Abstract
Background:
Corrosion at the modular head-neck junction of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty has been identified as a potential concern, although symptomatic adverse local tissue reactions secondary to corrosion have rarely been described.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the records of ten patients with a metal-on-polyethylene total hip prosthesis, from three different manufacturers, who underwent revision surgery for corrosion at the modular head-neck junction.
Results:
All patients presented with pain or swelling around the hip, and two patients presented with recurrent instability. Serum cobalt levels were elevated prior to the revision arthroplasty and were typically more elevated than were serum chromium levels. Surgical findings included large soft-tissue masses and surrounding tissue damage with visible corrosion at the femoral head-neck junction; the two patients who presented with instability had severe damage to the hip abductor musculature. Pathology specimens consistently demonstrated areas of tissue necrosis. The patients were treated with debridement and a femoral head and liner exchange, with use of a ceramic femoral head with a titanium sleeve in eight cases. The mean Harris hip score improved from 58.1 points preoperatively to 89.7 points at a mean of 13.0 months after the revision surgery (p = 0.01). Repeat serum cobalt levels, measured in six patients at a mean of 8.0 months following revision, decreased to a mean of 1.61 ng/mL, and chromium levels were similar to prerevision levels. One patient with moderate hip abductor muscle necrosis developed recurrent instability after revision and required a second revision arthroplasty.
Conclusions:
Adverse local tissue reactions can occur in patients with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing secondary to corrosion at the modular femoral head-neck taper, and their presentation is similar to the adverse local tissue reactions seen in patients with a metal-on-metal bearing. Elevated serum metal levels, particularly a differential elevation of serum cobalt levels with respect to chromium levels, can be helpful in establishing this diagnosis.
Level of Evidence:
Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Modularity at the head-neck junction of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty has several benefits, including intraoperative flexibility, the ability to change the femoral head later if necessary, and decreased implant inventory1-3. This design feature initially became popular in the late 1980s and early 1990s4,5, but soon thereafter concerns about fretting and crevice corrosion at the modular taper junction, particularly with mixed-metal junctions, were reported4,6-10. Subsequent design and manufacturing improvements minimized these concerns, allowing a nearly universal adoption of modular femoral head-neck tapers in modern total hip arthroplasty. As a result of these design improvements, corrosion at this modular taper interface has received relatively little attention over the last decade5,11,12.
Historically, a diagnosis of corrosion at this femoral head-neck interface has been made only on the basis of retrieval analysis2-5,8,13-18 or, rarely, in cases of catastrophic failure2,7. Although there have been sporadic reports of elevated serum metal levels1 and particle deposition within local tissues19 and isolated case reports of soft-tissue reactions20-22 associated with corrosion of modular implants, symptomatic adverse tissue reactions have not been described in a cohort of patients, to our knowledge. We identified ten patients with adverse local tissue reactions following total hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing secondary to corrosion at the modular head-neck taper junction. These adverse tissue reactions are similar to the deleterious local tissue reactions reported in some patients with metal-on-metal bearing surfaces23-26. The purpose of the present report is to describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and early results of operative treatment of patients with corrosion at the modular head-neck junction of a metal-on-polyethylene total hip prosthesis.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
Ten patients underwent revision of a total hip arthroplasty at our institution for a primary or secondary diagnosis of complications arising from corrosion at the modular femoral head-neck taper junction between January 1, 2009, and August 31, 2011. These procedures represent 1.8% of the 569 revision hip arthroplasties performed at our institution over the same period. The study group consisted of eight women and two men with an average age of 59.7 years (Table I). Approval was obtained from our institutional review board prior to initiation of this study.
TABLE I.
Demographic and Initial Surgical Data
| Case | Age (yr) | Sex | Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | Femoral Component | Taper | Head Size, Neck Length (mm) | Interface | Time to Revision (After Index Op.) (yr) |
| 1 | 66.5 | F | 31.9 | Zimmer VerSys Beaded FullCoat | 12/14 | 32, +3.5 | Co alloy/Co alloy | 3.4 |
| 2 | 65.0 | F | 24.3 | Zimmer VerSys Beaded FullCoat | 12/14 | 28, +10.5 | Co alloy/Co alloy | 6.5 |
| 3 | 69.9 | F | 25.2 | Zimmer VerSys Beaded FullCoat | 12/14 | 36, +7 | Co alloy/Co alloy | 4.3 |
| 4 | 58.1 | F | 27.2 | Zimmer VerSys Beaded FullCoat | 12/14 | 28, +10.5 | Co alloy/Co alloy | 5.1 |
| 5 | 41.1 | F | 28.0 | Zimmer VerSys Beaded FullCoat LHC | 12/14 | 32, +5 | Co alloy/Co alloy | 2.1 |
| 6* | 61.5 | M | 27.3 | Zimmer VerSys Beaded FullCoat Revision | 12/14 | 32, +10.5 | Co alloy/Co alloy | 0.8 |
| 7 | 46.5 | M | 36.0 | Zimmer VerSys Fiber Metal Taper | 12/14 | 32, −3.5 | Ti alloy/Co alloy | 5.1 |
| 8 | 62.6 | F | 36.0 | Zimmer M/L Taper, Kinectiv Modular Neck | 12/14 | 32, +0 | Ti alloy/Co alloy | 0.7 |
| 9 | 55.5 | F | 32.1 | DePuy Bantam Full Porocoat | 10/12 | 28, +5 | Co alloy/Co alloy | 8.9 |
| 10* | 70.4 | F | 25.2 | Stryker Accolade | V40 | 36, +0 | Ti alloy/Co alloy | 2.2 |
The patient was referred from another facility.
Patients initially presented with symptoms at a mean of 3.2 years (range, 0.7 to 8.7 years) after their index procedure. The presenting symptoms varied quite a bit among the patients but included groin and anterior thigh pain (two patients), buttock pain (two patients), lateral hip pain (one patient), generalized pain and weakness (one patient), a palpable fluid collection (one patient), and marked lower-extremity swelling (one patient). The remaining two patients presented with recurrent instability with vague hip pain; one of them reported progressive weakness and limping over the preceding year whereas the second presented with recurrent hematomas and marked weakness. Harris hip scores27 averaged 54.5 points (range, 22 to 79 points) prior to the revision surgery.
Eight of the primary procedures were done at our institution. Five hip prostheses were implanted via a posterior approach; two, via an anterolateral approach; two, via an abductor-sparing mini-Watson-Jones anterior approach; and one, through a two-incision approach. The implanted acetabular components included nine Trilogy shells (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) and one Trident PSL shell (Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey). The bearing surface was highly cross-linked polyethylene in all ten patients, with nine having a Longevity (Zimmer) insert and one having an X3 (Stryker) insert. The implanted femoral components, femoral head sizes, and neck lengths are listed in Table I.
Preoperative Workup
All patients had radiographs at the time of their initial symptoms. In each case, the findings were interpreted as normal, demonstrating well-fixed components with no evidence of loosening, wear, or osteolysis. Laboratory test results included an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mean, 47.3 mm/hr; range, 4 to 108 mm/hr; normal, <27 mm/hr) in four of seven patients in whom this test was performed, and an elevated C-reactive protein level (mean, 2.6 mg/dL; range, <0.5 to 5.7 mg/dL; normal, <0.8 mg/dL) in three of six patients in whom this test was performed.
Nine of the ten patients had preoperative hip aspiration under fluoroscopy, with a mean synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count of 4009 WBC/μL (range, 0 to 27,500 WBC/μL) and a mean WBC differential of 62% neutrophils (range, 12% to 99%), 28% lymphocytes (range, 0% to 57%), and 10% monocytes (range, 0% to 35%). The synovial fluid WBC count was suggestive of infection in one case (27,500 WBC/μL with a differential demonstrating 99% neutrophils), but cultures did not demonstrate bacterial or fungal growth in any patient. Three patients had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies and two had computed tomography scans, each of which demonstrated a large fluid collection around the hip joint (Fig. 1). Serum metal levels obtained with a previously described analytical methodology28 demonstrated elevated cobalt levels in all ten cases and elevated chromium levels in seven of the ten cases (Table II). Notably, cobalt levels were elevated above their reference range to a significantly greater degree than chromium levels (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.014). On average, it took 8.0 months (range, zero to thirty-six months) to establish a diagnosis and perform revision surgery after the patient’s initial presentation of symptoms.
Fig. 1.

Axial T1-weighted fat-suppressed MRI demonstrating a large fluid collection within the hip joint (arrowheads).
TABLE II.
Preoperative Metal Ion Levels, Demonstrating Differential Elevation in Serum Cobalt Over Chromium*
| Mean ± Std. Dev. | Range | Reference Range† | |
| Titanium | 2.12 ± 0.67 | 1.31-3.30 | 2.20 ± 0.52 |
| Cobalt | 9.55 ± 12.73 | 1.60-42.45 | 0.16 ± 0.10 |
| Chromium | 1.39 ± 1.23 | 0.18-3.28 | 0.24 ± 0.35 |
All values are given in ng/mL.
Reference data are from patients at our institution with a well-functioning metal-on-polyethylene total hip prosthesis at eighty-four months postoperatively31.
Revision Surgery
A posterior surgical approach was utilized in seven cases and an abductor-sparing mini-Watson-Jones anterior approach, in three. A large amount of abnormal fluid, ranging from milky white to brownish in color, was encountered on entry into the hip joint. Frozen section analysis and intraoperative cultures were performed in all cases. Hypertrophy of the synovial tissue and pseudocapsule was typical (Fig. 2), resulting in large masses in several patients. Permanent histological analysis of capsular tissue was performed in eight cases. There were varying degrees of hip abductor muscle necrosis, with the two patients who had presented with recurrent instability having gross hip abductor muscle deficiency. No impingement between the prosthetic femoral neck and acetabular cup was noted at the revision surgery.
Fig. 2.

Intraoperative photograph demonstrating corrosion (arrow) at the modular head-neck taper between the femoral component and a collared (+10.5-mm) head. The pseudocapsule is markedly hypertrophic and avascular (asterisk), which is typical of this adverse local tissue reaction.
A complete synovectomy was performed, with removal of all abnormal hypertrophic tissue. In all patients, the femoral head-neck junction demonstrated obvious corrosion, seen as black, flaky material at the base of the taper (Fig. 2). The modular head remained engaged on the taper in all cases without signs of loosening. Each was disengaged from the taper, and the taper was cleaned with a dry lap pad to remove the corrosion product. Visual inspection by the surgeon revealed that the structural integrity of the trunnion was maintained in all ten implants. The femoral component was well-fixed in all cases. The acetabular component was well-fixed in nine of ten cases. It was concomitantly revised in one case because of loosening and in a second case because of component malposition; the modular liner was exchanged in the remaining eight cases.
A constrained liner was utilized in three patients: in the two with recurrent instability and in a third with moderate abductor muscle necrosis. In eight of the ten patients, a titanium-alloy adapter sleeve (CeramTec, Plochingen, Germany) was inserted over the existing taper and a BIOLOX delta ceramic femoral head (CeramTec) was impacted onto the adapter sleeve; the sleeve was used because of theoretical concerns about ceramic fracture with insertion onto a potentially damaged taper and to avoid the use of an additional modular junction containing cobalt alloy29. In the remaining two patients, a metal femoral head was used. Two 28-mm, four 32-mm, three 36-mm, and one 40-mm head sizes were utilized (Table III).
TABLE III.
Revision Surgery and Postoperative Data
| Case | Revision Procedure | Head Size (mm) | Head Type | Liner | Preop. Cr Level (ng/mL) | Preop. Co Level (ng/mL) | Postop. Co Level (ng/mL) | Complications |
| 1 | Head + liner exchange | 32 | Ceramic | Elevated rim | 3.28 | 8.89 | 0.54 at 6.1 mo | Recurrent instability |
| 2 | Head + liner exchange | 28 | Ceramic | Constrained | 3.16 | 1.67 | 0.36 at 22.0 mo | — |
| 3 | Head + liner exchange, acetabular revision | 36 | Ceramic | Neutral | 1.94 | 10.80 | — | — |
| 4 | Head + liner exchange | 36 | Ceramic | Neutral | 0.60 | 6.30 | — | — |
| 5 | Head + liner exchange | 32 | Ceramic | Elevated rim | 1.23 | 7.21 | 0.20 at 14.0 mo | — |
| 6 | Head + liner exchange, irrigation and debridement | 32 | Ceramic | Constrained | 1.69 | 42.45 | 8.93 at 2.2 mo | — |
| 7 | Head + liner exchange, acetabular revision | 40 | Metal | Neutral | 0.18 | 2.72 | 0.18 at 12.0 mo | — |
| 8 | Head + liner exchange | 32 | Ceramic | Elevated rim | 0.21 | 3.17 | — | — |
| 9 | Head + liner exchange | 28 | Metal | Constrained | 3.18 | 1.60 | — | — |
| 10 | Head + liner exchange | 36 | Ceramic | Elevated rim | 0.18 | 2.79 | 1.18 at 3.6 mo | — |
Statistical Analysis
The mean serum levels of titanium, cobalt, and chromium prior to revision surgery were calculated. Nonparametric tests were used on the basis of the results of a Shapiro-Wilk test. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the degree of elevation between preoperative cobalt and chromium levels. This test was also applied to longitudinal comparison of Harris hip scores and metal levels, assuming a two-tailed p value of 0.05.
Source of Funding
This study was supported in part by funding from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIH/NIAMS) Grant AR39310.
Results
Frozen sections were negative for acute inflammation in nine cases, but one patient demonstrated acute inflammation consistent with infection. Peptostreptococcus anaerobius grew on culture of two of two samples from that patient, whereas cultures of specimens from the remaining nine patients demonstrated no growth. Notably, the patient with the positive WBC count on preoperative hip aspiration had a frozen-section examination that was negative for infection and cultures demonstrated no growth. Histological analysis of the eight tissue specimens revealed tissue necrosis in each. Remaining viable capsular tissue demonstrated areas of dense perivascular infiltration of lymphocytes (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Case 8. Photomicrograph of the pathology specimen (hematoxylin and eosin, ×125). Viable areas of the joint pseudocapsule demonstrated a dense perivascular infiltration of lymphocytes. Large areas of the specimen were necrotic (not visualized on this image).
The mean Harris hip score improved from 58.1 points (range, 32 to 79 points) prior to the revision surgery to 89.7 points (range, 76 to 99 points) at a mean of 13.0 months (range, 1.5 to 30.9 months) after it (p = 0.01). The post-revision hip score was classified as excellent (>90 points) in six patients, as good (80 to 89 points) in two, and as fair (70 to 79 points) in two27. Eight of the ten patients demonstrated an improvement of >20 points in the Harris hip score.
Postoperative metal levels were measured in six patients at nine different time points, at a mean of 8.0 months (range, 1.8 to 22.0 months) after the revision surgery. In each case, there was a decrease in the serum cobalt level with time (Fig. 4); the mean cobalt level in these six patients was 10.96 ng/mL (range, 1.60 to 42.45 ng/mL) prior to the revision surgery and decreased to a mean of 1.61 ng/mL (range, 0.18 to 8.93 ng/mL) after the revision surgery (p < 0.05). Neither the titanium levels (mean, 2.02 ng/mL pre-revision compared with 1.80 ng/mL post-revision) nor the chromium levels (mean, 1.62 ng/mL pre-revision compared with 1.38 ng/mL post-revision) demonstrated a significant change with the sample size available for study.
Fig. 4.
Graph depicting the decrease in serum cobalt levels following revision surgery for corrosion at the modular head-neck taper. The square represents the mean of the preoperative values for the six patients who had measurement of postoperative metal levels. The triangles represent individual data points for different patients at various points during the postoperative course. As a reference, patients with a well-functioning metal-on-polyethylene total hip prosthesis have demonstrated a serum cobalt level of 0.16 ± 0.10 ng/mL at eighty-four months postoperatively31.
Complications included recurrent instability in a sixty-six-year-old woman who was noted to have moderate abductor necrosis at the time of the initial revision. After three dislocations, she underwent a second revision in which a constrained liner was placed and she had not had any more episodes of instability at the time of writing.
Discussion
The idea that corrosion might occur at the head-neck taper of the femoral component of a total hip prosthesis was first described in the early 1980s30, and the concept that modular tapers are susceptible to mechanically assisted crevice corrosion, a combination of fretting and crevice corrosion, was subsequently introduced6. Since that time, there have been numerous reports of corrosion at this taper interface, documented primarily in retrieval studies2-5,8,13-18 or, in rare cases, in association with catastrophic failure2,7. Although there have been concerns9 that fretting corrosion at the modular taper may produce soluble and particulate debris that can migrate locally or systemically19, to the best of our knowledge there have been only two prior case reports of corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause of occult, ongoing hip pain or as a cause of adverse local tissue reactions21,22.
In the present series, corrosion was a difficult diagnosis in most cases. The level of suspicion for an adverse metal reaction was initially quite low for patients with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing surface. However, as serum testing for metal is readily available at our institution, the role of these tests has expanded beyond patients with a metal-on-metal bearing surface. Our relatively low threshold for performing these tests, coupled with our confidence in the accuracy of our laboratory’s results, likely enabled us to make this diagnosis more readily than we would have been able to do otherwise. The results of these tests suggested an abnormality in all ten patients, typically showing a greater elevation in serum cobalt levels than in chromium levels when compared with reference ranges for patients with a well-functioning metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty28,31. Notably, two studies of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties have also documented differential elevations in serum cobalt levels over chromium levels, and their authors attributed this to release of metal debris or corrosion at the modular taper32,33.
It is clear from our series that, although it is uncommon, corrosion at the head-neck taper of the femoral component can produce substantial soft-tissue damage around the hip and should be included in the differential diagnosis for occult hip pain following total hip arthroplasty. On the basis of the type of tissue reaction and the presence of elevated serum metal levels, this process appears to be quite similar to adverse metal tissue reactions secondary to metal-on-metal bearing surfaces23-26. Further complicating the clinical picture, the primary process of corrosion has the potential to masquerade as a more obvious secondary process such as instability or component loosening, which has also been reported in the setting of adverse tissue reactions surrounding metal-on-metal bearings25,26,34,35. In particular, instability was a substantial problem in our series. Two patients presented with recurrent dislocations, and in both cases there was extensive necrosis with gross deficiency of the abductor mechanism that necessitated a constrained liner to achieve stability. A third patient experienced recurrent instability after revision surgery and subsequently had a revision to a constrained liner. Although the literature has demonstrated an increased dislocation rate after isolated head and liner exchange36,37, this problem is likely compounded in the setting of local tissue damage and severe abductor damage38. In view of this complication, the patient in this series who most recently underwent revision surgery for taper corrosion received a constrained liner despite having no history of instability, with the decision based on the amount of abductor damage seen at surgery.
Although the distribution of implants and manufacturers in this series may suggest a problem with a specific design, the distribution of implants is more likely related to the pattern of use in our institution than a design flaw of a single implant. Seven of the ten femoral components in this series were diaphysis-engaging cobalt-alloy stems with sintered beads. The findings in this series may be related to the preponderance of cobalt-alloy cementless stems that were used, as these devices had a greater-than-anticipated prevalence of intergranular corrosion on their trunnions in a separate series of 246 retrieved implants39. One of the stems in our study was a titanium femoral component with a modular neck and modular head. While modular neck stems may have some clinical benefits, this additional modular junction may increase the risk of corrosion and the types of soft-tissue reactions seen in this series; these complications may be more likely to occur in designs with a cobalt-alloy neck.
There was one acute infection in the setting of ongoing corrosion. This patient underwent two preoperative hip aspirations, several weeks apart. In both cases, no organisms grew on culture, and cell counts demonstrated fragmented cells and debris but no WBCs. The patient was scheduled for revision surgery on the basis of markedly elevated serum cobalt levels (42.45 ng/mL), after which he reported developing a sinus infection and subsequent worsening of hip pain. At the time of revision, gross purulence was found in the setting of a large, avascular soft-tissue mass and capsular hypertrophy, with cultures positive for Peptostreptococcus, an anaerobic organism commonly associated with sinus infections40. Although uncommon, the presentation of a superimposed infection has been reported in the setting of a pseudotumor associated with a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty41. It is possible that the avascular and necrotic nature of these large soft-tissue masses make them a susceptible site for infection in the setting of transient bacteremia. As this was thought to be an acute hematogenous infection with prompt treatment, irrigation and debridement with head and liner exchange was performed, with no evidence of recurrence to date.
The revision consisted of a modular head and liner exchange in eight of the ten patients (with the remaining two having a concomitant revision of the acetabular component), with reasonably good results at the time of early follow-up. This allowed retention of well-fixed components while still addressing, at least in part, the underlying problem at the taper junction. While extensive damage to the retained trunnion was not observed in these patients, there was likely some degree of damage. In a large retrieval study, corrosion was found to be more advanced in the head than on the trunnion8. The dilemma faced by the revising surgeon is whether to expose the patient to the potential morbidity associated with revision of a well-fixed femoral stem (particularly a distally fixed, fully porous-coated stem) in the setting of mild-to-moderate fretting corrosion on the trunnion. Our approach in this small series involved converting the cobalt-alloy/cobalt-alloy and cobalt-alloy/titanium-alloy head-neck interfaces to titanium-alloy/cobalt-alloy or titanium-alloy/titanium-alloy interfaces. This may be sufficient to prevent recurrence of the adverse local tissue responses, as was demonstrated in another case report42; however, longer-term follow-up is required to determine if the favorable results observed at a mean of 13.0 months postoperatively are maintained.
This study had several limitations, the most notable being an unknown denominator as not all patients had the primary arthroplasty performed at our institution. Nonetheless, we believe that this complication is relatively uncommon as it accounted for only 1.8% of the hip revisions performed at our institution over this time period. Furthermore, this is a relatively small series of patients with a short duration of follow-up, and it is unclear how these patients will fare over time. Despite the small size of this series, given the difficulties in diagnosis and the severity of the soft-tissue damage noted, we think that sharing our experience is important. Additionally, metal levels were available for all patients prior to revision, but these levels were inconsistently collected postoperatively.
In conclusion, adverse local tissue reactions can occur secondary to metal debris resulting from corrosion of the modular head-neck taper of metal-on-polyethylene total hip prostheses; these reactions appear to be quite similar to those reported in patients with metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. Serum metal levels were abnormal in every case, with an elevation of cobalt levels that was differentially higher than that of chromium levels. We recommend consideration of these tests for patients with a painful total hip prosthesis without an obvious cause, particularly if evidence of a fluid collection or tissue damage is detected by advanced imaging modalities.
Supplementary Material
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
Acknowledgments
Note: The authors thank Sheila Sanders for her assistance in data collection and Robert Urban for his assistance in analyzing the retrieved tissue samples in this study.
Footnotes
Disclosure: One or more of the authors received payments or services, either directly or indirectly (i.e., via his or her institution), from a third party in support of an aspect of this work. In addition, one or more of the authors, or his or her institution, has had a financial relationship, in the thirty-six months prior to submission of this work, with an entity in the biomedical arena that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. No author has had any other relationships, or has engaged in any other activities, that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. The complete Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest submitted by authors are always provided with the online version of the article.
References
- 1.Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Gilbert JL, Skipor AK, Black J, Jasty M, Galante JO. Local and distant products from modularity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995. Oct;(319):94-105 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Collier JP, Mayor MB, Williams IR, Surprenant VA, Surprenant HP, Currier BH. The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995. Feb;(311):91-101 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cook SD, Barrack RL, Baffes GC, Clemow AJ, Serekian P, Dong N, Kester MA. Wear and corrosion of modular interfaces in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. Jan;(298):80-8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB. Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991. Oct;(271):305-12 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kop AM, Swarts E. Corrosion of a hip stem with a modular neck taper junction: a retrieval study of 16 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2009. Oct;24(7):1019-23 Epub 2008 Oct 5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ. In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993. Dec;27(12):1533-44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ, Bertin KC, Zernich MR. Intergranular corrosion-fatigue failure of cobalt-alloy femoral stems. A failure analysis of two implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994. Jan;76(1):110-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002. Aug;(401):149-61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL. In vitro corrosion testing of modular hip tapers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003. Feb 15;64(2):78-93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawalec JS, Brown SA, Payer JH, Merritt K. Mixed-metal fretting corrosion of Ti6Al4V and wrought cobalt alloy. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995. Jul;29(7):867-73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Krachler M, Thomsen M, Heisel C. Metal release and corrosion effects of modular neck total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2009. Dec;33(6):1531-6 Epub 2009 Feb 14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mroczkowski ML, Hertzler JS, Humphrey SM, Johnson T, Blanchard CR. Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Orthop Res. 2006. Feb;24(2):271-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB, Surprenant HP. Corrosion between the components of modular femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992. Jul;74(4):511-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, Dujovne AR, Brooks CE. Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. Jan;(298):27-36 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brown SA, Flemming CA, Kawalec JS, Placko HE, Vassaux C, Merritt K, Payer JH, Kraay MJ. Fretting corrosion accelerates crevice corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Appl Biomater. 1995. Spring;6(1):19-26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cook SD, Barrack RL, Clemow AJ. Corrosion and wear at the modular interface of uncemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994. Jan;76(1):68-72 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lieberman JR, Rimnac CM, Garvin KL, Klein RW, Salvati EA. An analysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. Mar;(300):162-7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mathiesen EB, Lindgren JU, Blomgren GG, Reinholt FP. Corrosion of modular hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991. Jul;73(4):569-75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO. Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994. Sep;76(9):1345-59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Walsh AJ, Nikolaou VS, Antoniou J. Inflammatory pseudotumor complicating metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012. Feb;27(2):324.e5-8 Epub 2011 Apr 16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Svensson O, Mathiesen EB, Reinholt FP, Blomgren G. Formation of a fulminant soft-tissue pseudotumor after uncemented hip arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988. Sep;70(8):1238-42 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lindgren JU, Brismar BH, Wikstrom AC. Adverse reaction to metal release from a modular metal-on-polyethylene hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011. Oct;93(10):1427-30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S, Takamura K, De Smet K, Amstutz HC. Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. Sep;468(9):2321-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Doorn PF, Mirra JM, Campbell PA, Amstutz HC. Tissue reaction to metal on metal total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. Aug;(329 Suppl):S187-205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mahendra G, Pandit H, Kliskey K, Murray D, Gill HS, Athanasou N. Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop. 2009. Dec;80(6):653-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill HS, Murray DW. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008. Jul;90(7):847-51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969. Jun;51(4):737-55 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J, Galante JO. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998. Oct;80(10):1447-58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pulliam IT, Trousdale RT. Fracture of a ceramic femoral head after a revision operation. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997. Jan;79(1):118-21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lucas LC, Buchanan RA, Lemons JE. Investigations on the galvanic corrosion of multialloy total hip prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1981. Sep;15(5):731-47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J, Galante JO. Metal concentrations in patients with UHMWPE/CoCr THR: an 84 month prospective study. Read at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 2002. Feb 10-13; Dallas, TX [Google Scholar]
- 32.Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Gandhi JN, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P, Lord J, Nargol AV. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011. Aug;93(8):1011-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. Feb;468(2):318-25 Epub 2009 Aug 21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Killampalli VV, Reading AD. Late instability of bilateral metal on metal hip resurfacings due to progressive local tissue effects. Hip Int. 2009. Jul-Sep;19(3):287-91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. Sep;468(9):2313-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boucher HR, Lynch C, Young AM, Engh CA, Jr, Sr Engh C. Dislocation after polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003. Aug;18(5):654-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Griffin WL, Fehring TK, Mason JB, McCoy TH, Odum S, Terefenko CS. Early morbidity of modular exchange for polyethylene wear and osteolysis. J Arthroplasty. 2004. Oct;19(7 Suppl 2):61-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kung PL, Ries MD. Effect of femoral head size and abductors on dislocation after revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007. Dec;465:170-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Urban RM, Hall DJ, Gilbert JL, Della Valle CJ, Galante JO, Jacobs JJ. Have fretting and corrosion been reduced in contemporary head/neck modular junctions? Presented as a poster exhibit at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2012. Feb 7-11; San Francisco, California; Poster no. 12 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brook I. Microbiology of acute and chronic maxillary sinusitis associated with an odontogenic origin. Laryngoscope. 2005. May;115(5):823-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Watters TS, Eward WC, Hallows RK, Dodd LG, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP. Pseudotumor with superimposed periprosthetic infection following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. Jul 7;92(7):1666-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Morteza M, Nicolaou N, Rodriguez JA. Metal allergy response to femoral head-neck corrosion after total hip replacement. Curr Orthop Pract. 2010. Sep-Oct;21(5):530-3 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

