Correlation between MTA2 overexpression and tumour progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

The aim of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological outcome and prognostic significance of metastasis-associated gene 2 (MTA2) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Immunohistochemical staining for MTA2 was performed on surgical specimens obtained from 162 patients with ESCC. Relationships between MTA2 expression and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, were analyzed. Significant correlations were noted among MTA2 overexpression and TNM clinical classification staging, depth of invasion, presence of regional lymph node metastasis, presence of distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion, blood-vessel invasion and the 5-year survival rates. The expression of MTA2 protein was correlated with tumour progression. Patients with MTA2 overexpression tended to have poor prognosis compared to patients with MTA2 underexpression.

Introduction

Although effective surgical and radiation treatment exist for clinically localized esophageal cancer, refractory metastatic esophageal cancer remains incurable. Distinct sets of genes and proteins dictate the progression from precursor lesions to localized disease and finally to metastatic disease (1). Identifying and characterizing key genes that regulate the metastatic ability of esophageal cancer may help identify which tumours are on an aggressive path from the outset and may aid in treating them adequately before the development of metastases. Through gene expression profiling studies, metastasis-associated gene 2 (MTA2), a gene involved in the transcriptional silencing machinery of mammalian cells, was recently identified to be significantly overexpressed in metastatic prostate cancer when compared to clinically localized disease (2). MTA2 was identified by differential cDNA library screening of metastatic breast cancer cell lines and confirmed in breast cancer tissue (3). MTA2 overexpression at the transcription level was observed in other cancers, such as gastrointestinal cancers, and was associated with tumour invasiveness and metastasis (4–6). In addition, inhibition of MTA2 protein expression resulted in growth inhibition of cancer cell lines (7). However, the expression of MTA2 in the development and progression of esophageal carcinoma are not clear. In the present study, we characterized for the first time the expression of MTA2 in esophageal cancer progression. All observations suggest that MTA2 is associated with carcinogenesis, progression and metastasis in human tumours.

Based on the above considerations, we performed an immunohistochemical study on MTA2 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, and examined whether any relationships exist among the expression of MTA2, pathological tumour variables and prognosis in patients with ESCC.

Patients and methods

Patient selection

Surgical specimens were obtained from 162 patients (112 males; 50 females) who had ESCC and underwent potentially curative surgery at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Shijiazhuang, China) between 1996 and 2002. The age of the patients ranged from 30 to 89 years, with a mean of 61.9 years. The tumour stage and disease grade were classified according to the 5th edition of the TNM Classification of the International Union Against Cancer (8). The evaluation of tumour differentiation was based on histological criteria by the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases (9). None of the patients had received irradiation or chemotherapy prior to surgery. Patients who underwent non-curative surgery and/or who had received inadequate follow-up were excluded from this study (10). The information was entered into a database following the approval of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical Univercity Institutional Review Board. M1 tumours were attributable to distant lymph node metastases. Post-operative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy were not performed until recurrence of the tumour was confirmed by a radiologic or endoscopic examination. Specimens were fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution and embedded in paraffin. We examined sections that contained both a tumour portion and non-cancerous esophageal epithelium.

Immunohistochemical staining and evaluation

Immunohistochemical staining of the section for MTA2 was performed by streptoavidin-biotin methods. Antigen retrieval was achieved by boiling the specimen in a citrate buffer 0.01 M (pH 7.0) at 120°C for 3 min, continued with a blocking treatment by normal rabbit serum for 30 min. For MTA2, the specimens were incubated with mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody (sc-55566; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at a dilution of 1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4°C overnight. After washing with PBS, specimens were incubated with a secondary antibody for 30 min. Immunohistochemistry was performed using a Histofine SAB-PO (M) kit (Zhongshan, Beijing, China). Human breast tumour expressing MTA2 was used as a positive control. Negative controls were prepared by substituting normal mouse serum for primary antibody; no detectable staining was evident.

The expression of MTA2 in tumour cells was compared to MTA2 expression in non-cancerous epithelium. When the staining in tumour cells (in the cancer cell nests) was stronger than the staining noted in the non-cancerous epithelium, the sample was classified as having MTA2 overexpression; when staining in the tumour cell was as strong as the staining noted in the non-cancerous epithelium it was considered to have weak expression, or when there was no staining at all, the sample was classified as exhibiting MTA2 under-expression. The sections were evaluated independently by three investigators (Y.P. L., G.X. W. and X.L. W.) without knowledge of the clinical and pathological background of the patients. When the interpretation differed among observers, re-evaluation was carried out for a final decision on a conference microscope.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired two-group t-test for age. A Chi-square test was used for gender, differentiation, TNM clinical classification, stage and location. In this study, the correlation among MTA2, lymphatic invasion, infiltrative growth pattern and blood-vessel invasion to the tumour tissues was also assessed. The survival curves of the patients were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.

Results

Immunohistochemistry of MTA2 expression

Immunostaining of MTA2 in non-cancerous tissue was detected in the nucleus of the parabasal layer (Fig. 1A). In tumour tissue, MTA2 expression was observed in the nucleus, particularly in cells located in the central layer of the cancer cell nests (Fig. 1B). MTA2 overexpression was detected in 65 of the 162 patients (40.1%). Ninety-seven cases (59.9%) were classified as having MTA2 underexpression (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.

Representative photomicrographs of tissue sections immunostained for MTA2. (A) MTA2 protein was detected in the nucleus in normal esophageal squamous epithelium in the basal layer (magnification, x200). (B) Primary esophageal cancer with MTA2 underexpression in a cancer cell nest (magnification, x400). (C) Primary esophageal cancer with MTA2 overexpression in a cancer cell nest (magnification, x400).

Relationship between MTA2 expression and clinicopathological outcome

The relationship between MTA2 and clinicopathological outcome in ESCC is summarized in Table I. There were significant correlations between the overexpression of MTA2 and the TNM clinical classification (depth of invasion, P=0.018; presence of regional lymph node metastasis, P=0.009; presence of distant metastasis, P=0.003; staging, P=0.006), differentiation (P=0.05), lymphatic invasion (P=0.002) and blood-vessel invasion (P=0.004). However, there was no correlation with patient age, gender and location of the tumours.

Table I.

Clinicopathological findings and MTA2 expression.

Parameters	Total (n=162)	MTA2 underexpression (n=97)	MTA2 overexpression (n=65)	P-value
Age (years; mean ± SD)	60.9±6.4	62.1±6.7	59.7±6.1	0.860
Gender				0.320
Male	112	65	47
Female	50	32	18
Differentiation				0.050
Well	26	19	7
Moderate	86	51	35
Poor	50	27	23
TNM
T				0.018
T1	57	41	16
T2	31	17	14
T3	65	35	30
T4	9	4	5
N				0.009
N0	73	53	20
N1	89	44	45
M				0.003
M0	133	88	45
M1	29	9	20
Stage				0.006
I	48	35	13
II	52	32	20
III	36	23	13
IV	26	7	19
Location				0.500
Upper	22	14	8
Middle	100	60	40
Lower	40	23	17
Lymphatic invasion				0.002
Negative	52	41	11
Positive	110	56	54
Blood vessel invasion				0.004
Negative	78	57	21
Positive	84	40	44

Prognostic significance of MTA2 expression

The 5-year survival rates of the ESCC patients with MTA2 overexpression were significantly lower than those with MTA2 underexpression (P=0.002; Fig. 2). The 5-year survival rates of the patients with overexpression and underexpression of MTA2 were 18.4 and 46.0%, respectively. To further investigate the influence of MTA2 expression within homogeneous stage groups, adding more prognostic sense, we analysed the seperate Kaplan-Meier diagrams for T1, T2, T3, T4 and N0/N1 tumours with MTA2 expression; it was also shown that the 5-year survival rates of ESCC patients with MTA2 over-expression were poorer in every group (P=0.036, 0.012, 0.014, 0.038 and 0.000, 0.002, respectively; Figs. 3 and 4).

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating overall survival for patients according to MTA2 expression.

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating overall survival of patients by MTA2 expression according to stage. (A) T1, (B) T2, (C) T3 and (D) T4.

Figure 4.

Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating overall survival of patients by MTA2 expression according to N group. (A) N0 and (B) N1.

Discussion

MTA2 expression and prognosis in cancer in comparison with previous studies

In this study, we showed that MTA2 overexpression frequently occurred in ESCC and was correlated with several aspects of tumour progression summarized in the TNM classification. Recently, the expression of MTA2 in various types of malignant tumours has been reported. However, only a few reports, including our previous article, showed the prognostic relevance of MTA2 expression in ESCC. Zhang et al (11) reported that MTA2 was expressed in 10% of epithelial cells with a weak immunoreactivity in the nuclear compartment. A marked increase in the nuclear MTA signal was observed in late stage carcinoma. In their study, MTA immunoreactivity was associated with high tumour grade. We previously showed the prognostic relevance of MTA2 expression in a large series of gastric carcinoma and its significant relation to clinicopathological findings. These results indicate that MTA2 overexpression may be an outcome of some important genetic and/or epigenetic change in cancer progression; however, it remains unknown whether in these carcinomas MTA2 expression merely represents a surrogate marker for prognosis or whether it plays a pathogenic role in carcinogenesis and tumour progression.

In non-cancerous epithelial esophageal squamous cells, only slight MTA2 expression was observed in the parabasal layers. MTA2 overexpression was detected in the nucelus of cancer cells, especially in the central layers of the cancer cell nests. These immunohistochemical results suggest that the overexpression of MTA2 protein is correlated with TNM clinical classifications (depth of invasion, presence of regional lymph node metastasis, presence of distant metastasis and staging), lymphatic invasion and blood-vessel invasion. There was a statistically significant correlation between MTA2 over-expression and patient survival.

The prognosis of patients with overexpression of MTA2 was poorer than that of patients with MTA2 underexpression. Cancer invasion and metastasis are complex processes that include alterations in cell adhesion, allowing transformed cells to invade and migrate (12–14). MTA proteins are physiologically expressed at only low levels in human tissue, except the testis (10). Its expression has been found to be associated with progression in solid cancers of various organs and cancer cell lines with high invasive potential (15) and thus overexpression of MTA protein has been reported to be correlated with tumour invasiveness and lymph node metastasis in ESCC. Further study is required to elucidate the relationship between MTA2 and prognosis in ESCC.

In this study, patients with MTA2 overexpression were found to have a poorer prognosis for a 5-year survival. However, by multivariate analysis, MTA2 overexpression did not appear to be an independent prognostic factor. It may be influenced by the depth of tumour invasion and distant metastasis. In esophageal carcinoma, the presence of lymph node metastasis and the number of lymph node metastases were associated with the worst prognosis. As MTA2 overexpression was related to lymph node metastases, patients with MTA2 overexpression had a poor prognosis.

In conclusion, according to our data, MTA2 is usually overexpressed in ESCC cells compared to non-cancerous esophageal epithelia, and increased expression of MTA2 was associated with a poor prognosis. Thus, our findings suggest that MTA2 overexpression may play an important role in the progression of ESCC. Tumour-specific MTA2 down-regulation may become a novel therapeutic strategy for ESCC patients.