Skip to main content
The Ochsner Journal logoLink to The Ochsner Journal
. 2012 Fall;12(3):228–243.

Immunization of Children Receiving Immunosuppressive Therapy for Cancer or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Avinash K Shetty *, Mary A Winter
PMCID: PMC3448245  PMID: 23049460

Abstract

In the past 3 decades, the number of immunocompromised children has increased steadily because of dramatic improvement in survival rates in certain malignancies as a result of intensive curative treatment regimens and an increase in the number of children undergoing life-saving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Children receiving immunosuppressive therapy for cancer, as well as HSCT recipients, will benefit from vaccination but warrant close evaluation for a variety of reasons, such as the risk of developing severe infections, serious adverse events following certain vaccines, and decreased vaccine efficacy caused by poor immune response to vaccination. Various professional organizations have published vaccination guidelines for immunocompromised patients. Given their heterogeneity, recommendations for the immunization of immunocompromised patients may not be universally applicable. The safety of many commonly used vaccines has not been established in immunocompromised children. In addition, no large-scale vaccine studies have evaluated the clinical outcome of disease prevention in this population. All killed vaccines are generally safe, while live vaccines may be administered to immunocompromised children in select circumstances, depending on the degree of altered immunocompetence and the underlying primary condition. Healthcare providers should be knowledgeable about the indications, contraindications, and precautions for vaccine administration in immunocompromised patients. To protect immunocompromised patients, all family, household contacts, and healthcare workers should also be immunized with all routinely recommended vaccines. Pediatricians play a crucial role in identifying and effectively communicating the risks and benefits of vaccines to immunocompromised patients and their parents.

Keywords: Cancer, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunocompromised children, immunization, vaccines

INTRODUCTION

Vaccines represent one of the most successful public health advances of the 20th century.1 The vaccination of immunocompromised pediatric patients merits careful consideration because these children are at increased risk for exposure to microbes from frequent association with healthcare settings and for the development of life-threatening vaccine-preventable infections compared to patients with normal immune function.2-15 The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, the rise in the incidence of pertussis and antibiotic-resistant Pneumococcus, and recent outbreaks of measles and mumps in individuals with normal immune function further highlight the need for effective revaccination of immunocompromised patients.2-6 Other important considerations include safety concerns and the ability of immunocompromised individuals to generate a protective and sustained immune response.4

In the past 3 decades, the number of immunocompromised children has increased steadily in the United States. Dramatic improvement in survival rates in certain childhood malignancies has occurred. For example, acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) currently has a 5-year survival rate greater than 90%. This improvement is a result of more intensive and potentially curative treatment regimens and an increase in children undergoing life-saving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT).16,17 Likewise, in resource-rich settings such as the United States and Europe, dramatic decreases in morbidity and mortality and improved quality of life have occurred in children and adolescents infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) because of widespread access to highly active antiretroviral therapy, care, and support.18,19

The increased intensity of complex chemotherapy regimens for childhood cancer and aggressive immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection in pediatric HSCT and SOT recipients often result in prolonged and severe immune suppression that causes an increased risk for morbidity and mortality from certain infections (eg, invasive disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, varicella, and influenza).13-15 Therefore, the administration of appropriate vaccines to immunocompromised children is an important consideration for pediatricians and oncologists.6,9 Healthcare providers must be aware of the indications, contraindications, and precautions for the use of vaccines in individuals with altered immune competence.9

In this article, we review the basic concepts, strategies, and challenges related to vaccinations of immunocompromised individuals, discuss the indications and safety of specific vaccines in children with cancer and in HSCT recipients, summarize vaccine recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Advisory Committee on Infectious Diseases (ACIP), and review immunizations of healthcare workers and household contacts of immunocompromised children.9,20 Vaccine recommendations for HIV-infected children and adolescents are beyond the scope of this article, but professional societies have published comprehensive guidelines.19,20

PRINCIPLES AND CHALLENGES FOR VACCINATING IMMUNOCOMPROMISED CHILDREN

Table 1 summarizes the basic principles of vaccinating immunocompromised children.

Table 1.

Basic Principles of Vaccinating Immunocompromised Children9

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t01.jpg

Categories of altered immune competence include patients with primary immune deficiency or, more commonly, secondary (acquired) immune deficiency as a result of conditions such as HIV infection, solid organ or hematologic malignancies, SOT, or HSCT.13,19 Immune deficiencies can also result from radiation or immunosuppressive medication therapy, such as chemotherapy, corticosteroids, immunomodulators (such as 6-mercaptopurine, azathioprine, or methotrexate), calcineurin inhibitors (such as cyclosporine or tacrolimus), and the newer biological agents such as anti–tumor necrosis factor antibodies (infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab), antiintegrin antibodies (natalizumab), anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 agonists (abatacept), and anti–CD20 (rituximab).4,5 Other categories of secondary immune deficiency include chronic disorders such as diabetes, autoimmune disorders, severe malnutrition, protein loss, uremia, and splenectomy.9

Oral corticosteroids are a commonly prescribed form of systemic therapy. The immunosuppressive dose of oral corticosteroids is defined as a dose >20 mg/d in children weighing ≥10 kg or >2 mg/kg/d in children weighing <10 kg.20 Treatment with high-dose steroids for more than 2 weeks' duration will decrease immune function. The local administration of corticosteroids via the skin, the lungs, or the upper respiratory tract or by intraarticular injection will not be immunosuppressive.

Immunocompromised children benefit from vaccination but warrant unique considerations for reasons such as the risk of developing severe infections, serious adverse events after certain vaccines, and decreased efficacy from a poor immune response to vaccination compared to normal hosts.2-8 The determination of immune status depends on the underlying diagnosis. Not all immune deficiency states are comparable because individuals with altered immune competence often vary in their degree of immunosuppression and susceptibility to infection.13 The safety of many commonly used vaccines has not been established in immunocompromised children, especially HSCT recipients. In addition, no large-scale vaccine studies have evaluated clinical outcome (disease prevention) in individuals with altered immune competence. Table 2 lists the various challenges in vaccinating immunocompromised children. Given their heterogeneity, recommendations for the immunization of patients with altered immune competence may not be universally applicable.11 All killed vaccines are generally safe, while the live vaccines may be administered to immunocompromised children in select circumstances, depending on the degree of altered immunocompetence and underlying primary condition.7

Table 2.

Challenges of Vaccinating Immunocompromised Children07

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t02.jpg

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AND IMMUNE RECONSTITUTION

Children With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

At the time of diagnosis, most children with cancer have normal immune function characterized by normal levels of total immunoglobulins and antibodies to specific vaccine antigens, although peripheral blood T lymphocytes may be reduced in a small proportion of patients; significant lymphopenia is noted in untreated Hodgkin disease or Burkitt lymphoma.21,22

Immunosuppressive effects of malignant disease and chemotherapy include loss of cell-mediated immunity and humoral immunity.23 Although B cells, plasma cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and immunoglobulins (Igs) return to normal by 6 months after the cessation of therapy, the recovery of the T-lymphocyte population is relatively slow. CD4+ T lymphocytes are persistently low for more than 9-12 months at the end of therapy in 20%-50% of pediatric patients with cancer.24-26

In cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, all T-cell subsets decline but without the complete inversion of the CD4:CD8 ratio as reported after bone marrow transplantation.27 The low levels of naïve T cells are replaced by memory T cells. Antigen-specific T-cell memory is preserved in a majority of treated children with ALL, consistent with studies demonstrating a low infectious disease mortality in these children.28 In addition, the regeneration of naïve T cells occurs readily in children because of residual thymic function.29,30 Eventually, both pathways of T-cell regenerative capacity are restored in childhood ALL patients after remission induction therapy, explaining the low occurrence of severe opportunistic infections in ALL patients outside periods of neutropenia.3,31

Low levels of IgG, IgM, and IgA have been noted in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.25 Studies have also shown that current ALL protocols induce a loss of humoral immunity to viral vaccination antigens in a high proportion of children, especially younger infants. These findings suggest that revaccinating immunocompromised children at the end of therapy is prudent.23

HSCT Recipients

HSCT is the standard of care for defined hematological malignancies, and most patients become long-term survivors. HSCT recipients represent a heterogeneous group, and their degree of immunosuppression varies by underlying disease, type of transplant, conditioning regimen, presence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and several other factors (Table 3).32,33 HSCT recipients typically receive high doses of immunosuppressive regimens to prevent rejection, resulting in a high susceptibility to life-threatening infections.34

Table 3.

Heterogeneity in Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients05

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t03.jpg

Several studies indicate that patients who receive HSCT lose the protective immunity to vaccine-preventable infectious diseases that was achieved after childhood immunization.35 In the absence of reimmunization, antibody titers to pathogens such as tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella decrease during the 1-10 years after HSCT.6 Functional neutrophils, monocytes, and NK cells recover by 2-3 weeks after transplantation.5 However, the reconstitution of B-cell counts and T cells is slow. B lymphocytes remain very low (typically zero or near zero) in the first 1-3 months after HSCT and recover 3-12 months after transplant.6 CD4+ T lymphocytes remain low (typically <200 cells/μL) in the first 1-3 months after transplant and recover by 6-9 months in pediatric HSCT recipients (<18 years of age) without chronic GVHD. In contrast, the recovery of T cells may be delayed more than 2 years in adult HSCT recipients with chronic GVHD.6

Regardless of the interval to recovery, posttransplant recipients, especially those with chronic GVHD, exhibit persistent functional deficits with impaired T-cell and antibody responses, and immune reconstitution can be delayed for months to years.5,6 Impaired antigen-specific responses have been noted in newly regenerated B cells in the first year after transplant. The maintenance of immune memory is impaired in immunosuppressed transplant recipients.35

Memory/effector T cells are the predominant T cells circulating in adult HSCT recipients, likely originating from the T cells infused with the graft.6 In young children, newly generated naïve T cells can respond to new antigens as early as 6-12 months after transplantation.6 In general, autologous HSCT recipients have a lesser degree of altered immune function compared to allogeneic HSCT recipients and experience immune reconstitution within several months. In contrast, immune reconstitution may take up to a year or longer in allogeneic HSCT recipients.32 However, autologous HSCT recipients who were treated with multiple courses of chemotherapy before transplant have vaccine responses similar to those that occur after allogeneic HSCT.6

Vaccine studies show that T-cell responses to vaccines for exposed pathogens before transplant (such as the varicella zoster virus) are detected as soon as 1-6 months after transplant. In contrast, antibody responses to vaccines for exposed pathogens after transplant (such as hepatitis B virus) are often detected 6-12 months after transplant. Allogeneic HSCT recipients respond poorly to polysaccharide vaccines, likely because of the predominance of immature B cells and deficits in CD27+ memory cells.36-38 However, these patients' response to protein conjugate vaccines is significantly better than their response to polysaccharide vaccines.32,39,40

VACCINATION, TIMING OF IMMUNIZATION, AND CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS

Children With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Studies of vaccine responses in immunocompromised children are needed to assess functional immune reconstitution and to guide rational vaccination strategies.5 The safety and effectiveness of any administered vaccine depends on the patient's degree of immunosuppression.9 Studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the loss of preexisting antibodies and responses to immunization after receiving chemotherapy.41-43 Given the paucity of data on which to base firm recommendations, no universal guidelines exist. Therefore, different approaches have been proposed to manage vaccinations in children with cancer who are off therapy, including the administration of a new complete vaccine series, the administration of a booster dose without measuring possible residual immunity, or the measuring of serum levels of antibodies against vaccine antigens followed by the administration of a booster dose if no evidence of protective levels exists.2,44-46 Testing of residual immunity is complicated by the absence of correlates of protection for some vaccines and an inability to determine the antibody titer for each vaccine antigen. In addition, low serum antibody concentrations do not always indicate a loss of protective immunity.

To protect cancer patients against vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, physicians must ensure that patients have received all universally recommended vaccines, including the seasonal influenza vaccine.9 Patients who have not been fully vaccinated should receive the indicated vaccines soon after their cancer is diagnosed. In general, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated during treatment or within 3-6 months from the end of immunosuppressant chemotherapy or radiotherapy because of the documented and theoretical risks of disseminated infection caused by the vaccine virus (Table 4).6,9,13,14,20 The recommended timing of live vaccines in relation to poststeroid and postimmunoablative therapy varies among different countries (Table 5). Although safe, the administration of inactivated or recombinant vaccines is not recommended within 3-6 months of the completion of therapy because of a possible poor immune response, although the physician should make this decision on an individual basis after careful evaluation of the patient's social or epidemiologic risks of acquiring vaccine-preventable infectious diseases (Table 6).3 Given the seasonality of influenza outbreaks, the AAP recommends administration of the influenza vaccine annually; optimal immune responses are achieved when the vaccine is given at least 3-4 weeks after the interruption of chemotherapy.20,38 Passive immunization may also be indicated in select circumstances (eg, exposure to hepatitis B virus or varicella).3

Table 4.

Contraindicated Vaccines in Immunosuppressed Children With Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Recipients

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t04.jpg

Table 5.

Timing of Live Vaccines After Steroid Therapy and Chemotherapy04

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t05.jpg

Table 6.

Vaccination Schedule in Children With Cancer After Completion of Chemotherapy02,03

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t06.jpg

HSCT Recipients

Because HSCT recipients lose their previously acquired immunity from vaccines, repeating the primary vaccine series at fixed times posttransplant is critical to prevent infectious disease morbidity and mortality.6,39 Limited controlled data are available on the safety and efficacy of vaccines in this population. In general, indicated vaccines should be administered despite the possibility of reduced efficacy. However, live vaccines should be deferred for safety concerns. Data are also limited on the immunogenicity of vaccines in transplant patients who have received umbilical cord blood, haploidentical grafts, or less-intensive conditioning regimens.6 Various professional organizations and groups—including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation, the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation group, and the German-Austrian-Swiss-Consensus Conference on clinical practice in chronic GVHD—have published vaccination guidelines for HSCT recipients.6,9,33,40

In general, transplant recipients should receive all recommended immunizations, preferably prior to transplantation and on accelerated schedules if indicated. Transplant recipients should be vaccinated at least 2 weeks, but ideally more than 1 month, before the onset of immunosuppression. In general, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated during treatment.33 In HSCT patients not receiving immunosuppressive therapy and free of ongoing GVHD, the recommendation is to withhold live-virus vaccinations—such as the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and varicella vaccines—for 2 years after transplant.6,33 Inactivated or recombinant vaccines are not recommended within 6 months of completion of therapy (Table 7). HSCT recipients are at high risk for infections caused by encapsulated bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b. Therefore, the administration of conjugate vaccines against these encapsulated pathogens is a priority for allogeneic HSCT recipients because of their poor immune responses to polysaccharide vaccines.33

Table 7.

Vaccination Schedule After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Children and Adolescents06,33

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t07.jpg

Although early vaccination to protect against vaccine-preventable diseases is desirable, limited data exist regarding whether this approach is efficacious in patient groups whose immune recovery differs from recipients of an unmodified human leukocyte antigen–matched sibling transplant. In the absence of such data, prospective trials are needed to better define the optimal timing for immunizing recipients of alternative donor cells. Ideally, such trials should identify biological markers that will predict an optimal and durable vaccine response. However, recent data from the German-Austrian-Swiss Pediatric Working Group on Bone Marrow and Blood Stem Cell Transplantation recommend early revaccination of pediatric HSCT recipients starting at 6 months posttransplant followed by a booster dose at 18 months.40 Because children remain at high risk of exposure to infectious agents in day care centers and schools and experience relatively more rapid immune reconstitution compared to adult HSCT transplant patients, the recent guidelines also emphasize that immunizations should not be delayed in pediatric HSCT recipients with ongoing active or resolved chronic GVHD regardless of immunosuppressive therapy.33

Most experts recommend the measurement of specific antibody levels before and after HSCT in patients with chronic GVHD because immune reconstitution can be delayed considerably and vaccine responses cannot be reliably predicted in this population.6,33 Serologic testing prior to vaccination and 1 month after the primary series and/or booster dose is useful to determine if additional doses are needed because a number of immunogens have demonstrated considerable variability in the magnitude of immune responses (eg, hepatitis B, measles, varicella, and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines). Donor vaccination before harvest may improve the posttransplant immunity of the allogeneic HSCT recipient against certain vaccines such as the tetanus toxoid vaccine, the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), and the H influenzae type b conjugate vaccine, although this approach is limited by ethical and practical concerns.6

ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION

Live Vaccines

Both bacterial and viral live vaccines are generally contraindicated for severely immunocompromised individuals because of the risk of disease caused by vaccine strains.

Oral Poliovirus Vaccine

Use of the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) is contraindicated in patients with acquired immunodeficiency and their household contacts because of the risk of vaccine-associated polio in immunocompromised children.47,48 Viral shedding may occur in OPV recipients for 8-12 weeks after vaccine administration. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine is recommended when immunization is appropriate in both immunocompromised patients and their contacts. If OPV is introduced into the household of an immunosuppressed child, to minimize exposure to OPV, shedding household members should practice proper hand hygiene after contact with the child and the person who received the OPV should avoid changing diapers.

Varicella Vaccine

Immunosuppressed patients are at a higher risk of complications from varicella infection than immunocompetent patients.49 Although effective antiviral therapy against varicella infections exists and the incidence of varicella immunization is increasing, infectious complications remain a relevant concern because antiviral therapy can fail and not all contacts are likely to be immunized.50 The varicella vaccine should not be routinely administered to children who have T-lymphocyte immunodeficiency, including those with leukemia, lymphoma, and other malignant neoplasms affecting the bone marrow or lymphatic systems, as well as children receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy.20,51 Patients who have received high-dose steroids for ≥14 days should not receive a varicella vaccine for at least 1 month after the discontinuation of steroid therapy.

The timing of the varicella vaccine is controversial in leukemic patients in remission, but administration is prudent because the risk of natural varicella infection outweighs the risk of acquiring the disease via the live-attenuated vaccine virus.4,51 The varicella vaccine should be given as either a primary immunization or a booster dose in patients fully immunized at the time of cancer diagnosis if the patient is in continuous remission for at least 1 year with lymphocyte counts >0.7 × 109/L and platelet counts >100 × 109/L 24 hours before the immunization.46,47 If a patient requires multiple doses of the varicella vaccine, the doses should be scheduled 3 months apart.

In HSCT recipients, the administration of an Oka strain vaccine 12-18 months after transplantation in patients not receiving immunosuppressive therapy did not result in adverse events.52 Seroconversion occurred in all recipients after 2 doses, and antibodies lasted for at least 2 years in 6 respondents. The optimal time to administer the varicella vaccine after HSCT has not been determined.20

MMR Vaccine

The severity of both measles and mumps is increased in severely immunosuppressed patients.53,54 Because the greatest morbidity from rubella infections is likely to be from vertically acquired infections causing congenital rubella syndrome, unvaccinated and immunocompromised pediatric patients are not likely to suffer adversely from exposure to rubella. Because MMR is a live vaccine formulation, this vaccine should not be administered in patients with pharmacologically induced immunosuppression for a malignancy or HSCT.55

In children who will be receiving immunosuppressing therapy for a malignancy and have not received an MMR vaccine, the MMR vaccine should be withheld until at least 3 months after therapy is complete.42,56,57 Already-administered doses do not need to be repeated, but some experts recommend giving a booster dose to patients who have been off therapy for 6 months.2,3 Most studies have shown that the immune response 3-6 months after the completion of chemotherapy is similar to that of age-matched healthy children, with no risk of severe adverse events.42,56,57 However, some evidence indicates that in children (average 3 years old, range 1.5- 10 years) who had completely lost immune response, only low-avidity antibodies were generated.23 If the child is exposed to measles before the MMR vaccine can be safely administered, prophylaxis can be given with Ig.55

Revaccination with MMR should be delayed for at least 24 months after HSCT in children who no longer have a need for pharmacologic immunosuppression and do not have GVHD.58 After HSCT, the decision to reimmunize with MMR should be evaluated with consideration of serum antibody titers for MMR and in conjunction with the bone marrow transplant team. The need for a booster dose of MMR should be evaluated in conjunction with titers and given at least 28 days after the first dose of MMR.20

Rotavirus Vaccine

Because it is a live virus vaccine, the use of rotavirus vaccine is contraindicated in patients with severe immune suppression such as severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome.59 Rotavirus vaccines are of unproven safety in infants with immune deficiencies, and the ACIP notes that rotavirus vaccine should be used with caution. Physicians should carefully weigh the risks and benefits before recommending rotavirus vaccine in infants. Household contacts of immunocompromised patients should receive the rotavirus vaccine to minimize risk because the benefits of protection outweigh the small risks of transmission. Because horizontal transmission has occurred in clinical trials from rotavirus-positive diarrhea, precautions should be implemented if household contacts who have been immunized with rotavirus develop diarrhea.60 Immunocompromised patients should be instructed to avoid stools from rotavirus-immunized contacts, and all members of the family should practice good hand hygiene for at least 1 week after vaccination.20

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccine

The BCG live vaccine is recommended only in rare circumstances in the United States, including for patients with an unavoidable risk of being exposed to tuberculosis and in whom other control measures have failed or are not feasible.61 However, any patient with a primary or secondary immune deficiency should not receive the BCG virus because cases of localized and disseminated BCG have been described in infants and children with HIV infection.61,62

Killed and Component Vaccines

Killed and component vaccines should not present a risk to immunocompromised patients, and these vaccines are not generally contraindicated. However, the immunocompromised patient's ability to develop an adequate immune response is a significant clinical consideration that the physician should weigh against the risk of contracting a vaccine-preventable disease when making clinical decisions about when to immunize.

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine

The risk of contracting diphtheria or tetanus within 1 year of HSCT is low. However, increased reports of pertussis in adolescents and young adults have led to the recommendation to administer Tdap to all 11- to 12-year-old patients routinely. Data do not exist regarding the safety or immunogenicity of pertussis immunization for HSCT recipients.20 Children with intense immunosuppressing therapy, either to treat malignancy or from HSCT, should not receive vaccines because their immunity is unlikely to be developed.

After 3 months have passed from the last dose of immunosuppressant chemotherapy, the vaccination schedule should be continued where it left off prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. Some evidence suggests that antineoplastic treatment may decrease serologic immunity to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis.63 Patients who have received immunosuppressing therapy should be assessed to identify who could benefit from a booster dose of DTaP or Tdap. A booster dose of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine 3 months after the completion of chemotherapy has resulted in protective antibody titers.56,64-66

Revaccinating children with a 3-dose series of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis 12 months after stem cell transplant is reasonable because an adequate immune response may be generated at this time.67 This patient population should be classified as never vaccinated, so the full toxoid vaccine, DTaP, should be given if possible to generate an adequate immune response.6,68 Some evidence suggests that using reduced-dose pertussis in Tdap results in a poor immune response.68 Serum titers may be used to determine the number of doses needed to achieve an adequate immune response because patients may have heterogeneous responses to vaccinations.

H influenzae (Hib) Vaccine. Children with immunologic impairment are at an increased risk of Hib disease and may have an impaired anti–polyribosylribitol phosphate antibody response to conjugate vaccines.69-72 Although these children may benefit from an additional dose of Hib vaccine, studies have not been conducted to evaluate this practice.

Waiting to resume vaccination until immune function has returned after immunosuppressant chemotherapy would optimize an immune response to the vaccine. Starting or resuming vaccination with Hib 3 months after the completion of chemotherapy has resulted in protective antibody levels.73,74

More than 80% of adult HSCT patients who received Hib vaccines at 12 and 24 months after HSCT achieved protective antibody concentrations.67 Starting or resuming Hib vaccination 6 months after an allogeneic HSCT is recommended.6,33

Hepatitis A Vaccine

Hepatitis A is generally an acute self-limiting illness, but prolonged hepatic impairment and fulminant hepatitis can occur. Patients with malignancies have a high prevalence of antibodies to the hepatitis A antigen and a high incidence of hepatitis B virus infection.75,76 The vaccine is recommended at 12 and 23 months of age and for those at risk of developing chronic conditions. The immune response to the hepatitis A vaccine in immunocompromised patients may be suboptimal.20 Vaccinating after immune function has reconstituted is prudent and would likely provide the most benefit.

If risk factors are present, the hepatitis A vaccine may be administered as either a primary vaccine or as a booster 3 months after patients have completed chemotherapy.2,3 Combining the hepatitis A vaccine with the hepatitis B vaccine resulted in an immunogenic response in children with solid tumors.77 Patients who have not received the full course should receive 2 doses given 6 months apart, and a single dose should be administered to patients who have received a full course of the hepatitis A vaccine.

HSCT patients with risk factors for hepatitis A may benefit from a hepatitis A series.6,33 Recommendations on when to administer the hepatitis A vaccine had not been made at the time of writing, but practitioners should consider the return of immune function when making a clinical decision.

Hepatitis B Vaccine

Because the risk of chronic infection with hepatitis B is inversely related to age at the time of infection, universal vaccination is recommended for all infants, children, and adolescents.78 The physician should use clinical judgment to determine the optimal time to resume vaccination in immunosuppressed patients who have not completed a full course of hepatitis B. Serologic testing for the antibody to the hepatitis B surface antigen is recommended for immunosuppressed patients who are at risk of exposure to the hepatitis B virus.78

Starting or completing a primary vaccination schedule 3 months after the end of chemotherapy is recommended.2,3,77 If epidemiological risk factors are present in patients who have received a full course of the hepatitis B vaccine, a booster dose should be administered 3 months after chemotherapy.2,3

The hepatitis B vaccine series should be administered 6 months after an allogeneic HSCT.6,33

Pneumococcal Vaccines

Patients are at a high risk of invasive pneumococcal infections when a condition associated with immunosuppressive therapy such as HSCT or cancer is present.79,80 The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) provides protection against 13 pneumococcal serotypes and should be used instead of the older 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) formulation. Patients who have been immunized with a course of PCV7 should receive 1 supplemental dose of PCV13. Courses that have been started with PCV7 should be completed with PCV13. Vaccination with a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in addition to a full course of PCV13 is recommended to provide additional protection in immunosuppressed patients. PPSV23 should be administered 8 weeks after the last dose of PCV13. In patients eligible for PPSV23 and younger than 5 years, an additional dose of PPSV23 should be given 5 years after the previous dose because the polysaccharide formulation is less immunogenic than the conjugate vaccine, particularly in the first years of life.81 As with other inactivated vaccines in immunosuppressed patients, clinical judgment is important in determining the optimal time to resume immunization with the pneumococcal vaccine.

Starting or completing a primary vaccination series with PCV13 should occur 3 months after chemotherapy.2,3,82 Patients who have received a full course of PCV7 or PCV13 should receive a booster dose 3 months after chemotherapy. A 1- or 2-dose course of PCV23 is recommended in patients after the PCV13 series is complete.

Administration of a PCV13 and PPSV23 series should occur beginning 6 months after HSCT.6,33 The PCV formulation has been found to have better immune responses than the PPSV formulation, and a PCV13 series should be given first.40,83-85 A fourth dose of PPSV23 is likely beneficial because it affords protection against additional pneumococcal strains.39

Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine

The tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) is recommended for children ages 11-12 years. MCV4 is approved in infants as young as 9 months of age. This inactivated vaccine should be administered to immunosuppressed patients who are eligible to receive it at a time when adequate immunity is most likely to develop.86

The MCV4 was studied in 35 children ranging from 2-18 years old.87 A majority of these patients had ALL and had completed chemotherapy 3-18 months prior to vaccination or were on maintenance therapy. The vaccine was found to be safe and well tolerated, and a majority of the children generated either a positive serological response or a complement-mediated bactericidal response. Starting or completing a primary vaccination series with MCV4 should occur at least 3 months after chemotherapy. 2,3,87 Some experts recommend the administration of a booster dose in patients who received a full course of MCV4 3 months after chemotherapy.

Both polysaccharide-based and conjugate-type vaccines for meningococcal infections exist. Although no studies have compared the 2 types of meningococcal vaccines, it is reasonable to assume that a more stable immune response will result from a meningococcal conjugate vaccine because studies have shown this result for pneumococcal and Hib vaccines.88,89 The German-Austrian-Swiss-Consensus Conference on clinical practice in chronic GVHD recommends administration of 3 monthly doses of a meningococcal type C conjugate vaccine starting at 6-12 months after an allogeneic HSCT.6,33 No data are currently available on the immunogenicity and safety of MCV4 in pediatric allogenic HSCT recipients.

Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV)

The IPV vaccine can be given to immunosuppressed patients and their household contacts. In patients receiving high-dose steroids or immunosuppressant chemotherapy, the administration of incomplete courses of IPV vaccines should be resumed after the immune system has recovered.47

Starting or completing a primary vaccination series with IPV should occur 3 months after chemotherapy.2,3,90 For patients who have received a full course of IPV, a booster dose 3 months after chemotherapy is recommended because up to 38% of children no longer have protective antibody levels by then.90

A 4-dose IPV series (3 + 1) should be administered 6 months after HSCT.6,33 Three doses of IPV should be administered at monthly intervals, followed by a booster dose at 18 months after allogeneic HSCT.33

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine

The HPV vaccine has been shown to prevent the majority of HPV strains that cause cervical cancer and genital warts. Rates of HPV-related warts, neoplasia, and anogenital cancers are increased in SOT recipients.91 Patients with other causes of immune suppression are expected to have similar rates of increased HPV effects. Guidelines recommend the routine vaccination of females and males at age 11-12 years in a 3-dose series with a quadrivalent Gardasil (Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, NJ) vaccine or female patients only with a bivalent Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) vaccine. The HPV vaccine may be administered to immunocompromised female and male patients, but immune response and vaccine efficacy may be reduced in such recipients.92

Patients with a malignancy may benefit from a HPV vaccine series or booster. Recommendations about when to administer the HPV vaccine have not been made in cancer patients, but administering other inactivated vaccines is recommended 3 months after chemotherapy.2,3

Many HSCT patients may benefit from the HPV vaccine. Although specific recommendations about when to administer the HPV vaccine have not been made for HSCT patients, recommendations for other inactivated vaccines suggest administering them 6 months after HSCT.6,33

Influenza Vaccine

Patients and close contacts of immunosuppressed patients who are ≥6 months old should receive an annual dose of the inactivated influenza vaccine. Immunosuppressed patients are at a higher risk of complications from influenza, including prolonged hospitalization and intensive care stays, than the general population.20,93,94 The live influenza vaccine is contraindicated in patients with immune suppression because of the risk of disease from the vaccine strain.

In addition to the increased risk of complications, delays in the administration of life-saving chemotherapy can result when patients who have a malignancy contract influenza—an additional incentive to administer an annual influenza vaccine to these patients. In children with malignant neoplasms, inactivated influenza immunizations should be given no sooner than 3 to 4 weeks after a course of chemotherapy has been discontinued and when peripheral granulocyte and lymphocyte counts >1,000 cells/μL (1 × 109) are achieved.20 Evaluations of the immune responses in oncology patients have found the influenza vaccine to be modestly immunogenic, safe, and well tolerated.95-100

Lifelong seasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for all HSCT candidates and recipients. Vaccination must be administered before the influenza season, starting at 6 months after HSCT and continued annually.33 Two vaccine doses must be administered in children younger than 9 years who have not been previously immunized against influenza.20,33 However, because the immune response may be suboptimal in patients with recent immunosuppression from HSCT or malignancy, vaccinating close contacts and healthcare workers in transplant units should be encouraged to prevent exposure and contraction of influenza.33

PASSIVE IMMUNIZATION

Passive immunization occurs when a preformed antibody is administered to a recipient. It is indicated in certain situations with several types of products. The prototypical example in an immunocompromised patient is exposure to a vaccine-preventable disease in a person without immunity to that disease. Ig, administered intramuscularly, can be given for hepatitis A, measles, or rubella prophylaxis. Specific Ig preparations include hepatitis B Ig, rabies Ig, tetanus Ig, investigational varicella-zoster Ig (VariZIG), cytomegalovirus Ig intravenous, and botulism Ig intravenous. If VariZIG is not available, intravenous Ig can be administered for varicella prophylaxis. Intravenous Ig can be given up to 96 hours after exposure but has maximum benefit if administered as soon as possible after exposure. After passive immunization occurs with Ig, a washout period of 3 to 6 months should occur before other active vaccinations are administered.101 Detailed passive immunization recommendations for specific diseases are beyond the scope of this article, but the AAP provides comprehensive guidelines.20

Palivizumab

Administration of 5 monthly doses of the monoclonal antibody palivizumab during the respiratory syncytial virus season is recommended for certain infants and children with chronic lung disease of prematurity, a history of prematurity (≤35-week gestation), or congenital heart disease. Prophylaxis with palivizumab has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials in immunocompromised children, but children with immunodeficiencies may benefit from prophylaxis.102 Some experts routinely recommend the use of palivizumab prophylaxis for SOT recipients and candidates younger than 2 years.103

IMMUNOCOMPROMISED TRAVELERS

There is a paucity of data regarding the administration of travel vaccines in immunocompromised patients.104 Timely pretravel advice is recommended 4-6 weeks before departure. Immunocompromised patients should be routinely immunized against hepatitis B and hepatitis A. Live attenuated travel vaccines such as the yellow fever vaccine and the oral typhoid vaccine are contraindicated in patients receiving immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies.105 Likewise, the cholera and tick-borne encephalitis vaccines are not recommended in immunocompromised individuals because of a lack of data in HSCT recipients.25,104 The rabies vaccine may be indicated for use in HSCT recipients with potential exposure to rabies. Expert guidelines suggest delaying the preexposure rabies vaccination until 12-24 months after HSCT.6 Postexposure prophylaxis with rabies vaccine in conjunction with human rabies Ig can be given any time after HSCT, as indicated.6

Typhoid Vaccine

In the United States, travelers to areas where risk of exposure to the Salmonella serotype Typhi is recognized, people with intimate exposure to a documented typhoid fever carrier, or laboratory workers who have frequent contact with Salmonella serotype Typhi are candidates to receive a typhoid vaccine. However, the live attenuated oral vaccine Ty21a is contraindicated in immunosuppressed patients.25 The parenteral vaccine against typhoid, Vi capsular polysaccharide, can be administered to patients who are traveling to endemic areas and those who are at risk of contracting Salmonella serotype Typhi.29

Japanese Encephalitis Vaccines

Licensed Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccines include JE-MB, an inactivated mouse brain–derived vaccine and the JE-VC, a Vero cell culture–derived vaccine. No data exist regarding the safety and immunogenicity of the JE vaccine in HSCT recipients.6 Some expert reviews suggest that the JE vaccine may be considered in SOT recipients, but the ACIP does not offer guidance because data are very limited regarding the use of JE-VC in immunocompromised hosts.104 The limited information in pediatrics indicates that the JE-MB vaccine is safe and well tolerated in HIV-infected patients and those with cancer.105 In limited studies, JE-MB has shown an acceptable safety profile in children with HIV and neoplastic diseases.106

FAMILY, HOUSEHOLD CONTACTS, AND HEALTHCARE WORKERS

All close contacts who live in the same household as the immunocompromised patient should be immunized with all routinely recommended vaccines, including the live attenuated MMR, varicella, and rotavirus vaccines because the transmission of the live vaccine virus is rare (Table 8).8,25,107 The transmission of the live varicella vaccine virus from vaccine recipients to close contacts who are not immunosuppressed has occurred, but only from vaccine recipients who developed a rash.23 Household contacts who develop a vesicular rash after varicella vaccination should avoid contact with immunosuppressed individuals until the rash resolves. Immunocompromised patients should be instructed to avoid stools from rotavirus-immunized contacts, and all members of the family should practice good hand hygiene for at least 1 week after vaccination.15 In addition, the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine should be administered annually to all close contacts of immunocompromised individuals.25 Vaccinating siblings, family members, and other close contacts is an important strategy to protect immunocompromised patients against vaccine-preventable diseases, especially those transmitted in households, such as pertussis and influenza.12 Data are limited related to the transmission of the live attenuated influenza vaccine virus from vaccinated individuals to immunocompromised patients, but transmission may occur in rare instances.7 Live attenuated vaccines such as the oral polio, BCG, and oral typhoid Ty21a vaccines are contraindicated in household contacts.8

Table 8.

Immunization of Caregivers and Household Contacts of Immunocompromised Children09

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t08.jpg

ROLE OF THE CLINICIAN AND INFORMATION RESOURCES

Healthcare providers who care for immunocompromised children should be knowledgeable about the indications, contraindications, and precautions for vaccine administration in patients with altered immunocompetence.5 Pediatricians play a crucial role in identifying and effectively communicating the risks and benefits of vaccines to immunocompromised patients and their parents.108 Parents should also be educated about trustworthy websites where they can find reliable health information about vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases (Table 9).109,110 Examples include the AAP, CDC, National Institutes of Health, World Health Organization, National Network for Immunization Information, and Immunization Action Coalition.111 In addition to education, physicians should ensure proper storage and administration of vaccines by following ACIP recommendations, identify contraindications, report and treat adverse reactions, and refer and follow up as appropriate.

Table 9.

Selected Online Resources Regarding Vaccines

graphic file with name i1524-5012-12-3-228-t09.jpg

FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS

Given the paucity of data on the safety and efficacy of several newly introduced vaccines and the growing population of immunocompromised children and adolescents, additional research is a priority to guide rational guidelines and vaccine policy recommendations.35 Understanding the degree of immune reconstitution and identifying specific host immune responses and their clinical implications are important.8 Research must use rigorous study designs that will evaluate the outcome of natural infections and immunization in populations receiving varying immunosuppressive regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Children who are diagnosed with cancer and receive chemotherapy or HSCT are at increased risk for vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. Therefore, the immunization of immunocompromised patients is an important priority. Physicians must be aware of current immunization policy guidelines from the ACIP and AAP and should consider the risks and benefits of vaccines when recommending vaccination in compromised hosts. Further, all household contacts should be immunized with all routinely recommended vaccines to protect compromised patients against common vaccine-preventable infections, such as influenza and pertussis.

Footnotes

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Roush SW, Murphy TV. Vaccine-Preventable Disease Table Working Group. Historical comparisons of morbidity and mortality for vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States. JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2155–2163. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Esposito S, Cecinati V, Brescia L, Principi N. Vaccinations in children with cancer. Vaccine. 2010 Apr 26;28(19):3278–3284. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.096. Epub 2010 Mar 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ruggiero A, Battista A, Coccia P, Attinà G, Riccardi R. How to manage vaccinations in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Dec 15;57(7):1104–1108. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23333. Epub 2011 Sep 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Allen UD. Immunizations for children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Dec;49((7 Suppl)):1102–1108. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abzug MJ. Vaccination in the immunocompromised child: a probe of immune reconstitution. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Mar;28(3):233–236. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819d31bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ljungman P, Cordonnier C, Einsele H, et al. Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research; National Marrow Donor Program; European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group; American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group; Infectious Disease Society of America; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Canada; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccination of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Oct;44(8):521–526. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nield LS, Troisch MJ, Kamat D. Vaccinating the immunocompromised child. Consultant for Pediatricians. 2009;8((Suppl)):S7–S14. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tamma P. Vaccines in immunocompromised patients. Pediatr Rev. 2010 Jan;31(1):38–40. doi: 10.1542/pir.31-1-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Freed GL, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Immunization programs for infants, children, adolescents, and adults: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 15;49(6):817–840. doi: 10.1086/605430. Erratum in: Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 1;49(9):1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pirofski LA, Casadevall A. Use of licensed vaccines for active immunization of the immunocompromised host. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):1–26. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moss W, Lederman H. Immunization of the immunocompromised host. Clin Focus Prim Immune Defic. 1998 Oct;1(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burroughs M, Moscona A. Immunization of pediatric solid organ transplant candidates and recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;30(6):857–869. doi: 10.1086/313823. Epub 2000 Jun 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ljungman P. Vaccination of the immunocompromised host. In: Plotkin SA, Offit PA, Orenstein WA, editors. Vaccines. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;; 2008. pp. 98–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): use of vaccines and immune globulins in persons with altered immunocompetence. MMWR. 1993. April 9:42(RR-04):1-18. [PubMed]
  • 15.Bodey GP. The changing face of febrile neutropenia-from monotherapy to moulds to mucositis. Fever and neutropenia: the early years. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 May;63(Suppl 1):i3–i13. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pui CH, Campana D, Pei D, et al. Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 25;360(26):2730–2741. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Dahl G, et al. Minimal residual disease-directed therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukaemia: results of the AML02 multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jun;11(6):543–552. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70090-5. Epub 2010 May 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brady MT, Oleske JM, Williams PL, et al. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 219/219C Team. Declines in mortality rates and changes in causes of death in HIV-1-infected children during the HAART era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Jan;53(1):86–94. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181b9869f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mofenson LM, Brady MT, Danner SP, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Institutes of Health; HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society; American Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections among HIV-exposed and HIV-infected children: recommendations from CDC, the National Institutes of Health, the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009;58((RR-11)):1–166. Sep 4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.American Academy of Pediatrics. Immunization in special clinical circumstances. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 68–104.
  • 21.Mackall CL, Fleisher TA, Brown MR, et al. Lymphocyte depletion during treatment with intensive chemotherapy for cancer. Blood. 1994 Oct 1;84(7):2221–2228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hersh EM, Whitecar JP, Jr, McCredie KB, Bodey GP, Sr, Freireich EJ. Chemotherapy, immunocompetence, immunosuppression and prognosis in acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1971 Nov;285(22):1211–1216. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197111252852201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nilsson A, De Milito A, Engström P, et al. Current chemotherapy protocols for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia induce loss of humoral immunity to viral vaccination antigens. Pediatrics. 2002 Jun;109(6):e91. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.6.e91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mackall CL. T-cell immunodeficiency following cytotoxic antineoplastic therapy: a review. Stem Cells. 2000;18(1):10–18. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.18-1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mustafa MM, Buchanan GR, Winick NJ, et al. Immune recovery in children with malignancy after cessation of chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1998 Sep-Oct;20(5):451–457. doi: 10.1097/00043426-199809000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kosmidis S, Baka M, Bouhoutsou D, et al. Longitudinal assessment of immunological status and rate of immune recovery following treatment in children with ALL. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Mar;50(3):528–532. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alanko S, Salmi TT, Pelliniemi TT. Recovery of blood T-cell subsets after chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1994 May-Jun;11(3):281–292. doi: 10.3109/08880019409141671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haining WN, Neuberg DS, Keczkemethy HL, et al. Antigen-specific T-cell memory is preserved in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2005 Sep 1;106(5):1749–1754. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1082. Epub 2005 May 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aquino VM, Douek DC, Berryman B, Johnson M, Jain VK, Collins RH. Evaluation of thymic output by measurement of T-cell-receptor gene rearrangement excisional circles (TREC) in patients who have received fludarabine. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003 Feb;44(2):343–348. doi: 10.1080/1042819021000029696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mackall CL, Fleisher TA, Brown MR, et al. Age, thymopoiesis, and CD4+ T-lymphocyte regeneration after intensive chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1995 Jan 19;332(3):143–149. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199501193320303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Eyrich M, Wiegering V, Lim A, Schrauder A, Winkler B, Schlegel PG. Immune function in children under chemotherapy for standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia—a prospective study of 20 paediatric patients. Br J Haematol. 2009 Nov;147(3):360–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07862.x. Epub 2009 Aug 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Löbermann M, Boršo D, Hilgendorf I, Fritzsche C, Zettl UK, Reisinger EC. Immunization in the adult immunocompromised host. Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Jan;11(3):212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 May 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hilgendorf I, Freund M, Jilg W, et al. Vaccination of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: report from the international consensus conference on clinical practice in chronic GVHD. Vaccine. 2011 Apr 5;29(16):2825–2833. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Feb 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wingard JR, Hsu J, Hiemenz JW. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an overview of infection risks and epidemiology. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010 Jun;24(2):257–272. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2010.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gangappa S, Kokko KE, Carlson LM, et al. Immune responsiveness and protective immunity after transplantation. Transpl Int. 2008 Apr;21(4):293–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00631.x. Epub 2008 Jan 21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Parkkali T, Käyhty H, Ruutu T, Volin L, Eskola J, Ruutu P. A comparison of early and late vaccination with Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines after allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Nov;18(5):961–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lortan JE, Vellodi A, Jurges ES, Hugh-Jones K. Class- and subclass-specific pneumococcal antibody levels and response to immunization after bone marrow transplantation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1992 Jun;88(3):512–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1992.tb06480.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hammarström V, Pauksen K, Azinge J, Oberg G, Ljungman P. Pneumococcal immunity and response to immunization with pneumococcal vaccine in bone marrow transplant patients: the influence of graft versus host reaction. Support Care Cancer. 1993 Jul;1(4):195–199. doi: 10.1007/BF00366446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cordonnier C, Labopin M, Chesnel V, et al. Immune response to the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine after the 7-valent conjugate vaccine in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: results from the EBMT IDWP01 trial. Vaccine. 2010 Mar 24;28(15):2730–2734. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.025. Epub 2010 Jan 29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meisel R, Kuypers L, Dirksen U, et al. Impfung von Kindern nach allogener Stammzelltransplantation (IKAST) Study Group. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine provides early protective antibody responses in children after related and unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):2322–2236. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-032284. Epub 2006 Nov 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zignol M, Peracchi M, Tridello G, et al. Assessment of humoral immunity to poliomyelitis, tetanus, hepatitis B, measles, rubella, and mumps in children after chemotherapy. Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):635–641. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Feldman S, Andrew M, Norris M, McIntyre B, Iyer R. Decline in rates of seropositivity for measles, mumps, and rubella antibodies among previously immunized children treated for acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Aug;27(2):388–390. doi: 10.1086/514661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fioredda F, Plebani A, Hanau G, et al. Re-immunisation schedule in leukaemic children after intensive chemotherapy: a possible strategy. Eur J Haematol. 2005 Jan;74(1):20–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00340.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Patel SR, Ortín M, Cohen BJ, et al. Revaccination of children after completion of standard chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44(5):635–642. doi: 10.1086/511636. Epub 2007 Jan 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Patel SR, Chisholm JC, Heath PT. Vaccinations in children treated with standard-dose cancer therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;55(1):169–186. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2007.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Succi RC, Farhat CK. Vaccination in special situations. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2006 Jul;82((3 Suppl)):S91–S100. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1474. Epub 2006 May 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.American Academy of Pediatrics. Poliovirus infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 541–545.
  • 48.Nkowane BM, Wassilak SG, Orenstein WA, et al. Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. United States: 1973 through 1984. JAMA. 1987 Mar 13;257(10):1335–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Leung TF, Chik KW, Li CK, et al. Incidence, risk factors and outcome of varicella-zoster virus infection in children after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Jan;25(2):167–172. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Levin MJ. Varicella vaccination of immunocompromised children. J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;197(Suppl 2):S200–S206. doi: 10.1086/522133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.American Academy of Pediatrics. Varicella-zoster infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 714–727.
  • 52.Sauerbrei A, Prager J, Hengst U, Zintl F, Wutzler P. Varicella vaccination in children after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Sep;20(5):381–383. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kaplan LJ, Daum RS, Smaron M, McCarthy CA. Severe measles in immunocompromised patients. JAMA. 1992 Mar 4;267(9):1237–1241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bakshi N, Lawson J, Hanson R, Ames C, Vinters HV. Fatal mumps meningoencephalitis in a child with severe combined immunodeficiency after bone marrow transplantation. J Child Neurol. 1996 Mar;11(2):159–162. doi: 10.1177/088307389601100218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.American Academy of Pediatrics. Measles. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 444–455.
  • 56.Ercan TE, Soycan LY, Apak H, et al. Antibody titers and immune response to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005 May;27(5):273–277. doi: 10.1097/01.mph.0000163214.37147.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Luthy KE, Tiedeman ME, Beckstrand RL, Mills DA. Safety of live-virus vaccines for children with immune deficiency. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Oct;18(10):494–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.King SM, Saunders EF, Petric M, Gold R. Response to measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in paediatric bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Apr;17(4):633–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Addition of severe combined immunodeficiency as a contraindication for administration of rotavirus vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Jun 11;59(22):687–688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pérez-Schael I, Guntiñas MJ, Pérez M, et al. Efficacy of the rhesus rotavirus-based quadrivalent vaccine in infants and young children in Venezuela. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 23;337(17):1181–1187. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710233371701. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 2;338(14):1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.American Academy of Pediatrics. Tuberculosis. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 680–701.
  • 62.Hesseling AC, Johnson LF, Jaspan H, et al. Disseminated bacille Calmette-Guérin disease in HIV-infected South African infants. Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Jul;87(7):505–511. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.055657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kwon HJ, Lee JW, Chung NG, Cho B, Kim HK, Kang JH. Assessment of serologic immunity to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis after treatment of Korean pediatric hematology and oncology patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Jan;27(1):78–83. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.1.78. Epub 2011 Dec 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kung FH, Orgel HA, Wallace WW, Hamburger RN. Antibody production following immunization with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids in children receiving chemotherapy during remission of malignant disease. Pediatrics. 1984 Jul;74(1):86–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ridgway D, Wolff LJ, Deforest A. Immunization response varies with intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy. Am J Dis Child. 1991 Aug;145(8):887–891. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160080065022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zengin E, Sarper N. Humoral immunity to diphtheria, tetanus, measles, and hemophilus influenzae type b in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and response to re-vaccination. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Dec;53(6):967–972. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vance E, George S, Guinan EC, et al. Comparison of multiple immunization schedules for Haemophilus influenzae type b-conjugate and tetanus toxoid vaccines following bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Oct;22(8):735–741. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Small TN, Zelenetz AD, Noy A, et al. Pertussis immunity and response to tetanus-reduced diphtheria-reduced pertussis vaccine (Tdap) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Dec;15(12):1538–1542. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Sep 25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.American Academy of Pediatrics. Haemophilus influenza infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 314–321.
  • 70.Avanzini MA, Carrà AM, Maccario R, et al. Immunization with Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine in children given bone marrow transplantation: comparison with healthy age-matched controls. J Clin Immunol. 1998 May;18(3):193–201. doi: 10.1023/a:1020578921706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lee AC, Lam SY. Life threatening acute epiglottitis in acute leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002 Mar;43(3):665–667. doi: 10.1080/10428190290012254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rolston KV. The spectrum of pulmonary infections in cancer patients. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001 Jul;13(4):218–223. doi: 10.1097/00001622-200107000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ek T, Mellander L, Hahn-Zoric M, Abrahamsson J. Intensive treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia reduces immune responses to diphtheria, tetanus, and Haemophilus influenzae type b. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Nov;26(11):727–734. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200411000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ek T, Mellander L, Hahn-Zoric M, Abrahamsson J. Avidity of tetanus and Hib antibodies after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia—implications for vaccination strategies. Acta Paediatr. 2006 Jun;95(6):701–706. doi: 10.1080/08035250500459717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.McFarlane ES, Embil JA. Prevalence of antibodies to Hepatitis A antigen in sera from patients with haematological malignancies. J Med Virol. 1981;8(1):49–53. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890080104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Takai S, Tsurumi H, Ando K, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infection in haematological malignancies and liver injury following chemotherapy. Eur J Haematol. 2005 Feb;74(2):158–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Köksal Y, Varan A, Aydin GB, et al. Comparison of accelerated and rapid schedules for monovalent hepatitis B and combined hepatitis A/B vaccines in children with cancer. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007 Dec;24(8):587–594. doi: 10.1080/08880010701703511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.American Academy of Pediatrics. Hepatitis B. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 337–356.
  • 79.American Academy of Pediatrics. Pneumococcal infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 524–535.
  • 80.Kumar D, Humar A, Plevneshi A, et al. Toronto Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network. Invasive pneumococcal disease in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a decade of prospective population-based surveillance. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Apr;41(8):743–747. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705964. Epub 2008 Jan 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.O'Brien KL, Hochman M, Goldblatt D. Combined schedules of pneumococcal conjugate and polysaccharide vaccines: is hyporesponsiveness an issue? Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;7(9):597–606. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70210-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chan CY, Molrine DC, George S, et al. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine primes for antibody responses to polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. J Infect Dis. 1996 Jan;173(1):256–258. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.1.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Cordonnier C, Labopin M, Chesnel V, et al. Influence of immunization timing on the response to conjugate-pneumococcal vaccine after allogenic stem cell transplant: final results of the EBMT IDWP01 Trial. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41((Suppl 1)):S2. Mar. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kumar D, Chen MH, Welsh B, et al. A randomized, double-blind trial of pneumococcal vaccination in adult allogeneic stem cell transplant donors and recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Dec 15;45(12):1576–1582. doi: 10.1086/523583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Molrine DC, Antin JH, Guinan EC, et al. Donor immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and early protective antibody responses following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2003 Feb 1;101(3):831–836. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0832. Epub 2002 Sep 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.American Academy of Pediatrics. Meningococcal infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 455–463.
  • 87.Yu JW, Borkowski A, Danzig L, Reiter S, Kavan P, Mazer BD. Immune response to conjugated meningococcal C vaccine in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Dec;49(7):918–923. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Parkkali T, Käyhty H, Lehtonen H, et al. Tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine is immunogenic in adult allogeneic BMT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Jan;27(1):79–84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mahler MB, Taur Y, Jean R, Kernan NA, Prockop SE, Small TN. Safety and immunogenicity of the tetravalent protein-conjugated meningococcal vaccine (MCV4) in recipients of related and unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jan;18(1):145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.027. Epub 2011 Aug 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.van Tilburg CM, Sanders EA, Rovers MM, Wolfs TF, Bierings MB. Loss of antibodies and response to (re-)vaccination in children after treatment for acute lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review. Leukemia. 2006 Oct;20(10):1717–1722. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404326. Epub 2006 Aug 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Avery RK, Michaels M. Update on immunizations in solid organ transplant recipients: what clinicians need to know. Am J Transplant. 2008 Jan;8(1):9–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02051.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.American Academy of Pediatrics. Human papillomaviruses. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 477–483.
  • 93.Principi N, Esposito S. Are we ready for universal influenza vaccination in paediatrics? Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;4(2):75–83. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)00926-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Esposito S, Marchisio P, Principi N. The global state of influenza in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Nov;27((11 Suppl)):S149–S153. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31818a542b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hakim H, Allison KJ, Van De Velde LA, Li Y, Flynn PM, McCullers JA. Immunogenicity and safety of inactivated monovalent 2009 H1N1 influenza A vaccine in immunocompromised children and young adults. Vaccine. 2012 Jan 20;30(5):879–885. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.105. Epub 2011 Dec 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Porter CC, Edwards KM, Zhu Y, Frangoul H. Immune responses to influenza immunization in children receiving maintenance chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004 Jan;42(1):36–40. doi: 10.1002/pbc.10459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Matsuzaki A, Suminoe A, Koga Y, Kinukawa N, Kusuhara K, Hara T. Immune response after influenza vaccination in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Nov;45(6):831–837. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Esposito S, Cecinati V, Russo FG, Principi N. Influenza vaccination in children with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Hum Vaccin. 2009 Jun;5(6):430–432. doi: 10.4161/hv.5.6.7942. Epub 2009 Jun 26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Cecinati V, Esposito S, Scicchitano B, et al. Effectiveness of recall systems for improving influenza vaccination coverage in children with oncohematological malignancies. Hum Vaccin. 2010 Feb 6;6(2):194–197. doi: 10.4161/hv.6.2.10253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Goossen GM, Kremer LC, van de Wetering MD. Influenza vaccination in children being treated with chemotherapy for cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;15(2) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006484.pub2. Apr. CD006484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.American Academy of Pediatrics. Passive immunization. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 55–67.
  • 102.American Academy of Pediatrics. Respiratory syncytial virus. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, eds. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009. pp. 560–569.
  • 103.Abuali MM, Arnon R, Posada R. An update on immunizations before and after transplantation in the pediatric solid organ transplant recipient. Pediatr Transplant. 2011 Dec;15(8):770–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01593.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kotton CN. Vaccination and immunization against travel-related diseases in immunocompromised hosts. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008 Jul;7(5):663–672. doi: 10.1586/14760584.7.5.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Staples JE, Gershman M, Fischer M. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Yellow fever vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59((RR-7)):1–27. Jul 30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Fischer M, Lindsey N, Staples JE, Hills S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Japanese encephalitis vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59((RR-1)):1–32. Mar 12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kappagoda C, Shaw P, Burgess M, Botham S, Cramer L. Varicella vaccine in non-immune household contacts of children with cancer or leukaemia. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999 Aug;35(4):341–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Healy CM, Pickering LK. How to communicate with vaccine-hesitant parents. Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(Suppl 1):S127–S133. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1722S. Epub 2011 Apr 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gust DA, Darling N, Kennedy A, Schwartz B. Parents with doubts about vaccines: which vaccines and reasons why. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122(4):718–725. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Freed GL, Clark SJ, Butchart AT, Singer DC, Davis MM. Sources and perceived credibility of vaccine-safety information for parents. Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(Suppl 1):S107–S112. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1722P. Epub 2011 Apr 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Pineda D, Myers MG. Finding reliable information about vaccines. Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(Suppl 1):S134–S137. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1722T. Epub 2011 Apr 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Ochsner Journal are provided here courtesy of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

RESOURCES