Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2012 Sep 18;7(9):e44714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044714

Global Renal Gene Expression Profiling Analysis in B2-Kinin Receptor Null Mice: Impact of Diabetes

Miran A Jaffa 1, Firas Kobeissy 2, Moustafa Al Hariri 2, Hussein Chalhoub 2, Assaad Eid 3, Fuad N Ziyadeh 2, Ayad A Jaffa 2,4,*
Editor: Paolo Madeddu5
PMCID: PMC3445541  PMID: 23028588

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy (DN), the leading cause of end-stage renal failure, is clinically manifested by albuminuria and a progressive decline in glomerular filtration rate. The risk factors and mechanisms that contribute to the development and progression of DN are still incompletely defined. To address the involvement of bradykinin B2-receptors (B2R) in DN, we used a genome wide approach to study the effects of diabetes on differential renal gene expression profile in wild type and B2R knockout (B2R−/−) mice. Diabetes was induced with streptozotocin and plasma glucose levels and albumin excretion rate (AER) were measured at predetermined times throughout the 23 week study period. Longitudinal analysis of AER indicated that diabetic B2R−/−D null mice had a significantly decreased AER levels compared to wild type B2R+/+D mice (P = 0.0005). Results from the global microarray study comparing gene expression profiles among four groups of mice respectively: (B2R+/+C, B2R+/+D, B2R−/−C and B2R−/−D) highlighted the role of several altered pathological pathways in response to disruption of B2R and to the diabetic state that included: endothelial injury, oxidative stress, insulin and lipid metabolism and inflammatory process with a marked alteration in the pro-apoptotic genes. The findings of the present study provide a global genomics view of biomarkers that highlight the mechanisms and putative pathways involved in DN.

Introduction

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a major health epidemic and is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetes. It is the single most common cause of end-stage renal failure [1], [2]. A very characteristic and initial event of the development of DN is glomerulosclerosis, which is featured by increased thickness of the glomerular basement membrane, and widening of the mesangium with accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM). Furthermore, the degree of mesangial expansion is strongly related to the clinical manifestations of diabetic nephropathy, such as albuminuria and decreased glomerular filtration rate [3], [4]. Even though inherent susceptibility seems to influence the rate at which glomerular injury develops, hyperglycemia seems to be the primary driving force for cellular damage [5]. In this regard, intensive control of glycemia in type I diabetic patients was associated with a significant reduction in the development and progression of nephropathy [6].

Although, the underlying biochemical and cellular mechanisms that promote renal injury in diabetes are still undefined, accumulating evidence supports a relationship between the activity of the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) and renal impairment. It has been shown that type I diabetic patients with hyperfiltration as well as diabetic rats with increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) are associated with increased active kallikrein excretion rate [7], [8]. In addition, treatment of hyperfiltering diabetic rats with aprotinin, a kallikrein inhibitor, or with a B2-kinin receptor (B2R) antagonist, increases the renal vascular resistance and reduces GFR and RPF [9]. Furthermore, previous findings from our lab have shown that increased plasma prekallikrein activity is associated with increased albumin excretion rate; these data have been demonstrated in DCCT/EDIC-cohort of type 1 diabetic patients [10].

While most of the physiological actions of the KKS are attributed to the generation of BK and activation of B2R, the intracellular signaling pathways initiated upon activation of B2R leading to expression of prosclerotic factors that ultimately result in glomerular injury are just beginning to be defined. Activation of B2R by BK results in marked induction of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), collagen I and transforming growth factor-β type II receptor (TGF-ßRII) in mesangial cells. Inhibition of B2R by Icatibant significantly reduced the increase in collagen I and CTGF mRNA levels in response to BK challenge [11]. Of interest, it has been shown that the glomerular expression of B2Rs are increased in diabetes and a targeted deletion B2R protects against the development of DN [12], [13]. Furthermore, diabetic B2R−/− null mice display reduced albumin excretion rate (AER), as well as reduced glomerular and tubular injury compared to diabetic B2R+/+ mice [13].

In this study, we employed a global microarray analysis coupled with systems biology study to investigate the differential gene expression in wild type control (B2R+/+) and diabetic (B2R+/+D) mice as well as in B2R knockout-control (B2R−/−) mice and in B2R knockout-diabetic (B2R−/−D) mice in order to identify candidate genes that may be involved in the development of diabetic nephropathy. The objective of our study was to determine 1) whether deletion of B2-receptors will result in alteration in specific gene expression profiles whose specific functions can shed light on the role(s) of B2-receptors, and 2) whether diabetes will result in differences in the patterns of gene expression and pathways between B2R+/+D and B2R−/−D mice that can be linked to the pathological manifestation observed after the induction of DN.

Methods

Study Design

To address the contribution of B2R to the development of diabetic nephropathy, we studied B2R knockout mice (B2R−/−) and their wild type littermates (B2R+/+). Male B2R−/− mice (strain # B6 129S-BdKrb2, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) and B2R+/+ mice (strain # B6 129 SF2/J, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) weighing 20–30 g were used in our studies. Mice were housed three per cage in a light and temperature controlled room and had free access to food and water. Diabetes was induced by daily intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (50mg/kg body weight) for 3–5 days. Diabetes was confirmed in STZ-treated mice by tail vein plasma glucose levels. We used a total of 12 mice for this study divided into 4 groups, 3 mice in each group. Group 1, wild type non-diabetic-controls (B2R+/+C); group 2, wild type-diabetic (B2R+/+ D); group 3, B2R knockout-control (B2R−/−C) and group 4, B2R knockout-diabetic (B2R−/−D). Glucose levels and body weights were measured at predetermined intervals to characterize the diabetic state and to ensure adequate metabolic control. Every week mice were placed in metabolic cages (Nalgene) for 24 h to acclimate, and then 24h urine collections were obtained from all mice to measure albumin excretion rate. The mice were sacrificed 6 months after the induction of diabetes. The studies were done in line with the Guide for the Care and Use of laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No 85–23, revised 1996). The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Medical University of South Carolina.

RNA Extraction

Kidneys from control and diabetic mice (B2R+/+C, B2R+/+D, B2R−/−C and B2R−/−D mice, n = 3 per group) were removed under anesthesia and cortexes were cut off to extract RNA. For RNA extraction and purification, a method combined Trizol (Cat. No.15596-018, Invitrogen Life Technologies) and RNeasy Midi Kit (Cat. No.75144, QIAGEN) for total RNA isolation from animal tissue was used. Briefly, the cortexes were homogenized using an appropriate volume of Trizol (1ml of Trizol/100 mg tissue). Then chloroform (0.2 ml/1 ml Trizol used) was added to separate the aqueous phase from protein phase. Total RNA was dissolved in the aqueous phase. RNA purification followed the protocol of RNeasy kit handbook. The RNA concentration was determined in a spectrophotometer (ultraspec III, Pharmacia) by absorbance at 260 nm. The ratio of A260 to A280 was calculated to check the purification of RNA, and the rRNA ratio of 28S/18S using 2100 Bioanalyzer (Aglilent) was measured to check the quality of RNA.

Synthesis of Double-stranded cDNA from Total RNA

Total RNA (10 µg) from each sample was used to synthesize ds-cDNA. In primer hybridization, 10 µg of RNA, T7-(dT)24 primer (100 pmol/ul, HPLC purified) and DEPC-H2O were added to the tube and incubated at 70°C for 10 min. Next, 5× first strand cDNA buffer 4 µl, DTT (0.1 M) 2 µl dNTP (10 mM) were added to each tube, incubated at 42°C for 2 min. and followed by addition of SuperScrip II RT (200 U/µl) 2 µl and incubated at 42°C for 1 hour to synthesize the first strand of cDNA. The final volume for the first strand cDNA synthesis was 20 µl. In order to synthesis the second strand, the following reagents were added to the first strand synthesis tube: DEPC-treated water 91 µl, 5× second strand cDNA reaction buffer 30 µl, 10 mM dNTP mix 3 µl, 10 U/µl E.coli DNA ligase, 10 U/µl E.coli DNA polymerase I 4 µl and 2 U/µl E.coli RNase H. The final volume of the second strand reaction was 150 µl. The reaction tubes were incubated at 16°C for 2 hours in a cooling water bath. After the incubation, 2 µl of [10 U] T4 DNA polymerase was added to the reaction tube, incubated at 16°C for 5 min, followed by addition of 10 µl of 0.5 M EDTA to complete synthesis of the second cDNA strand.

Synthesis of Biotin-labeled cRNA

Before Synthesis of biotin-labeled cRNA, double-strand cDNA was cleaned according to the GeneChip Sample Cleanup Module. The following reagents were used in the final reaction volume (40 µl): 4 µl of 10×HY reaction buffer, 4 µl of 10×Biotin-labeled ribonucleotides, 4 µl of 10×DTT, 4 µl 10×RNase inhibitor mix, 2 µl 20×T7 RNA polymerase and distilled water. All of the reagents were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 5 hours, with gentle mixing of the tube every 30 min. The biotin-labeled cRNA was cleaned according to the GeneChip Sample Cleanup Module before quantification.

cRNA Fragmentation and Microarray Procedure

To reach a final concentration of 1 µg/µl, 20 µg cRNA and 8 µl of 5×fragmentation buffer were incubated at 94°C for 35 min. A total of 15 µl of each sample (1.0 µg/µl) was used for preparation of hybridization cocktail that was loaded onto the GeneChips (Mouse Expression Array 430 A, Affymetrix) and hybridized for 16 h at 45°C in the Affymetrix GeneChip hybridization oven 640. Following this, the chips were loaded into the Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics Station 400 with double stain antibody amplification solution for washing and staining. Finally, the GeneChips were scanned using the Hewlett Packard GeneArray Scanner 2500.

Expression values were derived using RMA (for normalization and background subtraction) as executed by the software RMAexpress (University of California, Berkeley). Expressed genes were determined according to the following criterion: any gene for which a sample had an average detection p-value (MASS) >0.04 (standard threshold for MASS “presence” call); all other genes were excluded from further consideration. RMA expression values were converted from log-base 2 and imported into dchip. Dchip was used to perform comparisons for all desired group comparisons. Criteria for comparison were: Fold change of 1.8; 90% confidence bound of fold change was used; T-test with p-value <0.05; false discovery rate was calculated as the median number genes discovered in 50 iterations of permutated samples.

Real-Time PCR

Total RNA (2 µg) was converted to cDNA using MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol at 37°C for 1 hr. To determine the validity of primers and appropriate Tm for Real Time PCR, the primers were first amplified in a PCR reaction to ensure that only one band is amplified. The following primers were designed so that all of the PCR products are within 75–150 bp (Integrated DNA Technologies Inc). β-actin: 5′-actgccgctcctcttcctc-3′; 5′-ccgctcgttgccaatagtga-3′; Growth hormone receptor: 5′- ttctgggaagcctcgattcaccaa-3′, 5′:cagcttgtcgttggctttcccttt-3′; Insulin growth factor binding protein-1(IGFBP1) 5′: agatcgccgacctcaagaaatgga-3′, 5′-tgttgggctgcagctaatctctct-3′; IGFBP4: 5′-tcggaaatcgaagccatccaggaa-3′, 5′-tgaagctgttgttgggatgttcgc-3′; Extracellular superoxide distmutase (EC-SOD) 5′-tgcatgcaatctgcagggtacaac-3′, 5′-aagagaaccaagccggtgatctgt-3′; Flavin containing monooxygenase 2 (FMO2) 5′-caacgcactgtctttgacgctgtt-3′, 5′-atggaaatactggcttcggaacct-3′; Glutathione-S-transferase a-2 (GSTa-2) 5′-atgacaaggactaccttgtgggca-3′, 5′-ggctggcatcaagctcttcaacat-3′. For each target gene, a standard curve was established. This was achieved by performing a series of 3-fold dilutions of the gene of interest. Negative control was made using the same volume of Rnase-free water instead of sample. The master mix was prepared as follows: 2× SYBR Green Supermix (cat. No. 170–8880, BIO-RAD) 12.5 µl, forward and reverse primer 0.25 µl respectively and ddH2O 12 µl. For each well, 22 µl of master mix was loaded first, followed by 3 µl of sample, mixed well to get total reaction volume of 25 µl. For plate setup, SYBR-490 was chosen as fluorophore. The plate was covered with a sheet of optical sealing film. PCR conditions were 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 58°C for 1 min for ß-actin and for all the other genes 60°C for 1 min, then 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min and 100 cycles of 55°C for 10 sec. All of the reactions were done in duplicate. The correlation coefficient is between 0.98-1, PCR efficiency is between 75–130%. The mRNA levels were expressed relative to ß-actin mRNA. Realtime PCR using iCycle™ iQ optical system software (version 3.0a) was used in our studies.

Urinary Albumin Excretion Rate

The urinary albumin excretion rate was measured with a murine microalbuminuria ELISA kit (Exocell Inc., PA) according to the manufacturer’s suggestions.

Systems Biology Analysis

The microarray differential expression of the wild type B2R vs. knockout (B2R−/−) in control and diabetic phenotypes was further analyzed using a systems biology approach to assess the altered pathway(s) relevant to differential B2R knockout (B2R−/−) phenotype mice and its contribution to the development of Diabetes. PathwayStudio software (v 9.0; Ariadne Genomics, Rockville, MD, USA) was applied for the systems biology analysis. This software helps to interpret biological meaning from differential gene expression, build and analyze pathways, and identify altered cellular processes and molecular functions involved. PathwayStudio comes with a built-in resource named ResNet, which is a database of molecular interactions based on natural language processing of scientific abstracts in PubMed.

For gene ontology analysis including differential molecular function and biological processes involved, PANTHER software (Protein ANalysis THrough Evolutionary Relationships; http://www.pantherdb.org/genes/batchIdSearch.jsp) was utilized to classify proteins into distinct categories of molecular functions and biological processes. Panther software uses published scientific experimental evidence and evolutionary relationships abstracted by curators with the goal of predicting function even in the absence of direct experimental evidence. Proteins are classified into families and subfamilies of shared function, which are then categorized using a highly controlled vocabulary (ontology terms) by biological process, molecular function and molecular pathway.

Statistical Methods

Power Analysis

Sample size calculation for our study was determined by using the formula by Hedeker D et al, for longitudinal data [14]. In this study we assumed 80% power, significance of 5%, repeated measure correlation of 0.5, 9 measurement time points, within subject variance of 4.2, and medium effect size of 0.3. This resulted in 2.3 mice per group, and accounting for possible attrition effect we inflated our sample size by 20% so the sample size in each group will be 2.76 mice.

Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± standard error, unless stated otherwise. All data were analyzed using SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Version 8, Cary, NC). t-tests were used to analyze continuous outcomes versus each covariate separately. To compare means values across three or more groups, ANOVA was used. Generalized linear models and generalized estimating equations were used to compare albumin excretion rates, plasma glucose levels and body weights within mice and across groups over time. A longitudinal data analysis was conducted to assess the effect of group on the AER levels over time. A mixed model was fit and spatial data covariance structure was used to accommodate for the unequally- spaced measurement time points. In this context, a continuous-time model was employed using variance-covariance matrix with type = sp (pow) in SAS PROC MIXED. Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for inflated type I error when making multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was determined using a two-sided test and significance was assumed for P-values ≤0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the Diabetic State

Plasma glucose levels were markedly elevated 2 weeks after STZ injection in both B2R+/+D and B2R−/−D groups of mice compared to their non-diabetic controls, and remained elevated throughout the study period (Figure 1A). On average plasma glucose levels increased by 205 mg/dl in B2R−/−D null mice and by 251 mg/dl in B2R+/+D null mice compared to B2R+/+C mice, P<0.001. No significant difference in plasma glucose levels was observed between B2R+/+C mice and B2R−/−C mice, P = 0.276. No significant time effect on plasma glucose level was observed, P = 0.2647. Also no significant effect of group by time interaction on plasma glucose levels was detected, P = 0.28. Hence, the observed difference in plasma glucose levels across groups was primarily due to group effect.

Figure 1. Plasma glucose levels (A) and body weights (B) in diabetic (B2R+/+D and B2R−/−D) and control (B2R+/+C and B2R−/−C) mice.

Figure 1

(A) Plasma glucose levels were significantly increased two weeks after STZ injection in both diabetic groups (B2R+/+D and B2R−/−D) compared to B2R+/+C and B2R−/−C (P<0.001) and remained significantly elevated for the duration of the study. (B) Initial body weights were not significantly different between diabetic and control mice. However, B2R−/−D mice had significantly reduced bodyweight after 14 weeks and B2R+/+D after 20 weeks compared with B2R+/+ C and B2R−/− C mice and this reduction in body weight was maintained for the duration of the study (P<0.001 vs. B2R+/+C and B2R−/−C).

Initial body weights were not significantly different between diabetic and non-diabetic mice. However, B2R−/−D mice had significantly reduced bodyweight after 14 weeks and B2R+/+D after 20 weeks compared with B2R+/+ C and B2R−/− C mice and this reduction in body weight was maintained for the duration of the study (Figure 1B). Body weight analyses revealed that there was no significant group effect on bodyweights over time, but there was a significant effect of time on bodyweights, P = 0.0011. In addition, there was interaction between time and group effect on changes in body weights P = 0.0011. Thus, the decrease in bodyweights in B2R−/−D null mice and B2R+/+D mice compared to B2R+/+C mice are a result of time effect.

Albumin Excretion Rate

The albumin excretion rate results are presented in Figure 2. Groups were defined as B2R+/+C, B2R+/+D, B2R−/−C and B2R−/−D. AER was modeled with a time and group main effect and a time by group effect. Since AER in each mouse was measured up to 10 times over 23 weeks, a longitudinal data analysis was conducted to assess the effect of group on the AER levels over time. A mixed model was fit and spatial data covariance structure was used to accommodate for the unequally-spaced measurement time points. Our results showed that there was a significant overall group effect with P<0.0001. In particular, when the wild type control group B2R+/+C was considered as the reference group, we observed that B2R−/−D had a significant increase in the AER by 13.5 mg/24 h, P = 0.001. Overall, a significant increase by about 28.5 mg/24 h in AER was also observed for B2R+/+D mice compared to B2R+/+C mice P<.0001. No significant differences in AER was observed between B2R+/+C and B2R−/−C, P = 0.1629.

Figure 2. Albumin excretion rate (AER) in diabetic (B2R+/+D and B2R−/−D) and control (B2R+/+C and B2R−/−C) mice.

Figure 2

AER was significantly higher in B2R+/+D mice compared to B2R−/− D (†P<0.05) and to B2R+/+C and or B2R−/−C (*P<0.001), as early as two weeks after induction of diabetes and remained elevated for the duration of the study period.

Our result also showed that the B2R−/−D null mice had a significant decrease of 14.97 mg/24 h in the AER levels compared to wild type B2R+/+D mice, P = 0.0005. Some minor time effect on the AER was also observed. In particular, we can estimate that overall the AER appeared to be decreasing with time at a slow rate of 0.547 mg/24 h, P<.0001. An interaction test was then performed which showed that there is no significant interaction between time and group (P-value  = 0.24). Although there was some minor effect of time on AER, the observed changes in AER across groups was mainly due to group effect rather than an effect of time.

Hierarchical Clustering of Gene Expression

Differential gene expression profiles in the kidney were identified among four groups of mice: B2R+/+C, B2R+/+D, B2R−/−C and B2R−/−D. Each column represents one sample, and the color bars represent the median value of three array experiments for an individual mouse for that gene (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Hierarchical clustering of gene expression in the kidney among four groups of mice: B2R+/+C, B2R+/+D, B2R−/−C and B2R−/−D.

Figure 3

Each column represents one sample, and the color bars represent the median value of three array experiments for an individual mouse for that gene.

Gene Regulation in Response to Disruption of B2R

Upon deletion of B2R, There were a total of 14 altered genes (4 upregulated and 9 downregulated shown in Table 1 ); these include genes that code for ATPase activity, hemoglobin and enzymes involved in protein metabolism. Among the altered genes, Monoglyceride lipase (MGLL; EC 3.1.1.23) and lysine (K)-specific demethylase 2B (KDM2B) were found to be downregulated due to B2R deletion. KDM2B gene encodes a member of the F-box protein family lysine (K)-specific demethylase 2B which function in phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination while MGLL gene functions together with hormone-sensitive lipase to hydrolyze intracellular triglyceride stores in adipocytes and other cells to fatty acids and glycerol. The biological processes depicting genes that are altered in response to B2R disruption are shown in Figures 4 A and B.

Table 1. Upregulated and Downregulated Genes in B2R−/−C vs. B2R+/+C.

Accession ID Gene Gene ID Fold Change P value
NM_018731 Atp4a ATPase, H+/K+ exchanging, gastric, alpha polypeptide 11944 2.77 0.001678
AK007618 Ak3 adenylate kinase 3 56248 1.85 0.017419
NM_001164745 Ptp4a2 protein tyrosine phosphatase 4a2 19244 2.97 0.028458
NM_012032 Serinc3 serine incorporator 3 26943 2.14 0.013514
NM_013467 Aldh1a1 aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, subfamily A1 11668 −4.13 0.003764
BC027434 Hbb-b2 hemoglobin, beta adult minor chain 15130 −2.42 0.002817
NM_008218 Hba-a1 hemoglobin alpha, adult chain 1 15122 −2.54 0.00193
NM_011921 Aldh1a7 aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, subfamily A7 26358 −2.35 0.005015
BC005569 Rnase4 ribonuclease, RNase A family 4 58809 −4.28 0.00286
AF031467 Bcat2 branched chain aminotransferase 2, mitochondrial 12036 −2.49 0.047991
NM_011844 Mgll monoglyceride lipase 23945 −3.01 0.028657
BC027279 Blvrb biliverdin reductase B (flavin reductase (NADPH)) 233016 −1.94 0.016502
NM_001003953 Kdm2b lysine (K)-specific demethylase 2B 30841 −1.81 0.001347

Figure 4. Biological processes depicting genes that are altered in response to B2R disruption are shown in pie chart.

Figure 4

Data compares genes altered in B2R−/−C vs. B2R+/+C (A) upregulated genes and (B) downregulated genes.

Gene Regulation in Response to Diabetes

Upon Diabetes induction, a total of 9 genes were found to be upregulated and 16 genes downregulated compared to B2R+/+C wild type mice. An enriched pathways analysis identified genes associated with potassium transport, cell cycles and lipid metabolism as shown in Table 2 ). The biological processes depicting genes that are altered in response to diabetes are shown in Figures 5A and B .

Table 2. Upregulated and Downregulated Genes in B2R+/+D vs. B2R+/+C.

Accession ID Gene Gene ID Fold Change P value
NM_019659 Kcnj1 potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 1 56379 2.1 0.005281
NM_011819 Gdf15 growth differentiation factor 15 23886 1.82 0.031049
AK007630 Cdkn1a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (P21) 12575 4.61 0.000166
AK008108 Sulf2 sulfatase 2 72043 1.91 0.027765
AK013376 Aplp2 amyloid beta (A4) precursor-like protein 2 11804 1.88 0.022803
AK007618 Ak3 adenylate kinase 3 56248 1.99 0.010866
NM_030558 Car15 carbonic anhydrase 15 80733 1.99 0.013746
AAC42082 Ccng1 cyclin G1 12450 1.91 0.007673
NM_012032 Serinc3 serine incorporator 3 26943 2.02 0.018166
BC010197 Cpe carboxypeptidase E 12876 −2.91 0.001076
NM_008321 Id3 inhibitor of DNA binding 3 15903 −1.97 0.007472
NM_013475 Apoh apolipoprotein H 11818 −2.55 0.005274
BC027434 Hbb-b2 hemoglobin, beta adult minor chain 15130 −2.17 0.003365
NM_008218 Hba-a1 hemoglobin alpha, adult chain 1 15122 −2.1 0.001414
D89669 Cyp24a1 cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 13081 −2.34 0.038907
BC020534 Cckar cholecystokinin A receptor 12425 −2.28 0.032112
NM_007812 Cyp2a5 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily a, polypeptide 5 13087 −1.85 0.038301
BC005569 Rnase4 ribonuclease, RNase A family 4 58809 −3.31 0.002108
NM_030888 C1qtnf3 C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 3 81799 −2.24 0.025602
BC013343 Hpd 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid dioxygenase 15445 −1.98 0.027661
S64539 Odc1 ornithine decarboxylase, structural 1 18263 −1.86 0.045764
AK011116 Hba-a1 hemoglobin alpha, adult chain 1 15122 −1.98 0.004592
AAH23851 Hmgcs1 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 1 208715 −2.71 0.013067
NM_001004148 Slc13a5 solute carrier family 13 (sodium-dependent citrate transporter), member 5 237831 −1.84 0.00636
EDL41048 Id4 inhibitor of DNA binding 4 15904 −1.95 0.031173

Figure 5. Biological processes depicting genes that are altered in response to diabetes in wild type control mice are shown in pie chart.

Figure 5

Data compares genes altered in B2R+/+D vs. B2R+/+C (A) upregulated genes and (B) downregulated genes.

Of great interest, in B2R−/− null mice, a total of 181 genes were regulated by diabetes including 91 upregulated genes and 90 downregulated genes, respectively ( Table 3 ). A thorough systems biology analysis of specific enriched pathways, several genes were found to be associated with: endothelial cellular injury, insulin & lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, cardiac and kidney toxicity as illustrated in the biological processes ( Figures 6A & B ).

Table 3. Upregulated and Downregulated Genes in B2R−/−D vs. B2R−/−C.

Accession ID Gene Gene ID Fold Change P value
BC009155 Mgst1 microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 56615 1.97 0.035109
NM_019703 Pfkp phosphofructokinase, platelet 56421 1.99 0.045538
EDL25631 Mpzl2 myelin protein zero-like 2 14012 1.86 0.035095
NM_019423 Elovl2 elongation of very long chain fatty acids (FEN1/Elo2, SUR4/Elo3, yeast)-like 2 54326 2.03 0.003224
NM_013467 Aldh1a1 aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, subfamily A1 11668 8.21 0.015004
NM_009994 Cyp1b1 cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily b, polypeptide 1 13078 1.84 0.022511
NM_009255 Serpine2 serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade E, member 2 20720 2.25 0.002624
NM_021897 Trp53inp1 transformation related protein 53 inducible nuclear protein 1 60599 1.84 0.024129
BC027434 Hbb-b2 hemoglobin, beta adult minor chain 15130 2.69 0.013965
NM_025284 Tmsb10 thymosin, beta 10 19240 1.9 0.024637
NM_007631 Ccnd1 cyclin D1 12443 2.95 0.000665
NM_007752 Cp ceruloplasmin 12870 2.49 0.007697
NM_008218 Hba-a1 hemoglobin alpha, adult chain 1 15122 3.2 0.019897
AF047838 Clca1 chloride channel calcium activated 1 12722 3.37 0.011734
BC021776 Apoc3 apolipoprotein C-III 11814 2.01 0.000641
NM_009244 Serpina1b serine (or cysteine) preptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 1B 20701 2.24 0.006778
NM_008332 Ifit2 interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 2 15958 2.05 0.022893
NM_001198560 H2-Q7 histocompatibility 2, Q region locus 7 15018 1.84 0.013281
NM_011921 Aldh1a7 aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, subfamily A7 26358 3.96 0.030189
NM_013492 Clu clusterin 12759 1.92 0.000802
NM_009705 Arg2 arginase type II 11847 1.98 0.00093
D89669 Cyp24a1 cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 13081 3.09 0.079614
NM_008341 Igfbp1 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 16006 2.81 0.042115
NM_031161 Cck cholecystokinin 12424 2.17 0.002063
NM_010281 Ggh gamma-glutamyl hydrolase 14590 2 0.012756
NM_019738 Nupr1 nuclear protein 1 56312 1.85 0.001812
NM_008935 Prom1 prominin 1 19126 2.21 0.014173
NM_031185 Akap12 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein (gravin) 12 83397 1.86 0.00053
NM_009831 Ccng1 cyclin G1 12450 2.15 0.007653
NM_008182 Gsta2 glutathione S-transferase, alpha 2 (Yc2) 14858 2.65 0.000003
NM_011313 S100a6 S100 calcium binding protein A6 (calcyclin) 20200 3.53 0.000785
NM_011169 Prlr prolactin receptor 19116 3.04 0.026061
NM_010145 Ephx1 epoxide hydrolase 1, microsomal 13849 5.62 0.000013
NM_013602 Mt1 metallothionein 1 17748 2.96 0.003938
NM_009256 Serpinb9 serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade B, member 9 20723 1.88 0.031251
NM_001166409 Rbm3 RNA binding motif protein 3 19652 2.57 0.034705
NM_009162 Scg5 secretogranin V 20394 2.08 0.031656
NM_013590 Lyz1 lysozyme 1 17110 2.11 0.004781
BC010291 Ifitm3 interferon induced transmembrane protein 3 66141 2.1 0.001773
AK007630 Cdkn1a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (P21) 12575 4.38 0.018945
BC010747 Cyp4a10 cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily a, polypeptide 10 13117 2.97 0.008145
BC019601 Wsb1 WD repeat and SOCS box-containing 1 78889 2.08 0.017203
AK011116 Hba-a1 hemoglobin alpha, adult chain 1 15122 2.87 0.004126
NM_008630 Mt2 metallothionein 2 17750 2.3 0.000286
AK002562 Reep6 receptor accessory protein 6 70335 1.83 0.006197
AK019319 Apoe apolipoprotein E 11816 2.03 0.013394
NM_009964 Cryab crystallin, alpha B 12955 1.98 0.008461
NM_009700 Aqp4 aquaporin 4 11829 2.24 0.04758
NM_011403 Slc4a1 solute carrier family 4 (anion exchanger), member 1 20533 1.88 0.005501
NM_028071 Cotl1 coactosin-like 1 (Dictyostelium) 72042 2.52 0.045007
NM_033521 Laptm4b lysosomal-associated protein transmembrane 4B 114128 2.24 0.022123
NM_017372 Lyz2 lysozyme 2 17105 3.11 0.0077
NM_019989 Sh3bgrl SH3-binding domain glutamic acid-rich protein like 56726 2.1 0.02642
NM_001206367 Gsn gelsolin 227753 1.82 0.004725
NM_001039392 Tmsb10 thymosin, beta 10 19240 2.41 0.009177
NM_010169 F2r coagulation factor II (thrombin) receptor 14062 2.66 0.008048
NM_007569 Btg1 B-cell translocation gene 1, anti-proliferative 12226 1.9 0.027652
NM_013492 Clu clusterin 12759 3.04 0.023634
NM_010664 Krt18 keratin 18 16668 2.33 0.032815
NM_009242 Sparc secreted acidic cysteine rich glycoprotein 20692 2.77 0.01031
NM_021281 Ctss cathepsin S 13040 1.94 0.003757
NM_007631 Ccnd1 cyclin D1 12443 2.36 0.01662
NM_011579 Tgtp1 T-cell specific GTPase 1 21822 2.11 0.048236
NM_010501 Ifit3 interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 15959 2.4 0.043235
NM_019975 Hacl1 2-hydroxyacyl-CoA lyase 1 56794 2.68 0.000059
NM_012006 Acot1 acyl-CoA thioesterase 1 26897 2.11 0.001113
NM_009735 B2m beta-2 microglobulin 12010 2.8 0.025118
NM_009517 Zmat3 zinc finger matrin type 3 22401 1.93 0.005952
NM_054102 Ivns1abp influenza virus NS1A binding protein 117198 1.98 0.02154
NM_009254 Serpinb6a serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade B, member 6a 20719 2.45 0.016523
NM_011844 Mgll monoglyceride lipase 23945 2.2 0.021782
AF177041 Akr1c12 aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C12 622402 2.06 0.010183
NM_016668 Bhmt betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase 12116 3.04 0.00654
NM_010379 H2-Ab1 histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, beta 1 14961 1.86 0.01325
NM_010169 coagulation factor II (thrombin) receptor 14062 2.02 0.003274
AF263458 Plac8 placenta-specific 8 231507 1.84 0.001426
BC008184 Aldoc aldolase C, fructose-bisphosphate 11676 2 0.008866
BC027340 Lyplal1 lysophospholipase-like 1 226791 1.8 0.001368
BC012874 Serpina1b serine (or cysteine) preptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 1B 20701 2.34 0.024747
NM_009735 B2m beta-2 microglobulin 12010 1.88 0.015559
AK011116 Hba-a1 hemoglobin alpha, adult chain 1 15122 2.52 0.003324
NM_013492 Clu clusterin 12759 2.45 0.011136
NM_001042611 Cp ceruloplasmin 12870 4.02 0.000586
NM_010362 Gsto1 glutathione S-transferase omega 1 14873 2.53 0.001403
NM_009369 Tgfbi transforming growth factor, beta induced 21810 1.82 0.021522
NM_011701 Vim vimentin 22352 1.93 0.022829
NM_008538 Marcks myristoylated alanine rich protein kinase C substrate 17118 1.83 0.018183
NM_007620 Cbr1 carbonyl reductase 1 12408 3.36 0.016972
AF108501 Clca2 chloride channel calcium activated 2 80797 4.01 0.007099
NM_013470 Anxa3 annexin A3 11745 1.81 0.022226
NM_009156 Sepw1 selenoprotein W, muscle 1 20364 2.02 0.001731
NM_008509 Lpl lipoprotein lipase 16956 −3.3 0.000892
BC010197 Cpe carboxypeptidase E 12876 −2.11 0.000013
AF145253 Sec61a1 Sec61 alpha 1 subunit (S. cerevisiae) 53421 −2.13 0.005158
NM_007823 Cyp4b1 cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily b, polypeptide 1 13120 −1.92 0.00051
BC013477 Adh1 alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (class I) 11522 −1.92 0.007629
NM_013560 Hspb1 heat shock protein 1 15507 −2.56 0.004221
NM_013475 Apoh apolipoprotein H 11818 −2.66 0.003569
BC021352 Plod2 procollagen lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2 26432 −1.98 0.012487
NM_029550 Keg1 kidney expressed gene 1 64697 −1.85 0.000586
NM_008766 Slc22a6 solute carrier family 22 (organic anion transporter), member 6 18399 −1.8 0.001602
NM_007376 Pzp pregnancy zone protein 11287 −2.24 0.022851
NM_008878 Serpinf2 serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade F, member 2 18816 −2.54 0.001222
NM_010007 Cyp2j5 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily j, polypeptide 5 13109 −2.12 0.042784
NM_011435 Sod3 superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular 20657 −2 0.023677
NM_021788 Sap30 sin3 associated polypeptide 60406 −1.82 0.005361
NM_013478 Azgp1 alpha-2-glycoprotein 1, zinc 12007 −2.14 0.004734
AW105741 Slc16a2 solute carrier family 16 (monocarboxylic acid transporters), member 2 20502 −2.32 0.007439
BC012637 Aadat aminoadipate aminotransferase 23923 −1.97 0.007973
NM_008129 Gclm glutamate-cysteine ligase, modifier subunit 14630 −2.06 0.015486
BC016885 Ugt8a UDP galactosyltransferase 8A 22239 −2.77 0.004372
L27424 Timp3 tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 21859 −2.34 0.006506
NM_027884 Tns1 tensin 1 21961 −2.12 0.049487
NM_013797 Slco1a1 solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1a1 28248 −11.51 0.014794
NM_008079 Galc galactosylceramidase 14420 −2.1 0.017597
NM_030721 Acox3 acyl-Coenzyme A oxidase 3, pristanoyl 80911 −2.68 0.006701
NM_007825 Cyp7b1 cytochrome P450, family 7, subfamily b, polypeptide 1 13123 −5.04 0.009947
NM_015804 Atp11a ATPase, class VI, type 11A 50770 −2.76 0.012782
BC020534 Cckar cholecystokinin A receptor 12425 −2.11 0.006061
AB008174 Hnf1b HNF1 homeobox B 21410 −1.94 0.032091
NM_008016 Mpp6 membrane protein, palmitoylated 6 (MAGUK p55 subfamily member 6) 56524 −2.17 0.00856
NM_053097 Cml3 camello-like 3 93674 −2.48 0.001103
NM_010232 Fmo5 flavin containing monooxygenase 5 14263 −2.66 0.000267
NM_008173 Nr3c1 nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 1 14815 −1.86 0.006131
NM_008261 Hnf4a hepatic nuclear factor 4, alpha 15378 −2.08 0.004817
NM_010517 Igfbp4 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 16010 −2.37 0.00307
NM_010496 Id2 inhibitor of DNA binding 2 15902 −1.88 0.004033
NM_009203 Slc22a12 solute carrier family 22 (organic anion/cation transporter), member 12 20521 −2.13 0.044714
AK004192 Cd36 CD36 antigen 12491 −2.07 0.000977
NM_001160404 Galnt1 UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 14423 −2.22 0.001029
NM_009467 Ugt2b5 UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B5 22238 −1.99 0.005327
NM_010279 Gfra1 glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor family receptor alpha 1 14585 −1.86 0.029282
BC003451 Mat2a methionine adenosyltransferase II, alpha 232087 −2.03 0.000527
BC019374 Gclc glutamate-cysteine ligase, catalytic subunit 14629 −2.18 0.00284
BC025936 Cyp4a12a cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily a, polypeptide 12a 277753 −3.57 0.000548
U68542 Cux1 cut-like homeobox 1 13047 −2.1 0.024224
BC013521 Anxa13 annexin A13 69787 −1.94 0.041203
AY038079 Fbxw11 F-box and WD-40 domain protein 11 103583 −2.24 0.009461
BC003476 Cd74 CD74 antigen (invariant polypeptide of major histocompatibility complex, class II antigen-associated) 16149 −1.9 0.012558
AB022340 Acsm3 acyl-CoA synthetase medium-chain family member 3 20216 −3.76 0.001304
AF213670 Mlx MAX-like protein X 21428 −2.08 0.007919
NM_001164099 Add3 adducin 3 (gamma) 27360 −1.84 0.002187
BC027063 Bdh1 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, type 1 71911 −2.16 0.001797
BC023060 Efemp1 epidermal growth factor-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 216616 −2.16 0.001651
S64539 Odc1 ornithine decarboxylase, structural 1 18263 −2.3 0.033305
NM_009202 Slc22a1 solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 1 20517 −1.95 0.002763
AK003232 Cbr3 carbonyl reductase 3 109857 −3.48 0.045187
AK009736 Gpr137b-ps G protein-coupled receptor 137B, pseudogene 664862 −2.01 0.00129
AK006387 Me1 malic enzyme 1, NADP(+)-dependent, cytosolic 17436 −2.8 0.011484
AK005023 Sel1l sel-1 suppressor of lin-12-like (C. elegans) 20338 −2.25 0.003066
NM_001159375 Eif4a1 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A1 13681 −2.08 0.023416
AK002362 Myo5a myosin VA 17918 −2.24 0.00322
AK003786 Nfs1 nitrogen fixation gene 1 (S. cerevisiae) 18041 −2.05 0.009065
AK007618 Ak3 adenylate kinase 3 56248 −2.05 0.039247
NM_008303 Hspd1 heat shock protein 1 (chaperonin) 15528 −2.75 0.037992
NM_011631 Hsp90b1 heat shock protein 90, beta (Grp94), member 1 22027 −2.07 0.012751
NM_010516 Cyr61 cysteine rich protein 61 16007 −2.08 0.007693
NM_013614 Odc1 ornithine decarboxylase, structural 1 18263 −1.91 0.002118
NM_001111289 Caprin1 cell cycle associated protein 1 53872 −1.93 0.041035
NM_023908 Slco3a1 solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 3a1 108116 −2.27 0.010399
NM_019699 Fads2 fatty acid desaturase 2 56473 −2.1 0.011032
AB046929 Chst7 carbohydrate (N-acetylglucosamino) sulfotransferase 7 60322 −2.15 0.000153
NM_033564 Mpv17l Mpv17 transgene, kidney disease mutant-like 93734 −2.04 0.004172
AK003671 Car3 carbonic anhydrase 3 12350 −2.4 0.020089
NM_032000 Trps1 trichorhinophalangeal syndrome I (human) 83925 −1.83 0.008962
AB031813 Slco1a1 solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1a1 28248 −5.5 0.024812
NM_019657 Hsd17b12 hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 12 56348 −1.91 0.02581
NM_010302 Gna12 guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 14673 −1.82 0.010264
NM_010232 Fmo5 flavin containing monooxygenase 5 14263 −3.12 0.000843
AF319542 Kcnk5 potassium channel, subfamily K, member 5 16529 −2.11 0.038642
NM_001159555 Cd36 CD36 antigen 12491 −3.35 0.002187
NM_025903 Ifrd2 interferon-related developmental regulator 2 15983 −2.47 0.005388
AF133669 Arl6ip1 ADP-ribosylation factor-like 6 interacting protein 1 54208 −1.94 0.00508
BC022130 Slc26a1 solute carrier family 26 (sulfate transporter), member 1 231583 −1.85 0.008221
BC026422 Tgm1 transglutaminase 1, K polypeptide 21816 −2.49 0.000038
BC026598 Slc22a7 solute carrier family 22 (organic anion transporter), member 7 108114 −7.3 0.004741
M33324 Ghr growth hormone receptor 14600 −2.58 0.005396
M55333 Ace angiotensin I converting enzyme (peptidyl-dipeptidase A) 1 11421 −2.45 0.006298
NM_013876 Rnf11 ring finger protein 11 29864 −2.38 0.008352
NM_001122683 Bdh1 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, type 1 71911 −1.88 0.001252
NM_009199 Slc1a1 solute carrier family 1 (neuronal/epithelial high affinity glutamate transporter, system Xag), member 1 20510 −2.07 0.004881

Figure 6. Biological processes depicting genes that are altered in response to diabetes in B2R−/− null mice are shown in pie chart.

Figure 6

Data compares genes altered in B2R−/−D vs. B2R−/−C (A) upregulated genes and (B) downregulated genes.

Gene Expression in Diabetes with or without Disruption of B2R

In B2R−/−D vs. B2R+/+D mice, a total of 43 genes were upregulated and 66 genes were downregulated ( Table 4 ). Among these altered genes: IGFBP, GST, EC-SOD and GHR genes. In a detailed assessment of these genes, gene expressions of IGFBP-1(3.65 fold) and GST (Yc2, 2.05 fold; omega1, 2.43 fold) were elevated in the B2KR−/−D mice compared to the B2KR+/+D mice. On the other hand, gene expressions of Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) (−2.18 fold), EC-SOD (−1.95 fold), FMO2 (−1.94 Fold) and GHR (−2.7 fold) were suppressed in the B2KR−/−D mice compared to the B2KR+/+D mice, P<0.05. The biological processes depicting genes that are altered in response to diabetes +/− B2R are shown in Figure 7A & B.

Table 4. Upregulated and Downregulated Genes in B2R−/−D vs. B2R+/+D.

Accession ID Gene Gene ID Fold Change P value
BC009155 Mgst1 microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 56615 2.01 0.025734
NM_019423 Elovl2 elongation of very long chain fatty acids (FEN1/Elo2, SUR4/Elo3, yeast)-like 2 54326 2.08 0.003068
NM_021450 Trpm7 transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 7 58800 1.83 0.002536
BC027434 Hbb-b2 hemoglobin, beta adult minor chain 15130 2.41 0.026002
NM_008218 Hba-a1 hemoglobin alpha, adult chain 1 15122 2.73 0.027316
AF047838 Clca1 chloride channel calcium activated 1 12722 2.15 0.00938
D89669 Cyp24a1 cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 13081 6.34 0.054554
NM_008341 Igfbp1 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 16006 3.65 0.030456
NM_027884 Tns1 tensin 1 21961 1.77 0.007886
AAD38411 March7 membrane-associated ring finger (C3HC4) 7 57438 1.82 0.005006
NM_008182 Gsta2 glutathione S-transferase, alpha 2 (Yc2) 14858 2.05 0.020506
NM_011313 S100a6 S100 calcium binding protein A6 (calcyclin) 20200 2.51 0.003671
NM_011169 Prlr prolactin receptor 19116 2.6 0.018234
NM_010145 Ephx1 epoxide hydrolase 1, microsomal 13849 2.32 0.015186
NM_010424 Hfe hemochromatosis 15216 1.85 0.005272
NM_001172121 Rbms3 RNA binding motif, single stranded interacting protein 207181 2.35 0.034332
NM_010279 Gfra1 glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor family receptor alpha 1 14585 1.81 0.020694
BC013343 Hpd 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid dioxygenase 15445 1.97 0.007464
NM_008096 Gc group specific component 14473 3.77 0.008264
BC023060 Efemp1 epidermal growth factor-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 216616 2.13 0.001006
AK009020 Clic3 chloride intracellular channel 3 69454 2.05 0.005867
NM_145942 Hmgcs1 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 1 208715 2.75 0.005719
NM_019989 Sh3bgrl SH3-binding domain glutamic acid-rich protein like 56726 2.04 0.037097
NM_010169 F2r coagulation factor II (thrombin) receptor 14062 2.31 0.015754
NM_007569 Btg1 B-cell translocation gene 1, anti-proliferative 12226 2.03 0.025775
NM_001004148 Slc13a5 solute carrier family 13 (sodium-dependent citrate transporter), member 5 237831 1.86 0.029255
NM_145569 Mat2a methionine adenosyltransferase II, alpha 232087 1.8 0.034233
NM_001110831 Dnpep aspartyl aminopeptidase 13437 1.9 0.001443
NM_009837 Cct4 chaperonin containing Tcp1, subunit 4 (delta) 12464 2.06 0.000479
NM_009242 Sparc secreted acidic cysteine rich glycoprotein 20692 1.8 0.020269
NM_008597 Mgp matrix Gla protein 17313 1.91 0.002312
NM_019975 Hacl1 2-hydroxyacyl-CoA lyase 1 56794 2.17 0.003102
NM_054102 Ivns1abp influenza virus NS1A binding protein 117198 2.1 0.01779
NM_013806 Abcc2 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 2 12780 2.18 0.019342
NM_031166 Id4 inhibitor of DNA binding 4 15904 2.36 0.013276
BC012874 Serpina1b serine (or cysteine) preptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 1B 20701 1.89 0.044292
NM_029023 Scpep1 serine carboxypeptidase 1 74617 1.84 0.001437
NM_009009 Rad21 RAD21 homolog (S. pombe) 19357 2.09 0.001454
NM_010362 Gsto1 glutathione S-transferase omega 1 14873 2.43 0.008124
NM_016792 Txnl1 thioredoxin-like 1 53382 1.84 0.016406
NM_011701 Vim vimentin 22352 1.95 0.026022
NM_007620 Cbr1 carbonyl reductase 1 12408 2.2 0.012532
AF108501 Clca2 chloride channel calcium activated 2 80797 2.57 0.003658
AF145253 Sec61a1 Sec61 alpha 1 subunit (S. cerevisiae) 53421 −2.11 0.005453
NM_013560 Hspb1 heat shock protein 1 15507 −2.36 0.004073
BC021352 Plod2 procollagen lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2 26432 −2 0.005958
NM_029550 Keg1 kidney expressed gene 1 [Mus musculus ] 64697 −1.8 0.031526
AK146840 Amd1 S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase 1 11702 −2 0.014904
NM_030706 Trim2 tripartite motif-containing 2 80890 −2 0.048874
NM_010274 Gpd2 glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase 2, mitochondrial 14571 −1.9 0.008751
NM_008878 Serpinf2 serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade F, member 2 18816 −1.8 0.027152
NM_011435 Sod3 superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular 20657 −2 0.00248
BC006716 Vdr vitamin D receptor 22337 −1.8 0.005698
NM_019444 Ramp2 receptor (calcitonin) activity modifying protein 2 54409 −3.2 0.027003
AF067806 Pde8a phosphodiesterase 8A 18584 −1.9 0.036591
AF012834 Kcnj1 potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 1 56379 −2.1 0.025618
NM_007788 Csnk2a1 casein kinase 2, alpha 1 polypeptide 12995 −2 0.033254
L27424 Timp3 tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 21859 −2.1 0.0122
NM_008079 Galc galactosylceramidase 14420 −1.9 0.045887
NM_023646 Dnaja3 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 3 83945 −1.9 0.007017
NM_030721 Acox3 acyl-Coenzyme A oxidase 3, pristanoyl 80911 −2 0.018101
NM_018760 Slc4a4 solute carrier family 4 (anion exchanger), member 4 54403 −2.1 0.029658
NM_001164733 Mpp6 membrane protein, palmitoylated 6 (MAGUK p55 subfamily member 6) 56524 −2.1 0.023307
NM_010890 Mus musculus neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4 (Nedd4) 17999 −1.9 0.000172
NM_010517 Igfbp4 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 16010 −2.2 0.018949
NM_008397 Itga6 integrin alpha 6 16403 −2.3 0.03713
NM_009203 Slc22a12 solute carrier family 22 (organic anion/cation transporter), member 12 20521 −1.9 0.010432
NM_018881 Fmo2 flavin containing monooxygenase 2 55990 −1.9 0.000286
NM_011851 Nt5e 5′ nucleotidase, ecto 23959 −2 0.020878
NM_001160404 Galnt1 UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 14423 −2 0.046958
NM_009443 Tgoln1 trans-golgi network protein 22134 −2.2 0.006538
BC019374 Gclc glutamate-cysteine ligase, catalytic subunit 14629 −1.8 0.014479
BC025936 Cyp4a12a cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily a, polypeptide 12a 277753 −2.2 0.050246
BC021452 Ddx6 DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 6 13209 −1.8 0.002793
AY038079 Fbxw11 F-box and WD-40 domain protein 11 103583 −2.3 0.013332
NM_016870 Acsm3 acyl-CoA synthetase medium-chain family member 3 20216 −2.7 0.073051
AF213670 Mlx MAX-like protein X 21428 −1.8 0.025547
NM_001164099 Add3 adducin 3 (gamma) 27360 −1.8 0.003839
NM_001167745 Wasl Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome-like (human) 73178 −2.3 0.005224
BC027063 Bdh1 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, type 1 71911 −2.7 0.0021
AK003232 Cbr3 carbonyl reductase 3 109857 −2.57 0.049803
AK014338 Manf mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor 74840 −1.9 0.027373
NM_001159375 Eif4a1 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A1 13681 −2.2 0.006428
NM_010911 Nfs1 nitrogen fixation gene 1 (S. cerevisiae) 18041 −2.1 0.002002
AK015410 Dnm2 dynamin 2 13430 −2.1 0.004377
AK013376 Aplp2 amyloid beta (A4) precursor-like protein 2 11804 −2.3 0.007349
AK007618 Ak3 adenylate kinase 3 56248 −2.2 0.026914
NM_031843 Dpp7 dipeptidylpeptidase 7 83768 −1.8 0.017748
EDL19081 Actb actin, beta 11461 −1.88 0.006181
NM_010477 Hspd1 heat shock protein 1 (chaperonin) 15510 −2.72 0.029635
NM_011631 Hsp90b1 heat shock protein 90, beta (Grp94), member 1 22027 −2.17 0.009681
NM_001111289 Caprin1 cell cycle associated protein 1 53872 −1.88 0.005003
NM_080555 Ppap2b phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2B 67916 −2.08 0.001515
NM_011390 Slc12a7 solute carrier family 12, member 7 20499 −1.88 0.010937
NM_010302 Gna12 guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 14673 −1.83 0.001605
NM_019664 Kcnj15 potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15 16516 −2.17 0.012327
U41465 Bcl6 B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 6 12053 −1.82 0.009357
AF319542 Kcnk5 potassium channel, subfamily K, member 5 16529 −2.05 0.003671
NM_008261 Hnf4a hepatic nuclear factor 4, alpha 15378 −1.8 0.00581
NM_001159555 Cd36 CD36 antigen 12491 −2.58 0.021768
NM_016697 Gpc3 glypican 3 14734 −2.43 0.001794
BB540964 Ifrd2 interferon-related developmental regulator 2 15983 −2.09 0.036417
BC022130 Slc26a1 solute carrier family 26 (sulfate transporter), member 1 231583 −1.81 0.011694
M33324 Ghr growth hormone receptor 14600 −2.71 0.020174
NM_013876 Rnf11 ring finger protein 11 29864 −2.37 0.002724
NM_026147 Rps20 ribosomal protein S20 67427 −1.97 0.023604
NM_008538 Marcks myristoylated alanine rich protein kinase C substrate 17118 −1.96 0.011844
NM_009199 Slc1a1 solute carrier family 1 (neuronal/epithelial high affinity glutamate transporter, system Xag), member 1 20510 −2.21 0.008478
U13836 Atp6v0a1 ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal V0 subunit A1 11975 −1.9 0.007939

Figure 7. Biological processes depicting genes that are altered in response to diabetes in wild type control mice and in B2R−/− null mice are shown in pie chart.

Figure 7

Data compares genes altered in B2R−/−D vs. B2R+/+D (A) upregulated genes and (B) downregulated genes.

Validation of Specific Gene Expressions by Quantitative Real-time PCR Superoxide Dismutase 3, Extracellular (EC-SOD)

EC-SOD gene encodes a member of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) protein family which are antioxidant enzymes that catalyze the dismutation of two superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen protecting from oxidative stress. EC-SOD expression tended to be suppressed by diabetes in the wild type mice. Interestingly, in the B2R−/−D mice, EC-SOD expression was increased up to 37% compared to that in the B2R+/+D mice (*P<0.05 vs. B2R+/+D, Figure 8A ).

Figure 8. Renal expression of (A) Superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular (EC-SOD), (B) Glutathione S-transferase, (GST), (C) Flavin containing monooxygenase (FMO) and (D) Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP-1) in B2R+/+D and B2R−/−D.

Figure 8

Renal cortex mRNA levels were measured by real time PCR. Data presented in the bar graph demonstrates that disruption of B2R results in significant increases in anti-oxidant enzymes as well as IGFBP-1 (*P<0.05 B2R−/−D vs. B2R+/+D, n = 3).

Glutathione S-transferase, Alpha 2(Yc2) (GST-Yc2)

GST-Yc2 catalyze the conjugation of reduced glutathiones and a variety of electrophiles, including many known carcinogens and mutagens. Our data indicated that the expression of GST was significantly higher in B2R−/−D mice compared to B2R+/+D mice (*P<0.05 vs. B2R+/+D, Figure 8B).

Flavin Containing Monooxygenase 2 (FMO2)

FMO2 family is NADPH-dependent enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of many drugs and xenobiotics. In the B2R+/+D mice, FMO2 expression was decreased up to 34% compared to that in the controls. However, the expression FMO2 was significantly higher in B2R−/−D mice compared with B2R+/+D mice (*P<0.05 vs. B2R+/+D, Figure 8C).

Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein (IGFBP-1)

IGFBP-1 gene is a member of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) family and encoding proteins with an IGFBP domain and a thyroglobulin type-I domain. It binds both insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) I and II and circulates in the plasma prolonging the half-life of the IGFs. In our work, the deletion of B2R didn’t change the expression of IGFBP-1. However, IGFBP-1 expression was decreased up to 33% by diabetes in the wild type mice (P<0.05). Interestingly, in B2R−/−D mice, IGFBP-1 expression was upregulated significantly: up to 2.7-fold increase compared to that in B2R+/+D (*P<0.05 vs. B2R+/+D, Figure 8D).

We next performed a targeted analysis to identify the involvement of these selected validated genes in the most highlighted altered pathways (apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation). These genes were shown to be highly related to the aforementioned pathways as shown in Figure 9 .

Figure 9. Pathways influenced by the validated targeted genes.

Figure 9

Targeted system biology analysis of the biological process and molecular function of the 4 validated genes (Superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular (EC-SOD), Glutathione S-transferase, alpha 2(Yc2) (GST-Yc2), Flavin containing monooxygenase 2 (FMO2), Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP-1). Similar to the identified altered pathways, these 4 proteins are shown to be related to the identified molecular pathways (apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation).

Systems Biology Analysis of Altered Genes in B2R−/−D and B2R+/+D mice

Pathway Studio 9.0 (2011, Ariadne Genomics, Rockville, MD) was also used to search for potential altered cellular processes, and related pathways for associations with gene alterations in our diabetic mice in the presence or absence of B2R. The network was generated using the “direct interaction” algorithm with the filters of “Cellular process and Protein” as Entity Type while the Relation Type parameter was set to “Regulation Analysis” to map altered pathways regulated by the identified (downregulation vs. upregulation) subsets of genes. Several processes believed to be central to the pathogenesis of DN included oxidative stress mechanisms (ROS generation & oxidative stress), cardiac injury mechanisms along with pronounced inflammatory process with a marked alteration in the pro-apoptotic genes as illustrated in Figure 10 .

Figure 10. Molecular & Biological Pathway Interaction Map Analysis upon Diabetes induction with or without disruption of B2R.

Figure 10

Using Pathway Studio 9.0, altered genes relevant to diabetic induction with or without disruption of B2R. were analyzed. In B2R−/−D vs. B2R+/+D mice, a total of 109 genes were found to be altered (43 upregulated and 66 downregulated). The network was generated using “direct interaction” algorithm to map cellular processes and interactions among altered genes. Of interest, global Pathway analysis revealed association of these genes to oxidative stress mechanisms (ROS generation & oxidative stress), cardiac injury mechanisms along with pronounced inflammatory process with a marked alteration in the pro-apoptotic genes. The upregulated genes are shown in green and downregulated genes are in red.

Discussion

A pivotal event initiated by DN is glomerular injury, characterized by mesangial deposition and podocyte loss. The degree of podocyte loss and mesangial expansion are strongly correlated with the clinical manifestations of DN, such as albuminuria and decreased GFR [3], [4], [15]. Microalbuminuria, an early marker of DN, signifies high risk for progressive renal failure and cardiovascular disease [16]. Microalbuminuria has also been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic populations and with generalized and glomerular endothelial dysfunction [17]. Identifying biomarkers and risk factors that contribute to the development of microalbuminuria may provide insights into the mechanisms of diabetic renal injury.

Few interventions have been shown to slow the progression of renal disease in diabetic patients. These include intensive glycemic control, blood pressure control and treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) [6], [18]. Despite these interventions and beneficial effects, diabetic patients progress with time to develop end stage renal disease. It is of significance to note here that a recent Interventional study aimed at blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with ACE-inhibitors or ARBs, in patients with type 1 diabetes, did not slow nephropathy progression [19]. However, the exact factors responsible for these maladaptive signals leading to renal failure are poorly defined.

Metabolic imbalances associated with high tissue glucose and abnormal lipid levels in the diabetic state influence many pathways that contribute to the pathogenesis of DN [20], [21]. The modifiable factors engaged in these processes are yet to be identified but there is evidence for promotion of chronic low-grade inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, stimulation of proliferative/apoptotic pathways, and deposition of extracellular matrix [22][24]. Importantly, inflammatory mediators and growth factors are increasingly recognized as key players in the pathogenesis of DN [25][27].

Our published work has provided evidence for the involvement of the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) in the initiation of DN [7], [13]. In the current work, we performed longitudinal data analysis to assess the rate of change in AER levels over time among the 4 different groups. Our data indicated that targeted deletion of B2R in mice interferes with the progression of DN. Diabetic B2R−/− mice display reduced AER compared to diabetic B2R+/+ mice. Other investigators have also implicated a role for B2R in DN. Polymorphisms in the human B2R have been linked to increased albuminuria in diabetic patients and to the development of chronic renal failure [28], [29]. In addition, blockade of B2R markedly reduced the proteinuria in STZ-diabetic mice and inhibition of B2R ameliorated the accelerated nephropathy in uninephrectomized db/db mice, lending support to the pathogenic role of B2R in DN [30], [31].

Contrary to the aforesaid findings, Kakoki and Smithies have reported a protective role for B2R in DN. They have shown that the insulin Akita (Ins2Akita) mice crossed with null B2R (In2Akita/B2R−/−) or with double-null B2R and B1R (In2Akita/B2R−/−/B1R−/−) displayed increased albuminuria compared to Ins2Akita mice alone [32], [33].Other factors contributing to these apparent differences in the role of B2R in DN may be attributed to differences in the model of DN studied, genetic background of the animal models studied, severity and metabolic control of the diabetic state, specifics of the experimental design, the end points measured. It is noteworthy to point here that a confounding factor to be considered when using the Insulin Akita mouse is the propensity for these mice to develop mesangial deposits of IgG [34].

To investigate the underlying mechanisms and involved pathways linking the role of B2R genotype to the development/progression of DN, we examined the contribution of B2R genotype on the global genomics level. We performed a global microarray study comparing gene expression profiles among four groups of mice respectively: (B2R+/+C, B2R+/+D, B2R−/−C and B2R−/−D). Findings from this work highlighted the role of several altered pathological pathways involved in the development of diabetes in the B2R−/−D vs. B2R−/−C mice which included: endothelial injury, oxidative stress, and insulin and lipid metabolism.

A detailed analysis of the top scoring biological processes data [Panther Analysis] reflected the central role of B2R to increased immune response/inflammation along with other cellular functions (transport, systems process and response to stimulus which can be linked to protective/compensatory mechanism. This is in accordance with a previous study by Bascands et al, in which a global microarray renal gene expression changes were examined in lipopolysacharide-treated wild-type and kinin B1 receptor-knockout mice to investigate underlying mechanisms of renal inflammation reflected the role of acute phase response and inflammatory process [35].

This is in contrast to the sole effect of diabetes induction in wild type mice which reflected more pronounced metabolic/cellular processes changes (metabolites precursor generation, cellular adhesion, and cellular communication) rather than inflammatory immune response mediated response. Of interest, is the upregulation of one of the genes, aquaporin 4, (AQP4, 2.24) due to diabetes. AQP4 functions as a water transport channel in the kidney and has been shown to be downregulated in mice lacking B2R [36].

These results validate existing published literature linking renal inflammation to early events of renal disease [37][39]. Furthermore, a global systems biology analysis among the diabetic mice with or without disruption of B2R (B2R−/−D vs. B2R+/+D) illustrated the role of oxidative stress mechanisms (ROS generation & oxidative stress), along with inflammatory process with a marked alteration in the pro-apoptotic genes. Indeed, these results may reflect a pathologic exacerbative role of B2R in inducing cellular vascular injury mediated via apoptotic pathways in the presence of diabetes. These findings are in concert with other microarray studies involving B1 and B2 receptor knockout mice [40], [41].

Taken together, the finding of this study investigates the contributing role of B2-receptors in either exacerbating or at least enhancing the occurrence of diabetic nephropathy. In conclusion, the present study investigates the impact B2R deletion on the development of DN. A critical analysis of the data hints that renal function is preserved in the B2R−/−D mice especially at the early stages of DN, compared to that of B2R+/+D mice; these data were substantiated by the genomics/systems biology analysis. To the best of knowledge, this represents the first study that utilizes wide scale genomic/systems biology analysis in B2R−/−D mice. Finally, several of the identified genes (EC-sod, GST, IGFBP1 and FMO) were validated with RT-PCR to confirm gene alteration. Further studies including immunohistological analysis and assessment of protein levels and the activities of the antioxidants identified are certainly necessary to further evaluate the contributing role of the disruption of the B2-receptors.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants HL077192 and HL087986 (AAJ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Dronavalli S, Duka I, Bakris GL (2008) The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 4: 444–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Blazquez-Medela AM, Lopez-Novoa JM, Martinez-Salgado C (2010) Mechanisms involved in the genesis of diabetic nephropathy. Curr Diabetes Rev 6: 68–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mauer M, Drummond K (2002) The early natural history of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: I. Study design and baseline characteristics of the study participants. Diabetes 51: 1572–1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Drummond K, Mauer M (2002) The early natural history of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: II. Early renal structural changes in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 51: 1580–1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Balakumar P, Arora MK, Reddy J, Anand-Srivastava MB (2009) Pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy: involvement of multifaceted signalling mechanism. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 54: 129–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications (DCCT) Research Group. Kidney Int 47: 1703–1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Harvey JN, Edmundson AW, Jaffa AA, Martin LL, Mayfield RK (1992) Renal excretion of kallikrein and eicosanoids in patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Relationship to glomerular and tubular function. Diabetologia 35: 857–862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Harvey JN, Jaffa AA, Margolius HS, Mayfield RK (1990) Renal kallikrein and hemodynamic abnormalities of diabetic kidney. Diabetes 39: 299–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Jaffa AA, Rust PF, Mayfield RK (1995) Kinin, a mediator of diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration. Diabetes 44: 156–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jaffa AA, Durazo-Arvizu R, Zheng D, Lackland DT, Srikanth S, et al. (2003) Plasma prekallikrein: a risk marker for hypertension and nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 52: 1215–1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tan Y, Wang B, Keum JS, Jaffa AA (2005) Mechanisms through which bradykinin promotes glomerular injury in diabetes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288: F483–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Christopher J, Jaffa AA (2002) Diabetes modulates the expression of glomerular kinin receptors. Int Immunopharmacol 2: 1771–1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tan Y, Keum JS, Wang B, McHenry MB, Lipsitz SR, et al. (2007) Targeted deletion of B2-kinin receptors protects against the development of diabetic nephropathy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F1026–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hedeker D, Gibbons R, Waternaux C (1999) Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: comparing time-related contrasts between two groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24: 70–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Stitt-Cavanagh E, MacLeod L, Kennedy C (2009) The podocyte in diabetic kidney disease. ScientificWorldJournal 9: 1127–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Brown WV (2008) Microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus: renal protection accompanies cardiovascular protection. Am J Cardiol 102: 10L–13L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nakagawa T, Tanabe K, Croker BP, Johnson RJ, Grant MB, et al. (2011) Endothelial dysfunction as a potential contributor in diabetic nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 7: 36–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD (1993) The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 329: 1456–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mauer M, Zinman B, Gardiner R, Suissa S, Sinaiko A, et al. (2009) Renal and retinal effects of enalapril and losartan in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 361: 40–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Busch M, Franke S, Ruster C, Wolf G (2010) Advanced glycation end-products and the kidney. Eur J Clin Invest 40: 742–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Rutledge JC, Ng KF, Aung HH, Wilson DW (2010) Role of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in diabetic nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 6: 361–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Haneda M, Araki S, Togawa M, Sugimoto T, Isono M, et al. (1997) Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade is activated in glomeruli of diabetic rats and glomerular mesangial cells cultured under high glucose conditions. Diabetes 46: 847–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Singh DK, Winocour P, Farrington K (2011) Oxidative stress in early diabetic nephropathy: fueling the fire. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7: 176–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Eid AA, Gorin Y, Fagg BM, Maalouf R, Barnes JL, et al. (2009) Mechanisms of podocyte injury in diabetes: role of cytochrome P450 and NADPH oxidases. Diabetes 58: 1201–1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ziyadeh FN, Hoffman BB, Han DC, Iglesias-De La Cruz MC, Hong SW, et al. (2000) Long-term prevention of renal insufficiency, excess matrix gene expression, and glomerular mesangial matrix expansion by treatment with monoclonal antitransforming growth factor-beta antibody in db/db diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 8015–8020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sakharova OV, Taal MW, Brenner BM (2001) Pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy: focus on transforming growth factor-beta and connective tissue growth factor. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 10: 727–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rincon-Choles H, Kasinath BS, Gorin Y, Abboud HE (2002) Angiotensin II and growth factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl: S8–11. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28. Maltais I, Bachvarova M, Maheux P, Perron P, Marceau F, et al. (2002) Bradykinin B2 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with altered urinary albumin/creatinine values in diabetic patients. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 80: 323–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jozwiak L, Drop A, Buraczynska K, Ksiazek P, Mierzicki P, et al. (2004) Association of the human bradykinin B2 receptor gene with chronic renal failure. Mol Diagn 8: 157–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zuccollo A, Navarro M, Catanzaro O (1996) Effects of B1 and B2 kinin receptor antagonists in diabetic mice. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74: 586–589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Tang SC, Chan LY, Leung JC, Cheng AS, Lan HY, et al. (2011) Additive renoprotective effects of B2-kinin receptor blocker and PPAR-gamma agonist in uninephrectomized db/db mice. Lab Invest 91: 1351–1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kakoki M, Takahashi N, Jennette JC, Smithies O (2004) Diabetic nephropathy is markedly enhanced in mice lacking the bradykinin B2 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 13302–13305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kakoki M, Sullivan KA, Backus C, Hayes JM, Oh SS, et al. (2010) Lack of both bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors enhances nephropathy, neuropathy, and bone mineral loss in Akita diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 10190–10195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Haseyama T, Fujita T, Hirasawa F, Tsukada M, Wakui H, et al. (2002) Complications of IgA nephropathy in a non-insulin-dependent diabetes model, the Akita mouse. Tohoku J Exp Med 198: 233–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bascands JL, Bachvarova M, Neau E, Schanstra JP, Bachvarov D (2009) Molecular determinants of LPS-induced acute renal inflammation: Implication of the kinin B1 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 386: 407–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Monti J, Gross V, Luft FC, Franca Milia A, Schulz H, et al. (2001) Expression analysis using oligonucleotide microarrays in mice lacking bradykinin type 2 receptors. Hypertension 38: E1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Keepers TR, Psotka MA, Gross LK, Obrig TG (2006) A murine model of HUS: Shiga toxin with lipopolysaccharide mimics the renal damage and physiologic response of human disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 3404–3414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Karkar A (2008) Modulation of renal inflammation: therapeutic strategies. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 19: 1–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Panzer U, Stahl RA (1999) Chemokines and renal inflammation. Nephrologie 20: 335–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Schanstra JP, Bachvarova M, Neau E, Bascands JL, Bachvarov D (2007) Gene expression profiling in the remnant kidney model of wild type and kinin B1 and B2 receptor knockout mice. Kidney Int 72: 442–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bachvarov D, Bachvarova M, Koumangaye R, Klein J, Pesquero JB, et al. (2006) Renal gene expression profiling using kinin B1 and B2 receptor knockout mice reveals comparable modulation of functionally related genes. Biol Chem 387: 15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES