Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, which is known to be associated with insulin resistance (IR). NAFLD occurs when the rate of hepatic fatty acid uptake from plasma and de novo fatty acid synthesis is greater than the rate of fatty acid oxidation and excretion as very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). To estimate the effects of IR on hepatic lipid excretion, mRNA expression levels of genes involved in VLDL assembly were analyzed in NAFLD liver. Twenty-two histologically proven NAFLD patients and 10 healthy control subjects were enrolled in this study. mRNA was extracted from liver biopsy samples and real-time PCR was performed to quantify the expression levels of apolipoprotein B (apoB), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and liver fatty-acid binding protein (L-FABP). Hepatic expression levels of the genes were compared between NAFLD patients and control subjects. In NAFLD patients, we also examined correlations between expression levels of the genes and metabolic factors, including IR, and the extent of obesity and hepatic lipid accumulation. Hepatic expression levels of apoB, MTP and L-FABP were significantly up-regulated in NAFLD patients compared to control subjects. The expression levels of MTP were correlated with those of apoB, but not with those of L-FABP. In the NAFLD liver, the expression levels of MTP were significantly reduced in patients with HOMA-IR >2.5. In addition, a significant reduction in MTP expression was observed in livers with advanced steatosis. Enhanced expression of genes involved in VLDL assembly may be promoted to release excess lipid from NAFLD livers. However, the progression of IR and hepatic steatosis may attenuate this compensatory process.
Keywords: apolipoprotein B, fatty-acid binding protein, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, very low-density lipoprotein
Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a clinicopathological disease characterized by elevated accumulation of triglycerides in the liver. In more than 10% of patients with NAFLD, liver disease progresses to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is characterized by hepatic inflammatory cell infiltration and ballooning of hepatocytes. Liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma occur in certain patients with NASH (1).
Many studies have attempted to investigate the mechanisms involved in the progression of hepatic steatosis to control lipid content in NAFLD. Steatosis occurs when the rate of hepatic fatty acid uptake from plasma and de novo fatty acid synthesis is greater than the rate of fatty acid oxidation and excretion as very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) (2). Insulin resistance (IR), which is frequently accompanied by obesity and T2DM, is known to promote the progression of hepatic steatosis (3). Of note, insulin activity to suppress triglyceride hydrolysis in adipose tissue is diminished in IR, eventually causing fatty acid accumulation in the liver (4). Moreover, enhanced hepatic lipid production is induced by IR. Hyperglycemia induces the transactivation of transcriptional factors, carbohydrate responsive element binding protein and Liver X receptor, which are known to activate de novo hepatic lipid synthesis (5,6). Furthermore, triglyceride hydrolysis in the liver is also modified by IR. Hepatic mRNA expression levels of lipolytic enzymes, hormone-sensitive lipase and adipose tissue triglyceride lipase were found to be suppressed in NAFLD with IR (7). These observations suggest that IR may adversely affect multiple mechanisms regulating hepatic lipid contents and promote the progression of NAFLD.
Triglyceride release as VLDL requires coordinated functions of apolipoprotein B (apoB) and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) (8). ApoB is an essential protein required for assembly and secretion of VLDL from the liver and chylomicron from the small intestine (9). MTP transfers free cholesterol, phospholipids, triglyceride and cholesterol esters to apoB during translation, allowing apoB to attain a pre-VLDL conformation, which supports the subsequent fusion of apoB with MTP-stabilized triglyceride droplets and the formation of mature VLDL (10). Genetic analyses confirm the crucial roles of MTP in lipid metabolism; liver-specific Mttp-knockout induced striking reductions in VLDL triglyceride and caused hepatic steatosis (11). In addition, liver fatty-acid binding protein (L-FABP) is known to facilitate intracellular trafficking of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) (12). This property of L-FABP modulates diverse cellular functions, including fatty acid uptake and intracellular lipid contents and metabolism.
To understand the effects of IR on the mechanism of triglyceride release from the liver, we conducted this study to estimate hepatic mRNA expression levels of apoB, MTP and L-FABP in patients with NAFLD using RT-PCR. We examined the effects of metabolic factors, including IR, and the extent of obesity and hepatic lipid accumulation on the expression of the genes. We found that the expression levels of all genes examined in the NAFLD liver were significantly increased compared to those of the healthy controls. Furthermore, IR or advanced hepatic steatosis significantly reduced the expression levels of MTP in the NAFLD liver. These observations may be helpful to understand the effects of IR on the progression of NAFLD.
Materials and methods
Patients and samples
Liver tissue samples were obtained by biopsy from 22 patients with histologically diagnosed NAFLD who were admitted to the Kyushu University Hospital between 2004 and 2006. To avoid the effects of fibrosis on metabolic parameters, patients histologically diagnosed with NASH were not included. Liver tissue samples were obtained from living donors during liver transplantation and used as healthy controls. Written consent was obtained from all of the patients. Characteristics of the enrolled subjects, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γGTP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting plasma glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet count and prothrombin time, were documented.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was prepared with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and cDNA was synthesized with GeneAmp™ RNA PCR (Applied Biosystems. Branchburg, NJ, USA). Real-time PCR was performed using LightCycler-FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green 1 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To control for variations in the reactions, all PCR data were normalized against β-actin expression. PCR primers for apoB were forward 5′-GCCGAGTTTGCCTTGCTCA-3′ and reverse 5′-TCCGGAGGCTCACCAGTTTC-3′; the primers for MTP were forward 5′-GGCTCCTGCCTACAGCTTCT-3′ and reverse 5′-CAGCCAGTGGATCACCACA-3′; the primers for L-FABP were forward 5′-CAGCTGCGGGATGAGATTGA-3′ and reverse 5′-AAACGCTGGTGTGTGATGGGTA-3′.
Statistical analyses
The results were expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Significant differences between two groups were assessed using unpaired two-tailed t-tests. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Subject characteristics
We studied 22 NAFLD patients (12 males and 10 females) and 10 control subjects (6 males and 4 females) (Table I). Since control samples were obtained from healthy donors for transplantation, the age of this group was younger compared to the NAFLD group, but the difference was not significant. BMI was significantly higher in the NAFLD group than in the control group. AST, ALT and γGTP were higher in the NAFLD group than in the control group, but the differences were not significant. Nutritional parameters, including total cholesterol, triglyceride and fasting plasma glucose, were higher in the NAFLD group than in the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant.
Table I.
Control (n=10) | NAFLD (n=22) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Male/female | 6/4 | 12/10 | 0.77000 |
Age (years) | 32.6±7.06 | 38.0±14.1 | 0.06600 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 21.3±2.58 | 25.3±6.94 | 0.00261a |
AST (U/l) | 15.0±3.35 | 39.9±47.1 | 0.15100 |
ALT (U/l) | 12.3±4.09 | 54.2±69.6 | 0.10300 |
γGTP (U/l) | 17.9±3.18 | 61.3±82.0 | 0.12900 |
LDH (U/l) | 138±27.6 | 217±83.2 | 0.01450a |
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 164±26.7 | 191±45.1 | 0.12600 |
Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 77.0±22.0 | 130±112 | 0.20200 |
Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl) | 87.6±4.90 | 108±32.2 | 0.09690 |
Platelets (×104/mm3) | 24.2±4.39 | 21.6±3.77 | 0.13600 |
Prothrombin time (%) | 88.8±6.65 | 94.3±9.32 | 0.13700 |
CRP (mg/dl) | 0.062±0.13 | 0.081±0.1 | 0.69000 |
BMI, body mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γGTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP, C-reactive protein. p-values were calculated to compare the subjects in the control and NAFLD groups
(ap<0.05).
Up-regulation of genes involved in VLDL assembly and fatty acid trafficking in the NAFLD liver
mRNA expression levels of apoB and MTP were significantly higher, 3-fold and 2-fold, respectively, in the NAFLD than in the control liver (Fig. 1A and B). L-FABP was also significantly higher in the NAFLD liver than in the control (Fig. 1C). Since all three genes were up-regulated in the NAFLD liver in a similar manner, we evaluated the correlations among the expression levels of these genes. As shown in Fig. 2, the expression levels of MTP were significantly correlated with those of apoB (r=0.614, p=0.0006; Fig. 2A), but not with those of L-FABP (Fig. 2B), suggesting that a common mechanism may be involved in the transcriptional regulation of MTP and apoB in the NAFLD liver. Moreover, enhanced expression of these genes suggests that a compensatory mechanism to release excess lipids is activated in the NAFLD liver.
Effects of IR on the expression levels of apoB, MTP and L-FABP in the NAFLD liver
We analyzed whether IR modifies the expression levels of these genes in NAFLD. In 22 patients with NAFLD, 12 had homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) values >2.5 and were considered to have IR. Expression levels of all of the genes measured were reduced in patients with IR. Of note, the expression levels of MTP in patients with HOMA-IR >2.5 were significantly reduced compared to those with HOMA-IR <2.5 (Fig. 3). To evaluate the effects of obesity, we compared the expression levels of genes between patients with BMI <30 kg/m2 (n=9) and those with BMI >30 kg/m2 (n=13). However, significant differences were not observed (Fig. 4).
Effects of the extent of lipid accumulation on the expression levels of apoB, MTP and L-FABP in the NAFLD liver
The numbers of lipid-laden hepatocytes in the NAFLD liver were histologically counted on biopsy sections. mRNA expression levels of genes were then compared between liver samples with mild steatosis (<30% of hepatocytes showed marked lipid accumulation; n=12) and advanced steatosis (>30% of hepatocytes showed marked lipid accumulation; n=10). The expression levels of MTP in livers with advanced steatosis were significantly reduced compared to those with mild steatosis (Fig. 5). A similar tendency was observed in the expression levels of apoB, but the difference was not significant. These results suggest that the reduced expression of MTP in the liver with advanced steatosis is involved in the mechanism to exacerbate hepatic lipid accumulation in the NAFLD liver, through the reduction of lipid excretion as VLDL.
Discussion
In this study, the hepatic mRNA expression levels of apoB, MTP and L-FABP were increased in the NAFLD liver compared to those in the control livers, suggesting that a compensatory mechanism to release excess lipid as VLDL is promoted in the steatotic liver. However, in patients with IR or advanced steatosis, this compensatory mechanism seems to be disrupted via the down-regulation of MTP. This process to attenuate the compensatory mechanism may be involved in the progression of NAFLD.
Transcriptional regulations of genes examined in this study are known to be mediated by transcriptional factors, including hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)4α and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α. HNF4α controls the expression of genes involved in lipoprotein and lipid metabolism, including MTP and apoB (13–15). HNF4α binds long chain fatty acyl-CoA and this binding stimulates its transcriptional activity (16,17). PPARα, which regulates the expression of a number of genes critical for lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, is known to transactivate MTP expression in rat liver and cultured hepatocytes (18,19). PPARα is also responsible for the induction of L-FABP in hepatocytes in response to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (20). Since our observations showed a positive correlation between the expression levels of apoB and MTP, but not between those of L-FABP and MTP, HNF4α may be more likely to be responsible for the simultaneous and correlated transactivation of apoB and MTP.
In this study, the expression levels of MTP were reduced in NAFLD with IR; however, this observation is not consistent with the known effects of insulin on the transcriptional regulation of MTP. Hepatic expression of MTP is reported to be down-regulated by insulin (21). In detail, MTP expression is induced by transcriptional factor forkhead box O1 (FoxO1), whose activation is down-regulated by exposure to insulin (10,22). In response to insulin, FoxO1 is phosphorylated by activated Akt, resulting in a reduction in nuclear FoxO1 and time-dependent decreases in MTP transcription. These findings suggest that MTP expression would not be down-regulated in IR. Currently, we cannot explain why the opposite results were observed in this study. Small sample size may be the reason for this unexpected MTP expression. However, we hypothesize that deteriorated cellular circumstances in the NAFLD liver may be responsible. Of note, oxidative stress, which is induced by mitochondrial dysfunction in steatotic cells, has a strong potential to damage various cellular functions, including homeostasis of endoplasmic reaction, control of cell death and transcriptional regulation of various genes (23–26). Furthermore, hepatic iron load in the NAFLD liver would be a factor to enhance cellular damages. Since iron has a strong potential to produce oxidative stress, hepatic iron load is known to promote the progression of NASH (27,28). In the NAFLD liver, reduction in MTP expression levels and increased iron score were simultaneously observed during the progression of liver disease (29). Taken together, reduced MTP expression in NAFLD liver with IR or advanced steatosis may be induced by enhanced oxidative stress in these cellular circumstances.
In this study, the expression of genes involved in VLDL assembly and fatty acid trafficking was enhanced in the liver with NAFLD. However, the reduced expression of MTP in livers with IR or advanced steatosis may be factors to accelerate further steatosis. Further studies are necessary to determine the effects of IR on the progression of NAFLD.
References
- 1.Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1221–1231. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fabbrini E, Sullivan S, Klein S. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: biochemical, metabolic, and clinical implications. Hepatology. 2010;51:679–689. doi: 10.1002/hep.23280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tiniakos DG, Vos MB, Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathology and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:145–171. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jaworski K, Sarkadi-Nagy E, Duncan RE, Ahmadian M, Sul HS. Regulation of triglyceride metabolism. IV. Hormonal regulation of lipolysis in adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G1–G4. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00554.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iizuka K, Horikawa Y. ChREBP: a glucose-activated transcription factor involved in the development of metabolic syndrome. Endocr J. 2008;55:617–624. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.k07e-110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Higuchi N, Kato M, Shundo Y, Tajiri H, Tanaka M, Yamashita N, Kohjima M, Kotoh K, Nakamuta M, Takayanagi R, Enjoji M. Liver X receptor in cooperation with SREBP-1c is a major lipid synthesis regulator in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Res. 2008;38:1122–1129. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00382.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kato M, Higuchi N, Enjoji M. Reduced hepatic expression of adipose tissue triglyceride lipase and CGI-58 may contribute to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with insulin resistance. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:1018–1019. doi: 10.1080/00365520802008140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meshkani R, Adeli K. Hepatic insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Clin Biochem. 2009;42:1331–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shelness GS, Sellers JA. Very-low-density lipoprotein assembly and secretion. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12:151–157. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200104000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sparks JD, Sparks CE. Overindulgence and metabolic syndrome: is FoxO1 a missing link? J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2012–2015. doi: 10.1172/JCI35693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Raabe M, Veniant MM, Sullivan MA, Zlot CH, Bjorkegren J, Nielsen LB, Wong JS, Hamilton RL, Young SG. Analysis of the role of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in the liver of tissue-specific knockout mice. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1287–1298. doi: 10.1172/JCI6576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Binas B, Erol E. FABPs as determinants of myocellular and hepatic fuel metabolism. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007;299:75–84. doi: 10.1007/s11010-005-9043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sladek FM. Orphan receptor HNF-4 and liver-specific gene expression. Receptor. 1993;3:223–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sheena V, Hertz R, Nousbeck J, Berman I, Magenheim J, Bar-Tana J. Transcriptional regulation of human microsomal triglyceride transfer protein by hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:328–341. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M400371-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ladias JA, Hadzopoulou-Cladaras M, Kardassis D, Cardot P, Cheng J, Zannis V, Cladaras C. Transcriptional regulation of human apolipoprotein genes ApoB, ApoCIII, and ApoAII by members of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily HNF-4, ARP-1, EAR-2, and EAR-3. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:15849–15860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hertz R, Magenheim J, Berman I, Bar-Tana J. Fatty acyl-CoA thioesters are ligands of hepatic nuclear factor-4alpha. Nature. 1998;392:512–516. doi: 10.1038/33185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jump DB. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and regulation of gene transcription. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13:155–164. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200204000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yoon M. The role of PPARalpha in lipid metabolism and obesity: focusing on the effects of estrogen on PPARalpha actions. Pharmacol Res. 2009;60:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ameen C, Edvardsson U, Ljungberg A, Asp L, Akerblad P, Tuneld A, Olofsson SO, Linden D, Oscarsson J. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha increases the expression and activity of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in the liver. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1224–1229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412107200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Landrier JF, Thomas C, Grober J, Duez H, Percevault F, Souidi M, Linard C, Staels B, Besnard P. Statin induction of liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) gene expression is peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha-dependent. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:45512–45518. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407461200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Au WS, Kung HF, Lin MC. Regulation of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein gene by insulin in HepG2 cells: roles of MAPKerk and MAPKp38. Diabetes. 2003;52:1073–1080. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kamagate A, Qu S, Perdomo G, Su D, Kim DH, Slusher S, Meseck M, Dong HH. FoxO1 mediates insulin-dependent regulation of hepatic VLDL production in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2347–2364. doi: 10.1172/JCI32914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wei Y, Wang D, Topczewski F, Pagliassotti MJ. Saturated fatty acids induce endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis independently of ceramide in liver cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;291:E275–E281. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00644.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roebuck KA. Oxidant stress regulation of IL-8 and ICAM-1 gene expression: differential activation and binding of the transcription factors AP-1 and NF-κB (Review) Int J Mol Med. 1999;4:223–230. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.4.3.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gius D, Botero A, Shah S, Curry HA. Intracellular oxidation/reduction status in the regulation of transcription factors NF-kappaB and AP-1. Toxicol Lett. 1999;106:93–106. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu H, Colavitti R, Rovira II, Finkel T. Redox-dependent transcriptional regulation. Circ Res. 2005;97:967–974. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000188210.72062.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.George DK, Goldwurm S, MacDonald GA, Cowley LL, Walker NI, Ward PJ, Jazwinska EC, Powell LW. Increased hepatic iron concentration in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with increased fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:311–318. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70482-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mantena SK, King AL, Andringa KK, Eccleston HB, Bailey SM. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of alcohol- and obesity-induced fatty liver diseases. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44:1259–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mitsuyoshi H, Yasui K, Harano Y, Endo M, Tsuji K, Minami M, Itoh Y, Okanoue T, Yoshikawa T. Analysis of hepatic genes involved in the metabolism of fatty acids and iron in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Res. 2009;39:366–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]