Abstract
Calmodulin (CaM), a member of the EF-hand superfamily, regulates many aspects of the cell function by responding specifically to micromolar concentrations of Ca2+ in the presence of ~1000× higher concentration of cellular Mg2+. To explain the structural basis of metal ion binding specificity we have solved the X-ray structures of the N-terminal domain of calmodulin (N-CaM) in complexes with Mg2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+. In contrast to Ca2+, which induces domain opening in CaM, octahedrally coordinated Mg2+ and Mn2+ stabilize the closed-domain, apo-like conformation, while tetrahedrally coordinated Zn2+ ions bind at the protein surface and do not compete with Ca2+. The relative positions of bound Mg2+ and Mn2+ within the EF-hand loops are similar to those of Ca2+, however the Glu sidechain in the 12th position of the loop, whose bidentate interaction with Ca2+ is critical for domain opening, does not bind directly to either Mn2+ or Mg2+ and the vacant ligand position is occupied by a water molecule. We conclude that this critical interaction is prevented by specific stereochemical constraints imposed on the ligands by the EF-hand-β-scaffold. The structures suggest that Mg2+ contributes to the switching off of calmodulin activity and possibly other EF-hand proteins at the resting levels of Ca2+. The Mg2+-bound N-CaM structure also provides a unique view of a transiently bound hydrated metal ion and suggests a role for the hydration water in the metal induced conformational change.
Keywords: EF-hand, Ca2+-binding, calcium signaling, Mg2+-binding, magnesium deficiency, conformational change
Transient spikes in the free Ca2+ concentration activate the function of excitable cells such as myocytes and neurons and regulate a broad range of processes in virtually all cells (1–3). In the resting state the concentration of free Ca2+ is ~0.1 micromolar, and may increase ~100 fold upon cell activation. In contrast, the concentration of free Mg2+ is much higher and remains at a nearly constant level of ~1.0 mM (4). Thus, Ca2+-signaling occurs in the presence of a large excess of chemically similar divalent cation Mg2+. Although Mg2+ is generally considered not to play a regulatory function, large fluxes of Mg2+ through the cell membrane can be elicited upon hormonal stimulation in situ (5–9), which suggests that the free Mg2+ concentration in cells is tightly regulated. Significant changes in the intracellular free Mg2+ may occur in some pathological states such as dietary magnesium deficiency (10) or ischemia (11). Several observations point to an antagonistic role of Mg2+ with respect to Ca2+ in cell function, however the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Recently, we put forward a hypothesis that altered Ca2+ regulation may be an underlying cause of some pathological states attributed to magnesium deficiency (12). Our present work is an attempt at further exploration of this possibility through a detailed structural analysis of Mg2+ interaction with the key Ca2+-sensor protein calmodulin (CaM).
Calmodulin is a member of the EF-hand superfamily of Ca2+-binding proteins that function as intracellular receptors of Ca2+ signals. These proteins change their conformation upon binding Ca2+, the property that enables them to regulate the activity of various enzymes in a Ca2+-dependent manner (13–15). Many EF-hand proteins also bind Mg2+ with sufficient affinity to render them fully or partially filled with Mg2+ at the resting Ca2+ levels. Thus, the key question is how do these proteins respond specifically to Ca2+ signals in the presence of ~1000 fold excess of Mg2+. Such remarkable functional specificity requires not only a metal ion discrimination based on the binding affinity, but also different structural responses to Ca2+-binding vs. Mg2+-binding. Even though the Ca2+-binding sites in CaM are considered Ca2+-specific, they have sufficient affinity for Mg2+ to be partially occupied by Mg2+ (possibly as much as 50% in the N-terminal domain) at the resting intracellular Ca2+ concentrations (16–18) (reviewed in ref (12)). The Ca2+-induced activation of CaM requires a transition from a closed-domain to an open-domain conformation in which a target-binding hydrophobic pocket is formed in each of its two domains (19, 20). Mg2+ ions do not induce domain opening, and thus do not activate CaM (17, 21), but the structural basis for the different conformational response is not well understood.
The metal coordinating ligands in the canonical EF-hand are contained within a 12 amino acid loop, flanked on both ends by α-helices (22, 23). A pair of EF-hands is required for a structurally stable functional domain. The key element of the domain is a short stretch of antiparallel β-sheet connecting the Ca2+-binding loops named “EF-hand-β-scaffold”, which was proposed to play an important role in the Ca2+-binding mechanism and in the Ca2+-induced conformational changes (14, 24). In the proposed model the position of the bound metal ion is defined by the central carbonyl oxygen ligand (the –Y position), a part of the β-scaffold. The ligands in the N-terminal part of the loop are highly mobile and fold readily around the metal ion without significant effects on the domain structure, whereas contribution of a bidentate ligand provided by the side-chain carboxyl group of the invariant Glu reside in the C-terminal (12th) position of the loop (Glu12) requires a shift of the exiting helix, which opens the domain. The bidentate Ca2+ coordination by Glu12 is critical for the domain opening (24, 25) and that interaction is different or missing in the Mg2+-EF-hand protein structures. In the Mg2+-bound structure of parvalbumin (26) only one oxygen of the Glu12 side chain interacts with the metal (monodentate ligand) whereas in the structure of calbindin D9k (S100G) Glu12 does not contact Mg2+ at all (27) and the vacant coordinating position is occupied by H2O (reviewed in (12)). Neither protein undergoes a large conformational change upon Ca2+-binding, so it is not possible to make inferences from these structures with respect to CaM. Based on their NMR studies Malmendal and colleagues concluded that Glu12 does not contribute to Mg2+ binding in the N-terminal domain of CaM (17, 18) consistent with the closed domain conformation of the Mg2+-CaM complex (28). However, the structural basis for that difference is not clear.
Here we report X-ray structures of the N-terminal domain of calmodulin (N-CaM) in complexes with three divalent metal ions: Mg2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+. The hexa-coordinated Mg2+ and Mn2+ are bound within the EF-loops whereas the tetra-coordinated Zn2+ is found only at the interface between N-CaM monomers in the crystal lattice. In these structures N-CaM has a closed-domain apo-like conformation. Characteristically, the last ligand of the Ca2+-binding loop (Glu12) is not involved in Mg2+ or Mn2+ binding, which explains the lack of domain opening and CaM activation by these metal ions. Although like Ca2+, both Mg2+ and Mn2+ stabilize the N-CaM structure against thermal and urea induced unfolding, the stabilized structures are different. Cumulatively, the presented structures enable us to define the determinants of metal ion specificity in N-CaM. Unexpectedly, one of the structures provides a unique view of a bound hydrated Mg2+ and suggests that tightly coordinated water molecules may be important for the metal induced conformational transition.
Materials and Methods
Protein expression, purification and decalcification
The N-terminal domain of human CaM (residues 1–79) cloned in pAED4 vector (29) was expressed and purified in a similar manner as we previously described for the wild type CaM (20). Briefly, transformed Rosetta cells (Novagen) were grown in 1L of LB at 37 °C. Protein overexpression was induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-Dgalactopyranoside when OD600 reached 0.8–1.0, and the culture was incubated for 3 hours at 37 °C. Cells were harvested via centrifugation (4500 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C) and lysed by freeze-thawing the pellet (3 cycles) suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 M PMSF). Cell debris was removed via centrifugation (16,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C) and the supernatant was brought to 35% saturation of (NH4)2SO4 and centrifuged again. The supernatant was filtered through a syringe filter (Whatman, 0.2 µm PVDF w/ GMF) and after addition of 4 mM CaCl2 applied to a fast flow Phenylsepharose column. The column was then washed with high salt (1 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 2 mM CaCl2), low salt (0.1 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 2 mM CaCl2), and medium salt (0.3 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 2 mM CaCl2) buffers. Purified protein was eluted with 2 mM EDTA (0.3 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0) and the protein containing fractions pooled. The combined fractions were dialyzed against low salt DEAE buffer (50 mM NaCl, 20 mM BisTris pH 6.0) and purified on a DEAE column in a salt gradient (50–500 mM NaCl). Purified N-CaM was dialyzed against 2 mM NH4HCO3 and lyophilized. For crystallization lyophilized protein was dissolved in a minimal amount of 2 mM Hepes pH 7.5 and dialyzed against EDTA buffer (20 mM EDTA with 100 mM NaCl) to ensure decalcification, followed by dialysis against decreasing concentrations of EGTA (20 mM and 0.5 mM EGTA) to maintain a calcium free environment.
Isothermal titration calorimetry
Metal binding constants were determined via ITC using a VP-ITC calorimeter (MicroCal) and the data analyzed with the program Origin 7 (MicroCal) (30). Decalcified N-CaM samples were dialyzed against ITC buffer (50 mM tris-cacodylate, pH 6.5, 100 mM KCl) and diluted to 20, 20 and 150 µM for titration with CaCl2, MnCl2 and MgCl2, respectively. Each protein sample was degassed and immediately used for titration at 22 °C. A series of 10 µl aliquots of 20 fold molar excess of metal relative to total protein concentration were added and the heat due to metal ion binding to N-CaM measured calorimetrically. In each case a total of 300 µl of metal ion solution were added. Each data set was integrated and the resulting plot fitted with a single set of site model using a non-linear least-squares minimization algorithm. The fit parameters were used to calculate the dissociation constant, Kd, and enthalpy changes, ΔH, due to Ca2+, Mn2+ and Mg2+ ions binding to N-CaM.
Thermal unfolding monitored by far UV circular dichroism spectroscopy
Thermal denaturation curves of N-CaM were obtained using an AVIV 62DS CD spectrometer. Protein samples (5 µM) in CD Buffer (3M Urea, 10 mM Hepes pH 7.0) were titrated with CaCl2 (0–1 mM), MnCl2 (0–10 mM) or MgCl2 (0–10 mM). Sodium chloride was added as necessary to maintain constant ionic strength of 100 mM. N-CaM samples were denatured from 15–95 °C in 1 degree increments (30 sec equilibration time) and the ellipticity at 222 nm averaged for 5 sec. and recorded. The thermal unfolding curves were fitted as described before to determine melting temperature, Tm, and heat of unfolding, ΔH (31).
Protein crystallization
All crystals were grown at room temperature using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method with 2 µl drops over reservoirs containing 250 µl of crystallization solution. N-CaM crystals containing Mn2+/Zn2+ and Mg2+/Zn2+ metal ions were grown from 100 mM Tris-cacodylate pH 6.5, 25 mM ZnCl2, 16% PEG8000, 100 mM MnCl2 or MgCl2, and 20% ethylene glycol. Crystal formation under these conditions was complete within a day. Crystals containing only Mg2+ were grown from 20 mM Tris-cacodylate pH 7.0, 32% PEG8000, 25 mM magnesium acetate, 50 mM KCl, and 25% ethylene glycol. After two days of equilibration, the clear drop was microseeded. All crystals were frozen in liquid nitrogen directly from the crystallization solution.
X-ray data collection, structure solution and refinement
Data for all crystals were collected at Beamline X29 of the National Synchrotron Light Source (Brookhaven, NY). A complete data set was collected for each crystal at 100 °K at a wavelength of 1.0750 Å. For the Mn/Zn-N-CaM crystal, an additional data set was collected at 1.7587 Å where the anomalous signal due to Mn is stronger than the anomalous signal due to Zn. Reflections were indexed and integrated with DENZO and scaled with SCALEPACK (32). Data from SCALEPACK were then converted into MTZ format with structure factors using the programs ImportScaled and ctruncate, which are included in the CCP4 program suite (33).
SAD phases were determined for Mg/Zn-N-CaM and Mn/Zn-N-CaM using AutoSol module in the Phenix suite (34), using the anomalous signal due to the presence of Zn. The Mg-N-CaM crystal structure was solved using molecular replacement with Phaser-MR and a previously reported apo CaM structure (2PQ3). Electron density maps were improved by creating iterative build composite omit maps using AutoBuild (Phenix) (35). The initial models used for refinement were also created using AutoBuild with the appropriate sequence file for the N-terminal domain of calmodulin.
Initial automatic structural refinement was performed with the program phenix.refine. Metal ions and cacodylate groups were added manually in Coot (36) and ligand restraints produced using ReadySet (Phenix). Following the initial cycle of automatic refinement, several cycles of manual refinement in Coot as well as automatic refinement with phenix.refine and/or refmac5 were performed until Rwork and Rfree had reached acceptable values. Validation of the structure was performed using the Comprehensive Validation option in the Phenix program suite, as well as PROCHECK. Model statistics for each refined crystal structure are compiled in Table 1.
Table 1.
Structure determination of N-CaM metal ion complexes.
Mg/Zn-N-CaM | Mg-N-CaM | Mn/Zn-N-CaM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data collection | |||||
Wavelength (Å) | 1.0750 | 1.0750 | 1.0750 | 1.7587 | |
Space group | P43212 | P1 | P21 | ||
Molecules in ASU | 1 | 4 | 2 | ||
Cell dimension (Å) | |||||
a | 35.30 | 34.44 | 36.29 | 36.32 | |
b | 35.30 | 43.04 | 35.46 | 35.50 | |
c | 142.94 | 53.69 | 58.34 | 58.39 | |
α | 90.00 | 68.45 | 90.00 | 90.00 | |
β | 90.00 | 88.62 | 93.12 | 92.79 | |
γ | 90.00 | 79.45 | 90.00 | 90.00 | |
Resolution (Å) | 1.8 | 1.76 | 1.90 | 2.15 | |
Rmerge (%) | 15.7 (59.2)a | 7.1 (40.4)a | 6.5 (33.5)a | 6.9 (30.5)a | |
I/σ (I) | 18.3 (8.4)a | 15.6 (2.7)a | 28.7 (6.2)a | 26.6 (4.8)a | |
Completeness (%) | 100.0 (100.0)a | 95.6 (87.5)a | 100 (99.9)a | 99.7 (97.7)a | |
Redundancy | 27.4 (26.4)a | 4.0 (3.3)a | 8.2 (3.7)a | 3.8 (3.0)a | |
Refinement | |||||
Unique reflections | 9,179 | 27,732 | 11,882 | 8287 | |
Rwork | 0.2023 | 0.198 | 0.204 | ||
Rfree | 0.228 | 0.233 | 0.234 | ||
No. atoms | |||||
Protein | 575 | 2371 | 1150 | ||
Ligand/ion | 9 | 10 | 10 | ||
Water | 68 | 147 | 72 | ||
B-factors | |||||
Protein | 37.2 | 36.39 | 39.56 | ||
Ligand/ion | 33.04 | 26.01 | 40.88 | ||
Water | 50 | 35.65 | 41.94 | ||
r. m. s. deviations | |||||
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.017 | ||
Bond angles (deg) | 1.302 | 0.877 | 1.218 | ||
Ramachandran plot | |||||
Favorable region | 98.7 | 99.34 | 97.93 | ||
Allowed region | 1.3 | 0.66 | 2.07 | ||
Disallowed region | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Protein Data Bank ID | 3UCY | 3UCW | 3UCT |
All data sets were collected at NSLS Beamline X29.
Outer resolution shell (1.86–1.80, 1.82–1.76, 1.97–1.90, 2.23–2.15, from left to right)
Results
While both domains of CaM reportedly bind Mg2+, the binding to the N-domain is sufficiently strong to significantly affect the regulatory function of CaM under physiological conditions (17, 18, 37, 38). Therefore our goal was to obtain the high-resolution structure of the Mg2+-N-CaM complex. A search for the crystallization conditions using the Hampton Research Crystal Screens I and II yielded tetragonal crystals (space-group P43212), which contained also Zn2+ ions in addition to Mg2+. Similar crystals of N-CaM obtained in the presence of Zn2+ only have been previously reported by Warren et al. (39). Upon further search we have obtained triclinic crystals of N-CaM in the presence of Mg2+ only. The third structure is that of a monoclinic crystal of the Mn2+-N-CaM complex also obtained in the presence of Zn2+. The three metal ions used in this study have similar ionic radii: 0.72 Å for Mg2+, 0.67 Å for Mn2+ and 0.74 Å for Zn2+ in the octahedral coordination and 0.60 Å for Zn2+ in its more common tetrahedral coordination (40). Thus, these metal ions are significantly smaller than Ca2+ whose ionic radius is 1.00 Å in the octahedral coordination and 1.06 Å in the pentagonal bipyramid geometry typical for Ca2+ complexes with EF-hand proteins. Mg2+ and Mn2+ prefer octahedral ligand geometry, whereas Zn2+ has a preference for tetrahedral coordination. The important difference between Mg2+ and Mn2+ is that the latter binds N-CaM much more strongly (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). In all the structures described here N-CaM has a closed-domain apo-like conformation, consistent with the fact that none of the three metal ions is able to activate CaM. The structures are described in more detail below.
Table 2.
Thermodynamic parameters of metal binding to N-CaM determined by isothermal titration calorimetry.
Ca2+ | Mn2+ | Mg2+ | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of sites | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
Kd (µM) | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 13 ± 2 | 450 ± 10 |
ΔH (kcal/mol) | 1.68 ± 0.06 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 1 |
ΔS (cal/mol °K) | 29.7 | 34.9 | 48.7 |
Tetragonal crystals Mg/Zn-N-CaM
The Mg2+-N-CaM complex forms tetragonal crystals in the presence of Zn2+ and sodium dimethylarsenate (cacodylate). The structure was solved by molecular replacement using the coordinates of N-CaM structure obtained in the presence of Zn2+ only (39)(PDB code 2PQ3). Both Ca2+-binding loops of N-CaM in the Mg/Zn-N-CaM crystal contain an octahedrally coordinated metal ion. In site II the metal oxygen bond lengths (2.18 ± 0.11 Å) are consistent with Mg2+ (41, 42). However, in site I the metal-oxygen bonds (2.41 ± 0.09 Å) are outside the accepted range for Mg2+. The possible candidates are Ca2+ or Na+, for which the average bond lengths found in high-resolution protein structures fall in the same range of 2.35–2.45 Å (42). Calcium is a likely contaminant due to its high affinity for N-CaM, however, modeling the electron density as Ca2+ resulted in a large negative peak in the Fo-Fc electron density map. Furthermore, the octahedral ligand geometry of the bound metal is inconsistent with the pentagonal bipyramid geometry of Ca2+ coordination found in all published CaM structures. Thus, we have concluded that Na+ is most likely the metal bound at site I. While a relatively strong binding of Na+ to CaM (Ka=230 M−1) has been detected with 23Na-NMR (43) it is surprising that Mg2+ ions did not outcompete Na+ at this position in the crystal. A significant restriction of the loop conformation due to an interaction with a symmetry related molecule might be responsible. The Oδ atoms of Asp22 and Asp24 not only coordinate Na+ but also interact with one of the Zn2+ ions. The metal ion cluster is further stabilized by the oxygen atoms of dimethylarsenate, which provides a bridge between the two metal ions as well as the same cluster of a symmetry related molecule (39). This leads us to postulate that the absence of Mg2+ in site I results from unfavorable position of Asp22 and Asp24 side-chains due to the interaction with Zn2+.
The Mg2+ ion bound in site II is octahedrally coordinated by Oδ atoms of Asp56, Asp58, Asn60 and the carbonyl oxygen of Thr62 (Fig. 1A). The remaining two coordinating positions are occupied by water molecules. The Glu residue in the 12th position of the loop (Glu67), which provides bidentate coordination to Ca2+, does not interact directly with Mg2+ ion. The lack of this interaction critical for the Ca2+-induced domain opening (24, 25) is, apparently, the reason for the closed-domain conformation of N-CaM in this complex. Importantly, in this structure Mg2+ occupies the same position as Ca2+ by directly engaging four of the six ligands that typically are involved in Ca2+ coordination. Thus, the structure indicates that Mg2+ can be a direct competitor with respect to Ca2+ for site II of CaM depending upon their respective concentrations.
Figure 1. Two modes of Mg2+ interaction with site II of N-CaM.
Stereo diagrams showing 2Fo-Fc electron density maps contoured at 1.5 σ and the corresponding atomic models for site II of N-CaM (residues 55–67).
(a) – The “final” state found in the tetragonal crystals of Mg/Zn-N-CaM. (b) – The “intermediate” state found in the monoclinic crystal of Mg-N-CaM. Note the difference in the position of the metal ion (cyan spheres) and in the number of water molecules (red spheres) retained by Mg2+. In the intermediate state (b), the Mg2+ ion is directly coordinated to the N-CaM (blue lines) only via Thr62 side-chain and backbone carbonyl oxygen atoms. The remaining four coordinating positions are occupied by water molecules which make strong hydrogen bonds (yellow lines) with the side-chains of Asp58, Glu67 (each contributing two oxygen atoms), side-chain of Asp56, and the backbone carbonyl atom of Val55. A transition from the initial to the final position requires the elimination of two additional water molecules from the coordination sphere of Mg2+, which are replaced by direct bonds to side-chain oxygen atoms of Asp56, Asp58 and Asn60. Two water molecules complete the octahedral ligand geometry around the Mg2+ ion, one of which forms a hydrogen bond to Glu67 at the C-terminal position of the loop. The only metal ligand contributed by the protein that is common to the two structures is the carbonyl oxygen of Thr62 (the –Y coordinating position), which belongs to the β-scaffold. All structure figures were prepared with Pymol (71).
Triclinic crystals Mg-N-CaM
To resolve the issue of Mg2+ binding to site I, we have crystallized N-CaM in the presence of Mg2+ as the sole divalent metal ion. The structure of the Mg2+-N-CaM complex reveals three different modes of Mg2+ interaction with CaM. Two ions are coordinated to the ligands provided by the Ca2+-binding loops, whereas the third ion is coordinated by the side-chain carboxyls from adjacent molecules in the crystal lattice. At 1.76 Å resolution (Table 1) all the bound Mg2+ ions and the interacting ligands, including the tightly coordinated water molecules, are well represented in the electron density map (Fig 1B). The average temperature factor for the bound Mg2+ is 26.0 ± 4.8 Å2 (range 20.4–33.8 Å2). The asymmetric unit contains four molecules of N-CaM arranged in two pairs. Within each pair the molecules are positioned back-to-back (Fig. 2). This interaction is stabilized by multiple contacts between the helices of site II (helices C and D) and Mg2+ ion coordinated by the side-chains of Asp64, the residue in the 9th position of loop II. The back-to-back interaction of the N-CaM monomers apparently restricts the movement of the helices in EF-hand II, which has some important structural consequences. Each monomer of the Mg2+-bound N-CaM has a closed-domain conformation similar to that found in the apo structure, however there are key differences in the position of the helices in site II (see below). The coordination geometry of all Mg2+ ions in this structure is octahedral. The metal-oxygen bond lengths are in excellent agreement with the expected Mg2+-oxygen bond length. In site I, four of the six coordinating positions of the bound Mg2+ are occupied by the protein ligands that are normally involved in Ca2+ coordination (side-chain oxygen atoms of Asp20, Asp22, Asp24 and the carbonyl oxygen of Thr26). The two remaining coordinating positions (-X and –Z) are occupied by H2O. The position of the bound Mg2+ ion is the same as that of Ca2+, except that the Glu12 bidentate ligand (Glu31) is not engaged. Thus, this structure shows that site I of N-CaM is fully capable of coordinating the Mg2+ ion and it supports our earlier conclusion that the lack of Mg2+ in site I of Mg/Zn-N-CaM crystals resulted from constraints on the ligands (Asp22 and Asp24) due to their simultaneous interaction with Zn2+.
Figure 2. Stereo view of the N-CaM dimer in the monoclinic crystal of Mg2+-N-CaM complex.
Mg2+ ions are shown as cyan spheres. Note the back-to-back interaction of N-CaM monomers involving EF-hand II and a Mg2+ ion coordinated by the side chains of Asp64 (the residue in the 9th position of the loop). Due to the back-to-back interaction helix C is shifted and restricted in its movement.
Unexpectedly, in site II the Mg2+ ion is bound in a very different manner (Fig. 1B). The oxygen atom ligands contributed by the protein occupy only two of the six coordinating positions of the Mg2+ ion. These are the main chain carbonyl oxygen in the – Y position (Thr62), which is a part of the β-scaffold, and the Oγ of that residue. The remaining 4 coordinating positions are occupied by water molecules. The binding of such a highly hydrated metal ion is strongly stabilized by two-pronged hydrogen bonds of the coordinated water molecules to the side-chain carboxyl oxygen atoms of Asp58 and Glu67, the residues in the 3rd and 12th position of the loop, respectively, that provide the Y and –Z ligands for Ca2+ coordination. The entering helix (helix C) is shifted with respect to the β-scaffold in such a way that the side-chain of Asp56, the first residue of the loop (the Ca2+ ligand in the X position) is spatially too far removed to contact the Mg2+ ion directly and, instead, forms a hydrogen bond with one of the H2O molecules coordinated to the Mg2+ ion. Thus, although the Mg2+ ion is coordinated by the ligands of the loop, it still retains most of its hydration water and it has not reached the position normally occupied by Ca2+. This structure appears to represent an early step in the metal binding to an EF-hand, which was fortuitously captured due to specific intermolecular contacts in the crystal lattice, specifically the back-to-back interaction of N-CaM monomers (Fig. 2) in both pairs comprising the asymmetric unit of the crystal. The ~3 Å shift of the entering helix is the key difference (Fig. 3). The consequence of this shift is an expansion of the loop (Fig. 4) allowing the almost fully hydrated metal ion to engage the loop ligands. We infer that the ability of the entering helix to move freely with respect to the β-scaffold is an important factor in the process of metal ion binding. The implications of this unusual mode of metal ion binding will be considered further in the discussion.
Figure 3. Comparison of the domain structure of Mg-N-CaM and Mg/Zn-N-CaM.
The Mg-N-CaM is shown in green and the Mg/Zn-N-CaM is shown in red. Coordinates of the backbone atoms of the β-scaffold (Thr26, Ile27, Thr62, Ile63) were used for the superimposition. Note a large shift in the position of the entering helix of site II (helix C) in the Mg2+-N-CaM structure. Due to this shift the carbonyl oxygen of Val55 is approximately in the X coordinating position instead of Asp56 side-chain.
Figure 4. Fluctuation of the EF-hand loop during metal ion binding.
A stereo diagram of the backbone structure of loop II of N-CaM (residues 56–67) is shown. Key: cyan - apo form (2PQ3), green – Mg-N-CaM (3UCW) featuring the transiently bound hydrated Mg2+, red – Mg/Zn-N-CaM (3UCY) the final position of dehydrated Mg2+, and blue - +Ca2+ form (1CLL). Note that the loop initially expands to accommodate the hydrated Mg2+ ion and then contracts to a similar conformation as the apo form when the H2O molecules are replaced by loop ligands (Supplementary Video). Further contraction of the loop occurs in the case of Ca2+ when the bidentate Glu12 engages in Ca2+ coordination. The distance between Cα atoms of the first and last residue of the loop are: 8.6 Å (apo), 10.1 Å (hydrated Mg2+), 8.1 Å (Mg2+), and 6.6 Å (Ca2+).
Monoclinic crystals Mn/Zn-N-CaM
Two sets of data were collected from crystals of the Mn2+/Zn2+-bound form of N-CaM (Table 1). One set collected at 1.054 Å was used for solving and refining the structure, while the second set at 1.7587 Å, close to the anomalous scattering peak of Mn, was used to verify the position of the Mn2+ ions in the structure (Fig. 5). The structure was solved by SAD phasing using anomalous signals of Mn and Zn. The monoclinic crystals (space group P21) contain two N-CaM molecules in the asymmetric unit. Both chains are in the closed-domain conformation and contain Mn2+ ion in each EF-hand loop with identical octahedral ligand geometry. In loop 1 Asp20 provides an axial ligand (X position) to the Mn2+ complex via Oδ with the opposite axial position (-X) occupied by a water molecule. The Oδ atoms of Asp22 and Asp24 provide two equatorial ligands with the backbone carbonyl oxygen atom of Thr26 and a water molecule completing the octahedral ligand geometry. The loop 2 configuration around the second Mn2+ ion is similar. One of the water molecules and the Asp58 Oδ comprise the axial ligands, while the second water molecule, the Oδ atoms of Asp56 and Asn60 and the carbonyl oxygen atom of Thr62 form the equatorial plane of the Mn2+ ligation. Like in the Mg2+-N-CaM complexes the Glu12 residues in the –Y coordinating position (Glu31 in site I and Glu67 in site II) do not interact with Mn2+ ion. In chain A, one of the Oε atoms of this residue coordinates to the exogenous Mn2+ ion exclusive to chain A while the other Oε atom forms a hydrogen bonding network to the Mn2+ ion in loop 1 via a two water bridge. Alternatively, in chain B one of the Glu31 Oε atoms forms an indirect bond to the Mn2+ ion in loop 1 via a water bridge involving only a single water molecule.
Figure 5. Identification of the bound Mn2+ and Zn2+ based on anomalous X-ray scattering.
The data were recorded at two wavelengths, 1.0750 Å (blue) and 1.7587 Å (red). The f” value for Zn2+ ions (dark blue spheres) is ~3 fold larger at the shorter wavelength when compared to the longer wavelength (2.83e and 0.92e, respectively), where the opposite is the case for Mn2+ ions (cyan spheres) (1.59e and 3.4e, respectively). (a) - chain A in which 4 Mn2+ ions and 1 Zn2+ ion are coordinated to the metal binding loops. (b) - chain B which binds 1 Mn2+ ion and 1 Zn2+ ions in each loop 1 and 2. Contours for the maps are 6.0 σ with a 4.0 Å cut-off around the metal. Sphere radii are reduced to 0.5 Å for both Mn2+ and Zn2+ to improve visibility.
In addition to the Mn2+ ions, Zn2+ ions from the crystallization milieu were also present, as identified from the anomalous X-ray scattering signal (Fig. 5). The structure presented here includes 4 Zn2+ ions, all of which bind at the interface between N-CaM monomers in a tetrahedral geometry. Two of the Zn2+ ions are coordinated by Asp64 and Glu67 on the modeled chains and Glu7 and Glu11 on the symmetry related molecules. The third Zn2+ binds to chain B, residues Asp50 and Glu54, and their symmetry counterparts. The final Zn2+ ion binds on the outside of loop 1 of chain B to two of the same residues that bind Mn2+, Asp22 and Asp24, but via the alternative Oδ atoms and the Oε atom of the Glu45 residue on chain A.
It is striking that none of the Zn2+ ions are bound to the Ca2+-binding loops of N-CaM in a position normally occupied by Ca2+. This, in principle, could be related to the presence of competing Mn2+ in the Mn/Zn-N-CaM crystals or Mg2+ in the Mg/Zn-N-CaM crystals described above. However, Zn2+ was found not to bind at the Ca2+-binding sites of N-CaM even in the absence of competing ions (39). A similar observation was reported for the S100 protein interaction with Zn2+ (44). This is surprising in view of the fact that Zn2+ binding to low molecular weight ligands such as EDTA is several orders of magnitude stronger than that of Mg2+, Ca2+ or even Mn2+. According to the Irving-Williams series (45), which compares the stability of various complexes formed by the transition metals, Zn2+ binding to most ligands should be at least equal to, or significantly stronger than that of Mn2+. This rule is clearly not applicable to the EF-hand Ca2+-binding sites. A comparison of the N-CaM crystals obtained in the presence of Zn2+ with and without Mn2+ reveals a competition between these metals for the auxiliary sites located at the interface between N-CaM molecules in the crystal lattice, but not for the Ca2+-binding loops where only Mn2+ ions are found. Apparently the preference for tetrahedral ligand geometry makes Zn2+ incompatible with the ligand geometry in an EF-hand, which can accommodate metal ions in an octahedral or pentagonal bipyramid geometry only. Thus, Zn2+ ions cannot compete with Ca2+ for binding to EF-hand proteins.
Stabilization of the closed domain structure of N-CaM by Mg2+
If Mg2+ does not induce domain opening in N-CaM then, does it have any effect on the structure at all? We have addressed this question by measuring the effects of increasing concentrations of Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+ on the thermal denaturation of N-CaM. Binding of each of the metal ions tested increased the protein stability as reflected in the increase in unfolding temperature, consistent with the previous report (46). In order to compare directly the effect of Mg2+ vs. Ca2+ we also included 3 M urea in the protein solution, thus lowering the temperature range for the unfolding transition. The increase in the unfolding temperature occurs in a different concentration range for each metal ion, with Ca2+ having the strongest effect (Fig. 6a–c), However, when the melting temperature is plotted as a function of the ratio [Me]/Kd all three metal ions show similar effect on the stability of N-CaM (Fig. 6d), despite the differences in the domain conformation. The Mg2+-dependent stabilization of the closed domain conformation has important functional implications: (1) In the absence of Ca2+ it may prevent a partial activation of target enzymes that require the open domain conformation of CaM, and (2) It may promote CaM binding to the group of targets that have a preference for the closed domain conformation, such as those involving the IQ domain. Such a preferential effect of Mg2+ on some model target-CaM interaction has been reported (38).
Figure 6. Stabilization of N-CaM structure by metal ions.
Melting profiles for N-CaM (in 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 3 M urea) at various metal ion concentrations were determined by monitoring the circular dichroism signal at 222 nm for: A - Ca2+, B – Mn2+ and C – Mg2+. When the increase in melting temperature is plotted as a function of [Me]/Kd the increase in stability induced by binding of each metal is similar as shown in D.
Discussion
The closed-domain, apo-like conformation is a common characteristic of the N-CaM structures presented here. The EF-hand loops are extended and the Glu12 side-chain, whose bidentate interaction with Ca2+ is critical for the domain opening, does not directly contribute to Mg2+ or Mn2+ binding. Cumulatively, our data provide an explanation for the specific functional response of CaM to Ca2+ in the presence of Mg2+. Unique structural features of the hydrated Mg2+ ion interaction with N-CaM suggest a role for the hydration water in the mechanism of metal binding to an EF-hand and the resultant conformational change.
Structural basis for the metal ion-dependent functional specificity in a two-EF-hand domain
The structures of the Mg2+-N-CaM complexes obtained in this work demonstrate that Mg2+ ions compete directly with Ca2+ in both EF-hand loops of N-CaM by engaging the same ligands in all but one coordinating position. Mg2+ fails to directly engage the two side-chain oxygen atoms of Glu12 and the –Z coordinating position is occupied by H2O. In this respect the Mg2+-N-CaM interaction is similar to that found in site II of the Mg2+-S100G complex (27). The closed domain conformation and the lack of contribution from Glu12 are consistent with the NMR data of Malmendal et al.(17), with the lack of hydrophobic site exposure in CaM upon Mg2+ binding (28) and with the lack of enzyme activation by the Mg2+-CaM complex (21). The high-resolution structures and data presented here offer a view into the underlying mechanism.
The lack of domain opening upon Mg2+ binding to N-CaM can be attributed to several factors, all related in some ways to the smaller ionic radius of Mg2+ as compared to Ca2+. It is possible that Mg2+ cannot engage the Glu12 bidentate ligand because the loop cannot contract sufficiently around the smaller Mg2+ ion. This, however, does not appear to play a role since in the structure of Mg2+-bound parvalbumin (26) the Glu12 side chain is, in fact, involved in a direct monodentate interaction with Mg2+ (cf. Fig. 3 in ref. (12)). Moreover, the monodentate interaction is retained even when the side chain is shortened by substitution of Asp for Glu12(47). Using molecular dynamics simulations Cates et al. (48) have demonstrated a reversible switching from bidentate to monodentate Glu12 interaction with the bound metal ion in parvalbumin in response to “alchemical” in silico conversion of Ca2+ into Mg2+. The corresponding reduction from five to four oxygen atoms in the equatorial plane of the complex is necessary because the cavity formed by five oxygen atoms is too large for Mg2+ (cf. discussion and Fig. 3 in ref. (12)). The inability of Glu12 to engage in a bidentate interaction with Mg2+ (or Mn2+) is also related to the geometric constraints on the bond lengths and bond angles for the bidentate type of carboxylate-metal ion interaction. The smaller the ionic radius the closer the metal ion has to approach to the carboxylate oxygen atoms, which in turn constrains the bond angles. It is not possible to simultaneously satisfy the requirements for bond lengths and bond angles for a bidentate Mg2+-carboxylate interaction. While there are examples in the Protein Data Bank of bidentate Mg2+ coordination by a carboxylate group (Table 3), these structures present a significantly distorted geometry, making their occurrences rare. The preference of Mg2+ ions for monodentate interaction with carboxylate group is even more striking for small molecule isolated ligands (41) and is well justified by the ab initio energy calculations showing that monodentate Mg2+-carboxylate interaction is >10 kcal/mol more stable than the bidentate interaction (49).
Table 3.
Geometry of monodentate vs. bidentate coordination of Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+
Metal ion | Type of interaction |
Bond distance | Bond angle | PDB ID (resolution, Å) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
O-Me (Å) | C-O-Me | O-Me-O | |||
Ca2+ | monodentate | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 138.0 ±11.4 | 78.0 ±2.4 | 1EXR (1.0) |
bidentate | 2.50 ± 0.06 | 92.7 ±2.7 | 52.5 ±0.8 | ||
Mg2+ | monodentate | 2.08 ± 0.05 | 142.5 ± 14.6 | 90 | 3UCW (1.8) |
bidentatea | 2.33 | 89.9 | 56.7 | 1Z2O (1.24) | |
Mn2+ | monodentate | 2.17 ± 0.04 | 139.5 ± 10.8 | 90 | 3UCT (1.9) |
bidentatea | 2.33 | 90.8 | 56.1 | 2W5T (1.6) |
For Mg2+ and Mn2+ there are no examples of bidentate coordination among the published structures of EF-hand proteins. The examples given here are retrieved from PDB using MESPEUS server (70).
What remains to be explained is why, in contrast to parvalbumin, in the Mg2+-N-CaM complex the Glu12 side-chain does not contribute any of its oxygen atoms to Mg2+ coordination, i.e. why a water molecule at the –Z coordinating position is favored over the monodentate coordination by Glu12. The explanation is in the different domain conformations of N-CaM and parvalbumin. In parvalbumin the domain comprised of EF-hands II and III is fixed in the open conformation due to its strong interaction with the nonfunctional EF-hand I. The EF-hand helices are in perpendicular orientation in which Glu12 always remains in a suitable position for interaction with a metal ion. In contrast, in N-CaM the movement of Glu12 (Glu31 and Glu67) into and out of the metal coordinating position is structurally coupled to a change in the EF-hand interhelical angle associated with the Ca2+-induced domain opening (14, 24). The energy of the interaction between Ca2+ and the two oxygen atoms of Glu12 must overcome the loss of interhelical hydrophobic contacts associated with domain opening (reviewed by Gifford et al. (15)). Thus, it is plausible that the inability of Glu12 in N-CaM to bind Mg2+ results from the lower overall binding energy; the Kd for Mg2+ binding to N-CaM is only 0.45 mM as compared to 5.6 µM for Ca2+ (Table 2). However, this explanation is unsatisfactory in view of the fact that Mn2+, which has a similar ionic radius to Mg2+ but binds N-CaM almost as strongly as Ca2+ (Kd=13 µM), also does not engage Glu12.
If neither the local metal-ligand interaction geometry nor the overall energy balance can provide adequate explanation for our results, then we are left with the final possibility that the observed ligand-Mg2+ coordination in N-CaM is a result of some stereochemical constraints specific to the EF-hand. Such constraints are readily understood in light of the EF-hand-β-scaffold mechanism, which attributes a special role to the invariant main chain carbonyl group metal ligand in the –Y coordinating position (12). Unlike other ligands of the EF-hand Ca2+-binding loop the –Y carbonyl oxygen is highly constrained due to the strong, polarized hydrogen bonds within the β-scaffold with the pair-mate Ca2+-binding loop (50). This, in turn, defines the position of the bound metal ion and, indirectly, limits the available conformational space for the other ligands. The ligands in the N-terminal part of the loop fold around the metal ion due to the flexibility of the main chain, whereas the C-terminal ligand (Glu12) moves towards the metal ion together with the exiting helix, which in the case of Ca2+, or any metal ion capable of accepting the bidentate coordination, results in the conformational transition. Bidentate coordination of Mg2+ is geometrically unfavorable, and a monodentate interaction is energetically insufficient to break the hydrophobic interhelical contacts. As a result, Glu12 is not engaged in the interaction and a water molecule occupies the vacant ligand position. In view of these considerations we propose that the metal binding specificity of calmodulin, and more importantly its functional specificity, i.e. the ability to be activated specifically by Ca2+ but not by Mg2+, is related primarily to the stereochemical constraints imposed on the metal ligands by the EF-hand-β-scaffold. In view of the fact that all known EF-hand proteins appear to be composed of pairs of EF-hand motives and preserve the EF-hand-β-scaffold structure, it is likely that the above rule is applicable not only to CaM but to any EF-hand protein that has a sufficient affinity for Mg2+.
In the context of the above conclusion of particular interest is the potential effect of Mg2+ on the C-domain of CaM. Obtaining crystals of the Mg2+-bound C-domain is technically more challenging due to its lower affinity for Mg2+ and higher affinity for Ca2+ as compared to the N-domain (37). However, based on our circular dichrosim monitored melting profiles and bisANS fluorescence experiments we conclude that, like in the N-domain, Mg2+ binding also stabilizes the closed conformation of the C-domain (Supplementary Fig. 3). Although under physiological Mg2+ concentrations relatively little Mg2+ binding to the C-domain of free CaM can be expected, the binding may be enhanced in the presence of CaM target molecules with preference for the closed domain conformation, such as the various IQ-domain containing proteins (38). Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the role of Mg2+ in the cellular function of CaM.
Potential role of the tightly coordinated water in the metal-dependent conformational transitions in EF-hand proteins
The unusual binding mode of the tetra-hydrated Mg2+ ion in site II of N-CaM in the Mg2+-N-CaM complex provides new insights into the mechanism of metal ion binding to an EF-hand. As the Mn/Zn-N-CaM and Mg/Zn-N-CaM structures show, site II of N-CaM is perfectly competent to coordinate a dehydrated Mg2+ ion, or its equivalent Mn2+ ion, deep in the Ca2+-binding loop. Yet, that is not the case in the Mg-N-CaM structure. In this structure four of the six coordinating positions of the Mg2+ ion are still occupied by H2O, which clearly is an intermediate state in the process of shedding the hydration water as a part of the binding mechanism. Mg2+ has unusually high affinity for water, which is responsible for its generally weak interaction with most ligands and proteins. The transport number for Mg2+, i.e. an average number of tightly associated water molecules that migrate through the solution as the cation diffuses, is 12–14 (cf. Table 1 in ref. (51)). Six of these water molecules coordinated octahedrally form the first hydration shell, which can be retained in the crystalline state (52). The rate of water exchange from the first hydration shell is more than 1000× slower for Mg2+ than for Ca2+ (53). This, exceptionally strong interaction might be one of the reasons why we were able to capture the unusual state of Mg2+(H2O)4 bound to an EF-hand. We believe that the structure represents a plausible intermediate state in the binding of Mg2+, which occurs when a hydrated ion contacts the loop of an EF-hand (see Supplementary Video).
There are some striking features of the Mg2+-N-CaM complex suggesting that binding of other metal ions, Ca2+ in particular, might occur through a similar intermediate state. CaM and other EF-hand proteins coordinate Ca2+ ions in a dehydrated form in which only one (or none at all) of the seven coordinating positions retains a water molecule. It is plausible that a transition from the fully hydrated ion in solution to the protein-bound dehydrated form involves some intermediate state(s) similar to that observed in the Mg-N-CaM structure. Such a state, if it occurs, would facilitate the Ca2+-induced conformational transition (see below). Here we will highlight the relevant observations: First, despite the presence of the hydration water the interaction of Mg2+(H2O)4 with site II of N-CaM is very strong mainly due to the double two-pronged, unusually short hydrogen bonds involving the side-chains of Asp58 (hydrogen bond length = 2.66 ± 0.06 Å) and Glu67 (hydrogen bond length = 2.71 ± 0.06 Å). Although a similar complex of a hydrated Ca2+ ion would be significantly less stable due to the much faster solvent exchange rate for Ca2+ as compared to Mg2+(53), it would likely be of sufficient stability to contribute to the transitions between the conformational states of CaM, which are estimated to occur on a microsecond or faster time scale (54–56). Second, due to the engagement of the equatorial ligands of the complex in the Y and –Z coordinating positions the hydrated metal ion effectively bridges the opposite sides of the loop. The involvement of the key Glu12 appears to be of particular importance since it provides a direct link between the metal ion and the exiting helix. It is easy to envision that any change in the position or the hydration state of the bound metal ion in this dynamic complex would have an immediate effect on the exiting helix and could initiate the conformational transition. Third, at this early stage of metal-EF-hand interaction, the carbonyl oxygen of the β-scaffold (-Y position) is the only protein ligand whose interaction with the metal ion will remain unchanged in the final complex. Thus, as discussed above, the metal is already properly positioned for the loop to fold around it. Fourth, in order to accommodate the hydrated Mg2+, the entering helix (helix C) had to be shifted away from the exiting helix (helix D) (Fig. 3). This indicates that such a shift occurs readily without a significant perturbation of the remaining structure. There is evidence that such a shift in EF-hand I of N-CaM may be required for the conformational transition (see below). Fifth, the position of the bound Mg2+(H2O)4 is very similar to that of Ca2+ in some EF-hand proteins that in the first loop position utilize a main chain carbonyl oxygen as a ligand (Supplementary Fig. 2, cf. ref (14)). This type of Ca2+ coordination appears to be characteristic of the EF-hand proteins that do not undergo large conformational changes.
Based on the above considerations it seems plausible that the binding of Ca2+ to EF-hand II of N-CaM may also involve a hydrated ion state analogous to the Mg2+(H2O)4 state. Is it reasonable to extrapolate this conclusion to site I of N-CaM? The only change in the structure that would be required to accommodate a hydrated Ca2+ ion in site I of N-CaM is a small shift of helix A on the Z axis of the complex away from helix B. Recent atomistic multi-scale simulations performed by Dupuis and Mousseau (57) provide support for such a process. These authors have investigated the mechanism of domain closing upon Ca2+ removal from the holo- state of N-domains of calmodulin and troponin C. The main contact between the ends of helices A and B in N-CaM is a highly conserved Phe residue (Phe19), whose bulky hydrophobic side-chain has the unusual property of being more exposed to solvent in the closed-domain apo state than in the open-domain +Ca2+ state. Dupuis and Mousseau have shown that expulsion of Phe19 side chain (or its equivalent in troponin C) from the hydrophobic core is a necessary and limiting step in the domain closing transition (57). Importantly, in each of their successful domain closing trajectories the ends of helices A and B separated transiently to enable the Phe19 side-chain to move out of the hydrophobic core (Normand Mousseau and Lilianne Dupuis, personal communication). The magnitude of such helix separation is similar to that we observe in site II of Mg2+-N-CaM. Thus, a transient adjustment of the domain structure that would be required for accommodation of the hydrated Ca2+ ion might facilitate the conformational transition by permitting Phe19 side-chain to move into the hydrophobic core. This is an attractive concept that adds a dynamic aspect to the EF-hand-β-scaffold mechanism and warrants experimental verification.
Magnesium as a modulator of Ca2+ -signaling in cells
The free Mg2+ concentration in cells is buffered at a nearly constant level of ~1 mM. For that reason Mg2+ is unlikely to have a direct regulatory role in cell signaling. However, it is clearly an important player in the Ca2+/CaM signaling. As we have shown here Mg2+ stabilizes the off-state of CaM, thus it can act as a cellular break that counteracts the Ca2+ activation and facilitates switching off CaM when Ca2+ concentration returns to resting levels. The effect of Mg2+ on CaM can be manifested in several ways: (a) Due to the Mg2+/Ca2+ competition for the same binding sites the apparent affinity of N-CaM for Ca2+ is decreased in the presence of Mg2+, i.e. the titration curve is shifted to higher Ca2+ concentrations (18). (b) In systems that involve fast Ca2+ transients the Mg2+ dissociation rate may be a limiting factor, i.e. the extent of activation will be inversely related to the Mg2+ occupancy of N-CaM. Also under the conditions of partial activation when mixed Ca2+/Mg2+ species may be formed a different kinetic response may be expected (18). (c) In view of the fact that some targets have a preference for the closed-domain conformation of CaM(58) Mg2+ may affect the specificity of CaM and its distribution among the cellular targets (38).
Ca2+ signaling in excitable cells such as neurons and myocytes has to be precise in terms of time, space, and amplitude, yet flexible enough to accommodate variable functional demands (1, 59). It appears that changes in Mg2+ concentration in response to various effectors (6, 60–62) might provide the means to meet such variable demands by finely tuning the response of EF-hand regulated systems including various channel proteins (63, 64).
There are extensive studies documenting a correlation between dietary Mg2+ -deficiency and various pathological conditions (10) including cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, inflammation, asthma, metabolic syndrome and many others (65–69). Magnesium is the most abundant divalent metal ion in eukaryotic cells and it plays many important cellular functions. However, none of these functions appear to be critically regulated by Mg2+ in the very narrow concentration range found in magnesium deficiency. We have put forward a hypothesis that EF-hand proteins might be involved and their excessive activation at low Mg2+ might lead to impaired Ca2+-signaling, which in turn, might be a contributing factor in some pathological conditions(12). The structural information obtained in the present work provides a strong support for this hypothesis. Further studies are needed to test the applicability of the rules uncovered here to other EF-hand proteins and to characterize the effects of Mg2+ on various Ca2+ -signaling pathways in cells.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Howard Robinson at the Brookhaven National Laboratory for collecting the synchrotron data at X29 beamline of National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS). We are grateful to Andrew Bohm, Celia Harrison and Gretchen Meinke of Tufts University for their invaluable help with the initial screening of the crystals on their lab X-ray source. We thank Sam Lehrer, Franklin Fuchs and Andrew Bohm for critical comments on the manuscript.
Funding information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant HL91162).
Abbreviations
- CaM
recombinant human calmodulin
- N-CaM
recombinant N-terminal fragment of calmodulin (residues 1–79)
- C-CaM
recombinant C-terminal fragment of calmodulin (residues 79–148)
- ITC
isothermal titration microcalorimetry
- CD
circular dichroism
Footnotes
Supporting information:
Figure S1. Determination of Ca2+, Mn2+ and Mg2+ binding to N-CaM by isothermal titration calorimetry.
Figure S2. Comparison of EF-hand II of the Mg-N-CaM crystal with non-canonical EF-hand structures from calpain and calcyclin.
Figure S3. Stabilization of the closed domain conformation in the C-terminal domain of CaM by Mg2+
Supplementary video. Putative steps in the binding of a hydrated Mg2+ ion (Mg2+(H2O)6) to site II of N-CaM.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org
Accession codes. Coordinates and structure factors for the crystal structures of Mg/Zn-N-CaM, Mg-N-CaM and Mn/Zn-N-CaM are deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 3UCY, 3UCW, and 3UCT, respectively.
References
- 1.Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:11–21. doi: 10.1038/35036035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carafoli E, Santella L, Branca D, Brini M. Generation, control, and processing of cellular calcium signals. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;36:107–260. doi: 10.1080/20014091074183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clapham DE. Calcium signaling. Cell. 2007;131:1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Romani A, Scarpa A. Regulation of cell magnesium. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1992;298:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90086-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Romani A, Scarpa A. Hormonal control of Mg2+ transport in the heart. Nature. 1990;346:841–844. doi: 10.1038/346841a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Romani A, Marfella C, Scarpa A. Regulation of magnesium uptake and release in the heart and in isolated ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 1993;72:1139–1148. doi: 10.1161/01.res.72.6.1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fatholahi M, LaNoue K, Romani A, Scarpa A. Relationship between total and free cellular Mg(2+) during metabolic stimulation of rat cardiac myocytes and perfused hearts. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000;374:395–401. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Keenan D, Romani A, Scarpa A. Regulation of Mg2+ homeostasis by insulin in perfused rat livers and isolated hepatocytes. FEBS Lett. 1996;395:241–244. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Romani AM, Maguire ME. Hormonal regulation of Mg2+ transport and homeostasis in eukaryotic cells. Biometals. 2002;15:271–283. doi: 10.1023/a:1016082900838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Seelig MS. Magnesium deficiency in the pathogenesis of disease. Early roots of cardiovascular, Skeletal and renal abnormalities. New York, NY: Goldwater Memorial Hospital, New York University Medical Center; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Harkema JM, Chaudry IH. Magnesium-adenosine triphosphate in the treatment of shock, ischemia, and sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:263–275. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199202000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grabarek Z. Insights into modulation of calcium signaling by magnesium in calmodulin, troponin C and related EF-hand proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research. 2011;1813:913–921. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crivici A, Ikura M. Molecular and structural basis of target recognition by calmodulin. [Review] Annual Review of Biophysics & Biomolecular Structure. 1995;24:85–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.24.060195.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grabarek Z. Structural basis for diversity of the EF-hand calcium-binding proteins. J Mol Biol. 2006;359:509–525. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gifford JL, Walsh MP, Vogel HJ. Structures and metal-ion-binding properties of the Ca2+-binding helix-loop-helix EF-hand motifs. Biochem J. 2007;405:199–221. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ohki SY, Ikura M, Zhang MJ. Identification of Mg2+-Binding Sites and the Role of Mg2+ on Target Recognition By Calmodulin. Biochemistry. 1997;36:4309–4316. doi: 10.1021/bi962759m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Malmendal A, Evenas J, Thulin E, Gippert GP, Drakenberg T, Forsen S. When size is important. Accommodation of magnesium in a calcium binding regulatory domain. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:28994–29001. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.44.28994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Malmendal A, Linse S, Evenas J, Forsen S, Drakenberg T. Battle for the EF-hands: magnesium-calcium interference in calmodulin. Biochemistry. 1999;38:11844–11850. doi: 10.1021/bi9909288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang M, Tanaka T, Ikura M. Calcium-induced conformational transition revealed by the solution structure of apo calmodulin. Nature Structural Biology. 1995;2:758–767. doi: 10.1038/nsb0995-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tan RY, Mabuchi Y, Grabarek Z. Blocking the Ca2+-induced conformational transitions in calmodulin with disulfide bonds. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:7479–7483. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.13.7479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chao SH, Suzuki Y, Zysk JR, Cheung WY. Activation of calmodulin by various metal cations as a function of ionic radius. Mol Pharmacol. 1984;26:75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kretsinger RH, Nockolds CE. Carp muscle calcium binding protein. II. Structure determination and general description. J. Biol. Chem. 1973;248:3313–3326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Strynadka NCJ, James MNG. Crystal structures of the helix-loop-helix calcium-binding proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1989;58:951–998. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.004511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grabarek Z. Structure of a trapped intermediate of calmodulin: calcium regulation of EF-hand proteins from a new perspective. J Mol Biol. 2005;346:1351–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gagne SM, Li MX, Sykes BD. Mechanism Of Direct Coupling Between Binding and Induced Structural Change In Regulatory Calcium Binding Proteins. Biochemistry. 1997;36:4386–4392. doi: 10.1021/bi963076+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Declercq JP, Tinant B, Parello J, Rambaud J. Ionic interactions with parvalbumins. Crystal structure determination of pike 4.10 parvalbumin in four different ionic environments. J Mol Biol. 1991;220:1017–1039. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90369-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Andersson M, Malmendal A, Linse S, Ivarsson I, Forsen S, Svensson LA. Structural basis for the negative allostery between Ca(2+)- and Mg(2+)- binding in the intracellular Ca(2+)-receptor calbindin D9k. Protein Sci. 1997;6:1139–1147. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Follenius A, Gerard D. Fluorescence investigations of calmodulin hydrophobic sites. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;119:1154–1160. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)90896-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Doering DS, Matsudaira P. Cysteine Scanning Mutagenesis At 40 Of 76 Positions In Villin Headpiece Maps the F-Actin Binding Site and Structural Features Of the Domain. Biochemistry. 1996;35:12677–12685. doi: 10.1021/bi9615699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wiseman T, Williston S, Brandts JF, Lin LN. Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. Anal Biochem. 1989;179:131–137. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90213-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Meyer DF, Mabuchi Y, Grabarek Z. The role of Phe-92 in the Ca2+-induced conformational transition in the C-terminal domain of calmodulin. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:11284–11290. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Collaborative Computational Project, n. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 1994;50:760–763. doi: 10.1107/S0907444994003112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Adams PD, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Hung LW, Ioerger TR, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Read RJ, Sacchettini JC, Sauter NK, Terwilliger TC. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002;58:1948–1954. doi: 10.1107/s0907444902016657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, Adams PD, Read RJ, Zwart PH, Hung L-W. Iterative-build OMIT maps: map improvement by iterative model building and refinement without model bias. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 2008;64:515–524. doi: 10.1107/S0907444908004319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tsai MD, Drakenberg T, Thulin E, Forsen S. Is the binding of magnesium (II) to calmodulin significant? An investigation by magnesium-25 nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochemistry. 1987;26:3635–3643. doi: 10.1021/bi00386a057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Martin SR, Masino L, Bayley PM. Enhancement by Mg2+ of domain specificity in Ca2+-dependent interactions of calmodulin with target sequences. Protein Sci. 2000;9:2477–2488. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.12.2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Warren JT, Guo Q, Tang WJ. A 1.3-A structure of zinc-bound N-terminal domain of calmodulin elucidates potential early ion-binding step. J Mol Biol. 2007;374:517–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shannon RD. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr A. 1976;32:751–767. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Carrell CJ, Carrell HL, Erlebacher J, Glusker JP. Structural aspects of metal-ion carboxylate interactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1988;110:8651–8656. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Harding MM. Small revisions to predicted distances around metal sites in proteins. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006;62:678–682. doi: 10.1107/S0907444906014594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Delville A, Grandjean J, Laszlo P, Gerday C, Brzeska H, Drabikowski W. Sodium-23 nuclear magnetic resonance as an indicator of sodium binding to calmodulin and tryptic fragments, in relation to calcium content. Eur J Biochem. 1980;109:515–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Moroz OV, Blagova EV, Wilkinson AJ, Wilson KS, Bronstein IB. The crystal structures of human S100A12 in apo form and in complex with zinc: new insights into S100A12 oligomerisation. J Mol Biol. 2009;391:536–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Irving H, Williams RJP. The stability of transition-metal complexes. Journal of the Chemical Society. 1953:3192–3210. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brzeska H, Venyaminov SV, Grabarek Z, Drabikowski W. Comparative studies on thermostability of calmodulin, skeletal muscle troponin C and their tryptic fragments. FEBS Lett. 1983;153:169–173. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80141-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cates MS, Berry MB, Ho EL, Li Q, Potter JD, Phillips GN., Jr Metal-ion affinity and specificity in EF-hand proteins: coordination geometry and domain plasticity in parvalbumin. Structure Fold Des. 1999;7:1269–1278. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)80060-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cates MS, Teodoro ML, Phillips GN., Jr Molecular mechanisms of calcium and magnesium binding to parvalbumin. Biophys J. 2002;82:1133–1146. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75472-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Deerfield DW, 2nd, Fox DJ, Head-Gordon M, Hiskey RG, Pedersen LG. The first solvation shell of magnesium ion in a model protein environment with formate, water, and X-NH3, H2S, imidazole, formaldehyde, and chloride as ligands: an Ab initio study. Proteins. 1995;21:244–255. doi: 10.1002/prot.340210307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Biekofsky RR, Martin SR, Browne JP, Bayley PM, Feeney J. Ca2+ Coordination to Backbone Carbonyl Oxygen Atoms in Calmodulin and Other EF-Hand Proteins: 15N Chemical Shifts as Probes for Monitoring Individual-Site Ca2+ Coordination. Biochemistry. 1998;37:7617–7629. doi: 10.1021/bi9800449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Maguire ME, Cowan JA. Magnesium chemistry and biochemistry. Biometals. 2002;15:203–210. doi: 10.1023/a:1016058229972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Johnson C. X-ray crystal analysis of the substrates of aconitase. V. Magnesium citrate decahydrate [Mg(H2O)6][MgC6H5O7(H2O)]2.2H2O. Acta Cryst. 1965;18:1004–1018. doi: 10.1107/s0365110x6500244x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Diebler H, Eigen M, Ilgenfritz G, Maass G, Winkler R. Kinetics and mechanism of reactions of main group metal ions with biological carriers. Pure Appl Chem. 1969;20:93–115. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Evenas J, Malmendal A, Thulin E, Carlstrom G, Forsen S. Ca2+ binding and conformational changes in a calmodulin domain. Biochemistry. 1998;37:13744–13754. doi: 10.1021/bi9806448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Evenas J, Forsen S, Malmendal A, Akke M. Backbone dynamics and energetics of a calmodulin domain mutant exchanging between closed and open conformations. J Mol Biol. 1999;289:603–617. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Evenas J, Malmendal A, Akke M. Dynamics of the transition between open and closed conformations in a calmodulin C-terminal domain mutant. Structure. 2001;9:185–195. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00575-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dupuis L, Mousseau N. Understanding the EF-hand closing pathway using non-biased interatomic potentials. J Chem Phys. 2012;136:035101. doi: 10.1063/1.3671986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jurado LA, Chockalingam PS, Jarrett HW. Apocalmodulin. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:661–682. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Lipp P. Calcium--a life and death signal. Nature. 1998;395:645–648. doi: 10.1038/27094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Romani AM, Scarpa A. Regulation of cellular magnesium. Front Biosci. 2000;5:D720–D734. doi: 10.2741/romani. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Romani AM. Cellular magnesium homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2011;512:1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Brocard JB, Rajdev S, Reynolds IJ. Glutamate-induced increases in intracellular free Mg2+ in cultured cortical neurons. Neuron. 1993;11:751–757. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90084-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lee A, Zhou H, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Molecular determinants of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent regulation of Ca(v)2.1 channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:16059–16064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2237000100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Brunet S, Scheuer T, Klevit R, Catterall WA. Modulation of CaV1.2 channels by Mg2+ acting at an EF-hand motif in the COOH-terminal domain. J Gen Physiol. 2005;126:311–323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200509333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rayssiguier Y, Mbega JD, Durlach V, Gueux E, Durlach J, Giry J, Dalle M, Mazur A, Laurant P, Berthelot A. Magnesium and blood pressure. I. Animal studies. Magnes Res. 1992;5:139–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Touyz RM. Role of magnesium in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Mol Aspects Med. 2003;24:107–136. doi: 10.1016/s0098-2997(02)00094-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Touyz RM. Magnesium in clinical medicine. Front Biosci. 2004;9:1278–1293. doi: 10.2741/1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Weglicki W, Quamme G, Tucker K, Haigney M, Resnick L. Potassium, magnesium, and electrolyte imbalance and complications in disease management. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2005;27:95–112. doi: 10.1081/ceh-200044275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mazur A, Maier JA, Rock E, Gueux E, Nowacki W, Rayssiguier Y. Magnesium and the inflammatory response: potential physiopathological implications. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;458:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hsin K, Sheng Y, Harding MM, Taylor P, Walkinshaw MD. MESPEUS: a database of the geometry of metal sites in proteins. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2008;41:963–968. [Google Scholar]
- 71.DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Palo Alto, CA, USA: DeLano Scientific; 2002. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.