Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1984 Mar;81(5):1312–1316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1312

The free energy of DNA supercoiling is enthalpy-determined.

A Seidl, H J Hinz
PMCID: PMC344823  PMID: 6369324

Abstract

The thermodynamics of superhelix formation was determined by combining superhelix density data with enthalpy values obtained from microcalorimetric measurements of the relaxation of supercoiled ColE1 amp plasmid DNA in the presence of topoisomerase I from Escherichia coli (omega protein). The thermodynamic quantities for superhelix formation at 37 degrees C in 10 mM Tris/2 mM MgCl2/1 mM EDTA pH 8, are: delta G = 921 kJ X (mol of plasmid)-1; delta H 2260 kJ X (mol of plasmid)-1; deltaS = 4.3 kJ X (mol of plasmid X K)-1. These data clearly demonstrate that the unfavorable Gibbs free energy associated with supercoiling of DNA results exclusively from the positive enthalpy involved in formation of superhelical turns. A positive overall entropy change accompanies superhelix formation, which overcompensates the expected decrease of configurational entropy. By neglecting contributions from bending, an estimate of the torsional rigidity C = 1.79 X 10(-19) erg X cm (1 erg = 0.1 microJ) of the supercoiled ColE1 amp plasmid DNA was made on the basis of the enthalpy value. This value is in excellent agreement with values of C derived from subnanosecond time-resolved fluorescence depolarization measurements for pBR322 DNA [Millar, D. P., Robbins, R. J. & Zewai, A.H. (1982) J. Chem. Phys. 76, 2080-2094]. The magnitude of C is larger than for linear DNAs, indicating that supercoiled DNA is more rigid than linear DNA.

