Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47(38):7317–7320. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802548

Total Synthesis of Theopederin D

Michael E Green 1, Jason C Rech 1, Paul E Floreancig 1,
PMCID: PMC3440178  NIHMSID: NIHMS379121  PMID: 18683833

Abstract

The total synthesis of the potent cytotoxin theopederin D has been achieved through the use of an oxidative carbon–carbon bond cleavage reaction to form an acyliminium ion in the presence of acid labile acetal groups Other key transformations include an acid mediated functionalization of a tetrahydrofuranyl alcohol in the presence of a tetrahydropyranyl alcohol, a syn-selective glycal epoxide opening, and a catalytic asymmetric aldehyde-acid chloride condensation.

Keywords: total synthesis, radical ions, chemoselectivity, cyclization, C–C activation


Members of the mycalamide, theopederin, and onnamide family of natural products,[1] exemplified by mycalamide A (1) and theopederin D (2) have inspired substantial synthetic studies[2] in response to their intriguing structural features, labile functionality, and potent cytotoxic,[1,3] immunosuppressive,[4] and antiviral[1] activities. For example theopederin D, isolated from a sponge of the Theonella genus off the coast of Japan, contains ten stereocenters, an unusual amido trioxadecalin unit, an acid-labile cyclic β,γ-unsaturated acetal, and a butyrolactone group, and has an IC50 value of approximately 2 nM against murine P388 leukemia cells.[1c] Most synthetic endeavors have been directed toward mycalamide A, but theopederin D, with the additional structural complication of the butyrolactone group, has previously been synthesized only once.[2d] Our efforts toward the synthesis of this class of molecules stem from our studies on preparing cyclic acyl aminals,[5] including amido trioxadecalins, through electron transfer initiated cyclization (ETIC) reactions.[6] In this process cyclic acetals are formed through formaldehyde hemiacetal surrogates adding into oxidatively-generated acyliminium ions. Herein we report our total synthesis of theopederin D in which we employ the ETIC amido trioxadecalin construction as the key step. Other notable transformations include an asymmetric aldehyde-acid chloride condensation, a diastereoselective aldol reaction, a selective functionalization of a tetrahydrofuranol in the presence of a tetrahydropyranol, and a glycal epoxide opening.

We envisioned 2 as arising (Scheme 1) from subunits 3 and 4. This disconnection has proven to be effective for coupling the fragments, though stereocontrol at C10 is often elusive. Rawal, however, reported[2f] that the amido trioxadecalin of mycalamide A can be constructed with the correct stereochemical orientation at C10 through a DCC-mediated coupling of a protected pederic acid (C1-C8) unit with an amino trioxadecalin. The trioxadecalin group in 4 can be prepared through the ETIC reaction of 5, in which the mixed acetal must contain a group that depart as a highly stable carbocation. This acetal can be derived from bis-hemiacetal 6 which can be prepared from the known[7] keto-alcohol 7.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Retrosynthetic analysis of theopederin D.

Previous approaches to the pederic acid subunit have relied upon chiral pool materials or chiral auxiliaries to establish stereogenicity.[2,8] In consideration of the the need for this unit for the synthesis of all members of this structural family, we felt that developing the first approach to employ asymmetric catalysis as a means of establishing absolute stereocontrol would prove to be of general use. We initiated our route (Scheme 2) with an aldehyde-acid chloride condensation using trimethylsilyl quinidine and LiClO4[9] to form a β-lactone that was opened with the lithium enolate of tert-butyl acetate to form 8 in 76% yield and >99% ee. We converted 8 to pederic acid derivative 9 in six steps through a slight deviation from Nakata’s stereoselective variant[8d] of the Meinwald approach,[8a] in which we discovered that a Me3SnOH-mediated methyl ester cleavage[10] to form the C8 carboxylic acid was more efficient than the reported thiolate-mediated cleavage.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of benzoyl pederic acid. Reagents and conditions: a) Trimethylsilyl quinidine, LiClO4, iPr2NEt, Et2O. b) LDA, tBuOAc, THF, 76% (two steps).

Our initial objective for the construction of the trioxadecalin fragment (Scheme 3) was to develop a new and selective method for creating the C17 stereocenter. This stereocenter has most commonly been set in the mycalamide A syntheses through Sharpless dihydroxylation reactions, though the terminal alkenes that have been used as substrates react with moderate selectivity. We chose to employ an aldol reaction to introduce the C17–C20 unit and to set the stereocenter at C17 through remote induction from the C13 alkoxy group.[11] This approach commenced by exposing 7 to MeOTf and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-pyridine. The resulting methyl ether was converted to a boron enolate and coupled with 4-pentenal to provide 10. Attempts to use the diethylboron enolate resulted in modest selectivity (dr = 3:1). This result was consistent with reports[12] that methyl ethers are less effective at promoting 1,5-stereoinduction than bulkier alkyl ethers. Therefore we formed the enolate with (+)-(Ipc)2BCl,[13] which improved the dr to 10:1 through a matching sense of induction between substrate and reagent control, as precedented by Crimmins’ synthesis of leucascandolide A.[14] Syn-reduction of the β-hydroxy ketone[15] and cleavage of both alkenes under modified Johnson-Lemieux conditions[16] provided the highly polar bis hemiacetal 6. The completion of the sequence required that the tetrahydrofuranyl alcohol and the tetrahydropyranyl alcohol be distinguished. We reasoned that the tetrahydrofuranyl alcohol would undergo acid-mediated solvolysis faster than the tetrahydropyranyl alcohol because of its smaller difference in strain energy between starting material and product. Indeed, tetrahydrofuranyl ethers have been shown to be more labile than tetrahydropyranyl ethers in acidic conditions.[17] Thus, the cyclic hemiacetal groups were differentiated by selectively forming the tetrahydrofuranyl ether with MeOH and PPTs. The remaining tetrahydropyranol was then dehydrated with TFAA and iPr2NEt to yield 11. Introducing oxygenation at C12 and a vinyl group at C11 with the requisite syn-arrangement was achieved by treating 11 with dimethyl dioxirane[18] and exposing the crude, labile glycal epoxide to trivinylalane.[19] A similar glycal epoxidation in the synthesis of mycalamide A was reported by Nakata.[2b] The resulting C12 hydroxyl group was alkylated with benzyloxybutoxymethyl chloride[5c] to introduce the precursor of the formaldehyde hemiacetal surrogate. Nitrogen was incorporated into the structure through a sequence of C11 vinyl group cleavage with O3 and converting the resulting unstable aldehyde to sulfinyl imine 12 under standard conditions.[20] Homobenzylic amine 13 was subsequently constructed through a sequence of BnMgCl addition and HCl-mediated sulfinyl group cleavage. No stereocontrol was observed at C10 in the nucleophilic addition, showing that the conformational bias of the substrate overwhelmed the directing effect of the auxiliary. No change in selectivity was observed with the diastereomeric sulfinyl imine, indicating that the lack of control did not result from a mismatching between the auxiliary and the substrate. The stereochemistry at this position, however, is inconsequential since it will ultimately be converted to a planar acyliminium ion. The preparation of cyclization substrate 14 was completed by benzyl ether hydrogenolysis, benzyl carbamate formation from the unpurified amino alcohol, and oxidative etherification[21] to form the tetrahydrofuranyl ether.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of the cyclization substrate. Reagents and conditions: a) MeOTf, 2,6-(tBu)2Py, CH2Cl2, 88%. b) (+)-Ipc2BCl, Et3N, Et2O, then 5-pentenal, 65%, dr = 10:1. c) Et2BOMe, THF, then NaBH4, MeOH, 77%. d) OsO4, NaIO4, NMO, THF, H2O, 82%. e) PPTs, MeOH. f) TFAA, iPr2NEt, CH2Cl2, 92%, two steps. g) Dimethyl dioxirane, acetone, then trivinylalane, CH2Cl2, 100%. h) Benzyloxybutoxymethyl chloride, iPr2NEt, CH2Cl2, 77%. i) O3, CH2Cl2, −78 °C, then (R)-tBuS(O)NH2, Ti(OEt)4, CH2Cl2, 50%, 62% based on recovered aldehyde. j) BnMgCl, THF, 65%. k) HCl, MeOH, 80%. l) H2, Pd/C, MeOH, then CbzCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 70%. m) PhI(OAc)2, hν, C6H12, 80%. Ipc2BCl = diisopinocamphenyl chloroborane, PPTs = pyridinium para-toluenesulfonate, TFAA = trifluoroacetic anhydride, CbzCl = benzyl chloroformate.

The key cyclization proceeded (Scheme 4) by irradiating 14 (medium pressure mercury lamp, Pyrex filtration) in the presence of 6 mol% N-methylquinolinium hexafluorophosphate (NMQPF6) and O2[22] to provide trioxadecalin 17 in 76% yield as a 2:1 mixture of diastereomers at C10. By using these remarkably selective non-acidic oxidative fragmentation conditions, the requisite acyliminium ion 15 is formed in the presence of two highly acid-labile tetrahydrofuranyl ethers. Acetal addition provides oxonium ion 16, which loses the tetrahydrofuranyl cation to yield 17. The stereochemical outcome of this reaction, in which the orientation at C10 in the major product is opposite to that of the natural product, is inconsequential for the completion of the synthesis. Kishi has reported[2a] that the amino trioxadecalin that forms from cleaving the Cbz-group is configurationally labile under acidic, basic, and neutral conditions. Treating 17 with the Jones reagent produced lactone 18 in 64% yield.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Amido trioxadecalin synthesis. Reagents and conditions: a) hν, NMQPF6, O2, NaOAc, Na2S2O3, PhMe, DCE, 76%. b) Jones reagent, acetone, 64%. NMQPF6 = N-methylquinolinium hexafluorophosphate, DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane.

We initially attempted the notoriously difficult fragment coupling by hydrogenolytic cleavage of the Cbz group in 18 and exposing the crude amine to 9 under Rawal’s DCC/DMAP conditions.[2f] This, however, resulted in a very low yield of desired amide 19, with 20, the undesired C10 diastereomer, being the dominant coupling product and the aldehyde that results from amino trioxadecalin opening and β-alkoxy group elimination being formed as a major impurity. Reasoning that the decomposition pathway could be suppressed by using a more reactive acylating agent, we treated 9 with SOCl2 and pyridine to form the acid chloride[8b] and mixed it with the crude amine in the presence of DMAP. This sequence provided amides 19 and 20 in a combined 40% yield as a 1:1 mixture (Scheme 5). None of the aldehyde decomposition product was isolated, but variable amounts of the diastereomer at C7, resulting from ketene formation in the acylation, were observed. These results are consistent with previous studies[2] showing that the intermediate amino trioxadecalin is configurationally labile and that the stereochemical outcome of the acylation is quite difficult to control. Work on related structures in the psymberin/pederin series has also shown that remote structural differences can cause significant reactivity differences at C10.[23] The synthesis was completed through cleaving the benzoyl group of 19 under standard conditions[2d] to yield theopederin D in 66% yield. Spectral data matched reported values for natural[1c] and synthetic[2d] material.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Completion of the synthesis. DMAP = 4-dimethylamino pyridine.

We have reported a brief total synthesis of the immunosuppressant and cytotoxic agent theopederin D, with a longest linear sequence from 7, which is available from commercially available material in two operations, of 16 steps that require purification (18 steps that involve solvent changes) and in an overall yield of 0.8%. This sequence compares favorably with the most efficient approaches to any member of this structural class. For comparison, Rawal’s elegant mycalamide A synthesis[2f] was accomplished from diethyl tartrate in 20 steps that require purification (23 steps that involve solvent changes), and the landmark Kocienski synthesis of theopederin D[2d] proceeded in 33 steps from ethyl isobutyrate. The sequence highlights the capacity of electron transfer-mediated oxidative carbon–carbon bond activation to effect highly chemoselective transformations in densely functionalized structures, as indicated by the formation of an acyliminium ion in the presence of two acid labile tetrahydrofuranyl ethers. The use of the stereoselective aldol reaction to form the C16–C17 bond while providing a new solution to the generation of the C17 stereocenter makes this route applicable to numerous members of the theopederin and mycalamide family of natural products. The catalytic asymmetric approach to pederic acid will improve the accessibility of this ubiquitous subunit, thereby facilitating subsequent analog studies.

Supplementary Material

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mycalamide A and theopederin D.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM-62924) and the National Science Foundation (CHE-0139851). MEG is a recipient of a Novartis Graduate Fellowship and JCR was a recipient of a Roche Graduate Excellence Award.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org or from the author.

References

  • 1.a) Perry NB, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Pannell LK. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:4850. [Google Scholar]; b) Perry NB, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Thompson AM. J Org Chem. 1990;55:223. [Google Scholar]; c) Fusetani N, Sugawara T, Matsunaga S. J Org Chem. 1992;57:3828. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Hong CY, Kishi YJ. Org Chem. 1990;55:4242. [Google Scholar]; b) Nakata T, Matsukura H, Jian D, Nagashima H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:8229. [Google Scholar]; c) Roush WR, Pfeifer LA. Org Lett. 2000;2:859. doi: 10.1021/ol005629l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kocienski P, Narquizian R, Raubo P, Smith C, Farrugia LJ, Muir K, Boyle FT. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 12000:2357. [Google Scholar]; e) Trost BM, Yang H, Probst GD. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:48. doi: 10.1021/ja038787r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Sohn J-H, Waizumi N, Zhong HM, Rawal VH. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:7290. doi: 10.1021/ja050728l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Kagawa N, Ihara M, Toyota M. J Org Chem. 2006;71:6796. doi: 10.1021/jo060803q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Burres NS, Clement JJ. Cancer Res. 1989;49:2935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ogawara H, Higashi K, Uchino K, Perry NB. Chem Pharm Bull. 1991;39:2152. doi: 10.1248/cpb.39.2152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Galvin F, Freeman GJ, Razi-Wolf Z, Benacerraf S, Nadler L, Reiser H. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23:283. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830230145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) Aubele DL, Rech JC, Floreancig PE. Adv Synth Catal. 2004;346:359. [Google Scholar]; b) Aubele DL, Floreancig PE. Org Lett. 2002;4:3443. doi: 10.1021/ol026538m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Rech JC, Floreancig PE. Org Lett. 2003;5:1495. doi: 10.1021/ol034273l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Floreancig PE. Synlett. 2007:191. [Google Scholar]; b) Kumar VS, Floreancig PE. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:3842. doi: 10.1021/ja015526d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rech JC, Floreancig PE. Org Lett. 2005;7:5175. doi: 10.1021/ol0520267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Adams MA, Duggan AJ, Smolanoff J, Meinwald J. J Am Chem Soc. 1979;101:5364. [Google Scholar]; b) Matsuda F, Tomiyoshi N, Yanagiya M, Matsumoto T. Tetrahedron. 1988;44:7063. [Google Scholar]; c) Roush WR, Marron TG, Pfeifer LA. J Org Chem. 1997;62:474. doi: 10.1021/jo961841k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Trotter NS, Takahashi S, Nakata T. Org Lett. 1999;1:957. doi: 10.1021/ol991200m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Breitfelder S, Schuemacher AC, Rölle T, Kikuchi M, Hoffmann RW. Helv Chim Acta. 2004;87:1202. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chu C, Shen X, Nelson SG. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:5352. doi: 10.1021/ja0492900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nicolaou KC, Estrada AA, Zak M, Lee SH, Safina BS. Angew Chem. 2005;117:1402. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:1378. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Paterson I, Gibson KR, Oballa RM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:8585. [Google Scholar]; b) Evans DA, Coleman PJ, Cote B. J Org Chem. 1997;62:788. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Paton RS, Goodman JM. J Org Chem. 2008;73:1253. doi: 10.1021/jo701849x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paterson I, Oballa RM, Norcross RD. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:8581. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Crimmins MT, Siliphaivanh P. Org Lett. 2003;5:4641. doi: 10.1021/ol035797o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen K-M, Hardtmann GE, Prasad K, Repic O, Shapiro MJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:155. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu W, Mei Y, Kang Y, Hua Z, Jin Z. Org Lett. 2004;6:3217. doi: 10.1021/ol0400342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kruse CG, Poels EK, Jonkers FL, van der Gen A. J Org Chem. 1978;43:3548. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.a) Murray RW, Jeyaraman T. J Org Chem. 1985;50:2847. [Google Scholar]; b) Halcomb RL, Danishefsky SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:6661. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.a) Ishihara K, Hanaki N, Yamamoto H. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:10695. [Google Scholar]; b) Rainier JD, Cox JM. Org Lett. 2000;2:2707. doi: 10.1021/ol006286u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.a) Cogan DA, Liu G, Kim K, Backes BA, Ellman JA. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:8011. [Google Scholar]; b) Liu G, Cogan DA, Ellman JA. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:9913. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Armas P, Concepción JI, Francisco CG, Hernández R, Salazar JA, Suárez E. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 1989;1:405. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kumar VS, Aubele DL, Floreancig PE. Org Lett. 2001;3:4123. doi: 10.1021/ol016996f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiang X, Williams N, De Brabander JK. Org Lett. 2007;9:227. doi: 10.1021/ol062656o. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES