Abstract
Background
The present work was designed to evaluate the antibacterial properties of the methanol extracts of eleven selected Cameroonian spices on multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDR), and their ability to potentiate the effect of some common antibiotics used in therapy.
Results
The extract of Cinnamomum zeylanicum against Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 and AG100 strains showed the best activities, with the lowest minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 64 μg/ml. The extract of Dorstenia psilurus was the most active when tested in the presence of an efflux pump inhibitor, phenylalanine Arginine-β- Naphtylamide (PAβN), a synergistic effect being observed in 56.25 % of the tested bacteria when it was combined with Erythromycin (ERY).
Conclusion
The present work evidently provides information on the role of some Cameroonian spices in the fight against multi-resistant bacteria.
Keywords: Multi-Drug Resistant bacteria, Spices, Methanol extract, Cameroon
Background
Infectious diseases are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in developing countries [1,3]. Following the massive use of antibiotics in human therapy, bacteria have developed several resistance mechanisms including the efflux of antibiotics [3]. Several Cameroonian spices are known to possess medicinal values [4]. In our previous report, we demonstared that several medicinal spices inhibited the growth of MDR bacteria and were also able to improve the activity of commonly used antibiotics [5]. In our continuous search of antimicrobial drugs from medicinal plant, we designed the present work to investigate the antibacterial potential against Gram-negative MDR bacteria of some of the commonly used medicinal spices in Cameroon such as Aframomum citratum (Pereira) K. Schum. (Zingiberaceae), Aframomum melegueta (Roscoe) K. Schum. (Zingiberaceae), Scorodophloeus zenkeri Harms (Caesalpiniaceae), Tetrapleura tetraptera (Schum. & Thonn) Taub. (Mimosaceae), Fagara leprieurii (Guill and Perr) Engl. (Rutaceae), Monodora myristica Dunal (Annonaceae), Piper guineense (Schum and Thonn) (Piperaceae), Dorstenia psilurus Welwitch (Moraceae), Imperata cylindricum Beauv. var. koenigii Durand and Schinz (Gramineae), Pentadiplandra brazzeana Baill. (Capparaceae) and Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Linn) Cor. (Lauraceae).
Material and methods
Plant materials and extraction
The eleven edible spices used in this work were purchased from Dschang local market, West Region of Cameroon in January 2010. The collected spices material were the fruits of Aframomum citratumAframomum melegueta, Scorodophloeus zenkeri, Tetrapleura tetraptera, the seeds of Fagara leprieuriiMonodora myristica and Piper guineense, the roots of Dorstenia psilurusImperata cylindricum and Pentadiplandra brazzeana and the leaves of Cinnamomum zeylanicum. The plants were identified by Mr. Victor Nana of the National herbarium (Yaoundé, Cameroon) where voucher specimens were deposited under a reference number (Table 1). The extracts were obtained by methanol (MeOH) maceration as previously described [5].
Table 1.
Spice samples (Family) | Herbarium Voucher numbera | Traditional Treatment | Part used | Bioactive (or potentially active) compoundsband screened activitycfor crude plant extract |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aframomum citratum (Pereira) K. Schum. (Zingiberaceae) |
37 736/HNC |
Malaria, aphrodisiac, cancer [4,6] |
Fruits. leaves. seeds |
Antimicrobial: Ethylacetate extract of fruits on Ec. Pa. Sa[7] |
|
|
|
|
Cytotoxicity of fruits crude methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and CEM/ADR5000 cells, and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
Aframomum melegueta (Roscoe) K. Schum. (Zingiberaceae) |
39 065/HNC |
Malaria, dysentery, carminative, dysmenorrheal, fertility, rubella, leprosy, cancer [6,8] |
Fruits, leaves |
Antimicrobial : Aqueous and ethanol extract of leaves on Fo. An[9] Methanol extract of fruits (Q) on Sa. Bs. Ec. Pa. Ca[8] |
|
|
|
|
Cytotoxicity of fruits crude methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines and significant activity on CEM/ADR5000 cells with IC50 value of 7.08 μg/ml] [4] |
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Linn) Cor. (Lauraceae) |
22 309/SRFC |
Cancer [4] |
Fruits, leaves. bark |
Antimicrobial : Cd, Cm, Lt, Fp[10,11] |
|
|
|
|
Cytotoxicity of leaves crude methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and CEM/ADR5000 cells, and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
Dorstenia psilurus Welwitch (Moraceae) |
44 839/HNC |
Snake bite, rheumatism, head and stomach ache, hypertension, cancer [4,12,13]. |
Leaves, roots |
Cytotoxicity of roots crude methanol extract [Significant activity with IC50 values of 7.18; 7.79 and 9.17 μg/ml respectively on leukemia CCRF-CEM cells, CEM/5000 cells and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
Fagara leprieurii (Guill and Perr) Engl. (Rutaceae) |
37 632/HNC |
Gastritis, gingivitis. bilharzias, antidiarrhoeal, cancer, laxative, antimicrobial, ulcer, gonorrhea, kidney ache., sterility [4,14,15] |
Bark, leaves. roots |
Antimicrobial : Ethanol extract of the seeds on Ca. Cn. Mg. Tm. Tr. Bci. Af. Afl. Sb[6]Essential oil: Sa[15] |
|
|
|
|
Cytotoxicity of seeds crude methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines and significant activity on CEM/ADR5000 cells with IC50 value of 8.13 μg/ml] [4] |
Imperata cylindricum Beauv. var. koenigii Durand et Schinz (ramineae) |
30 139/SRFC |
Diuretic, anti-inflammatory, dysentery, urinary tract infections, cancer [4,16,17] |
Leaves, roots |
Cytotoxicity of roots crude methanol extract [Significant activity with IC50 values of 8.4; 7.18 and 12.11 μg/ml respectively on leukemia CCRF-CEM cells, CEM/5000 cells and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
Monodora myristica Dunal (Annonaceae) |
2 949/SRFC |
Insecticidal, diuretic, constipation, anti-hemorrhage, headache, wounds, worm infections,cancer [4,15,18,19] |
Fruits, leaves. seeds |
Antimicrobial : Fm. Afl. Af[18]; Essential oil: Af. Bc. Bs. Cgl. Ec. Kp. Sa. Sf[15]. Cytotoxicity of fruits seeds methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and CEM/ADR5000 cells, and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
Pentadiplandra brazzeana Baill. (Capparaceae) |
42 918/HNC |
Gastric ulcer, cancer [4,20] |
Fruits, leaves |
Cytotoxicity of roots crude methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and CEM/ADR5000 cells, and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
Piper guineense (Schum and Thonn) (Piperaceae) |
6 018/SRFC |
Cough, bronchitis, rheumatism, insecticidal, anemia, carminative, stomach ache, cancer [4,8,21] |
Fruits, leaves. bark |
Insecticidal : Cs[20]Antimicrobial(Q); Ec. Sa. Bs. Pa. Ca. An[8,22] |
Scorodophloeus zenkerii Harms (Caesalpiniaceae) |
44 803/HNC |
Cancer [4] |
Leaves. roots |
Antimicrobial : Essential oil of stem bark on Ec, Sa, Bs, Cu [23]. |
|
|
|
|
Cytotoxicity of fruits crude methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and CEM/ADR5000 cells, and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
Tetrapleura tetraptera (Schum. & Thonn) Taub. (Mimosaceae) | 12 117/SRFC | Pain, arthritis, epilepsy, convulsion, gastric ulcer, cancer [4,20] | Bark, leaves. roots | Cytotoxicity of fruits crude methanol extract [weak activity on leukemia CCRF-CEM and CEM/ADR5000 cells, and pancreatic MiaPaCa-2 cell lines] [4] |
a(HNC): Cameroon National Herbarium; (SRFC): Société des reserves forestières du Cameroun; b(/): Not reported.
c[Screened activity: significant (S: CMI < 100 μg/ml). moderate (M : 100 < CMI ≤ 625 μg/ml). Weak (W: CMI > 625 μg/ml) Q: Qualitative activity based on the determination of inhibition zone [15]; Af : Aspergillus fumigatus. Afl : Aspergillus flavus. An: Aspergillus niger. Bc : Bacillus cereus. Bci : Botrytis cinerea. Bs : Bacillis subtilis. Bt: Botryodiploidia theobromae. Ca : Candida albicans. Cd : Clostridium difficile. Cm : Colletotrichum musae. Cn : Cryptococcus neoformans. Cs: Callosobruchus subinnotatus. Cu : Candida utilis. Ec : Escherichia coli. Fm :Fusarium moniliforme. Fo :Fusarium oxysporum. Fp : Fusarium proliferatum. Lt : Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Mg : Microsporum gypseum. Pa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sa : Staphylococcus aureus. Sb: Scopulariopsis brevicaulis. Tm: Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Tr: Trichophyton rubrum.
Preliminary phytochemical investigations
The major secondary metabolites classes were screened according to the common phytochemical methods described by Harborne [24].
Chemicals for antimicrobial assays
Tetracycline (TET), cefepime (FEP), streptomycin (STR), ciprofloxacin (CIP), norfloxacin (NOR), chloramphenicol (CHL), cloxacillin (CLX), ampicillin (AMP), erythromycin (ERY), kanamycin (KAN) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Quentin Fallavier, France) were used as reference antibiotic. p-Iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (INT) and phenylalanine arginine β-naphthylamide (PAßN) were used as microbial growth indicator and efflux pumps inhibitor (EPI) respectively.
Bacterial strains and culture media
The studied microorganisms included reference (from the American Type Culture Collection) and clinical (Laboratory collection) strains of Providencia stuartii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae The bacterial strains and their features were previously reported [5]. The preliminary treatment of these organisms as well as the culture media were conducted as previously described [5].
Bacterial susceptibility determinations
The respective MICs of samples on the studied bacteria were determined using rapid INT colorimetric assay [25,26] with some modifications as previously reported [5]. The inoculum concentration used was 1.5 x106 CFU/ml and the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h [5]. The final concentration of DMSO was lower than 2.5 % and this concentration also served as negative control [5]. Chloramphenicol was used as reference antibiotic. The MICs of samples were detected after 18 h incubation at 37 °C, following addition (40 μl) of 0.2 mg/ml INT and incubation at 37 °C for 30 minutes [5]. MIC was defined as the lowest sample concentration that prevented the color change of the medium and exhibited complete inhibition of microbial growth [27].
Samples were tested alone and then, in the presence of PAßN at 20 mg/L final concentration as previously reported [5]. Four of the best extracts, those from A. citratum, C. zeylanicum, D. psilurus and T. tetraptera were also tested in association [5] at the concentrations selected following a preliminary assay on P. aeruginosa PA124 (See Additional file 1: Table S1). All assays were performed in triplicate and repeated thrice. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) [5] were calculated and the interpretations were made as follows: synergistic (<0.5), indifferent (0.5 to 4), or antagonistic (>4) [28] (The FIC values available in Additional file 1: Table S2 and S3).
Results
Phytochemical composition of the spice extracts
The results of qualitative analysis showed that each plant contains various phytochemicals compounds such as alkaloids, anthocyanins, anthraquinones, flavonoids, phenols, saponins, steroids, tannins and triterpenes as shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Spice samples | Extraction yield (%)* | Physical aspect | Phytochemical composition | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Alkaloids |
Anthocyanins |
Anthraquinons |
Flavonoids |
Phenols |
Saponins |
Sterols |
Tannins |
Triterpenes |
Aframomum citratum |
2.6 |
Oily, dark green |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
Aframomum melegueta |
7.3 |
Brown powder |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
Cinnamomum zeylanicum |
8.4 |
Oily, dark green |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
Dorstenia psilurus |
10.3 |
Oily, brown |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
Fagara leuprieurii |
26.2 |
Creamy, brown |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
Imperata cylindricum |
8.2 |
Creamy, brown |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
Monodora myristica |
23.5 |
Oily, brown |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
Pentadiplandra brazzeana |
4.6 |
Creamy, brown |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Piper guineense |
17.5 |
Creamy, brown |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Scorodophloeus zenkeri |
9.2 |
Creamy, dark green |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
Tetrapleura tetraptera | 29.4 | brown | + | - | + | + | + | + | - | + | + |
(+): Present; (−): Absent; *The yield was calculated as the ratio of the obtained methanol extract according to the initial mass of the spice powder.
Antibacterial activity of the spice extracts
The results summarized in Table 3 summarize the MIC of the extract tested alone or in combination with PAβN on the tested microorganisms. Its shows that all the studied extracts were active on at least one microbial strain. A. citratum showed the best activity, it inhibitory effect being recorded on 85% (24/28) of the tested bacteria. Other samples were less active, their inhibitory potencies being observed on 75% of tested bacteria (21/28) for I. cylindricum and C. zeylanicum, 67.9 % (19/28) for A. melegueta, D. psilurus, F. leprieuri and T. tetraptera; 64.3% (18/28) for M. myristica and S. zenkeri; 50 % (14/28) for P. guineense and 42.9 % (12/28) for P. brazzeana.
Table 3.
Bacterial strains | Tested samples and MIC in μg/ml in the absence and presence of PAßN (in parenthesis) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aframomum citratum |
Aframomum melegueta |
Imperata cylindricum |
Cinnamomum zeylanicum |
Dorstenia psilurus |
Fagara leprieuri |
Monodora myristica |
Pentadiplandra brazzeana |
Piper guineense |
Scorodophloeus zenkeri |
Tetrapleura tetraptera |
CHL |
E. coli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATCC8739 |
512 |
512 |
512 |
64 |
- |
512 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1 |
ATCC10536 |
1024 |
512 |
1024 |
512 |
128 |
256 |
1024 |
512 |
1024 |
512 |
1024 (1024) |
32 (<2) |
AG100 |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (256) |
- (64) |
- (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
512 |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
4 (<2) |
AG100A |
512 (128) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (128) |
512 (128) |
512 (128) |
512 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
- (−) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
<2 (<2) |
AG100ATET |
512 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (512) |
512 (128) |
1024 (1024) |
- |
- |
1024 |
512 |
1024 |
32 (<2) |
AG102 |
1024 |
- |
1024 |
1024 |
512 |
1024 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16 (<2) |
MC4100 |
512 (512) |
512 (256) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (256) |
512 |
- (−) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (512) |
4 (<2) |
W3110 |
512 (256) |
512 (512) |
512 (512) |
512 (512) |
512 (256) |
256 |
512 |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (128) |
512 |
512 (512) |
1 (<2) |
E. aerogenes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATCC13048 |
1024 |
- |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 (<2) |
CM64 |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (128) |
1024 (512) |
512 (256) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (512) |
32 |
EA27 |
512 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (512) |
512 (512) |
- (−) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
-(−) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (512) |
64 (32) |
EA289 |
- |
1024 |
- |
1024 |
- |
- |
1024 |
1024 |
- |
- |
1024 |
256 |
EA298 |
1024 |
512 |
- |
- |
1024 |
- |
256 |
256 |
512 |
256 |
1024 |
256 |
EA3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1024 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
256 |
E. cloacae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BM47 |
512 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (512) |
1024 (128) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
- (8) |
BM67 |
512 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (128) |
- (−) |
- (−) |
- (−) |
- (−) |
- (−) |
- (−) |
- (32) |
ECCI69 |
512 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
-(−) |
-(−) |
1024 (1024) |
- (−) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (512) |
- (32) |
K. pneumoniae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATCC12296 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
512 |
- |
- |
- |
1024 |
4 |
K2 |
1024 |
- |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
- |
1024 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
K24 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
512 |
- |
- |
1024 |
1024 |
32 (<2) |
KP55 |
512 |
1024 |
256 |
512 |
512 |
1024 |
1024 |
- |
- |
- |
1024 |
32(<2) |
KP63 |
512 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (512) |
512 (128) |
1024 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
512 |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (512) |
1024 (1024) |
64(<2) |
P. stuartuii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATCC29916 |
1024 (1024) |
- (−) |
-(−) |
-(−) |
1024 (1024) |
-(−) |
-(−) |
-(−) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
1024 (1024) |
8 |
NEA16 |
1024 (512) |
- (−) |
1024 (1024) |
512 (512) |
512 (256) |
1024 |
1024 |
- |
- |
1024 |
- |
64(<2) |
PS2636 |
1024 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
PS299645 |
512 |
512 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
1024 |
- |
1024 |
1024 |
512 |
1024 |
128 |
P. aeruginosa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PA01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
PA124 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1024 | - | 32(<2) |
(−): MIC not detected at up to 1024 μg/ml for the les extracts and 256 μg/ml for chloramphenicol. () : values in parenthesis are MIC of substance in the presence of PAßN at 20 μg/ml. The MIC of PAßN was 64 μg/ml on E. coli. AG100A. 512 μg/ml on ATCC11296. BM67. EA27. EA289; 1024 μg/ml on AG100ATET. ATCC13048. CM64; and > 1024 μg/ml on other bacteria. CHL: chloramphénicol; (in bold): significant MIC value.
Role of efflux pumps in susceptibility of gram negative bacteria to the tested spice extracts
Potentiating effect of EPI was not observed on tested bacteria when associated with M. myristica, P. brazzeana, T. tetraptera and S. zenkeri. PAβN weakly increased the activity of A. citratum, A. melegueta, F. leprieuri, I. cylindricum, C. zeylanicum and P. guineense. The activity of D. psilurus in the presence of EPI significantly increased on most of the tested bacteria (except against P. stuartii ATCC29916, E. cloacae ECCI69 and E. aerogenes EA27) (see Table 3).
Effects of the association of some spice extracts with antibiotics
A. citratum, C. zeylanicum, D. psilurus and T. tetraptera (Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7) were associated to antibiotics in view of evaluating the possible synergistic effect of these associations. A preliminary study using P. aeruginosa PA124 was carried out with ten antibiotics (CLX, AMP, ERY, KAN, CHL, TET, FEP, STR, CIP and NOR) to select the appropriate sub-inhibitory concentrations to be used. MIC/2.5 and MIC/5 were then selected as the sub-inhibitory concentrations (see Additional file 1: Table S1). All of these four extracts were then tested in association with antibiotics previously listed on strains of E. coli AG100ATET and AG102, E. aerogenes CM64, K. pneumonia KP63 and P. aeruginosa PA124. No antagonistic effect (FIC > 4) was observed between extracts and antibiotics meanwhile indifference was observe between T. tetraptera and antibiotics in most of the case (see Tables 5, 6, and 7, Additional file 1: S2, S3, S4 and S5). Significant increase of the activity was observed with the association of the extracts of A. citratum and D. psilurus on E. aerogenes CM64 and K. pneumoniae KP63, and with C. zeylanicum against K. pneumoniae KP63. A significant decrease (synergy effect) of MIC values was also observed when ERY was associated with various extracts, and when extracts of A. citratum and C. zeylanicum were each combined with aminoglycosides (KAN, STR), the best activity being noted against E. aerogenes CM64.
Table 4.
Bacterial strains | Antibiotics and MIC in absence and presence ofAframomum citratumextract | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ampicillin |
Cefepime |
Chloramphenicol |
Ciprofloxacin |
Cloxacillin |
||||||||||
|
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
AG100Atet |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
256 |
32 (8) S |
64 (4) S |
256 |
128 (2) S |
256 (1) I |
- |
- |
- |
AG102 |
- |
- |
- |
128 |
128 (1) I |
128 (1) I |
16 |
8 (2) S |
8 (2) S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
- |
- |
CM64 |
- |
256 (1)I |
- |
- |
64 (>4) S |
- |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
- |
- |
- |
KP63 |
- |
32 (>8)S |
- |
256 |
32 (8) S |
256 (1) I |
- |
64 (>4) S |
256 (>1)S |
64 |
64 (1) I |
64 (1) I |
- |
256 (>1)S |
- |
PA124 |
128 |
16 (8) S |
64 (2) S |
128 |
128 (1) I |
256 (0.5) I |
32 |
16 (2) S |
16 (2) S |
16 |
4 (4) S |
16 (1) I |
- |
- |
- |
Bacterial strains |
Erythromycin |
Kanamycin |
Norfloxacin |
Streptomycin |
Tetracyclin |
||||||||||
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
|
AG100Atet |
64 |
16 (4) S |
32 (2) S |
- |
32 (>8)S |
256 |
128 |
16 (8) S |
128 (1) I |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
2 |
<2 (>1)S |
2 (1) I |
AG102 |
32 |
16 (2) S |
16 (2) S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
128 (>2)S |
256 (>1)S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
CM64 |
- |
128 (>2)S |
256 (>1)S |
4 |
<2 |
<2 |
4 |
<2 (>2)S |
4 (1) I |
32 |
4 (8) S |
8 (4) S |
nt |
nt |
nt |
KP63 |
16 |
<1 (>16)S |
4 (4) S |
32 |
16 (2) S |
32 (1) I |
- |
128 (>2)S |
256 (>1)S |
<4 |
<4 |
<4 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
PA124 | 128 | 64 (2) S | 64 (2) S | 128 | 16 (8) S | 64 (2) S | 64 | 8 (8) S | 32 (2) S | nt | nt | nt | 8 | 2 (4) S | 2 (4) S |
MIC/2.5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 204.8 μg/mL for AG100ATET. KP63; and to 409.6 μg/mL for PA124. CM64. AG102.
MIC/5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 102. 4 μg/mL for AG100ATET. KP63; and to 204.8 μg/mL for PA124. CM64. AG102.
(): Folds decreasing of MIC. S: synergy. I: indifference. nt: not tested; (−): MIC > 256.
Table 5.
Bacterial strains | Antibiotics and MIC in absence and presence ofCinnamomum zeylanicumextract | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ampicillin |
Cefepime |
Chloramphenicol |
Ciprofloxacin |
Cloxacillin |
|||||||||||
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
|
AG100Atet |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
256 |
16 (16) S |
32 (8) S |
256 |
64 (4) S |
128 (2) S |
- |
- |
- |
AG102 |
- |
- |
- |
128 |
256 (0.5) I |
256 (1) I |
16 |
8 (2) S |
16 (1) I |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
256 (>1)S |
- |
CM64 |
- |
256 (>1) S |
- |
- |
256 (>1) S |
- |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
- |
- |
- |
KP63 |
- |
32 (>8) S |
- |
256 |
32 (8) S |
256 (1) I |
- |
32 (>8) S |
256 (>1) S |
64 |
128 (0.5) I |
128(0.5)I |
- |
64 (>4)S |
256 (>1)S |
PA124 |
128 |
16 (8) S |
64 (2) S |
128 |
128 (1) I |
128 (1) I |
32 |
2 (16) S |
8 (4) S |
16 |
8 (2) S |
16 (1) I |
- |
- |
- |
Bacterial strains |
Erythromycin |
Kanamycin |
Norfloxacin |
Streptomycin |
Tetracycline |
||||||||||
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
|
AG100Atet |
64 |
16 (4) S |
32 (2) S |
- |
16 (>16)S |
128 (>2)S |
128 |
128 (1) I |
128 (1) I |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
2 |
2 (1) I |
2 (1) I |
AG102 |
32 |
16 (2) S |
16 (2) S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
256 (>1) S |
256 (>1)S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
CM64 |
- |
128 (>2)S |
256 (>1)S |
4 |
<2 (>2) S |
<2 (>2) S |
4 |
<2 (>2) S |
4 (1) I |
32 |
4 (8) S |
8 (4) S |
nt |
nt |
nt |
KP63 |
16 |
1 (16) S |
4 (4) S |
32 |
32 (1) I |
32 (1) I |
- |
128 (>2)S |
256 (>1)S |
<4 |
<4 |
<4 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
PA124 | 128 | 16 (8) S | 32 (4) S | 128 | 8 (16) S | 32 (4) S | 64 | 32 (2) S | 64 (1) I | nt | nt | nt | 8 | 2 (4) S | 2 (4) S |
MIC/2.5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 204.8 μg/mL for AG100ATET. KP63; and to 409.6 μg/ml for PA124. CM64. AG102.
MIC/5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 102. 4 μg/mL for AG100ATET. KP63; and to 204.8 μg/ml for PA124. CM64. AG102.
(): Folds decreasing of MIC. S: synergy. I: indifference. nt: not tested; (−): MIC > 256 μg/ml.
Table 6.
Bacterial strains | Antibiotics and MIC in absence and presence ofDorstenia psilurusextract | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ampicillin |
Cefepime |
Chloramphenicol |
Ciprofloxacin |
Cloxacillin |
|||||||||||
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
|
AG100Atet |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
256 |
128 (2) S |
256 (1) I |
256 |
64 (4) S |
128 (2) S |
- |
- |
- |
AG102 |
- |
- |
- |
128 |
256 (0.5) I |
256 (0.5) I |
16 |
4 (4) S |
4 (4) S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
- |
- |
CM64 |
- |
256 (>1)S |
- |
- |
64 (>4) S |
64 (>4) S |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
- |
256 (>1) S |
- |
KP63 |
- |
32 (>8) S |
- |
256 |
64 (4) S |
128 (2) S |
- |
64 (>4) S |
256 (>1) S |
64 |
64 (1) I |
64 (1) I |
- |
64 (>4) S |
256 (>1) S |
PA124 |
128 |
64 (2) S |
64 (2) S |
128 |
128 (1) I |
128 (1) I |
32 |
16 (2) S |
32 (1) I |
16 |
16 (1) I |
16 (1) I |
- |
- |
- |
Bacterial strains |
Erythromycin |
Kanamycin |
Norfloxacin |
Streptomycin |
Tetracycline |
||||||||||
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
|
AG100Atet |
64 |
32 (2) S |
32 (2) S |
- |
128 (>2)S |
256 (>1) S |
128 |
128 (1) I |
256 (0.5) I |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
2 |
2 (1) I |
2 (1) I |
AG102 |
32 |
64 (0.5) I |
64 (0.5) I |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
256 (>1)S |
256 (>1)S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
CM64 |
- |
64 (>4) S |
256 (>1)S |
4 |
4 (1) I |
8 (0.5) I |
4 |
<2 (>2)S |
<2 (>2)S |
32 |
8 (4) S |
32 (1) I |
nt |
nt |
nt |
KP63 |
16 |
1 (16) S |
8 (2) S |
32 |
32 (1) I |
64 (0.5) I |
- |
- |
- |
<4 |
<4 |
<4 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
PA124 | 128 | 64 (2) S | 128 (1) I | 128 | 4 (32) S | 16 (8) S | 64 | 32 (2) S | 64 (1) I | nt | nt | nt | 8 | 2 (4) S | 8 (1) I |
MIC/2.5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 204.8 μg/mL for AG100ATET. CM64. KP63. AG102 and to 409.6 μg/ml for PA124.
MIC/5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 102. 4 μg/mL for AG100ATET CM64. KP63. AG102; and to 204.8 μg/ml for PA124.
(): Folds decreasing of MIC. S: synergy. I: indifference. nt: not tested; (−): MIC > 256 μg/ml.
Table 7.
Bacterial strains | Antibiotics and MIC in absence and presenceTetrapleura tetrapteraextract | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ampicillin |
Cefepime |
Chloramphenicol |
Ciprofloxacin |
Cloxacillin |
|||||||||||
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
|
AG100Atet |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
256 |
256 (1) I |
- |
256 |
128 (2) S |
128 (2)S |
- |
- |
- |
AG102 |
- |
- |
- |
128 |
256 (0.5)I |
256 (0.5) I |
16 |
8 (2) S |
8 (2) S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
- |
- |
CM64 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
- |
- |
- |
KP63 |
- |
- |
- |
256 |
256 (1) I |
- |
- |
256 (>1) S |
256 (>1) S |
64 |
64 (1) I |
64 (1) I |
- |
128 (>2) S |
256 (>1) S |
PA124 |
128 |
64 (2)S |
128 (1)I |
128 |
128 (1)I |
128 (1) I |
32 |
4 (8) S |
8 (4) S |
16 |
16 (1) I |
16 (1) I |
- |
- |
- |
Bacterial strains |
Erythromycin |
Kanamycin |
Norfloxacin |
Streptomycin |
Tetracycline |
||||||||||
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
Alone |
MIC/2.5 |
MIC/5 |
|
AG100Atet |
64 |
64 (1) I |
64 (1) I |
- |
256 (>1) S |
256 (>1) S |
128 |
128 (1) I |
256 (0.5) I |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
2 |
2 (1) I |
2 (1) I |
AG102 |
32 |
64 (0.5) I |
64 (0.5) I |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
- |
256 (>1) S |
256 (>1) S |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
CM64 |
- |
256 (>1) S |
- |
4 |
4 (1) I |
8 (0.5) I |
4 |
4 (1) I |
8 (0.5) I |
32 |
16 (2) S |
32 (1) I |
nt |
nt |
nt |
KP63 |
16 |
<1 (>16) S |
8 (2) S |
32 |
32 (1) I |
64 (0.5) I |
- |
256 (>1) S |
- |
<4 |
<4 |
<4 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
PA124 | 128 | 64 (2) S | 64 (2) S | 128 | 64 (2) S | 64 (2) S | 64 | 32 (2) S | 64 (1) I | nt | nt | nt | 8 | 2 (4) S | 2 (4) S |
MIC/2.5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 204.8 μg/mL for CM64 and to 409.6 μg/ml for AG100ATET. PA124. KP63. AG102.
MIC/5: concentration of plant extract added equal to 102. 4 μg/mL for CM64; and to 204.8 μg/ml for AG100ATET.PA124. KP63. AG102.
(): Folds decreasing of MIC. S: synergy. I: indifference. nt: not tested; (−): MIC > 256 μg/ml.
Discussion
Phytochemical composition of the spice extracts
The phytochemical studies revealed the presence of secondary metabolite such as alkaloids, anthocyanins, anthraquinones, flavonoids, phenols, saponins, sterols, tannins and triterpenes; several molecules belonging to these classes of secondary metabolites were found active on pathogenic microorganisms [29].
Antibacterial activity of the spice extract
Although this is the first time that plants used in this work are studied for their activities vis-à-vis multi-resistant bacteria, plants belonging to some of the genus studied herein, like the Aframomum genus are well documented for their antimicrobial activity [6]. Some antibacterial compounds, such as acridone and chelerythrine have previously been isolated from the fruits of F. leprieurii[14,30]. The antimicrobial activity of P. brazzeana and S. zenkeri is mainly due to some sulfur compounds. In fact, sulfur compounds with antimicrobial properties have previously been isolated from the two plants [7,31]. Several alkaloids of the genus Piper proved to be responsible for the activity of P. guineense[32]. The detection of this class of secondary metabolites in the extract studied herein can explain the observed activities. According to Krishnaiah et al. [16], the antimicrobial activity of I. cylindricum can be due to the presence of tannins in this plant. However, tannins were not detected in the extract of I. cylindricum as found in the present work (Table 2), suggesting that other classes of secondary metabolites might be responsible for the antibacterial activity of this plant.
Role of efflux pumps in susceptibility of gram negative bacteria to the tested spice extracts
The significant increase of the activity of the extract of D. psilurus in the presence of EPI, indicates that bioactive constituents of this plant extract are substrate of efflux pumps. Efflux through AcrAB-TolC pumps was reported as essential mode of resistance of several Gram-negative MDR bacteria to a number of flavonoids isolated from plants of the genus Dorstenia, such as isobavachalcone, kanzonol C, stipulin, etc. [4,15,33-35]. This suggests that possible combination of the extract of D. psilurus with EPI can be envisaged to overcome MDR bacteria.
Effects of the association of extracts with antibiotics
The results obtained by combining the antibiotic with the extracts of A. citratum, C. zeylanicum, D. psilurus and T. tetraptera indicate that these extracts contain chemical compounds that can modulate the activity of antibiotics against bacteria expressing MDR phenotypes. The methanol extracts of A. citratum, C. zeylanicum and D. psilurus showed a synergistic effect with antibiotics inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis (AMP and CEF) on K. pneumoniae KP63. The intrinsic mode of action of the active extracts is to be investigated.
Conclusion
The present work evidently provides information in the role of some Cameroonian spices in the fight against multi-resistant bacteria. The study also highlights the potential of D. psilurus as a strong antibacterial agent when the extract is combined with efflux pump inhibitor and several antibiotics.
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Authors’ contributions
IKV carried out the study; VK designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript; VK, GAF, JAKN, JPD, JRK and JMP supervised the work; VK and JMP provided the bacterial strains; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Igor K Voukeng, Email: tefogang@yahoo.fr.
Victor Kuete, Email: kuetevictor@yahoo.fr.
Jean P Dzoyem, Email: jpdzoyem@yahoo.fr.
Aimé G Fankam, Email: agfankam@yahoo.fr.
Jaures A K Noumedem, Email: jauresnoume@yahoo.fr.
Jules R Kuiate, Email: jrkuiate@yahoo.com.
Jean-Marie Pages, Email: jean-marie.pages@univmed.fr.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to the Cameroon National Herbarium (Yaounde) for plants identification, Mr Simplice R. Mouokeu for its technical support, and Mr. Paul K. Lunga for language editing.
References
- Ziegler J. L'Empire de la honte. Ed Fayard, Paris, France; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- OCDE. Partenariat contre les maladies infectieuses. 2009. http://www.observateurocde.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/743/Partenariat_contre_les_maladies_infectieuses.htmlAccessed on 22 February 2010.
- Yala D, Merad AS, Mohamedi D, Ouar Korich MN. Classification et mode d'action des antibiotiques. Médecine du Maghreb. 2001;91:5–12. [Google Scholar]
- Kuete V, Krusche B, Youns M, Voukeng I, Fankam AG, Tankeo S, Lacmata S, Efferth T. Cytotoxicity of some Cameroonian spices and selected medicinal plant extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;134(3):803–812. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fankam AG, Kuete V, Voukeng IK, Kuiate JR, Pages JM. Antibacterial activities of selected Cameroonian spices and their synergistic effects with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant phenotypes. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Titanji VPK, Zofou D, Ngemenya MN. The antimalarial potential of medicinal plants used for the treatment of malaria in Cameroonian folk medicine. Afr J Trad CAM. 2008;5(3):302–321. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngemenya MN, Mbah JA, Tane P, Titanji VPK. Antibacterial effects of some Cameroonian medicinal plants against common pathogenic bacteria. Afr J Trad CAM. 2006;3(2):84–93. [Google Scholar]
- Konning GH, Agyare C, Ennison B. Antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants from Ghana. Fitoterapia. 2004;75(1):65–67. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2003.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okigbo RN, Ogbonnaya UO. Antifungal effects of two tropical plant leaf extracts (Ocimum gratissimum and Aframomum melegueta) on postharvest yam (Dioscorea spp.) rot. Afr J Biotechnol. 2006;5(9):727–731. [Google Scholar]
- Ranasinghe L, Jayawardena B, Abeywickrama K. Fungicidal activity of essential oils of Cinnamomum zeylanicum (L.) and Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merret L. M. Perry against crown rot and anthracnose pathogens isolated from banana. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2002;35(3):208–211. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shahverdi AR, Monsef-Esfahani HR, Tavasoli F, Zaheri A, Mirjani R. Trans-Cinnamaldehyde from Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark essential oil reduces the Clindamycin resistance of Clostridium difficile in vitro. J Food Sci. 2007;72(1):55–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abegaz BM, Ngadjui BT, Dongo E, Bezabiha MT. Chemistry of the Genus Dorstenia. Curr Org Chem. 2000;4(10):1079–1090. doi: 10.2174/1385272003375905. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dimo T, Rakotonirina A, Tan PV, Dongo E, Dongmo AB, Kamtchouing P, Azay J, Abegaz BM, Cros G, Ngadjui TB. Antihypertensive effects of Dorstenia psilurus extract in fructose-fed hyperinsulinemic, hypertensive rats. Phytomedicine. 2001;8(2):101–106. doi: 10.1078/0944-7113-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngono AN, Biyiti L, Amvam Zollo PH, Bouchet P. Evaluation of antifungal activity of extracts of two Cameroonian Rutaceae: Zanthoxylum leprieurii Guill. etPerr., and Zanthoxylum xanthoxyloides Waterm. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;70(3):335–342. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00188-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuete V. Potential of Cameroonian plants and derived products against microbial infections: a review. Planta Med. 2010;76(14):1479–1491. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krishnaiah D, Devi T, Bono A, Sarbatly R. Studies on phytochemical constituents of six Malaysian medicinal plants. J Med Plant Res. 2009;3(2):67–72. [Google Scholar]
- Nishimoto K, Ito M, Natori S, Ohmoto T. The structures of arundoin, cylindrin and fernenoltriterpenoids of fernane and arborane of Imperata cylindrica var. koenigif. Terrahdron. 1968;24:735–752. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(68)88023-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nguefack J, Letha V, Amvam Zollo PH, Mathur SB. Evaluation of five essential oils from aromatic plants of Cameroon for controlling food spoilage and mycotoxin producing fungi. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;94(3):329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burubai W, Akor AJ, Igoni AH, Puyate YT. Some physical properties of African nutmeg (Monodora myristica) Int Agrophysics. 2007;21:123–126. [Google Scholar]
- Noumi E, Dibakto TW. Medicinal plants used for peptic ulcer in the Bangangte region, western Cameroon. Fitoterapia. 2000;71(4):406–412. doi: 10.1016/S0367-326X(00)00144-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oparaeke AM, Bunmi JO. Bioactivity of two powdered spices Piper guineense thonn & schum and Xylopia aethiopica (dunal) a. Richard] as home-made insecticides against Callosobruchus subinnotatus (pic.) on stored bambarra groundnut. Agric Trop Subtrop. 2006;39(2):132–134. [Google Scholar]
- Nwinyi OC, Chinedu NS, Ajani OO, Ikpo CO, Ogunniran KO. Antibacterial effects of extracts of Ocimum gratissimum and Piper guineense on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Afr J Food Sci. 2009;3(3):77–81. [Google Scholar]
- Kouokam JC, Jahns T, Becker H. Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil and Some isolated Sulfur-Rich Compounds from Scorodophloeus zenkeri. Planta Med. 2002;68(12):1082–1087. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harborne JB. Phytochemical Methods. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA; 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Eloff JN. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Med. 1998;64(8):711–713. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mativandlela SPN, Lall N, Meyer JJM. Antibacterial, antifungal and antitubercular activity of (the roots of) Pelargonium reniforme (CURT) and Pelargonium sidoides (DC) (Geraniaceae) root. S Afr J Bot. 2006;72(2):232–237. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2005.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kuete V, Ngameni B, Fotso Simo CC, Kengap Tankeu R, Tchaleu Ngadjui B, Meyer JJM, Lall N, Kuiate JR. Antimicrobial activity of the crude extracts and compounds from Ficus chlamydocarpa and Ficus cordata (Moraceae) J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;120(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coutinho HD, Vasconcellos A, Freire-Pessôa HL, Gadelha CA, Gadelha TS, Almeida-Filho GG. Natural products from the termite Nasutitermes corniger lower aminoglycoside minimum inhibitory concentrations. Pharmacogn Mag. 2010;6(21):1–4. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.59958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(4):564–582. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.4.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adesina SK. The Nigerian Zanthoxylum; chemical and biological values. Afr J Trad CAM. 2005;2(3):282–301. [Google Scholar]
- El Migirab S, Bergbr Y, Jadot J. Isothiocyanates, Thiourees et Thiocarbamates isolés de Pentadiplandra brazzeana. Phytochemistry. 1977;16(11):1719–1721. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(71)85078-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Parmar VS, Jain SC, Bisht KS, Jain R, Taneja P, Jha A, Tyagi OD, Prasad AK, Wengel J, Olsen CE, Bol PM. Phytochemistry of the genus Piper. Phytochemistry. 1997;46(4):591–673. [Google Scholar]
- Omisore NOA, Adewunmi CO, Iwalewa EO, Ngadjui BT, Adenowo TK, Abegaz BM, Ojewole JA, Watchueng J. Antitrichomonal and antioxidant activities of Dorstenia barteri and Dorstenia convexa. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38(7):1087–1094. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000700012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngameni B, Watchueng J, Fekam BF, Keumedjio F, Ngadjui TB, Gut J, Abegaz BM, Rosenthal PJ. Antimalarial prenylated chalcones from the twigs of Dorstenia barteri var. subtriangularis. ARKIVOC. 2007;13:116–123. [Google Scholar]
- Kuete V, Ngameni B, Tangmouo GJ, Bolla JM, Alibert-Franco S, Ngadjui TB, Pagès JM. Efflux Pumps Are Involved in the Defense of Gram-Negative Bacteria against the Natural Products Isobavachalcone and Diospyrone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(5):1749–1752. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01533-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.