Abstract
The human cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily includes at least 57 genes that encode enzymes with diverse metabolic and biosynthetic functions. This study was conducted in order to investigate the associations between polymorphisms in CYP superfamily genes (CYP11B2, CYP17A1, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1 and CYP7A1) and ischemic stroke (IS). Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP superfamily genes were selected and genotyped by direct sequencing in 121 patients with IS and 321 control subjects. The genetic data were analyzed using SNPStats and SPSS 18.0. Multiple logistic regression models (codominant 1, codominant 2, dominant, recessive and log-additive) were used to evaluate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. The rs179998 SNP of CYP11B2 was significantly associated with IS (p=0.0336 in a log-additive model). The rs3813867 SNP of CYP2E1 was significantly associated with smoking in IS (p=0.0336 in a log-additive model). The rs1799998 SNP of CYP11B2 and rs3808607 of CYP7A1 were related to diabetes mellitus in IS (p<0.05). CYP11B2, CYP2E1 and CYP7A1 SNPs were associated with IS in the population studied. Further study is required to confirm these associations and to determine their biological significance.
Keywords: association study, cytochrome P450 gene, ischemic stroke, polymorphism
Introduction
Stroke is the third leading cause of mortality and disability in Western countries and a major health problem worldwide. Almost 800,000 strokes occur annually in the United States, 80% of which are ischemic (1). Ischemic stroke (IS) results from the abrupt interruption of focal cerebral blood flow (2). The causes of IS include an embolic or thrombotic occlusion or a decrease in cerebral blood flow resulting from the abrupt occlusion of arteries and arterioles, poor blood circulation, arteritis, venous occlusion, anemia or hyperviscosity (2–5). Potent independent risk factors for IS include abdominal obesity and body mass index (BMI) (6,7). Insulin resistance, as indicated by elevated waist-to-hip ratios and insulin levels, may also contribute to IS risk (8). A decrease in blood pressure during the acute phase of IS is associated with brain injury and poor stroke outcome (9). A low level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a risk factor for mortality from coronary artery disease and stroke in advanced age (10). Spousal smoking may also be a significant risk factor for IS (11).
The human cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily comprises 57 genes and these code for enzymes with diverse metabolic and biosynthetic activities. Mutations in CYP genes may cause inborn errors of metabolism and contribute to clinically defined conditions (12). The CYP11B2 genotype significantly affects the risk of hypertension in association with alcohol consumption (13), and also interacts with BMI and waist circumference in the Chinese Mongolian population (14). Variants of CYP17A1 contribute to variations in blood pressure and hypertension risk (15), and the CYP17A1-CNNM2-NT5C2 region is associated with hypertension (16). Genetic variants of CYP2B6 may be related to the pathogenesis of leukemia (17) and to the metabolism of nicotine and cotinine (18). Polymorphisms of CYP2C9 can effect the risk of bleeding complications (19) and the response to the antihypertensive effects of losartan (20). Polymorphisms of CYP2E1, together with cumulative smoking and alcohol consumption, and polymorphisms of NQO1 and ALDH2 have been synergistically associated with lung cancer in Koreans (21). Polymorphisms of CYP7A1 have been associated with baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and HDL cholesterol levels and risk of coronary artery disease (22).
Recent studies have shown the relationships between genetic polymorphisms and IS. The P213S polymorphism in L-selectin and levels of the gene product sL-selectin have been associated with IS in a Chinese population (23), polymorphisms in AdipoQ in a Korean population (24), and variants of the adiponectin gene in a Han population (25). Increased PAI-1 levels in plasma (26), as well as the ACE (DD) genotype and D allele, significantly increase susceptibility to IS (27). A significantly increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events has been associated with polymorphisms of CYP2C19 (28), and the V433M variant of CYP4F2 has been associated with IS in Swedish males, beyond its effect on blood pressure (29).
In this study, we focused on the associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the CYP superfamily genes, CYP11B2, CYP17A1, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1 and CYP7A1, with IS, and with smoking and diabetes mellitus (known risk factors for stroke) in IS. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between CYP polymorphisms and IS.
Materials and methods
Subjects and clinical phenotypes
Patients with IS who visited the Stroke Center of the East-West Neo-Medical Center between October 2007 and December 2010 were enrolled in this study. A total of 121 IS patients (64 male/56 female) were recruited. Patients with trauma, vascular malformations, brain tumors and congenital brain disorders were excluded. Each patient was diagnosed using cranial computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), angiography or duplex sonography. Stroke patients were classified by two physicians with specialized knowledge of stroke into clinical phenotypes based on the results of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Survey (NIHSS), the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the presence or absence of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Neurological deficit on admission was measured using the NIHSS. The outcome at hospital discharge was assessed using the MBI. The control subjects (n=321, 176 male/145 female) were selected from participants in a general health check-up program. Participants with transient ischemic attack, ischemic heart diseases and any other severe diseases were excluded. The Ethics Review Committee of the Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University (Korea) approved the protocol for this study and all subjects gave written informed consent.
SNP selection and genotyping
We searched the SNP database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP, build 131) for promoter SNPs in the CYP superfamily genes. SNPs with unknown heterozygosity, minor allele frequency (MAF) below 10% and monomorphic genotypes in Asians were excluded. We selected the following six promoter-region SNPs: CYP11B2, rs1799998, −344; CYP17A1, rs2486758, −190; CYP2B6, rs4802100, −1180; CYP2C9, rs4918758, −1163; CYP2E1, rs3813867, −1272; CYP7A1, rs3808607, −278. Genomic DNA was extracted from the whole blood of each subject using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Blood samples collected from each subject were stored at −20°C. Genotypes were determined by direct sequencing. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed with the following primers (Table I). The PCR products were sequenced using the ABI PRISM 3730XL analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and sequence data were analyzed using SeqManII software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA).
Table I.
Gene | rs number | Forward (′5-′3) | Reverse (′5-′3) | Size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CYP11B2 | rs1799998 | GACTCCAGGACCCTGGTTGATA | CAGCCAAAGGTAGATGAAGGAG | 390 |
CYP17A1 | rs2486758 | GGACAGTCACACCACTGCACAC | TGTGTTATCTCTTGCCTTGTGG | 393 |
CYP2B6 | rs4802100 | TAGTCAGAGGCAGGGAAGAAAC | AATTTGGCCTACTGCCTTTGTA | 375 |
CYP2C9 | rs4918758 | CCAGTAAAGCTTTGTGCAACTG | TGAGAAACTAGGGCTTCTCGAC | 418 |
CYP2E1 | rs3813867 | CACTGGAAAGGAAAGAGAGGAG | ACAATCCAGCCAAATCACTTGT | 328 |
CYP7A1 | rs3808607 | CTCTCTGGCAAAGCACCTAAAT | AAGGATGCCACTGAAAAGAGAC | 440 |
SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Statistical analysis
SNPStats (http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/index.php?module=Snpstats) and SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used to analyze the genetic data. Hardy-Weinberg equilibria (HWE) were calculated using the Chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression analyses (codominant 1, codominant 2, dominant, recessive and log-additive) were performed to determine odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was performed by multiplying the p-value by the number of SNPs analyzed (n=6). The significance level was set at p<0.05.
Results
The clinical characteristics of IS patients and control subjects are shown in Table II. The mean ages of patients with IS and control subjects were 64.6±13.1 [mean ± standard deviation, (SD)] and 59.1±11.9 years, respectively. Patients were divided into subgroups according to NIHSS scores for neurological deficit on admission (<6 and >6), MBI scores for outcome at discharge (<60 and >60), CRPS (present and absent), smoking, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia (30).
Table II.
IS | Control | |
---|---|---|
Male/female (n) | 64/56 | 176/145 |
Age (mean ± SD) | 64.6±13.1 | 59.1±11.9 |
NIHSS (score) | ||
<6 | 58 | |
≥6 | 61 | |
MBI (score) | ||
<60 | 94 | |
≥60 | 25 | |
CRPS | ||
− | 96 | |
+ | 23 | |
Smoking | ||
− | 90 | |
+ | 29 | |
Hypertension | ||
− | 39 | |
+ | 80 | |
Diabetes | ||
− | 74 | |
+ | 45 | |
Dyslipidemia | ||
− | 86 | |
+ | 33 |
IS, ischemic stroke; SD, standard deviation; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Survey; MBI, Modified Barthel Index; CRPS, complex regional pain syndrome.