Full text

PDF
1312

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akrigg A., Cook P. R. DNA gyrase stimulates transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Feb 25;8(4):845–854. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer W. R. Structure and reactions of closed duplex DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer W., Vinograd J. Interaction of closed circular DNA with intercalative dyes. II. The free energy of superhelix formation in SV40 DNA. J Mol Biol. 1970 Feb 14;47(3):419–435. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer W., Vinograd J. The interaction of closed circular DNA with intercalative dyes. I. The superhelix density of SV40 DNA in the presence and absence of dye. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 14;33(1):141–171. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90286-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer W., Vinogradj The interaction of closed circular DNA with intercalative dyes. 3. Dependence of the buoyant density upon superhelix density and base composition. J Mol Biol. 1970 Dec 14;54(2):281–298. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90430-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benham C. J. Stable cruciform formation at inverted repeat sequences in supercoiled DNA. Biopolymers. 1982 Mar;21(3):679–696. doi: 10.1002/bip.360210314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benham C. J. Stable cruciform formation at inverted repeat sequences in supercoiled DNA. Biopolymers. 1982 Mar;21(3):679–696. doi: 10.1002/bip.360210314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Botchan P. An electron microscopic comparison of transcription on linear and superhelical DNA. J Mol Biol. 1976 Jul 25;105(1):161–176. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Botchan P., Wang J. C., Echols H. Effect of circularity and superhelicity on transcription from bacteriophagelambda DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Nov;70(11):3077–3081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.11.3077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burkardt H. J., Mattes R., Schmid K., Schmitt R. Properties of two conjugative plasmids mediating tetracycline resistance, raffinose catabolism and hydrogen sulfide production in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Oct 25;166(1):75–84. doi: 10.1007/BF00379731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Calladine C. R. Toroidal elastic supercoiling of DNA. Biopolymers. 1980 Oct;19(10):1705–1713. doi: 10.1002/bip.1980.360191002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Camerini-Otero R. D., Felsenfeld G. A simple model of DNA superhelices in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1708–1712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crawford L. V., Waring M. J. Supercoiling of polyoma virus DNA measured by its interaction with ethidium bromide. J Mol Biol. 1967 Apr 14;25(1):23–30. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90276-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Davidson N. Effect of DNA length on the free energy of binding of an unwinding ligand to a supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1972 May 14;66(2):307–309. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90482-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Depew D. E., Wang J. C. Conformational fluctuations of DNA helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4275–4279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gellert M. DNA topoisomerases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:879–910. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.004311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gellert M., Mizuuchi K., O'Dea M. H., Nash H. A. DNA gyrase: an enzyme that introduces superhelical turns into DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):3872–3876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.3872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gerlt J. A., Westheimer F. H., Sturtevant J. M. The enthalpies of hydrolysis of acyclic, monocyclic, and glycoside cyclic phosphate diesters. J Biol Chem. 1975 Jul 10;250(13):5059–5067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hays J. B., Boehmer S. Antagonists of DNA gyrase inhibit repair and recombination of UV-irradiated phage lambda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Sep;75(9):4125–4129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Helland D., Nes I. F., Kleppe K. Mammalian DNA-repair endonuclease acts only on supercoiled DNA. FEBS Lett. 1982 Jun 1;142(1):121–124. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80233-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hsieh T. S., Wang J. C. Thermodynamic properties of superhelical DNAs. Biochemistry. 1975 Feb 11;14(3):527–535. doi: 10.1021/bi00674a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Keller W. Determination of the number of superhelical turns in simian virus 40 DNA by gel electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):4876–4880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Le Bret M. Catastrophic variation of twist and writhing of circular DNAs with constraint? Biopolymers. 1979 Jul;18(7):1709–1725. doi: 10.1002/bip.1979.360180710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Le Bret M. Monte Carlo computation of the supercoiling energy, the sedimentation constant, and the radius of gyration of unknotted and knotted circular DNA. Biopolymers. 1980 Mar;19(3):619–637. doi: 10.1002/bip.1980.360190312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee C. H., Mizusawa H., Kakefuda T. Unwinding of double-stranded DNA helix by dehydration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2838–2842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee J. S., Morgan A. R. A rapid method for the measurement of the unwinding angle of intercalating agents and the superhelix density of circular DNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Jul;5(7):2425–2439. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.7.2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Litman R. M. A deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase from Micrococcus luteus (Micrococcus lysodeikticus) isolated on deoxyribonucleic acid-cellulose. J Biol Chem. 1968 Dec 10;243(23):6222–6233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mizuuchi K., Gellert M., Nash H. A. Involement of supertwisted DNA in integrative recombination of bacteriophage lambda. J Mol Biol. 1978 May 25;121(3):375–392. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mizuuchi K., Mizuuchi M., Gellert M. Cruciform structures in palindromic DNA are favored by DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):229–243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90325-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Panayotatos N., Wells R. D. Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature. 1981 Feb 5;289(5797):466–470. doi: 10.1038/289466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pulleyblank D. E., Shure M., Tang D., Vinograd J., Vosberg H. P. Action of nicking-closing enzyme on supercoiled and nonsupercoiled closed circular DNA: formation of a Boltzmann distribution of topological isomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4280–4284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Richardson J. P. Effects of supercoiling on transcription from bacteriophage PM2 deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1974 Jul 16;13(15):3164–3169. doi: 10.1021/bi00712a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Richardson J. P. Initiation of transcription by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase from supercoiled and non-supercoiled bacteriophage PM2 DNA. J Mol Biol. 1975 Feb 5;91(4):477–487. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90274-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Robinson B. H., Lerman L. S., Beth A. H., Frisch H. L., Dalton L. R., Auer C. Analysis of double-helix motions with spin-labeled probes: binding geometry and the limit of torsional elasticity. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 5;139(1):19–44. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90113-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Seeburg P. H., Nüsslein C., Schaller H. Interaction of RNA polymerase with promoters from bacteriophage fd. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Mar 15;74(1):107–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shure M., Vinograd J. The number of superhelical turns in native virion SV40 DNA and minicol DNA determined by the band counting method. Cell. 1976 Jun;8(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas J. C., Allison S. A., Appellof C. J., Schurr J. M. Torison dynamics and depolarization of fluorescence of linear macromolecules. II. Fluorescence polarization anisotropy measurements on a clean viral phi 29 DNA. Biophys Chem. 1980 Oct;12(2):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(80)80050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vinograd J., Lebowitz J., Watson R. Early and late helix-coil transitions in closed circular DNA. The number of superhelical turns in polyoma DNA. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 14;33(1):173–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vinograd J., Lebowitz J., Watson R. Early and late helix-coil transitions in closed circular DNA. The number of superhelical turns in polyoma DNA. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 14;33(1):173–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vologodskii A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Lukashin A. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Statistical mechanics of supercoils and the torsional stiffness of the DNA double helix. Nature. 1979 Jul 26;280(5720):294–298. doi: 10.1038/280294a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vologodskii A. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Theoretical study of cruciform states in superhelical DNAs. FEBS Lett. 1982 Jul 5;143(2):257–260. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Voordouw G., Kam Z., Borochov N., Eisenberg H. Isolation and physical studies of the intact supercoiled, the open circular and the linear forms of ColE1-plasmid DNA. Biophys Chem. 1978 May;8(2):171–189. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(78)80008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wahl P., Paoletti J., Le Pecq J. B. Decay of fluorescence emission anisotropy of the ethidium bromide-DNA complex. Evidence for an internal motion in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Feb;65(2):417–421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.65.2.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang J. C. Degree of superhelicity of covalently closed cyclic DNA's from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1969 Jul 28;43(2):263–272. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90266-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang J. C. Interaction between DNA and an Escherichia coli protein omega. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):523–533. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90334-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang J. C. Interactions between twisted DNAs and enzymes: the effects of superhelical turns. J Mol Biol. 1974 Aug 25;87(4):797–816. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang J. C., Peck L. J., Becherer K. DNA supercoiling and its effects on DNA structure and function. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):85–91. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang J. C. The degree of unwinding of the DNA helix by ethidium. I. Titration of twisted PM2 DNA molecules in alkaline cesium chloride density gradients. J Mol Biol. 1974 Nov 15;89(4):783–801. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wells R. D., Goodman T. C., Hillen W., Horn G. T., Klein R. D., Larson J. E., Müller U. R., Neuendorf S. K., Panayotatos N., Stirdivant S. M. DNA structure and gene regulation. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1980;24:167–267. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60674-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang H. L., Heller K., Gellert M., Zubay G. Differential sensitivity of gene expression in vitro to inhibitors of DNA gyrase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3304–3308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES