Sir,
We read with interest the review article titled, “Hair dye poisoning and the developing world” by Sampathkumar et al. published in the May-August 2009 issue of your journal.[1] I congratulate the authors on their well conceived article; however, one point is controversial.
Sampathkumar et al. described three toxic constituents of hair dye, which are Paraphenylene Diamine (PPD), resorcinol, and propylene glycol. PPD, when ingested in a dose-dependent manner results in severe cervico-facial inflammatory edema and rhabdomyolysis with renal failure secondary to acute tubular necrosis. It can result in hepatic necrosis, hemolysis, and cardio-toxicity resulting in fatal arrhythmias.[2] Resorcinol is known to cause eye, skin, oral, and gastrointestinal injuries. Systemic toxicity is manifested as vomiting, dyspnea, methemoglobinemia, hypothermia, tachypnea, pallor, profuse sweating, hypotension, and tachycardia.[3] Propylene glycol is associated with hyperosmolality, raised anion gap metabolic acidosis, central nervous system depression, arrhythmias, and less commonly renal dysfunction.[1]
Super-Vasmol, a cheap, freely-available hair dye is emerging as a major cause of suicidal poisoning in India.[2] The constituents of this dye are Paraphenylene Diamine (PPD < 4%), resorcinol, propylene glycol, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) sodium, liquid paraffin, cetostearyl alcohol, sodium lauryl sulphate, herbal extracts, preservatives, and perfumes.[4] It has become the cause for endemic poisoning in the kadapa district of Andhra Pradesh, India. In our hospital during 2010, 587 cases of Super-Vasmol poisoning were admitted in MICU, out of which 229 patients have under gone tracheostomy.
Sampathkumar et al. had mentioned gastric lavage as a modality of treatment. Gastric lavage is one of the modes of physical decontamination of stomach. It is not a routine procedure for all poisonings. Its use is reserved for life-threatening ingestions of selected agents within 1 hour of the ingestion.[5] Unless a patient is intubated, gastric lavage is contraindicated if airway protective reflexes are lost. It is also contraindicated if a hydrocarbon with high aspiration potential or corrosive substance has been ingested.[6]
Resorcinol is a phenolic derivative chemically designated as 1, 3-dihydroxybenzene or 3-hydroxyphenol. It is highly corrosive in nature.[1,2] The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) cites PPD as a contact allergen, and should not be directly applied to the skin. When used in hair dyes, it may cause mild contact dermatitis on the forehead, eyelids, or ears. If PPD comes in contact with mucosa it causes severe edematous reaction. Induction of emesis by ipecac is contraindicated in PPD and propylene glycol poisoning.[5]
In view of nature of hair dye constituents, gastric lavage should not be performed. In our hospital we do not do gastric lavage but we are using activated charcoal. To conclude, gastric lavage is not a friend but a foe in hair dye poisoning.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sampathkumar K, Yesudas S. Hair dye poisoning and the developing world. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2:129–31. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.50749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chrispal A, Begum A, Ramya I, Zachariah A. Hair dye poisoning – an emerging problem in the tropics: An experience from a tertiary care hospital in South India. Trop Doct. 2010;40:100–3. doi: 10.1258/td.2010.090367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Verma R, Tewari N, Jaiswal S, Rastogi V, Singh DK, Tiwari A. Fatal poisoning caused by oral ingestion of a hair dye. Internet J Emerg Intensive Care Med. 2008;11:1. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Soni SS, Nagarik AP, Dinaker M, Adikey GK, Raman A. Systemic toxicity of Paraphylene diamine. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63:164–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leikin JB, Paloucek FP. Approach to toxicology; poisoning and toxicology hand book. 4th ed. USA: Informa Healthcare Inc; 2008. p. 43. (834, 843). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vale JA. Position statement: Gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:711–9. doi: 10.3109/15563659709162568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]