Abstract
Biotin-containing analogs of a potent agonist (N6-phenyladenosine) and a potent antagonist (1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine) of adenosine receptor activity have been synthesized. A spacer chain to the biotin moiety is attached in both cases to the para-position of the phenylring. Two biotin conjugates of N6-phenyladenosine differing only in the length of the spacer chain bind to the adenosine receptor and to avidin simultaneously. The shorter-chain derivative was more potent in inhibiting binding of N6-[3H]cyclohexyladenosine to rat cerebral cortical membranes (K1 of 11 nM in the absence of avidin, 36 nM for the avidin complex). Three biotin conjugates of 1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine bound competitively to the adenosine receptor, but only in the absence of avidin. The results are interpreted in terms of the possible orientation of the ligands at the receptor binding site.
Keywords: Adenosine receptor, Biotin, Avidin, Functionalized congener, N6-Phenyladenosine, Xanthine
1. INTRODUCTION
The non-covalent avidin-biotin complex [1] forms rapidly, is remarkably stable, and has been used in a variety of manners as biochemical probes [2,3]. Biotin may be attached readily through its carboxyl group to a biologically active compound (pharmacophore) to afford a bifunctional entity, which still retains high affinity for avidin through its biotin component, and which has the potential to retain activity for its target site (receptor, enzyme, transport protein) through its pharmacophore (see [4-11] for examples of use in receptor localization and purification and in drug delivery).
We have introduced previously a series of ligands for the adenosine receptor which feature adenosine or xanthines covalently attached to chains bearing carboxylic or amino groups [12,13]. These biologically active analogs may be attached to other molecules or ‘carriers’ through the carboxyl or amino groups: such analogs are termed functionalized ‘congeners’ following the nomen-clature of Goodman and co-workers [14]. Functionalized congeners of N6-phenyladenosine (agonists) and of 1,3-dialkyl-8-phenylxanthine (antagonists) bearing amino groups were chosen as the parent ligands for the attachment to biotin. The properties of biotin conjugates of adenosine receptor ligands in the absence and presence of avidin were used to investigate the accessibility of the ligand binding site(s) on adenosine receptors.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Compounds 2a and 3a were prepared as reported previously [12,13] by acylation of the appropriate amino congener by d-biotin N-hydroxysuccinimide ester. Compounds 2b and 3b were synthesized in an analogous manner from the same functionalized congeners except that d-biotinyl-ε-aminocaproic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Calbiochem) was the acylating agent. Compound 3c was derived from the glycyl-glycine conjugate [12] of the 1,3-dipropylxanthine amino congener and d-biotinyl-ε-aminocaproic acid N-hydroxy-succinimide ester. A typical acylation reaction consisted of suspending 10-50 mg of the free amino-functionalized analog in several ml of dimethylformamide and treating the suspension with 1.2 molar equivalents of either active ester derivative of biotin. After the reaction mixture was stirred for one day the product precipitated upon addition of small amounts of methanol and ether. The conjugates were recrystallized from dimethylformamide/ether, and the purity of each product was ascertained by thin layer chromatography (silica gel, chloroform/methanol/acetic acid, 85 : 10: 5) using a biotin-specific spray reagent [15] and ultra-violet light for visualization. The following solid products were obtained: 2b, 93% yield, mp 195-198°C; 3b, 99%, mp 218-221°C; 3c, 85%, mp 210-212.5°C. The biotin conjugates gave correct C, H, and N analyses (2b, 3b, and 3c as the monohydrates) and were characterized further by 360 MHz proton NMR.
Avidin (affinity purified), streptavidin, avidin-fluorescein isothiocyanate, and avidin-peroxidase (purified by affinity chromatography and gel permeation chromatography) were obtained from Sigma.
Assays of competitive binding of N6-[3H]cyclohexyladenosine on rat cerebral cortical membranes were carried out as described previously [13] using triplicate determinations. Binding assays in the presence of avidin were carried out after prein-cubating the biotin conjugate at varying concentrations and avidin at a fixed concentration for 10 min in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.7).
Binding of biotin derivatives to avidin was measured by a modification of the procedure of Rylatt et al. [16] which involves saturation of unoccupied sites with [3H]biotin (New England Nuclear, 35 Ci/mmol) after preincubation of the avidin with varying amounts of the biotin derivative. The stable biotin-avidin complex was precipitated using alkaline zinc sulfate and isolated as a pellet by centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended and centrifuged to reduce baseline counts. Concentrations and conditions were as described by Kohanski and Lane [7].
3. RESULTS
Biotin was coupled to amino congeners of N6-phenyladenosine (agonists) and 1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine (antagonists) to give compounds 2a and 3a, respectively. Similarly, conjugates 2b and 3b containing the ε-aminocaproyl spacer group [6] were prepared to examine the relationship between chain length and activity in the binding assay. In the antagonist series, an analog (3c) containing glycylglycine as an additional spacer was also prepared.
The ability of the 5 biotin conjugates to inhibit competitively binding of N6-[3H]cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) to rat cerebral cortical membranes was used as a measure of the affinity for the central A1-adenosine receptor ([13] and refs there-in). The adenosine conjugates (2a, 2b) had substantial affinity for the A1-receptor (table 1) albeit slightly reduced relative to the parent N6-phenyladenosine (Ki = 3.2 ± 0.5 nM). The diminished potency of the conjugate having the aminocaproyl spacer group (2b) suggests a positive contribution of the biotin group when closer to the pharmacophore.
Table 1.
Affinity constants for biotinylated ligands, from competitive binding assays of N6-[3H]cyclohexyladenosine to rat cerebral cortical membranes
| Compound |
Ki (nM] |
|
|---|---|---|
| No avidin | 1 μM avidin | |
| 2a | 11.4±0.4 | 36 |
| 2b | 18 ±1.7 | 35 |
| 3a | 54 ±2 | <500 |
| 3b | 50±0.4 | <500 |
| 3c | 60 | <500 |
Values are the mean of single experiments done in triplicate or the mean ± SE of 2-6 experiments
The xanthine conjugates (3a, 3b, and 3c) were several-fold less potent at the A1-adenosine receptor than the parent 1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine (Ki = 13 ± 3 nM). Remarkably, the presence of the ε-aminocaproyl spacer group in 3b does not affect the receptor affinity. Compound 3c having the longest spacer chain was the least potent in the antagonist series in binding at the A1-adenosine receptor. The xanthine congeners were also active in an A2-adenosine receptor response, viz., reversal of the cyclic AMP accumulation elicited by 2-chloroadenosine in guinea-pig brain slices [13] (Ki for compound 3a was 180 ± 80 nM).
Binding of the isolated conjugates to avidin was studied through the zinc sulfate precipitation of the stable complex [16]. Binding sites not occupied by a biotin conjugate molecule were titrated with [3H]biotin (fig.2). All 5 of the biotin conjugates bound to the avidin tetramer in the predicted ratio of 4:1.
Fig.2.

Binding of compound 2a to avidin (60 pmol).
To assess the efficiency of binding of the conjugates simultaneously to the adenosine receptor and to avidin, the conjugates were pre-incubated with various concentrations of avidin to preform the complex and then tested in the competitive binding assay with [3H]cyclohexyladenosine. For compound 2a a family of curves resulted (fig.3), in which the binding profile was shifted to the right by avidin. At a large excess of avidin (100 nM in avidin tetramer, each containing 4 independent binding sites) the apparent Ki for 2a had increased from 11 to 36 nM. The long cabin biotin-adenosine conjugate (2b) also displayed simultaneous binding to avidin and to the adenosine receptor (fig.4). Avidin alone had no effect on binding of [3H]cyclohexyladenosine until it reached micromolar concentration at which point 10-20% inhibition occurred.
Fig.3.

Inhibition of binding of N6-cyclohexyladenosine to rat cerebral cortical membranes by compound 2a.
Fig.4.

Inhibition of binding of N6-cyclohexyladenosine to rat cerebral cortical membranes by compound 2b.
In contrast, the biotin-xanthine conjugates regardless of the length of the spacer chain bound to the receptor only in the absence of avidin. At a concentration of 1 μM in avidin subunits, the xan-thine conjugate 3a (fig.5) did not cause 50% inhibition even at a concentration 8-fold greater than the IC50 in the absence of avidin.
Fig.5.

Inhibition of binding of N6-cyclohexyladenosine to rat cerebral cortical membranes by compound 3a.
The most potent adenosine conjugate, compound 2a, was then tested for A1-receptor binding in the presence of several avidin derivatives used in histochemical studies. Avidin coupled to fluorescein isothiocyanate (average 3.5 equivalents per tetramer) or to peroxidase (average 1.5 equivalents per tetramer) was preincubated with compound 2a prior to the binding assays. The tetrameric protein streptavidin from Streptornyces avidinii, having less non-specific binding [17] than the glycoprotein avidin, was also examined. Streptavidin, like avidin, is a tetramer with 4 binding sites for biotin. These derivatives of avidin are virtually in-distinguishable from avidin in the effect on binding of compound 2a to the receptor (fig.6).
4. DISCUSSION
Pharmacophores attached to biotin have proven useful for the investigation of the topography of macromolecular regognition sites [5], for histochemical localization [4] and for the purification of recognition sites [7]. Biotin conjugates of an adenosine receptor agonist and an adenosine receptor antagonist have now been prepared and used to investigate possible topographical constraints at agonist and antagonist binding sites of A1-adenosine receptors.
The adenosine conjugate 2a readily binds simultaneously to the A1-adenosine receptor and to avidin: the Ki of 2a is reduced only by a factor of 3 in the presence of excess avidin. In the simplest interpretation, the spacer chain of 17 atoms separating the biotin moiety from the N6-amino group of adenine is sufficiently long to bridge the combined depth of both binding sites. It has been estimated [6] that the carboxyl group of biotin in the bound state is located at a maximum distance of 2 Å from the surface of the avidin molecule. This distance leads to an estimated maximum limit of the depth of the binding site at the adenosine A1-receptor. From our results, the N6-amino group of adenosine should be located in the binding site at a depth of no greater than approx. 12 Å, based on the sum of the linear dimensions of the spacer chain in the extended conformation. These dimensions might be defined more narrowly through the synthesis and biochemical characterization of adenosine conjugates with even shorter spacer chains.
The inability of the xanthine conjugates (3a, 3b, and 3c), having spacer chains up to 24 atoms in length, to bind simultaneously to the A1-adenosine receptor and to avidin is surprising in view of results with the adenosine conjugates. One explanation is that the agonist and antagonist sites may be at different domains of the receptor, perhaps with the agonist site ‘buried’ much deeper. Alternatively, the domains may be the same, but the antagonist may bind so that the 8-phenyl moiety is ‘buried’ more deeply within the site than is the N6-phenyl moiety of the agonist. Regardless of the interpretation, the present results provide evidence that a bulky macromolecule, i.e., the avidin-biotin complex, some 28 Å from a potent antagonist pharmacophore (3c) prevents interaction at the A1-adenosine receptor. In contrast, a bulky macromolecule (avidin-biotin complex) some 14 Å from a potent agonist pharmacophore does not prevent interaction of the A1-adenosine receptor. Whether other receptors will show analogous results with biotinylated agonists and antagonists deserves investigation.
The present results also indicate that the ligand binding site of the adenosine receptor is located within of 12 Å the surface of the membrane. Extra-cellular adenosine receptors were demonstrated previously through the cardiovascular activity of non-penetrating oligosaccharide conjugates of adenosine and theophylline [18].
The accessibility of the adenosine receptor to agonist-biopolymer complexes suggests that considerable flexibility is possible in the design of receptor probes having bulky substituent groups at the end of a chain and in the design of carrier-bound therapeutic agents acting at the adenosine receptor. In particular, the biotinylated conjugates of adenosine have considerable potential as a bifunctional link between the adenosine receptor and avidin coupled to spectroscopic or enzymatic markers for localization studies or biochemical assays.
Fig.1.
Structures of biotin and biotin conjugates.
Fig.6.
Effects of the presence of avidin derivatives (100 nM) on the inhibition of binding of N6-cyclohexyladenosine to rat cerebral cortical membranes by compound 2a. ∎, adenosine-biotin conjugate; ●, adenosine-biotin conjugate + avidin derivative; ◆◆**********, avidin derivative alone.
REFERENCES
- [1].Green NM. Biochem. J. 1963;89:585–591. doi: 10.1042/bj0890585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Bayer EA, Wilchek M. Meth. Biochem. Anal. 1980;26:1–45. doi: 10.1002/9780470110461.ch1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Korpela J. Med. Biol. 1984;62:5–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Axelrod D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1980;77:4823–4821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Holtzman E, Wise D, Wall J, Karlin A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1982;79:310–314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Finn FM, Titus G, Hoffmann K. Biochemistry. 1984;23:2554–2558. doi: 10.1021/bi00307a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Kohanski R, Lane MD. J. Biol. Chem. 1985 in press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Morris RE, Saelinger CB. J. Histo-chem. Cytochem. 1984;32:124–128. doi: 10.1177/32.1.6690597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Lavielle SC, Marquet A. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1983;759:270–277. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(83)90323-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Hsueh AJW, Adashi EY, Tucker E, Vale C, Ling NC. Endocrinology. 1983;112:689–695. doi: 10.1210/endo-112-2-689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Chaturvedi DN, Knittel JJ, Hruby V, De L. Castrucci AM, Hadley ME. 1984;27:1406–1410. doi: 10.1021/jm00377a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Jacobson KA, Kirk KL, Daly JW. presented at American Society meeting, Medicinal Chemistry Div.; Miami Beach, FL. May 1.1985. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Jacobson KA, Kirk KL, Padgett W, Daly JW. J. Med. Chem. 1985 doi: 10.1021/jm00147a039. submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Jacobson KA, Marr-Leisy D, Rosenkranz RP, Verlander MS, Melmon KL, Goodman M. J. Med. Chem. 1983;26:492. doi: 10.1021/jm00358a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].McCormick, Roth JA. Methods Enzymol. 1970;18A:383–385. [Google Scholar]
- [16].Rylatt DB, Keech DB, Wallace JC. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1977;183:113–122. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(77)90425-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Hoffman K, Wood SW, Brinton CC, Montibeller JA, Finn FM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1980;77:4666–4668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Olsson RA, Davis CJ, Khouri EM, Patterson RE. Circ. Res. 1976;39:93–98. doi: 10.1161/01.res.39.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


