Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2004 Feb;42(2):832–834. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.832-834.2004

Comparison of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from United Kingdom Hospitals with Predominant Northern European Genotypes by Amplified-Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis

Richard P Spence 1, Tanny J K van der Reijden 2, Lenie Dijkshoorn 2, Kevin J Towner 1,*
PMCID: PMC344483  PMID: 14766864

Abstract

Acinetobacter baumannii isolates collected between 1999 and 2001 from 46 United Kingdom hospitals were compared with previously identified northern European genotypes by amplified-fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis. Two predominant northern European genotypes associated with outbreaks in the mid-1980s had been superseded by new outbreak-associated genotypes.


Acinetobacter baumannii is a major cause of nosocomial infections such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, septicemia, secondary meningitis, and urinary tract infections (1). Outbreaks of infection caused by A. baumannii are widely reported and are a significant burden in terms of prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity and mortality (3, 9, 11, 13-15). A previous study of 287 A. baumannii isolates from 46 United Kingdom hospitals identified over 30 different genotypes by the technique of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis (12) with most outbreak-associated infections caused by three predominant RAPD genotypes (12). This observation of a diverse population contrasted with a study published in 1996 that used a polyphasic approach, including amplified-fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis (6-8), to examine the epidemiology of 14 outbreak-associated and 17 sporadic A. baumannii isolates in northern European countries. Four AFLP genotypes (clones) were identified, of which two genotypes, clones I and II, were responsible for most outbreak-associated infections in the countries examined (4). A further study in the Czech Republic published in 1999 also identified two predominant outbreak-associated clones, groups A and B, that corresponded to the two clones identified in other northern European countries (10).

In order to determine whether the current genotypes circulating in United Kingdom hospitals were related to the genotypes described in other northern European countries, the present study used AFLP analysis to directly compare the genetic diversity of 34 A. baumannii isolates, each representing an RAPD genotype identified in outbreaks and sporadic cases of infection in United Kingdom hospitals between 1999 and 2001, with 31 previously characterized isolates from six northern European countries (Belgium, Denmark, Ireland, The Netherlands, Sweden, and United Kingdom) (4, 5, 12). Isolates were classed as belonging to an outbreak on the basis of epidemiological and comparative local typing data (4, 12). Some of the RAPD genotypes identified in 1999 to 2001 were associated with separate outbreaks in hospitals located in different regions of the United Kingdom (12).

AFLP is a well-established species identification and genomic fingerprinting method that has been used successfully to study the epidemiology of A. baumannii (7, 8). Total cellular DNA was purified as described by Boom et al. (2), and 10 ng was digested with the restriction endonucleases EcoRI and MseI. Adapters for MseI and EcoRI were then ligated to the restriction fragments as described previously (6). Selective DNA amplification was performed with the Cy5-EcoRI+A primer(5′-Cy5-GACTGCGTACCAATTCA-3′) and the MseI+Cprimer (5′-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAAC-3′) on 5 μl of the digested and ligated template DNA fragments. Amplification was performed in a Progene thermal cycler (Techne, Cambridge, United Kingdom) as follows: 2 min at 72°C; 2 min at 94°C; one cycle of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 65°C, and 60 s at 72°C; 12 cycles of 30 s at 94°C and 30 s at a temperature 0.7°C lower than the previous cycle, starting at 64.3°C, followed by 60 s at 72°C; 23 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 56°C, and 60 s at 72°C; and a final extension period of 10 min at 72°C. Amplified fragments were separated on a 5% (wt/vol) Reprogel high-resolution denaturing polyacylamide gel by using the ALFexpress II DNA analysis system (Amersham Biosciences, Roosendaal, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Separation was for 500 min at 55°C and 30 W of constant power with 2-s sampling intervals. Strain LUH 1091 (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands) was run in the 1st lane and then every 10th lane for normalization purposes. Gel images were converted to the tagged image file (TIF) format before analysis with BioNumerics 2.50 software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Levels of similarity between fingerprints were calculated with the Pearson product moment coefficient. Cluster analysis was performed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetical averages (UPGMA).

The A. baumannii isolates included in this study were obtained between 1978 and 2001 from outbreaks and sporadic infections in 36 cities in six northern European countries (4, 12).

In the original European study, isolates that displayed ≥89% similarity by AFLP analysis were considered to be closely related and to belong to the same genotype (clone) (4). In the present study, using a modified protocol, the cutoff value required to group isolates described previously as belonging to European clones I and II was found to be 87%. However, one isolate (GNU1086) that grouped originally with European clone II (4) only clustered at 78% similarity. This discrepancy could be the result of using different primers or may reflect problems with the storage of the isolate since the original study.

Using the identified cutoff value of ≥87%, 11 AFLP clusters containing 39 isolates were distinguished (Table 1). The remaining 26 isolates remained ungrouped. Of the 34 RAPD genotypes identified in 1999 to 2001, 19 grouped within nine AFLP clusters and 15 remained distinct. AFLP clusters contained between two and nine strains originating from one to nine cities in between one and three countries. Strains belonging to European clone I were located in AFLP cluster 11. AFLP cluster 7 contained strains belonging to European clone II, with the exception of isolate GNU1086, which was located in AFLP cluster 8. In previous studies, clone I and group A isolates were identified in four United Kingdom centers and were also identified in Belgium, the Czech Republic, and The Netherlands (4, 10). Clone II and group B isolates were located in three United Kingdom centers and were also identified in Denmark, the Czech Republic, and The Netherlands (4, 10). In the present study, six different A. baumannii AFLP clusters were associated with outbreaks of infection in between one and nine centers (Table 1). United Kingdom isolates were represented in all six of these AFLP clusters; however, the United Kingdom outbreak-associated isolates from 1999 to 2001 (12) did not cluster with the outbreak-associated United Kingdom isolates from the original study (4), which indicated that they did not belong to northern European clones I or II (Table 1). Thus, while northern European clones I and II were associated with a number of outbreaks of infection in the United Kingdom in the mid-1980s, this no longer appeared to be the case in 1999 to 2001. Nevertheless, two sporadic isolates of clone II were still detected in United Kingdom hospitals in 1999 to 2001.

TABLE 1.

Clustering of A. baumannii isolates following AFLP analysis

AFLP clustera United Kingdom nosocomial isolatesb
Previously characterized (4) northern European isolatesf
No. of isolates No. of out- break isolatesc Isolate City Date No. of isolates No. of out- break isolatesc Isolate City Date
1 1 0 A1877 Berkshire 2000 1 0 PGS10086 Veile, Denmark 1990
2 NRe 2 0 TU133 Malmo, Sweden 1980
TU144 Malmo, Sweden 1980
3 3 0 A886 Bristol 2000 1 1 RUH1752 Enschede, The Netherlands 1986
A898 Ashford 2000
A1207 Derby 2000
4 1 0 A1415 Salford 2000 1 0 RUH2688 Rotterdam, The Netherlands 1987
5 1 0 A1761 Chelmsford 2000 1 0 RUH1486 Rotterdam, The Netherlands 1985
6 1 0 A1233 Derby 1999 1 0 TU147 Malmo, Sweden 1980
7 (clone II)d 2 0 A1124 Leeds 2000 3 2 RUH0134 Rotterdam, The Netherlands 1982
A1755 Chelmsford 2000 PGS189 Odense, Denmark 1984
GNU1080 Salisbury, UK 1989
8 4 0 A375 Ashford 2000 1 1 GNU1086 Newcastle, UK 1989
A732 Wrexham 2000
A1300 Stoke 2000
A2184 Chelsea 2000
9 2 1 A791 London 2000 NR
A1850 Berkshire 2000
10 4 2 A370 Ashford 1999 NR
A790 London 2000
A1637 London 2000
A1645 London 2000
11 (clone I)d NR 9 9 RUH0436 Utrecht, The Netherlands 1984
RUH0510 Nijmegen, The Netherlands 1984
RUH0875 Dordrecht, The Netherlands 1984
RUH2037 Venlo, The Netherlands 1986
GNU1078 Leuven, Belgium 1990
GNU1079 Salford, UK 1990
GNU1082 Basildon, UK 1989
GNU1083 London, UK 1985-1988
GNU1084 Sheffield, UK 1987
a

Cluster relationships were calculated with BioNumerics software using the Pearson product moment coefficient and UPGMA method.

b

Each isolate represented a separate RAPD genotype (12). Data are from 1999 to 2001.

c

Outbreak isolates were representative of particular genotypes causing outbreaks, often in a number of geographically distinct hospitals. Outbreaks were defined according to epidemiological and comparative local typing data.

d

As defined in previous northern European studies (4, 10).

e

NR, not represented.

f

Data are from 1978 to 1990.

Nonoutbreak-associated isolates belonged to 10 AFLP clusters and were found in between one and five centers, with those from the United Kingdom studied in 1996 belonging to six AFLP clusters. Similar isolates collected in 1999 to 2001 belonged to nine AFLP clusters (Table 1). A total of 26 isolates did not form AFLP clusters by the criterion used. These included 11 isolates from the original study and 15 isolates collected in 1999 to 2001 (Table 1), each of which was representative of an individual RAPD genotype (12).

Overall, the study indicated that there is a diverse population of A. baumannii genotypes currently causing outbreaks and sporadic cases of infection in United Kingdom hospitals. Isolates belonging to the two predominant northern European clones identified previously were not associated with outbreaks of infection in the United Kingdom hospitals studied during 1999 to 2001. Nevertheless, a number of isolates in the current collection shared AFLP profiles with those from the previous study, indicating that some genotypes are spread across time and space and demonstrating that AFLP typing databases can be important tools for monitoring the distribution and prevalence of A. baumannii genotypes. The precise reasons for the epidemiological success and changes in predominance of particular genotypes have yet to be identified.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bergogne-Bérézin, E., and K. J. Towner. 1996. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 9:148-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boom, R., C. J. A. Sol, M. M. M. Salimans, C. L. Jansen, P. M. E. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa. 1990. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:495-503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Corbella, X., A. Montero, M. Pujol, M. A. Domínguez, J. Ayats, M. J. Argerich, F. Garrigosa, J. Ariza, and F. Gudiol. 2000. Emergence and rapid spread of carbapenem resistance during a large and sustained hospital outbreak of multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4086-4095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dijkshoorn, L., H. Aucken, P. Gerner-Smidt, P. Janssen, M. E. Kaufmann, J. Garaizar, J. Ursing, and T. L. Pitt. 1996. Comparison of outbreak and nonoutbreak Acinetobacter baumannii strains by genotypic and phenotypic methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1519-1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Henwood, C. J., T. Gatwood, M. Warner, D. James, M. W. Stockdale, R. P. Spence, K. J. Towner, D. M. Livermore, and N. Woodford. 2002. Antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter in the UK, and in vitro evaluation of tigecycline (GAR-936). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:479-487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Janssen, P., R. Coopman, G. Huys, J. Swings, M. Bleeker, P. Vos, M. Zabeau, and K. Kersters. 1996. Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy. Microbiology 142:1881-1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Janssen, P., and L. Dijkshoorn. 1996. High resolution DNA fingerprinting of Acinetobacter outbreak strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 142:191-194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Janssen, P., K. Maquelin, R. Coopman, I. Tjernberg, P. Bouvet, K. Kersters, and L. Dijkshoorn. 1997. Discrimination of Acinetobacter genomic species by AFLP fingerprinting. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:1179-1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mathai, E., M. E. Kaufmann, V. S. Richard, G. John, and K. N. Brahmadathan. 2001. Typing of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from hospital-acquired respiratory infections in a tertiary care center in Southern India. J. Hosp. Infect. 47:159-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nemec, A., L. Janda, O. Melter, and L. Dijkshoorn. 1999. Genotypic and phenotypic similarity of multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in the Czech Republic. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:287-296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pillay, T., D. G. Pillay, M. Adhikari, A. Pillay, and A. W. Sturm. 1999. An outbreak of neonatal infection with Acinetobacter linked to contaminated suction catheters. J. Hosp. Infect. 43:299-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spence, R. P., K. J. Towner, C. J. Henwood, D. James, N. Woodford, and D. M. Livermore. 2002. Population structure and antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter DNA group 2 and 13TU isolates from hospitals in the UK. J. Med. Microbiol. 51:1107-1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Villers, D., E. Espaze, M. Coste-Burel, F. Giauffret, E. Ninin, F. Nicolas, and H. Richet. 1998. Nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii infections: microbiological and clinical epidemiology. Ann. Intern. Med. 129:182-189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Webster, C. A., K. J. Towner, G. L. Saunders, H. H. Crewe-Brown, and H. Humphreys. 1999. Molecular and antibiogram relationships of Acinetobacter isolates from two contrasting hospitals in the United Kingdom and South Africa. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:595-598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wisplinghoff, H., M. B. Edmond, M. A. Pfaller, R. N. Jones, R. P. Wenzel, and H. Seifert. 2000. Nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter species in United States hospitals: clinical features, molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31:690-697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES