Skip to main content
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
. 2012 May 1;6(3):563–571. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600311

New Bundled World: Quality of Care and Readmission in Diabetes Patients

Judy Y Chen 1, Qiufei Ma 1, Hua Chen 2, Irina Yermilov 1
PMCID: PMC3440042  PMID: 22768887

Abstract

Background

Hospital readmissions among patients with diabetes are substantial and costly. Although prior studies have shown that receipt of outpatient quality of care significantly reduces the risk of hospitalization among patients with diabetes, little is known about its impact on hospital readmission. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of outpatient quality of care on 30-day readmission among patients with diabetes.

Methods

We used deidentified administrative claims data from the IMS LifeLink and included commercially insured diabetes patients ≥ 19 years old discharged from hospitals in the United States in 2009 and 2010 (n = 30,139). The outcome was readmission within 2–30 days of discharge. The main independent variables were receipt of outpatient quality-of-care measures (i.e., two hemoglobin A1c tests, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) test, 90-day supply of statin, and 90-day supply of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of outpatient quality of care on hospital readmission while controlling for demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, and insurance type in the year prior to admission.

Results

Overall 30-day readmission rates among patients with diabetes were 18.9%. Patients who received at least one LDL test [odds ratio (OR) = 0.918, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.852 0.989), p < .025] and ≥90-day supply of statins (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.85 0.97], p < .01) were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital.

Conclusions

Receipt of LDL testing and adherence to statin medications were effective in decreasing the likelihood of 30-day hospital readmission and may be considered as elements of a quality focused incentive-based health care delivery package for diabetes patients.

Keywords: diabetes, quality of care, readmission, statins

Introduction

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed by President Obama in March 2010 emphasized improving the quality and efficiency of the health care system.1 One piece of this reform involves developing and evaluating payment bundling by an episode of hospitalization (defined as all care 3 days prior to hospitalization through 30 days following discharge). In addition, Medicare is considering ways to penalize hospitals with high readmission rates.2 Thus it is increasingly important to minimize cost and utilization, not only during the hospitalization, but also in the 30 days post-discharge. According to data collected by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 15% of all patients admitted to hospitals in the United States (U.S.) in 2009 had diabetes.3 Because inpatient stays account for the largest proportion of health care expenditure for diabetes (44%), followed distantly by nursing home stays (15%) and office visits (11%),3 decreasing 30-day hospital readmission rates among patients with diabetes is paramount in controlling health care costs in this new bundled world.

Readmission rates among patients with diabetes are substantial. Existing literature shows that 30-day readmission rates range from a low of 7.7% among the commercially insured to a high of 20% among Medicare and Medicaid patients.4,5 Studies have shown that up to 55% of hospital readmissions may be due to inappropriate inpatient care or poor discharge planning and, thus, are preventable.69 Robbins and Webb5 demonstrated that the absence of a diabetes diagnosis in the hospital discharge record in patients with known diabetes was a highly significant predictor of hospitalization after adjustment. Failure to code a diabetes diagnosis in administrative data suggests that the diabetes-specific needs of the patient were not met during hospitalization and no attention was given to diabetes-specific discharge planning. These findings strongly support that high-quality inpatient care and attention to diabetes discharge planning can reduce the likelihood of readmission.

However, questions remain as to whether receipt of high-quality outpatient care can have a significant impact on 30-day hospital readmissions. A study by Chen and colleagues10 found that receipt of two quality care processes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and lipid monitoring, in the previous year reduced the risk of hospitalization by 20% in the following year.10 Another study by Stuart and associates11 found a strong association between persistence of medication use and risk of hospitalization. Each additional prescription filled by users of oral anti-diabetic agents decreased the risk of hospitalization by 0.3%, while each additional prescription filled of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) reduced risk of hospitalization by 1.3%. Furthermore, every additional angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) prescription filled reduced the risk of hospitalization by 0.9% and additional 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) prescriptions filled lowered the risk of hospitalization by 0.5%. There is no direct research on the impact of these outpatient quality practices on readmission.

The objective of this study is to assess the impact of outpatient quality of care on 30-day hospital readmission rates among commercially insured patients with diabetes. Since the Institute of Medicine has recommended quality-based incentive programs as a mechanism to better align payment and quality in the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, state governments, and a majority of payers have implemented outpatient quality initiatives.1214 As the flurry of outpatient quality initiatives continues, it is important to understand the potential impact of outpatient quality of care on the likelihood of hospital readmission.

Methods

We used administrative claims data from the IMS LifeLink Database (formerly PharMetrics), encompassing both fee-for-service and managed-care coverage. The LifeLink population is representative of the U.S. commercially insured population in terms of age, gender, and type of health plan. Data were deidentified in compliance with the Health Portability and Accountability Act. For this study, we used data from approximately 12 million unique members from over 30 health plans living in all regions of the United States in 2010. Membership and health plan eligibility information were linked to claims from inpatient, outpatient, professional, emergency department, and ancillary sources. Data elements drawn from these databases included member demographics (age, gender, residence region, and enrollment), service dates, setting of care (outpatient, inpatient, or emergency room), diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and outpatient pharmacy (retail and mail-order prescriptions) claims.

Study Selection

This study included patients 19 years and older who were discharged from the acute inpatient setting with diabetes (ICD-9 diagnosis codes: 249.xx, 250.xx, 357.2, 362.0x, 366.41) between December 1, 2009, and November 30, 2010. Of note, the diagnosis of diabetes did not need to be the principal discharge diagnosis. To accurately assess both the baseline clinical characteristics prior to the hospital admission and the outcome of interest (i.e., 30-day hospital readmission), the study only included patients who were continuously enrolled in the health plan for medical and pharmacy benefits during the year prior to the admission date through 30 days after the discharge date (n = 30,139).

Outcome Variable

The outcome of this study was hospital readmission for any diagnosis in the 2–30 days after discharge. We did not include readmission 0–1 days after discharge because of the difficulty differentiating between transfer to another facility and inpatient readmission using commercial administrative claims data.

Main Independent Variables

The main independent variables we assessed include receipt of outpatient quality of care in the year prior to admission [i.e., two or more HbA1c lab tests (yes/no), one or more low-density lipoprotein (LDL) tests (yes/no), ≥90 days supply for a statin, and ≥90 days supply for ACEIs or ARBs]. We measured a 90-day supply of these medications because we wanted to capture the concept of medication adherence instead of just a one-time prescription.

Covariates

The covariates included demographics (i.e., age, gender, region, and health plan), clinical characteristics (i.e., Elixhauser comorbidities, any insulin use), health care utilization, and insurance type in the year prior to admission. We did not present information by health plan because of concerns regarding confidentiality. Elixhauser comorbidities is specifically adapted for administrative data sets and have been shown to predict a variety of patient outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges.15 We measured any insulin use (yes/no) as a proxy of diabetes severity; the hypothesis is that patients with more severe diabetes require insulin. Health care utilization in the year prior to admission included number of outpatient visits, hospitalization (yes/no), and emergency room use (yes/no). We controlled for the following insurance types: health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, and other.

Statistical Analysis

Univariate descriptive statistics were calculated for all independent variables. Bivariate statistical tests (i.e., chi-square) were conducted to test significant differences in patient characteristics by readmission (yes/no). Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to examine the impact of outpatient quality of care (i.e., two HbA1c tests, LDL test, 90-day supply of statin, and 90-day supply of ACEI/ARBs) on hospital readmission while controlling for covariates. We included health plan fixed effects to eliminate the variation in readmission across plans. All variables were assessed for colinearity prior to their inclusion in the final model. Because region was highly colinear with health plan (r = 0.87), we dropped region from the multivariate model. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p values. A p value of 0.05 was considered to be significant. SAS® Proprietary Software, Release 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

The overall 30-day readmission rate among patients with diabetes was 18.9%. The majority of patients in the hospitalized diabetes cohort were 55 years and older (72.41%; Table 1). Older patients were significantly more likely to be readmitted in both the bivariate (Table 2) and the multivariate (Table 3) analysis. Approximately half of the hospitalized patients with diabetes were female (50.1%), and gender was not a significant predictor of 30-day hospital readmission. Among hospitalized patients with diabetes, the majority had hypertension (76.3%), almost one-fourth had chronic pulmonary disease (23.0%) and anemia (23.6%), approximately one-fifth had heart failure (19.8%) and fluid and electrolyte disorders (21.9%), and nearly one-sixth had peripheral vascular disease (15.5%) and renal failure (16.7%). Patients with the following comorbid conditions were more likely (p < .05) to be hospitalized, even when controlling for other patient characteristics: heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, other neurological disorders, renal failure, lymphoma, solid tumors, weight loss, fluid and electrolyte disorders, chronic blood loss anemia, drug abuse, and psychoses. Prior history of hospitalization (OR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.43 1.68], p < .001) and emergency use (OR = 1.13, 95% CI [1.05 1.22], p = .001) in the past year were both predictors of hospital readmission among patients with diabetes. Number of outpatient visits in the year prior to admission had no significant impact on the likelihood of readmission when controlling for other patient characteristics.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Diabetes Patients and 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate by Characteristic

Patient characteristic Sample (n) Percentage of total (%) Readmission rate (%)
Total 30,139 100.00 18.88

Age (years)

 18–44 3548 11.77 13.36

 45–54 4765 15.81 16.03

 55–64 9522 31.59 18.21

 65–74 5091 16.89 21.25

 75–84 5293 17.56 22.73

 85+ 1920 6.37 22.50

Gender

 Male 15,048 49.93 18.75

 Female 15,091 50.07 19.00

Clinical characteristics

 Heart failure 5969 19.80 27.98

 Valvular disease 3386 11.23 25.87

 Pulmonary circulation disease 1503 4.99 26.75

 Peripheral vascular disease 4658 15.46 26.36

 Paralysis 925 3.07 27.68

 Other neurological disorders 3659 12.14 27.33

 Chronic pulmonary disease 6935 23.01 22.91

 Hypertension 22,984 76.26 20.01

 Hypothyroidism 4103 13.61 20.16

 Renal failure 5036 16.71 28.51

 Liver disease 1370 4.55 24.16

 Peptic ulcer disease x bleeding 59 0.20 22.03

 Acquired immune deficiency syndrome 53 0.18 20.75

 Lymphoma 350 1.16 29.71

 Metastatic cancer 627 2.08 30.30

 Solid tumor without metastasis 2280 7.56 26.45

 Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular disease 1189 3.95 23.13

 Coagulopathy 1414 4.69 29.42

 Obesity 3902 12.95 19.22

 Weight loss 1464 4.86 30.46

 Fluid and electrolyte disorders 6606 21.92 27.48

 Chronic blood loss anemia 521 1.73 31.48

 Deficiency anemias 7121 23.63 25.88

 Alcohol abuse 448 1.49 24.11

 Drug abuse 436 1.45 29.82

 Psychoses 2006 6.66 26.42

 Depression 2982 9.89 22.70

 Any insulin 11,265 37.38 21.61

Health care utilization in the year prior to hospitalization

 Hospitalized 13,524 44.87 25.97

 Emergency department use 16,630 55.18 22.74

 Number of outpatient visits

 0–3 visits 5243 17.40 15.35

 4–8 visits 8519 28.27 16.21

 9–12 visits 5549 18.41 18.27

 13 or more 10,828 35.93 22.99

Receipt of outpatient quality of care in the year prior to hospitalization

Receipt of two HbA1c tests 11,082 36.77 17.79

 LDL test 14,457 47.97 17.26

 ≥90 days of statin prescription 13,589 45.09 18.93

 ≥90 days of ACEI/ARB prescription 15,529 51.52 18.73

Insurance type

 Health maintenance organization 6022 19.98 19.98

 Preferred provider organization 18,591 61.68 18.53

 Others 5526 18.34 18.84

Region

 East 2413 8.01 17.16

 Midwest 10,217 33.90 19.73

 South 8321 27.61 19.94

 West 9188 30.49 17.41

Table 2.

Bivariate Analysis: Patient Characteristics by 30-Day Hospital Readmission

Patient characteristic Not readmitted (n = 24,450) Not readmitted (%) Readmitted (n = 5689) Readmitted (%)
Age (years)a

 18–44 3074 12.57 474 8.33

 45–54 4001 16.36 764 13.43

 55–64 7788 31.85 1734 30.48

 65–74 4009 16.40 1082 19.02

 75–84 4090 16.73 1203 21.15

 85+ 1488 6.09 432 7.59

Gender

 Male 12,226 50.00 2822 49.60

 Female 12,224 50.00 2867 50.40

Clinical characteristics

 Heart failurea 4299 17.58 1670 29.35

 Valvular diseasea 2510 10.27 876 15.40

 Pulmonary circulation diseasea 1101 4.50 402 7.07

 Peripheral vascular diseasea 3430 14.03 1228 21.59

 Paralysisa 669 2.74 256 4.50

 Other neurological disordersa 2659 10.88 1000 17.58

 Chronic pulmonary diseasea 5346 21.87 1589 27.93

 Hypertensiona 18,385 75.19 4599 80.84

 Hypothyroidismb 3276 13.40 827 14.54

 Renal failurea 3600 14.72 1436 25.24

 Liver diseasea 1039 4.25 331 5.82

 Peptic ulcer disease x bleeding 46 0.19 13 0.23

 Acquired immune deficiency syndrome 42 0.17 11 0.19

 Lymphomaa 246 1.01 104 1.83

 Metastatic cancera 437 1.79 190 3.34

 Solid tumor without metastasisa 1677 6.86 603 10.60

 Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseasea 914 3.74 275 4.83

 Coagulopathya 998 4.08 416 7.31

 Obesity 3152 12.89 750 13.18

 Weight lossa 1018 4.16 446 7.84

 Fluid and electrolyte disordersa 4791 19.60 1815 31.90

 Chronic blood loss anemiaa 357 1.46 164 2.88

 Deficiency anemiasa 5278 21.59 1843 32.40

 Alcohol abusec 340 1.39 108 1.90

 Drug abusea 306 1.25 130 2.29

 Psychosesa 1476 6.04 530 9.32

 Depressiona 2305 9.43 677 11.90

 Any insulina 8831 36.12 2434 42.78

Health care utilization in the year prior to hospitalization

 Hospitalizeda 10,012 40.95 3512 61.73

 Emergency department usea 12,849 52.55 3781 66.46

 Number of outpatient visitsa

 0–3 visits 4438 18.15 805 14.15

 4–8 visits 7138 29.19 1381 24.27

 9–12 visits 4535 18.55 1014 17.82

 13 or more 8339 34.11 2489 43.75

Receipt of outpatient quality of care in the year prior to hospitalization

 Receipt of two HbA1c testsa 9110 37.26 1972 34.66

 LDL testa 11,961 48.92 2496 43.87

 ≥90 days of statin prescription 11,016 45.06 2573 45.23

 ≥90 days of ACEI/ARB prescription 12,621 51.62 2908 51.12

Insurance typeb

 Health maintenance organization 4819 19.71 1203 21.15

 Preferred provider organization 15,146 61.95 3445 60.56

 Others 4485 18.34 1041 18.30

Regiona

 East 1999 8.18 414 7.28

 Midwest 8201 33.54 2016 35.44

 South 6662 27.25 1659 29.16

 West 7588 31.03 1600 28.12
a

p < 0.001.

b

p < 0.05.

c

p < 0.01.

Table 3.

Multivariate Analysis: Predictors of 30-Day Hospital Readmission among Patients with Diabetes

Patient characteristic OR 95% CI
Age (years)

 18–44 1.00 reference

 45–54a 1.26 (1.11, 1.43)

 55–64a 1.42 (1.26, 1.59)

 65–74a 1.53 (1.34, 1.75)

 75–84a 1.57 (1.37, 1.79)

 85+a 1.53 (1.30, 1.80)

Gender

 Male 1.00 reference

 Female 1.01 (0.95, 1.07)

Clinical characteristics

 Heart failurea 1.23 (1.13, 1.33)

 Valvular disease 1.04 (0.95, 1.14)

 Pulmonary circulation disease 0.98 (0.86, 1.11)

 Peripheral vascular diseasea 1.19 (1.10, 1.29)

 Paralysis 1.08 (0.92, 1.26)

 Other neurological disordersb 1.10 (1.01, 1.21)

 Chronic pulmonary disease 1.02 (0.95, 1.10)

 Hypertension 0.99 (0.91, 1.07)

 Hypothyroidism 0.96 (0.88, 1.05)

 Renal failurea 1.27 (1.17 1.38)

 Liver disease 1.10 (0.96, 1.26)

 Peptic ulcer disease x bleeding 0.75 (0.40, 1.42)

 Acquired immune deficiency syndrome 1.02 (0.51, 2.03)

 Lymphomac 1.39 (1.10, 1.77)

 Metastatic cancer 1.22 (1.00 1.49)

 Solid tumor without metastasisb 1.20 (1.07, 1.35)

 Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular disease 1.13 (0.98, 1.31)

 Coagulopathy 1.13 (1.00, 1.29)

 Obesity 0.92 (0.84, 1.01)

 Weight lossa 1.29 (1.14, 1.46)

 Fluid and electrolyte disordersa 1.15 (1.07, 1.24)

 Chronic blood loss anemiab 1.22 (1.01, 1.49)

 Deficiency anemias 1.05 (0.97, 1.13)

 Alcohol abuse 1.02 (0.80, 1.28)

 Drug abusec 1.41 (1.13, 1.76)

 Psychosesb 1.15 (1.03, 1.29)

 Depression 1.07 (0.97, 1.19)

 Any insulina 1.20 (1.12, 1.28)

Health care utilization in the year prior to hospitalization

 Hospitalizeda 1.55 (1.43, 1.68)

 Emergency department usec 1.13 (1.05, 1.22)

Number of outpatient visits

 0–3 visits 1.00 reference

 4–8 visits 0.94 (0.85, 1.04)

 9–12 visits 0.92 (0.82, 1.03)

 13 or more 0.94 (0.85, 1.05)

Receipt of outpatient quality of care in the year prior to hospitalization

 Receipt of two HbA1c tests 0.94 (0.87, 1.02)

 LDL testb 0.92 (0.85, 0.99)

 ≥90 days of statin prescriptionc 0.91 (0.85, 0.97)

 ≥90 days of ACEI/ARB prescription 0.94 (0.88, 1.01)

Insurance type

 Health maintenance organization 0.95 (0.82, 1.10)

 Preferred provider organization 1.00 reference

 Others 0.95 (0.87, 1.04)
a

p < 0.001.

b

p < 0.05.

c

p < 0.01.

Patients who received both quality processes of care (i.e., two HbA1c and LDL tests) in the year prior to admission were significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital in the bivariate analysis (p < .001; Table 2]. However, when controlling for other patient characteristics, only patients who received an LDL test in the year prior to admission were significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital (OR = 0.918, 95% CI [0.852 0.989], p < .025; Table 3). Patients who filled at least a 90-day supply of a statin in the year prior to admission were significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.85 0.97], p < .01; Table 3). Conversely, patients who filled at least one prescription for insulin were significantly more likely to be readmitted to the hospital (OR = 1.20, 95% CI [1.12 1.28], p < .001).The majority of patients in our analysis were in the preferred provider organization insurance type. Insurance types were not a significant predictor of readmission in the multivariate analysis.

Discussion

The 30-day hospital readmission rate among commercially insured patients in this study (18.9%) was higher than those reported in prior studies of commercially insured populations (7.7–11.6%)4,5 but was in line with a study of the Medicaid and Medicare population (21.2–23.3%).5 This rate may be more in line with rates reported of Medicare populations, because 40% of the patients in this study were 65 years and older (mean age = 63.0 years) and have Medicare plus commercial insurance.

We found in this study that patients who filled at least a 90-day supply of a statin medication were significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital. This may be because most 30-day readmissions among patients with diabetes were associated with exacerbations of vascular disease, and a robust randomized control trial, the Heart Protection Study, has shown that statin therapy was associated with a 22–33% reduction in cardiovascular events among all patients with diabetes, regardless of history of vascular disease.16 What is most interesting is that we found that patients who received a standard quality-of-care intervention consisting of at least one LDL test as an outpatient in the year prior to hospital admission were also significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital in the 30 days post-discharge. This is important because the receipt of at least one LDL test among patients with diabetes is one of the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) diabetic process of care measures that is used widely by quality-based incentive programs such as pay for performance or transparency programs. Although a majority of payers have adopted some form of quality-based incentive program, the evidence for the effectiveness of these programs to impact outcomes has been scant. This study suggests that quality-based incentive programs, including the receipt of at least annual LDL testing among patients with diabetes, can lead to reduced rates of 30-day hospital readmission.

We did not find significant association between receipt of HbA1c testing, another commonly used HEDIS diabetic process of care measure, and the reduction of 30-day hospital readmission. This may be because good glycemic control is difficult to achieve, a long period of tight glycemic control may be needed to see its benefit, and the receipt of HbA1c testing is only first of many steps in achieving good glycemic control.

Unlike Stuart and associates,11 who found a significant reduction in hospitalization associated with persistence of ACEI/ARBs, we did not find a significant reduction in 30-day readmission among diabetes patients who received at least 90 days of ACEI/ARBs. This may be because the benefit of ACEI/ARBs among patients with diabetes is strongest for subgroups of high-risk diabetes patients, mainly those with existing cardiovascular disease, heart failure,17,18 or diabetic nephropathy,19 and the evidence for reduction of cardiovascular events among diabetes patients in general is conflicting.20,21

There are some limitations to consider. First, this is an administrative-claims-based data analysis, with potential biases secondary to coding variation and missing data. However, administrative claims data have been used successfully in many studies to examine patterns, effectiveness, and gaps in quality of care and assess outcomes in care.2225 Second, although the IMS LifeLink Database is a fairly comprehensive database, it is only representative of a commercially insured population. The findings of this study cannot be generalized to other populations, specifically Medicaid and the uninsured. Lastly, there were unmeasured factors that predict hospital readmission (e.g., quality of inpatient care and discharge planning, race, education, blood pressure control, HbA1c and LDL levels, smoking, obesity) that were not controlled for in the multivariate analyses.

Conclusions

We found that patients who received at least a 90-day supply of statins or an LDL test as an outpatient in the year prior to hospital admission were significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. This is a strong affirmation to the value of statins among all patients with diabetes in the real world outside the confines of a rigorous randomized control trial. In addition, this finding should be good news for the majority of payers that adopted some form of quality-based incentive program to target the increase receipt of LDL testing for patients with diabetes. Findings of this study also suggest that incentive-based quality programs to increase the use of and adherence to statins among all patients with diabetes regardless of LDL level may be worthy of consideration. Although we did not find a positive association between receipt of HbA1c testing and decreased likelihood of hospital readmission, future studies can focus on HbA1c control and hospital readmission. Similarly, although we did not find a positive association between persistence of ACEI/ARB and decreased likelihood of readmission among all patients with diabetes, future studies should focus on the benefit of ACEI/ARB among the subpopulation of diabetes patients with diabetic nephropathy or heart failure on hospital readmission.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank IMS Health for funding this study.

Glossary

Abbreviations

(ACEI)

angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

(ARB)

angiotensin receptor blocker

(CI)

confidence interval

(HbA1c)

hemoglobin A1c

(HEDIS)

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set

(LDL)

low-density lipoprotein

(OR)

odds ratio

(U.S.)

United States

Funding

This work was supported by IMS Health.

References

  • 1.Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2011.
  • 2.Rau J. Medicare prepares rule to penalize hospitals with high readmission rates. Kaiser Health News. July 30, 2011. http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2011/July/30/medicare-and-hospital-readmissions.aspx. Accessed November 29, 2011.
  • 3.Wier LM, Pfuntner A, Maeda J, Stranges E, Ryan K, Jagadish P, Collins Sharp B, Elixhauser A. Rockvill: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. HCUP facts and figures: statistics on hospital-based care in the United States, 2009. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports.jsp. Accessed November 29, 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jiang HJ, Andrews R, Stryer D, Friedman B. Racial/ethnic disparities in potentially preventable readmissions: the case of diabetes. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(9):1561–1567. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.044222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Robbins JM, Webb DA. Diagnosing diabetes and preventing rehospitalizations: the urban diabetes study. Med Care. 2006;44(3):292–296. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000199639.20342.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ashton CM, Kuykendall DH, Johnson ML, Wray NP, Wu L. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(6):415–421. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ashton CM, Del Junco DJ, Souchek J, Wray NP, Mansyur CL. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission: a meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care. 1997;35(10):1044–1059. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199710000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Niefeld MR, Braunstein JB, Wu AW, Saudek CD, Weller WE, Anderson GF. Preventable hospitalization among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1344–1349. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, Horner M, Mengel C, Goldstein F, Ginier P, Smith D, Huey J, Farber NJ, Asch DA, Loo L, Mack E, Hurder AG, Henderson W, Feussner JR. Classifying general medicine readmissions. Are they preventable? Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies in Health Services Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmissions. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(10):597–607. doi: 10.1007/BF02599027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen JY, Tian H, Taira Juarez D, Hodges KA Jr, Brand JC, Chung RS, Legorreta AP. The effect of a PPO pay-for-performance program on patients with diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(1):e11–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stuart BC, Simoni-Wastila L, Zhao L, Lloyd JT, Doshi JA. Increased persistency in medication use by U.S. Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes is associated with lower hospitalization rates and cost savings. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(4):647–649. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Terry K. Pay for performance: how fast is it spreading? Medical Economics. http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/memag/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=190108. Accessed August 11, 2008.
  • 13.Campion FX. Medicare's P4P program aims to improve care. Managed Healthcare Executive. http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/P4P/Medicares-P4P-program-aims-to-improve-care/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/585253?contextCategoryId=45197. Accessed March 20, 2012.
  • 14.Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand SL, Frank RG, Epstein AM. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(18):1895–1902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa063682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleigh P, Peto R, Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9374):2005–2016. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13636-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, CHARM Investigators and Committees Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9386):767–771. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14283-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J, Yusuf S, Pocock S, CHARM Investigators and Committees Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. Lancet. 2003;362(9386):759–766. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14282-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berl T, Hunsicker LG, Lewis JB, Pfeffer MA, Porush JG, Rouleau JL, Drury PL, Esmatjes E, Hricik D, Parikh CR, Raz I, Vanhille P, Wiegmann TB, Wolfe BM, Locatelli F, Goldhaber SZ, Lewis EJ, Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial. Collaborative Study Group Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(7):542–549. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):703–713. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, Koepsell TD, Weiss NS, Heckbert SR, Lemaitre RN, Wagner EH, Furberg CD. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 1997;277(9):739–745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen JY, Tian H, Taira Juarez D, Hodges KA, Jr, Brand JC, Chung RS, Legorreta AP. The effect of a PPO pay-for-performance program on patients with diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(1):e11–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen JY, Kang N, Juarez DT, Hodges KA, Chung RS, Legorreta AP. Impact of a pay-for-performance program on low performing physicians. J Healthc Qual. 2010;32(1):13–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2009.00059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Min JK, Kang N, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Robinson M, Lin F, Legorreta AP, Gilmore A. Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology. 2008;249(1):62–70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O'Connor RD, Rosenzweig JR, Stanford RH, Gilmore AS, Ryskina KL, Legorreta AP, Stempel DA. Asthma-related exacerbations, therapy switching, and therapy discontinuation: a comparison of 3 commonly used controller regimens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;95(6):535–540. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Diabetes Technology Society

RESOURCES