Sleep is essential to brain development and maturation in infants.1 Infants require extensive sleep for further development of the neurosensory systems; structural development of the hippocampus, pons, brainstem, and midbrain;2 and optimizing physical growth.3 Protecting infant sleep is a critical component of providing developmentally appropriate care for premature and full-term infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) because many of these infants are hospitalized during one of the most critical periods of brain development.4 To best provide developmentally appropriate care, identification of sleep-wake states is necessary.
Sleep-wake states can be distinguished both through EEG and biobehavioral techniques. Electroencephalography (EEG) can be useful in the detection of sleep-wake states and cycles in infant, but most nurses are not trained to interpret EEGs. Generally, nurses utilize observation of biobehavioral responses to determine changes in sleep-wake states. Sleep-wake states are observable behaviors regulated by neuronal-controlled physiologic mechanisms recurring longitudinally in infants.5 Sleeping and waking evolve into distinct states as the brain continues to develop the neural structures and connections necessary for cyclical synchronization with other physiologic mechanisms (e.g., heart rate variability, thermoregulation).5 If the infant's brain has not reached the necessary stage of development to perform certain behaviors, the infant is unable to display the overt behaviors associated with various sleep-wake states. Thus, as premature infants develop so do their behaviors displayed through the range of sleep-wake states in their behavioral repertoire.6
Scales to describe sleep-wake states have been used for decades to better understand how the infant interacts with his environment.7 The underlying objective of the scales is to identify infant behaviors and their relationship to phases of development that are portrayed through their individual responses to their environment.8 The Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (BNBAS)9 was an early scale that was developed for term infants and measured four dimensions: interactive capacities, motor capacities, response to increased stimulation, and physiological response to stress. The BNBAS was later adapted for use in the premature infants and is known as the Assessment of Preterm Infants’ Behavior (APIB).8 Other researchers describe sleep-wake behaviors based on eye movement, respiratory pattern, gross motor movement, and muscle tone.7, 10 See Table 1 for categorization of sleep-wake states and the behaviors associated with each state defined through eye movement, respiration pattern, motor movement, muscle tone, and vocalizations.10 Identification of the behaviors associated with specific sleep-wake states is important because endogenous stimulation occurs during the active sleep state and endogenous stimulation aids in the development of the neurosensory systems (touch, vestibular, auditory, and visual).11 Animal models suggest that deprivation of sleep, both active and quiet sleep, can result in impaired development and loss of brain plasticity.2
Initially, preterm and term-infants appear to have an ultradian rhythm (< 24-hour cycle) regulating sleep-wake cycles.12 The thought is that the ultradian rhythm may be driven by infant care schedules.12 In older, healthy infants (> 4 weeks of age13), the timing of the sleep-wake cycle is associated with their internally driven circadian rhythm.5 The circadian rhythm is synchronized to the light-dark cycle promoting wakeful activities and restful activities depending on the timing of the cycle.5 The average time a healthy full-term infant spends sleeping during the 1st week of life is 16 hours, which decreases to 15 hours by the 16th week of life.1 The average duration of the sleep cycle is 47 minutes for healthy term infants and 50 minutes for 12-week and 24-week-old term infants.14 When REM and NREM were compared in full-term, preterm, and small for gestational age (SGA) infants at 40 weeks gestation, full-term infants spent the most time in REM sleep, followed by preterm infants, and the SGA infants had the shortest cycle. But for NREM sleep, SGA infants spent the most time in the state followed by preterm and full-term infants.15 The development and length of sleep-wake cycles are also influenced by gender,16 neurological injuries,17, 18 epilepsy,19 and prematurity.16, 20 Given the complexities of sleep-wake state development and the importance of sleep in relationship to long-term outcomes, neonatal nurses need to promote and protect sleep, as much as possible, in vulnerable hospitalized infants.
PubMed and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched to obtain English language publications from 1996 to May 2011 for evidence supporting current recommendations to protect and promote sleep in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). The inclusion criteria of studies were clinical studies examining interventions or care practices that impaired or enhanced sleep patterns, infants were being cared for in the NICU and included human infants (< 1 year of age). Studies were excluded if participants were ≥1 year of age at the start of the study, did not include humans, focused on parent outcomes, or primarily focused on sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The findings were organized by the evidence to support interventions implemented to influence sleep behaviors of infants in the NICU.
Nursing care and interventions had both positive and negative effects on infant sleep-wake states. After premature infants received necessary nursing care, they exhibited more quiet sleep than before the care was delivered.21, 22 Premature infants had increased amounts of active awaking when procedural nursing care (vital signs or other procedures) was provided compared to routine care (feeding, diaper changing, bathing) or contact care (touching, holding, carrying).23 During procedural care, active waking was greater than in contact care or routine care. As premature infants developed, they continued to maintain active sleep during contact care; whereas, when premature infants were exposed to routine care a more rapid decline was noted in active sleep as they matured.23 Additional factors identified as increasing quiet sleep were no caregiving, social interactions, infant in lateral position, and use of non-nutritive sucking. Active sleep was increased by no caregiving and decreased by the use of non-nutritive sucking.24 Thus multiple aspects of current nursing care, social interactions, and infant position can impact the sleep-wake states in premature infants. See Table 2 for interventions that may promote sleep.
Skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care)25, 26 is also thought to be beneficial to premature sleep cycles and brain development. Skin-to-skin contact interventions are generally implemented for premature infants at 32 weeks and continue until the infant is discharged home. Research suggests skin-to-skin contact improves sleep-wake cycling, which may indicate accelerated brain maturation, in both preterm and term infants.25, 26 The benefits of skin-to-skin contact may also be associated with improved arousal modulation, emotional regulation, and toy manipulation at 3 and 6 months of age for premature infants.26
Touch,27 massage,28 and music are emerging as possible interventions to improve sleep states with subsequent positive impact on early brain development.27, 28 Further research about the effect of touch and/or massage on premature infants, which should elucidate the impact of touch and massage on premature infant brain development.4, 29 When considering these interventions, it is important to recognize that current recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)30 are to limit sound to less than 45 decibels and that music within appropriate sound levels may be beneficial to premature infant development. Arnon et al.31 conducted a within-subjects, counterbalancing, repeated measures study to determine if delivery of music (live, recorded, or none) impacted the sleep-wake states of the infants. Live music was found to significantly induce active sleep 30 minutes after the intervention compared to the other intervention groups. However, other researchers32 were unable to detect differences between sleep-wake cycles and length of quiet sleep in term and near-term infants exposed to music. Further research is needed to determine the type and quality of music that is best for the developing brain.
In an attempt to adjust nursing care to be more developmentally driven, the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) has been recommended as a potentially useful way for nurses to provide care.33 The program advocates for decreased light through covering the incubator, decreased noise, use of supportive bedding, and promotion of state transition to sleep by hand swaddling, non-nutritive sucking, or grasping.34 Premature infants who received the developmental care versus the standard care had increased sleep times in total sleep time, active sleep, and quiet sleep.34 However, Westrup et al.35 failed to find any differences in quiet sleep of very low birth weight infants between developmental care (NIDCAP) versus standard care. The differences could be related to the study designs employed by each researcher and the differences between the sample characteristics. Additional research is necessary to understand the implications of an individualized, developmental care program on sleep-wake states.
Conclusions
Sleep is critical to brain maturation in infants. Deprivation of sleep (2-4 hours) in healthy infants has been found to lead to short-term alterations in cardiac function during the next sleep cycle36 and increased respiratory events (e.g., apnea).37 The importance of observing sleep-wake states in premature and critically ill term infants is to ensure that nursing care focuses on prevention of stress in the infant, which may lead to loss of caloric intake and physiologic alterations.38 Many interventions exist that have the potential to improve sleep in premature and critically ill infants and ongoing research continues to provide additional information about how to best deliver the interventions. Providing nursing care that protects sleep in the NICU is critical to ensuring vulnerable infants receive the best care possible.
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this article was partially supported by 1F31 NR012083-01 from the National Institute for Nursing Research, NIH to the first author.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Parmelee AH, Jr., Wenner WH, Schulz HR. Infant Sleep Patterns: From Birth to 16 Weeks of Age. J Pediatr. 1964;65:576–82. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(64)80291-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Graven S. Sleep and brain development. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33:693–706. vii. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tikotzky L, G DEM, Har-Toov J, Dollberg S, Bar-Haim Y, Sadeh A. Sleep and physical growth in infants during the first 6 months. J Sleep Res. 2010;19:103–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00772.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Calciolari G, Montirosso R. The sleep protection in the preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(Suppl 1):12–4. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.607563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peirano P, Algarin C, Uauy R. Sleep-wake states and their regulatory mechanisms throughout early human development. J Pediatr. 2003;143:S70–9. doi: 10.1067/s0022-3476(03)00404-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Holditch-Davis D, Brandon DH, Schwartz T. Development of behaviors in preterm infants: relation to sleeping and waking. Nurs Res. 2003;52:307–17. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200309000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prechtl HF. The behavioural states of the newborn infant (a review). Brain Res. 1974;76:185–212. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90454-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Als H, Butler S, Kosta S, McAnulty G. The Assessment of Preterm Infants’ Behavior (APIB): furthering the understanding and measurement of neurodevelopmental competence in preterm and full-term infants. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:94–102. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Als H, Tronick E, Lester BM, Brazelton TB. The Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (BNBAS). J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1977;5:215–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00913693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Holditch-Davis D, Edwards LJ. Modeling development of sleep-wake behaviors. II. Results of two cohorts of preterms. Physiol Behav. 1998;63:319–28. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00396-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gottlieb G. Conceptions of prenatal development: behavioral embryology. Psychol Rev. 1976;83:215–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rivkees SA. Developing circadian rhythmicity in infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112:373–81. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Weinert D, Sitka U, Minors DS, Waterhouse JM. The development of circadian rhythmicity in neonates. Early Hum Dev. 1994;36:117–26. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(94)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stern E, Parmelee AH, Akiyama Y, Schultz MA, Wenner WH. Sleep cycle characteristics in infants. Pediatrics. 1969;43:65–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Watt JE, Strongman KT. The organization and stability of sleep states in in fullterm, preterm, and small-for-gestational-age infants: a comparative study. Dev Psychobiol. 1985;18:151–62. doi: 10.1002/dev.420180207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Foreman SW, Thomas KA, Blackburn ST. Individual and gender differences matter in preterm infant state development. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37:657–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00292.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Scher MS, Steppe DA, Beggarly ME, Salerno DG, Banks DL. Neonatal EEG-sleep disruption mimicking hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after intrapartum asphyxia. Sleep Med. 2002;3:411–5. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(02)00071-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Olischar M, Klebermass K, Waldhoer T, Pollak A, Weninger M. Background patterns and sleep-wake cycles on amplitude-integrated electroencephalography in preterms younger than 30 weeks gestational age with peri-/intraventricular haemorrhage. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:1743–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nunes ML, da Costa JC. Sleep and epilepsy in neonates. Sleep Med. 2010;11:665–73. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scher MS, Johnson MW, Ludington SM, Loparo K. Physiologic brain dysmaturity in late preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2011;70:524–8. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31822f24af. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Symanski ME, Hayes MJ, Akilesh MK. Patterns of premature newborns’ sleep-wake states before and after nursing interventions on the night shift. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31:305–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00052.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liaw JJ, Yang L, Yuh YS, Yin T. Effects of tub bathing procedures on preterm infants’ behavior. J Nurs Res. 2006;14:297–305. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387589.12340.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brandon DH, Holditch-Davis D, Beylea M. Nursing care and the development of sleeping and waking behaviors in preterm infants. Res Nurs Health. 1999;22:217–29. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199906)22:3<217::aid-nur4>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liaw JJ, Yang L, Lo C, et al. Caregiving and positioning effects on preterm infant states over 24 hours in a neonatal unit in Taiwan. Res Nurs Health. 2012;35:132–45. doi: 10.1002/nur.21458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scher MS, Ludington-Hoe S, Kaffashi F, Johnson MW, Holditch-Davis D, Loparo KA. Neurophysiologic assessment of brain maturation after an 8-week trial of skin-to-skin contact on preterm infants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1812–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feldman R, Weller A, Sirota L, Eidelman AI. Skin-to-Skin contact (Kangaroo care) promotes self-regulation in premature infants: sleep-wake cyclicity, arousal modulation, and sustained exploration. Dev Psychol. 2002;38:194–207. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.2.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Im H, Kim E, Cain KC. Acute effects of Yakson and Gentle Human Touch on the behavioral state of preterm infants. J Child Health Care. 2009;13:212–26. doi: 10.1177/1367493509337441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guzzetta A, D'Acunto MG, Carotenuto M, et al. The effects of preterm infant massage on brain electrical activity. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(Suppl 4):46–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Colombo G, De Bon G. Strategies to protect sleep. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(Suppl 1):30–1. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.607571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Environmental Health. Pediatrics. 1997;100:724–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Arnon S, Shapsa A, Forman L, et al. Live music is beneficial to preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. Birth. 2006;33:131–6. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Olischar M, Shoemark H, Holton T, Weninger M, Hunt RW. The influence of music on aEEG activity in neurologically healthy newborns >/=32 weeks’ gestational age. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:670–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Als H, Lawhon G, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Gibes-Grossman R, Blickman JG. Individualized developmental care for the very low-birth-weight preterm infant. Medical and neurofunctional effects. JAMA. 1994;272:853–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bertelle V, Mabin D, Adrien J, Sizun J. Sleep of preterm neonates under developmental care or regular environmental conditions. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:595–600. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Westrup B, Hellstrom-Westas L, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H. No indications of increased quiet sleep in infants receiving care based on the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP). Acta Paediatr. 2002;91:318–22. doi: 10.1080/08035250252833996. discussion 262-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Franco P, Seret N, Van Hees JN, Lanquart JP, Jr., Groswasser J, Kahn A. Cardiac changes during sleep in sleep-deprived infants. Sleep. 2003;26:845–8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.7.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Canet E, Gaultier C, D'Allest AM, Dehan M. Effects of sleep deprivation on respiratory events during sleep in healthy infants. J Appl Physiol. 1989;66:1158–63. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.3.1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vandenberg KA. State systems development in high-risk newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit: identification and management of sleep, alertness, and crying. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2007;21:130–9. doi: 10.1097/01.JPN.0000270630.96864.9a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Elder DE, Campbell AJ, Larsen PD, Galletly D. Respiratory variability in preterm and term infants: Effect of sleep state, position and age. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011;175:234–8. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Coughlin M, Gibbins S, Hoath S. Core measures for developmentally supportive care in neonatal intensive care units: theory, precedence and practice. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:2239–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05052.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]