Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertension. 2012 Jul 2;60(2):283–284. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.197616

Arterial Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: Does Gender Matter?

Daniel Duprez 1, David R Jacobs Jr 2
PMCID: PMC3449159  NIHMSID: NIHMS391260  PMID: 22753204

Diastolic heart failure with preserved systolic ejection fraction is becoming a major health burden and responsible for more than 50 % of the heart failure hospital admissions1. Arterial hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for diastolic dysfunction. However systolic and diastolic blood pressures are the two extreme points of the arterial waveform. Arterial stiffness/elasticity derived from the continuous arterial waveform has been the focus of research to expand knowledge of blood pressure with diastolic (dys)function2. Interestingly, women have a lower arterial elasticity (higher arterial stiffness) than men and tend to develop more diastolic dysfunction than men3. A consistent finding among population studies is that women significantly outweigh men in this disease in a range of 2:1.

In this issue Russo and coworkers reported their results about gender differences in relationship between arterial stiffness, wave reflections and left ventricular diastolic function beyond the classical cardiovascular risk factors in the Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Brain Lesions (CABL) study cohort4. They used applanation tonometry, considering the following hemodynamic parameters: central pulse pressure/stroke volume index, total arterial compliance, pulse pressure amplification, and augmentation index. These parameters of arterial stiffness and wave reflection were greater in women compared to men, independent of body size and heart rate, and showed inverse relationships with parameters of diastolic function in both sexes. Further adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors attenuated these relationships; however the ratio central pulse pressure/stroke volume predicted left ventricular dysfunction both in women and men independent of other risk factors. This study had several limitations. This was a cross-sectional design and did not allow demonstration of a cause-effect relationship. The majority of the central hemodynamic parameters provide only indirect information about arterial stiffness. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, which is an important parameter for aortic stiffness was not measured. Antihypertensive therapy was taken by 75.7 % of the female and 68.5 % of the men, but was not stopped on the day of the measurement. However there was an adjustment in the analysis for the use of antihypertensive therapy and similar findings were confirmed.

Arterial wave reflections can be studied by wave analysis obtained by tonometry of the radial artery5. The central aortic pressure waveform is composed by a forward-traveling waveform and a backward wave reflection from the peripheral arteries to the aorta. The amplitude and timing of the reflected waves ultimately depend on the stiffness of the small and large arteries. Normally the reflected pressure waves arrive in the aorta after the peak systolic pressure. When arterial stiffness increases, reflected waves arrive earlier and consequently augment the peak systolic pressure. These changes in central hemodynamics have a major impact on the left ventricle due to an increased afterload, enhancing the left ventricular remodeling process and also decreasing the coronary blood flow, leading to subendocardial ischemia.

There is a gender difference in arterial stiffness and arterial wave reflections. In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis we studied the large and small artery elasticity derived from the diastolic pulse contour analysis of the radial artery6. Our results demonstrated that women had lower large and small artery elasticity than men. Height did explain much of the sex difference in both large and small artery elasticity in our data. Although frame size may be important in arterial elasticity, we did see a small difference in both large and small artery elasticity even for men and women of similar height. Height also played a role in ethnic differences in large and small artery elasticity, since Chinese and Hispanic men and women have both lower arterial elasticity and shorter height than White and African American men. In a study where elderly hypertensive men and women were height-matched, Gatzka et al.7 found that women still had earlier wave reflection. Moreover women also had a smaller aortic diameter and a stiffer aortic arch than men.

The differences regarding increased arterial stiffness in women versus men may be the result of a difference in sex hormones, obesity, low grade inflammation and fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction, beyond height and advancing age (Figure 1). Increased arterial stiffness and wave reflections may accelerate the development of diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure development in vulnerable subjects by increasing load and worsening the ventricular-vascular coupling. Beyond the gender differences of arterial stiffness and wave reflections, there is also a difference in ventricular remodeling due to increased vascular load to the heart8. The female heart will tend to show a concentric hypertrophy, which is associated with an increase in wall thickness and initial preservation of cavity size and ejection fraction, while the male heart tends more to develop an eccentric hypertrophy, which is associated with progressive left ventricle dilation and dysfunction. These differences between men and women are widely held to be related to sex hormones such as estrogen on the vasculature and the myocardium. Estrogen affects collagen synthesis and degradation and inhibits the renin-angiotensin system. Effects of estrogen may provide benefit to premenopausal women, and the loss of its protective mechanisms may render the heart of postmenopausal women more vulnerable to deleterious effects in diastolic ventricular-vascular coupling because of lack of estrogens with aging and the menopause.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of Different Factors on Arterial Stiffness and Arterial Wave Reflections in Relation to Left Ventricular (LV) Diastolic Function.

Obesity and diabetes affect myocardial and vascular stiffness differently and lead to different forms of myocardial hypertrophy in women and men. The Strong Heart study demonstrated that left ventricular mass is actually greater in obese women than in obese men when normalized for measures of geometrically consistent body size that do not incorporate body weight (height or fat-free mass), even though, absolute left ventricular mass is lower in women than in men9. In particular, this difference was most evident when left ventricular mass was indexed for height2.7.

The age-related abnormalities in the biomechanical properties of the arterial system and the myocardium are more pronounced in women than in men leading to changes in the ventricular-vascular coupling10. Therefore elderly women have a higher prevalence of hypertension with aging and also higher blood pressure variability.

With the growing aging population in our society, especially the female, diastolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction will become a major health problem. A strategy needs to be developed to detect early changes in arterial stiffness, arterial wave reflections and ventricular-vascular coupling with special attention to the elderly female. Non-invasive techniques for the examination of arterial stiffness and arterial wave reflections beyond the classical arterial blood pressure assessment need to be evaluated longitudinally. Moreover clinical trials need to be done to examine the effect of novel medical therapies on the reduction of arterial stiffness, arterial wave reflections and the improvement of ventricular-vascular coupling. Therapies which have these apparently beneficial effects need to be evaluated to see whether these novel therapies will also reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality due to diastolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding: Grant support: RO1HL09382

Footnotes

Disclosures: None.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Kane GC, Karon BL, Mahoney DW, Redfield MM, Roger VL, Burnett JC, Jr, Jacobsen SJ, Rodeheffer RJ. Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure. JAMA. 2011;306:856–863. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Borlaug BA, Paulus WJ. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:670–679. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scantlebury DC, Borlaug BA. Why are women more likely than men to develop heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26:562–528. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834b7faf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Russo C, Jin Z, Palmieri V, Homma S, Tatjana R, Mitchell SV, Elkind MSV, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR. Arterial stiffness and wave reflection: sex differences and relationship with left ventricular diastolic function. Hypertension. 2012;x:xx–xx. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.191148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohn JN, Duprez DA, Finkelstein SM. Comprehensive noninvasive arterial vascular evaluation. Future Cardiol. 2009;5:573–579. doi: 10.2217/fca.09.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duprez DA, Jacobs DR, Jr, Lutsey PL, Herrington D, Prime D, Ouyang P, Barr RG, Bluemke DA. Race/ethnic and sex differences in large and small artery elasticity--results of the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) Ethn Dis. 2009 Summer;19:243–250. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gatzka CD, Kingwell BA, Cameron JD, Berry KL, Liang YL, Dewar EM, Reid CM, Jennings GL, Dart AM. ANBO2 investigators. Australian Comparative Outcome Trial of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor- and Diuretic-Based Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly. Gender differences in the timing of arterial wave reflection beyond differences in body height. J Hypertens. 2001;19:2197–2203. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200112000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Piro M, Della Bona R, Abbate A, Biasucci LM, Crea F. Sex-related differences in myocardial remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Simone G, Devereux RB, Chinali M, Roman MJ, Barac A, Panza JA, Lee ET, Howard BV. Sex differences in obesity-related changes in left ventricular morphology: the Strong Heart Study. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1431–1438. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328347a093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rossi P, Francès Y, Kingwell BA, Ahimastos AA. Gender differences in artery wall biomechanical properties throughout life. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1023–1033. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328344da5e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES