significantly higher levels than that observed in SPF and GF/n mice (Fig. 4A). This was due to significant increases of Cxcl16 mRNA expression levels in the colon and lung—but not ileum, liver, and thymus—of GF and GF/a relative to SPF and GF/n mice (Fig. 4B and fig. S12A), and mainly immunolocalized to the epithelium (fig. S12B). Although Cxcl16 mRNA levels in the colon, ileum, and lung were similar immediately after birth in the GF and SPF animals at the beginning of colonization, they increased significantly and specifically only in the colon and lungs of the GF mice during later life (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that microbial exposure provides signals that determine Cxcl16 gene expression in specific tissues. GF and SPF mice, however, exhibited similar levels of Cxcr6 mRNA expression in tissues and CXCR6 expression on the cell surface of iNKT cells (fig. S12, C and D).
CXCL16 was responsible for the accumulation of iNKT cells because treatment of newborn SPF and GF mice with a CXCL16-neutralizing Ab caused a decrease in iNKT cells in the colon and lung (Fig. 4D) but had no effect on iNKTcell levels in the ileum or thymus (fig. S13A). However, it was associated with an increased accumulation of iNKT cells in the liver (fig. S13A), suggesting CXCL16 blockade caused a redirection of iNKT cells to this organ. Consequently, Ab-to-CXCL16– but not isotype-treated GF mice were protected from oxazolone colitis–induced mortality and pathology (fig. S13, B to D).
We next examined the epigenetic content of the Cxcl16 gene of GF and SPF mice. A region 5′ of the Cxcl16 gene of SW mice that contains five potential CpG sites was determined by means of bisulfite pyrosequencing to be hypermethylated in the colon and lungs (Fig. 4E)—but not in other tissues such as the spleen and liver (fig. S14)—under GF conditions as compared with SPF conditions. Colonization of neonatal —but not adult—GF mice with a conventional microbiota decreased the hypermethylation of the Cxcl16 gene to SPF levels (Fig. 4E). Gene activation due to hypermethylation may occur as a consequence of specific types of environmental exposure (26). To confirm this, we treated SPF neonates on their first day of life by oral gavage with high doses of folinic acid as previously described (27) so as to force Cxcl16 methylation. Compared with PBS-treated control mice, folinic acid administration resulted in elevated methylation of the Cxcl16 gene in the colon, ileum, and lung; at least a three- to fourfold increase of Cxcl16 mRNA expression in the same tissues; increased CXCL16 serum levels; and accumulation of iNKT cells in these tissues as observed in GF mice (fig. S15). Alternatively, we investigated whether elimination of Cxcl16 methylation in GF mice would reverse the elevation of CXCL16 expression by treating GF newborn littermates with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza). When examined at 2 weeks of life, 5-Aza treatment inhibited methylation and mRNA expression of Cxcl16 in the colon, ileum, and lung (fig. S16, A and B), diminished the levels of CXCL16 in the serum, and reduced iNKT cells in these tissues (fig. S16, C and D). 5-Aza treatment had no effect on other cell populations such as CD45+CD11c+ double positive cells (fig. S17).
Epigenetic marks provided by 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) incorporation into DNA have been suggested to be different from those provided by 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and a distinct signature for elevated levels of transcription (28). We therefore performed DNA immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal 5-hmC Ab followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for Cxcl16 in seven different regions of Cxcl16 in DNA samples obtained from the colons of SPF, GF, GF/a, and GF/n mice. We observed that Cxcl16 was highly increased in three out of the seven investigated regions (with region 4 as a representative) within the 5-hmC–modified DNA of GF and GF/a mice but not in the DNA acquired from SPF and GF/n mice (Fig. 4F). No differences were observed in the other four regions (with region 2 as a representative) and in the DNA samples obtained from the ileum demonstrating the colonic specificity for 5-hmC modification of Cxcl16 (fig. S18). A map summarizing this information is provided in fig. S19.
Our studies indicate that CXCL16 is an age- and organ-dependent microbially regulated factor that modulates the quantities and function of iNKT cells in the colon and lungs and, consequently, susceptibility to tissue inflammation. The exact mechanism by which the microbiota regulates CXCL16 expression and thus iNKT cell accumulation in these organs is unknown, although it is independent of the Toll-like receptor adapter protein MyD88 (fig. S20). These observations are in accordance with previous epidemiological studies collectively known as the “hygiene hypothesis,” which proposes that early-life exposure to specific microbe-enriched environments decreases susceptibility to diseases such as IBD and asthma (3, 5, 29, 30), whereas its absence, as in antibiotic treatment during childhood, may have the opposite effect (31, 32). Our results suggest that CD1d-restricted iNKT cell pathways and their relationship to microbes play a central role in these aforementioned processes. Early-life microbial exposure elicits long-lasting effects on iNKT cells, and in their absence, later-life exposure to factors that stimulate these cells may induce an autoinflammatory response. These findings are predicted to extrapolate to humans, given the extensive similarities between the mouse and human CD1d and iNKT cell systems (33).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank E. Troy and S. Edwards for handling of the GF mice, J. Cusick for technical assistance, E. Nieuwenhuis and K. Schneeberger for assistance with epigenetics studies, A. Bellacosa and K. Baker for helpful discussions and manuscript preparation, and the KinderKrebsInitiative Buchholz/Holm-Seppensen for providing pyrosequencing infrastructure. The work was supported by NIH grants DK44319, DK51362, DK53056, and DK88199 (R.S.B.) and AI090102 (D.L.K.); Crohn's Colitis Foundation of America Senior Research Award (D.L.K.) and Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America Postdoctoral Fellowship Award (D.A. and S.Z.); the Harvard Digestive Diseases Center (DK034854); the Medizinausschuss Schleswig-Holstein, German Ministry of Education Research through the National Genome Research Network (A.F.); The Medical Faculty, Kiel (R.S.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (OL 324/1-1, SZ 814/1-1, 814/4-1); as well as DFG Excellence Cluster “Inflammation at Interfaces” (A.F. and S.Z.). The data reported in this manuscript are tabulated in the main paper and in the supplementary materials.
Footnotes
Supplementary Materials
References and Notes
- 1.Kelly D, King T, Aminov R. Mutat. Res. 2007;622:58. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Renz H, et al. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012;12:9. doi: 10.1038/nri3112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ege MJ, et al. GABRIELA Transregio 22 Study Group N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:701. [Google Scholar]
- 4.López-Serrano P, et al. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1464. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.510575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.von Mutius E. Immunobiology. 2007;212:433. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Akbari O, et al. Nat. Med. 2003;9:582. doi: 10.1038/nm851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fuss IJ, et al. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;113:1490. doi: 10.1172/JCI19836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen NR, Garg S, Brenner MB. Adv. Immunol. 2009;102:1. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(09)01201-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kronenberg M. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005;26:877. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wei B, et al. J. Immunol. 2010;184:1218. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heller F, Fuss IJ, Nieuwenhuis EE, Blumberg RS, Strober W. Immunity. 2002;17:629. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00453-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schiechl G, et al. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:1692. doi: 10.1172/JCI42540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maslowski KM, et al. Nature. 2009;461:1282. doi: 10.1038/nature08530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, Edberg S, Medzhitov R. Cell. 2004;118:229. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Strober W, Fuss IJ, Blumberg RS. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002;20:495. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Roark JH, et al. J. Immunol. 1998;160:3121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yue SC, Shaulov A, Wang R, Balk SP, Exley MA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005;102:11811. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503366102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mizoguchi A, Bhan AK. J. Immunol. 2006;176:705. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Meyer EH, DeKruyff RH, Umetsu DT. Annu. Rev. Med. 2008;59:281. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.061506.154139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wingender G, et al. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:1151. doi: 10.1084/jem.20102229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Iwamura C, Nakayama T. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2010;22:807. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Herbst T, et al. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011;184:198. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1574OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Germanov E, et al. J. Immunol. 2008;181:81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Day C, Patel R, Guillen C, Wardlaw AJ. Exp. Lung Res. 2009;35:272. doi: 10.1080/01902140802635517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Diegelmann J, et al. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010;16:1871. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rishi V, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:20311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008688107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pufulete M, et al. Gut. 2005;54:648. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.054718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Song CX, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:68. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Neish AS. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:65. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Strachan DP. BMJ. 1989;299:1259. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6710.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shaw SY, et al. Am. J. Gastro. 2010;105:2687. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goksör E, et al. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:1561. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02411.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sullivan BA, Kronenberg M. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2007;314:165. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69511-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.