The genotype frequencies of the six selected SNPs are shown in Table III. An association was found between rs1799998, a SNP of CYP11B2, and IS. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for the promoter SNP (rs1799998, −344, T/C) [codominant 1, T/T (reference) vs. T/C; codominant 2, T/T vs. C/C; dominant, T/T vs. T/C+C/C; recessive, T/T+T/C vs. C/C; and log-additive, T/T vs. T/C vs. C/C]. The parameters for the association of SNP rs1799998 with IS are shown in Table III [(p=0.018; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11–0.81 in the codominant 2 model), (p=0.0220; OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39–0.93 in the dominant model), (p=0.023; OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13–0.95 in the recessive model) and (p=0.0056; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.87 in the log-additive model)]. In allele distribution analysis, the frequency of the rs1799998 C allele was lower in the IS group than in the control group (C allele frequency, 32.0 vs. 23.5%, p=0.015; OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.92; data not shown). Following Bonferroni correction, the association was also significant (p=0.0336; Table III).
Table III.
Gene
|
Genotype | Control
|
IS
|
Model | OR (95% CI) | p-value | pc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | n | % | n | % | |||||
CYP11B2 | T/T | 146 | 45.6 | 68 | 57.1 | Codominant 1 | 0.67 (0.43–1.06) | 0.10 | 0.60 |
rs1799998 | T/C | 143 | 44.7 | 46 | 38.7 | Codominant 2 | 0.29 (0.11–0.81) | 0.0180 | 0.11 |
−344 | C/C | 31 | 9.7 | 5 | 4.2 | Dominant | 0.60 (0.39–0.93) | 0.0220 | 0.13 |
Recessive | 0.35 (0.13–0.95) | 0.0230 | 0.14 | ||||||
Log-additive | 0.61 (0.43–0.87) | 0.0056 | 0.0336 | ||||||
CYP17A1 | T/T | 185 | 57.8 | 66 | 55.5 | Codominant 1 | 1.01 (0.64–1.59) | 0.68 | 1.00 |
rs2486758 | T/C | 115 | 35.9 | 45 | 37.8 | Codominant 2 | 1.08 (0.45–2.63) | 0.80 | 1.00 |
−190 | C/C | 20 | 6.2 | 8 | 6.7 | Dominant | 1.02 (0.66–1.58) | 0.94 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 1.08 (0.45–2.57) | 0.86 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.02 (0.72–1.45) | 0.89 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP2B6 | C/C | 192 | 60.0 | 75 | 63.0 | Codominant 1 | 0.98 (0.62–1.55) | 0.70 | 1.00 |
rs4802100 | G/C | 112 | 35.0 | 40 | 33.6 | Codominant 2 | 0.66 (0.21–2.10) | 0.44 | 1.00 |
−1180 | G/G | 16 | 5.0 | 4 | 3.4 | Dominant | 0.94 (0.60–1.46) | 0.78 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 0.66 (0.21–2.10) | 0.47 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 0.91 (0.62–1.33) | 0.62 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP2C9 | T/T | 109 | 34.1 | 46 | 38.7 | Codominant 1 | 0.84 (0.52–1.35) | 0.55 | 1.00 |
rs4918758 | T/C | 153 | 47.8 | 56 | 47.1 | Codominant 2 | 0.65 (0.34–1.24) | 0.27 | 1.00 |
−1163 | C/C | 58 | 18.1 | 17 | 14.3 | Dominant | 0.79 (0.50–1.23) | 0.29 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 0.71 (0.39–1.30) | 0.26 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 0.81 (0.60–1.11) | 0.19 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP2E1 | G/G | 217 | 67.8 | 75 | 63.0 | Codominant 1 | 1.13 (0.70–1.81) | 0.58 | 1.00 |
rs3813867 | G/C | 94 | 29.4 | 37 | 31.1 | Codominant 2 | 2.66 (0.92–7.63) | 0.12 | 0.72 |
−1272 | C/C | 9 | 2.8 | 7 | 5.9 | Dominant | 1.25 (0.79–1.96) | 0.34 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 2.56 (0.90–7.26) | 0.09 | 0.52 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.32 (0.90–1.93) | 0.16 | 0.96 | ||||||
CYP7A1 | T/T | 84 | 26.2 | 38 | 31.9 | Codominant 1 | 0.75 (0.45–1.24) | 0.23 | 1.00 |
rs3808607 | T/G | 164 | 51.2 | 55 | 46.2 | Codominant 2 | 0.88 (0.48–1.61) | 0.45 | 1.00 |
−278 | G/G | 72 | 22.5 | 26 | 21.9 | Dominant | 0.79 (0.49–1.26) | 0.32 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 1.05 (0.62–1.77) | 0.85 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 0.92 (0.68–1.25) | 0.59 | 1.00 |
IS, ischemic stroke; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; pc, For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was performed by multiplying the p-value by the number of SNPs analyzed (n=6). The p-values were calculated from logistic regression analysis. Bold numbers indicate significant associations.
We analyzed the genetic data in order to evaluate the interactions of traditional IS risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia) with the association between IS and polymorphisms of the CYP superfamily genes (CYP11B2, CYP17A1, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1 and CYP7A1). When we assessed the genetic relationships between CYP promoter SNPs and IS risk by smoking status, CYP11B2 (rs1799998) and CYP2E1 (rs3813867) differed between smoking (−) and smoking (+) [(rs1799998: p=0.022; OR, 14.00; 95% CI, 1.03–190.90 in the recessive model), (rs3813867: p=0.019; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09–0.87 in the dominant model) and (p=0.0056; OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11–0.79 in the log-additive model) Table IV]. Following Bonferroni correction, the association of rs3813867 of CYP2E1 was significant (p= 0.0336; Table IV). In allele distribution analysis, the frequency of the rs3813867 C allele of CYP2E1 was lower in the smoking (−) than in the smoking (+) group (C allele frequency, 25.6 vs. 8.6%; p=0.010; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10–0.73; data not shown). The SNPs rs1799998 of CYP11B2 and rs3808607 of CYP7A1 were associated with diabetes mellitus in IS [rs1799998: (p=0.002; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.59–8.41 in the codominant 1 model), (p=0.0011; OR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.66–8.56 in the dominant model) and (p=0.0014; OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.51–6.38 in the log-additive model)] and [rs3808607: (p=0.047; OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17–0.99 in the codominant 1 model), (p=0.013; OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07–0.73 in the codominant 2 model), (p=0.011; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15–0.79 in the dominant model) and (p=0.0067; OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26–0.83 in the log-additive model)]. Following Bonferroni correction, the associations of the rs1799998 SNP of CYP11B2 and rs3813867 of CYP2E1 were significant (p<0.05; Table V). In allele distribution analysis, the C allele of rs1799998 of CYP11B2 and the G allele of rs3808607 of CYP7A1 were also associated with diabetes mellitus [(rs1799998 of CYP11B2: p=0.002; OR, 2.59, 95% CI, 1.40–4.77), (rs3808607 of CYP7A1: p=0.012; OR, 0.50, 95% CI, 0.29–0.86)].
Table IV.
Gene
|
Genotype | Smoking (−)
|
Smoking (+)
|
Model | OR (95% CI) | p-value | pc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | n | % | n | % | |||||
CYP11B2 | T/T | 51 | 56.7 | 17 | 58.6 | Codominant 1 | 0.55 (0.19–1.56) | 0.34 | 1.00 |
rs1799998 | T/C | 38 | 42.2 | 8 | 27.6 | Codominant 2 | 10.51 (0.73–150.38) | 0.26 | 1.00 |
−344 | C/C | 1 | 1.1 | 4 | 13.8 | Dominant | 0.76 (0.29–2.01) | 0.57 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 14.00 (1.03–190.90) | 0.0220 | 0.13 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.19 (0.53–2.65) | 0.67 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP17A1 | T/T | 50 | 55.6 | 16 | 55.2 | Codominant 1 | 1.02 (0.38–2.71) | 0.98 | 1.00 |
rs2486758 | T/C | 34 | 37.8 | 11 | 37.9 | Codominant 2 | 0.63 (0.11–3.83) | 0.96 | 1.00 |
−190 | C/C | 6 | 6.7 | 2 | 6.9 | Dominant | 0.94 (0.37–2.37) | 0.89 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 0.63 (0.11–3.63) | 0.60 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 0.89 (0.43–1.82) | 0.74 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP2B6 | C/C | 54 | 60.0 | 21 | 72.4 | Codominant 1 | 0.53 (0.19–1.48) | 0.35 | 1.00 |
rs4802100 | G/C | 32 | 35.6 | 8 | 27.6 | Codominant 2 | 0.00 (0.00-NA) | ||
−1180 | G/G | 4 | 4.4 | 0 | 0.0 | Dominant | 0.47 (0.17–1.29) | 0.13 | 0.78 |
Recessive | 0.00 (0.00-NA) | ||||||||
Log-additive | 0.45 (0.18–1.15) | 0.08 | 0.49 | ||||||
CYP2C9 | T/T | 34 | 37.8 | 12 | 41.4 | Codominant 1 | 1.19 (0.44–3.26) | 0.74 | 1.00 |
rs4918758 | T/C | 43 | 47.8 | 13 | 44.8 | Codominant 2 | 1.21 (0.29–5.16) | 0.84 | 1.00 |
−1163 | C/C | 13 | 14.4 | 4 | 13.8 | Dominant | 1.20 (0.46–3.08) | 0.71 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 1.11 (0.29–4.27) | 0.88 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.12 (0.57–2.20) | 0.73 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP2E1 | G/G | 51 | 56.7 | 24 | 82.8 | Codominant 1 | 0.42 (0.13–1.35) | 0.15 | 0.90 |
rs3813867 | G/C | 32 | 35.6 | 5 | 17.2 | Codominant 2 | 0.00 (0.00-NA) | ||
−1272 | C/C | 7 | 7.8 | 0 | 0.0 | Dominant | 0.28 (0.09–0.87) | 0.0190 | 0.11 |
Recessive | 0.00 (0.00-NA) | ||||||||
Log-additive | 0.30 (0.11–0.79) | 0.0056 | 0.0336 | ||||||
CYP7A1 | T/T | 29 | 32.2 | 9 | 31.0 | Codominant 1 | 1.50 (0.51–4.41) | 0.10 | 0.60 |
rs3808607 | T/G | 42 | 46.7 | 13 | 44.8 | Codominant 2 | 1.78 (0.49–6.46) | 0.77 | 1.00 |
−278 | G/G | 19 | 21.1 | 7 | 24.1 | Dominant | 1.59 (0.58–4.33) | 0.36 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 1.41 (0.46–4.31) | 0.55 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.35 (0.71–2.54) | 0.36 | 1.00 |
IS, ischemic stroke; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; pc, For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was performed by multiplying the p-value by the number of SNPs analyzed (n=6). The p-values were calculated from logistic regression analysis. Bold numbers indicate significant associations.
Table V.
Gene
|
Genotype | DM (−)
|
DM (+)
|
Model | OR (95% CI) | p-value | pc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | n | % | n | % | |||||
CYP11B2 | T/T | 51 | 68.9 | 17 | 37.8 | Codominant 1 | 3.65 (1.59–8.41) | 0.0020 | 0.0120 |
rs1799998 | T/C | 21 | 28.4 | 25 | 55.6 | Codominant 2 | 5.49 (0.77–39.41) | 0.12 | 0.7200 |
−344 | C/C | 2 | 2.7 | 3 | 6.7 | Dominant | 3.77 (1.66–8.56) | 0.0011 | 0.0066 |
Recessive | 2.74 (0.41–18.35) | 0.29 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 3.10 (1.51–6.38) | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | ||||||
CYP17A1 | T/T | 46 | 62.2 | 20 | 44.4 | Codominant 1 | 2.09 (0.93–4.69) | 0.08 | 0.48 |
rs2486758 | T/C | 24 | 32.4 | 21 | 46.7 | Codominant 2 | 2.83 (0.61–13.02) | 0.27 | 1.00 |
−190 | C/C | 4 | 5.4 | 4 | 8.9 | Dominant | 2.18 (1.01–4.74) | 0.05 | 0.28 |
Recessive | 2.05 (0.47–9.00) | 0.34 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.86 (1.00–3.45) | 0.05 | 0.28 | ||||||
CYP2B6 | C/C | 46 | 62.2 | 29 | 64.4 | Codominant 1 | 0.99 (0.44–2.22) | 0.90 | 1.00 |
rs4802100 | G/C | 25 | 33.8 | 15 | 33.3 | Codominant 2 | 0.57 (0.05–6.06) | 0.59 | 1.00 |
−1180 | G/G | 3 | 4.0 | 1 | 2.2 | Dominant | 0.95 (0.43–2.08) | 0.89 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 0.57 (0.05–5.98) | 0.63 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 0.91 (0.46–1.81) | 0.79 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP2C9 | T/T | 31 | 41.9 | 15 | 33.3 | Codominant 1 | 1.23 (0.53–2.86) | 0.38 | 1.00 |
rs4918758 | T/C | 33 | 44.6 | 23 | 51.1 | Codominant 2 | 1.30 (0.40–4.19) | 0.53 | 1.00 |
−1163 | C/C | 10 | 13.5 | 7 | 15.6 | Dominant | 1.25 (0.56–2.77) | 0.58 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 1.15 (0.40–3.36) | 0.79 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.16 (0.66–2.02) | 0.60 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP2E1 | G/G | 48 | 64.9 | 27 | 60.0 | Codominant 1 | 1.14 (0.49–2.63) | 0.46 | 1.00 |
rs3813867 | G/C | 21 | 28.4 | 16 | 35.6 | Codominant 2 | 0.97 (0.17–5.51) | 0.70 | 1.00 |
−1272 | C/C | 5 | 6.8 | 2 | 4.4 | Dominant | 1.11 (0.51–2.44) | 0.79 | 1.00 |
Recessive | 0.93 (0.17–5.26) | 0.94 | 1.00 | ||||||
Log-additive | 1.06 (0.56–2.00) | 0.86 | 1.00 | ||||||
CYP7A1 | T/T | 18 | 24.3 | 20 | 44.4 | Codominant 1 | 0.41 (0.17–0.99) | 0.0470 | 0.48 |
rs3808607 | T/G | 36 | 48.6 | 19 | 42.2 | Codominant 2 | 0.23 (0.07–0.73) | 0.0130 | 0.13 |
−278 | G/G | 20 | 27.0 | 6 | 13.3 | Dominant | 0.34 (0.15–0.79) | 0.0110 | 0.07 |
Recessive | 0.39 (0.14–1.10) | 0.06 | 0.37 | ||||||
Log-additive | 0.47 (0.26–0.83) | 0.0067 | 0.0402 |
IS, ischemic stroke; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; DM, diabetes mellitus; pc, For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was performed by multiplying the p-value by the number of SNPs analyzed (n=6). The p-values were calculated from logistic regression analysis. Bold numbers indicate significant associations.
We used the online program AliBaba2.1 (www.gene-regulation.com/pub/programs/alibaba2) to evaluate whether the promoter SNPs affect transcription factor binding at the promoter site. The results are shown in Table VI.
Table VI.
Gene
|
Allele | Transcription factor |
---|---|---|
SNP | ||
CYP11B2 | T | NF-1 |
rs1799998 | C | disappeared |
−344 | ||
CYP17A1 | T | C/EBPα, Oct-1, C/EBPa1p |
rs2486758 | C | C/EBPa1p |
−190 | ||
CYP2B6 | C | C/EBPa1p |
rs4802100 | G | disappeared |
−1180 | ||
CYP2C9 | T | Oct-1, HNF-3 |
rs4918758 | C | C/EBPa1p |
−1163 | ||
CYP2E1 | G | Sp1 |
rs3813867 | C | disappeared |
−1272 | ||
CYP7A1 | T | disappeared |
rs3808607 | G | AP-1, C/EBPa1p |
−2789 |
SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Discussion
The results of this study reveal that promoter SNPs of CYP superfamily genes are associated with IS, and suggest that these polymorphisms may effect the risk of IS in Koreans. Recently, genetic studies of SNPs from CYP11B2, CYP17A1, CYP2E1 and CYP7A1 in several diseases have been reported. Tu et al reported that the promoter SNP of CYP11B2 (rs1799998, T/C, −344) is associated with IS in both a dominant and a recessive effect in meta-analyses, with a moderate overall effect in the Han Chinese population (31). They suggest that the rs1799998 variant in CYP11B2 affects susceptibility to stroke. In an Indian population, significant associations were found between the rs1799998 SNP of CYP11B2 and the risk of hypertension and IS (32).
The present study reveals an association between the rs1799998, −344T/C SNP of CYP11B2 and IS, which suggests that this SNP may effect susceptibility to IS. The C/C genotype and C allele distributions of rs1799998 in IS (C/C genotype, 4.2%; C allele, 23.5%) were approximately 2.3- and 1.4-fold lower than those in the controls (C/C genotype, 9.7%; C allele, 32.0%), respectively. These results may indicate that the C allele of rs1799998 has a protective effect on IS risk.
In a Japanese population, the −344T/C polymorphism in CYP11B2 was identified as an independent genetic factor associated with hypertension or atherosclerotic disease (33). However, we did not find such an association with hypertension in the present study. Instead, we identified associations with smoking and diabetes mellitus in IS. An association between −344T/C of the CYP11B2 gene and smoking was identified, but it was not significant. The −1272G/C SNP of CYP2E1 was significantly associated with smoking and IS in the present study. CYP2E1 metabolizes endogenous substrates, including ethanol, acetone and acetal, and exogenous substrates, including benzene, carbon tetrachloride, ethylene glycol and nitrosamines, which are premutagens found in cigarette smoke. Through its numerous substrates, CYP2E1 may be involved in such diverse processes, such as gluconeogenesis, hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes and cancer [Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), 124040]. Howard et al suggested that CYP2E1 induction in the brain, by ethanol or nicotine, may influence the central effects of ethanol and the development of nervous tissue pathologies observed in alcoholics and smokers (34). The −344T/C of CYP11B2 and −278T/G of CYP7A1 were associated with diabetes mellitus in IS. Bellili et al found associations of the −344T/C and the 3097 G>A polymorphisms of CYP11B2 with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in a French population (35). Russo et al reported that the C allele of the −344T/C variant of CYP11B2 increases susceptibility to metabolic syndrome in European males, but not in females (36). Aldosterone is one of the main effectors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, regulating blood pressure. Previous studies have shown that the aldosterone synthase promoter polymorphism, −344T/C, affects aldosterone levels and is associated with hypertension, a risk factor for the initiation and progression of diabetic nephropathy. The −344T/C of CYP11B2 may also effect glucose homeostasis and body mass in humans (36,37). CYP7A1 is a rate-limiting enzyme for cholesterol catabolism and bile acid synthesis, and may thereby effect cholesterol homeostasis. The −278T/G of CYP7A1 is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, LDL cholesterol level and gallstone disease.
In conclusion, this study, carried out in a Korean population, reveals that variations in the CYP11B2, CYP2E1 and CYP7A1 genes are associated with IS and may represent genetic risk factors in IS. Larger studies are required to confirm these associations and to evaluate their causal roles in IS.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the Oriental Medicine R&D Project, Ministry for Health and Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (B090027).
References
- 1.Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics - 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:948–954. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zivin JA. Factors determining the therapeutic window for stroke. Neurology. 1998;50:599–603. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.3.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sorensen AG, Copen WA, Ostergaard L, et al. Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow, and mean tissue transit time. Radiology. 1999;210:519–527. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99fe06519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gonner F, Remonda L, Mattle H, et al. Local intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:1894–1900. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.9.1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Richardson SG, Matthews KB, Stuart J, Geddes AM, Wilcox RM. Serial changes in coagulation and viscosity during sickle-cell crisis. Br J Haematol. 1979;41:95–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1979.tb03685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Suk SH, Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, et al. Abdominal obesity and risk of ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 2003;34:1586–1592. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000075294.98582.2F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Winter Y, Rohrmann S, Linseisen J, et al. Contribution of obesity and abdominal fat mass to risk of stroke and transient ischemic attacks. Stroke. 2008;39:3145–3151. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Folsom AR, Rasmussen ML, Chambless LE, et al. Prospective associations of fasting insulin, body fat distribution, and diabetes with risk of ischemic stroke. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1077–1083. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.7.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castillo J, Leira R, Garcia MM, et al. Blood pressure decrease during the acute phase of ischemic stroke is associated with brain injury and poor stroke outcome. Stroke. 2004;35:520–526. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000109769.22917.B0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weverling-Rijnsburger AW, Jonkers IJ, van Exel E, Gussekloo J, Westendorp RG. High-density vs low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as the risk factor for coronary artery disease and stroke in old age. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1549–1554. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.13.1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.You RX, Thrift AG, McNeil JJ, Davis SM, Donnan GA. Ischemic stroke risk and passive exposure to spouses’ cigarette smoking. Melbourne Stroke Risk Factor Study (MERFS) Group. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:572–575. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nebert DW, Russell DW. Clinical importance of the cytochromes P450. Lancet. 2002;360:1155–1162. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11203-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pan XQ, Zhang YH, Liu YY, Tong WJ. Interaction between the C(−344)T polymorphism of CYP11B2 and alcohol consumption on the risk of essential hypertension in a Chinese Mongolian population. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:813–821. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9504-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pan X, Liu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Interaction of the C-344T polymorphism of CYP11b2 gene with body mass index and waist circumference affecting diastolic blood pressure in Chinese Mongolian population. Blood Press. 2010;19:373–379. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2010.495859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu C, Li H, Qi Q, et al. Common variants in or near FGF5, CYP17A1 and MTHFR genes are associated with blood pressure and hypertension in Chinese Hans. J Hypertens. 2010;29:70–75. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833f60ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schunkert H, Konig IR, Kathiresan S, et al. Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2010;43:333–338. doi: 10.1038/ng.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yuan ZH, Liu Q, Zhang Y, et al. CYP2B6 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms and leukemia susceptibility. Ann Hematol. 2010;90:293–299. doi: 10.1007/s00277-010-1085-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ring HZ, Valdes AM, Nishita DM, et al. Gene-gene interactions between CYP2B6 and CYP2A6 in nicotine metabolism. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2007;17:1007–1015. doi: 10.1097/01.fpc.0000220560.59972.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Samardzija M, Topic E, Stefanovic M, et al. Association of CYP2C9 gene polymorphism with bleeding as a complication of warfarin therapy. Coll Antropol. 2008;32:557–564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yin T, Maekawa K, Kamide K, et al. Genetic variations of CYP2C9 in 724 Japanese individuals and their impact on the antihypertensive effects of losartan. Hypertens Res. 2008;31:1549–1557. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Eom SY, Zhang YW, Kim SH, et al. Influence of NQO1, ALDH2, and CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms, smoking, and alcohol drinking on the risk of lung cancer in Koreans. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:137–145. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9225-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Poduri A, Khullar M, Bahl A, Sharma YP, Talwar KK. A combination of proatherogenic single-nucleotide polymorphisms is associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction in Asian Indians. DNA Cell Biol. 2009;28:451–460. doi: 10.1089/dna.2009.0887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wei YS, Lan Y, Meng LQ, Nong LG. The association of L-selectin polymorphisms with L-selectin serum levels and risk of ischemic stroke. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011;32:110–115. doi: 10.1007/s11239-011-0587-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheong MY, Bang OS, Cha MH, et al. Association of the adiponectin gene variations with risk of ischemic stroke in a Korean population. Yonsei Med J. 2010;52:20–25. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen XL, Cheng JQ, Zhang RL, et al. Study on the relationship between polymorphism of adiponectin gene and risk of ischemic stroke among Han population in the Northern parts of China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010;31:129–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.de Paula Sabino A, Ribeiro DD, Domingueti CP, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/5G promoter polymorphism and PAI-1 plasma levels in young patients with ischemic stroke. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:5355–5360. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0687-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kalita J, Somarajan BI, Kumar B, Mittal B, Misra UK. A study of ACE and ADD1 polymorphism in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;412:642–646. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jin B, Ni HC, Shen W, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism is associated with poor clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease patients treated with clopidogrel. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;38:1697–1702. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0282-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fava C, Montagnana M, Almgren P, et al. The V433M variant of the CYP4F2 is associated with ischemic stroke in male Swedes beyond its effect on blood pressure. Hypertension. 2008;52:373–380. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.114199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.O’Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2010;376:112–123. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60834-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tu Y, Cui G, Xu Y, et al. Genetic polymorphism of CYP11B2 gene and stroke in the Han Chinese population and a meta-analysis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2010;21:115–120. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3283432a32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kumar NN, Benjafield AV, Lin RC, et al. Haplotype analysis of aldosterone synthase gene (CYP11B2) polymorphisms shows association with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003;21:1331–1337. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200307000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Matsubara M, Sato T, Nishimura T, et al. CYP11B2 polymorphisms and home blood pressure in a population-based cohort in Japanese: the Ohasama study. Hypertens Res. 2004;27:1–6. doi: 10.1291/hypres.27.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Howard LA, Miksys S, Hoffmann E, Mash D, Tyndale RF. Brain CYP2E1 is induced by nicotine and ethanol in rat and is higher in smokers and alcoholics. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;138:1376–1386. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bellili NM, Foucan L, Fumeron F, et al. Associations of the −344 T>C and the 3097 G>A polymorphisms of CYP11B2 gene with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome in a French population. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23:660–667. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Russo P, Lauria F, Loguercio M, et al. −344C/T Variant in the promoter of the aldosterone synthase gene (CYP11B2) is associated with metabolic syndrome in men. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:218–222. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ranade K, Wu KD, Risch N, et al. Genetic variation in aldosterone synthase predicts plasma glucose levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:13219–13224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221467098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]