Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cytotechnology logoLink to Cytotechnology
. 2005 Jun;48(1-3):15–26. doi: 10.1007/s10616-005-2926-9

Techniques for Dual Staining of DNA and Intracellular Immunoglobulins in Murine Hybridoma Cells: Applications to Cell-Cycle Analysis of Hyperosmotic Cultures

Kathleen M McNeeley 1,2, Zhe Sun 1,3, Susan T Sharfstein 1,4,✉
PMCID: PMC3449722  PMID: 19003029

Abstract

Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the effects of hyperosmotic stress on cell-cycle distribution and cell-associated immunoglobulins for murine hybridoma cells grown in batch culture. Paraformaldehyde/methanol fixation substantially increased the fluorescence signal for intracellular immunoglobulins compared to ethanol fixation. For surface immunoglobulins, similar fluorescence signals were observed regardless of fixation method. Dual staining of immunoglobulins and cellular DNA was employed to determine immunoglobulin pool size as a function of cell-cycle phase. The intracellular immunoglobulin pool sizes increased as the cells progressed through the cell cycle for both control and hyperosmotic cultures. For control cultures, the immunoglobulin pool size increased during the exponential phase of culture, followed by a decrease as the cultures entered stationary phase. In contrast, hyperosmotic cultures showed an initial decrease in immunoglobulin pool size upon the application of osmotic shock, followed by an increase to a level above that of control cultures. This behavior was observed in all phases of the cell cycle. In addition, hyperosmotic cultures exhibited an increase in cell size when compared to control cultures. When normalized for cell size, the intracellular immunoglobulin concentration in hyperosmotic cultures was initially lower than in control cultures and subsequently increased to slightly above the level of control cells. Cells in all phases of the cell cycle behaved in a similar manner. There was no apparent relationship between the intracellular antibody concentration and the rate of antibody secretion.

Keywords: Cell cycle, Flow cytometry, Hybridoma, Hyperosmotic stress, Immunoglobulin, Monoclonal antibody

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (420.9 KB).

References

  1. Al-Rubeai M., Emery A.N. Mechanisms and kinetics of monoclonal antibody synthesis and secretion in synchronous and asynchronous hybridoma cell cultures. J. Biotechnol. 1990;16:67–86. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(90)90066-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Briles D.E., Forman C., Hudak S., Claflin J.L. The effects of idiotype on the ability of IgG1 anti-phosphorylcholine antibodies to protect mice from fatal infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur. J. Immunol. 1984;14(11):1027–1030. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830141112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chung J., Zabel C., Sinskey A., Stephanopoulos G. Extension of Sp2/0 hybridoma cell viability through interleukin-6 supplementation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1997;55(2):439–446. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970720)55:2<439::AID-BIT21>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coco-Martin J.M., Oberink J.W., Velden-de Groot T.A.M., Beuvery E.C. The potential of flow cytometric analysis for the characterization of hybridoma cells in suspension cultures Cytotechnology. 1992;8:65–74. doi: 10.1007/BF02540031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dalili M., Ollis D.F. The influence of cyclic nucleotides on hybridoma growth and monoclonal antibody production. Biotechnol. Lett. 1988;10:781–786. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dalili M., Ollis D.F. A flow-cytometric analysis of hybridoma growth and monoclonal antibody production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1990;36:64–73. doi: 10.1002/bit.260360109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. deZengotita V.M., Schmelzer A.E., Miller W.M. Characterization of hybridoma cell responses to elevated pCO(2) and osmolality: intracellular pH, cell sizeapoptosis, and metabolism. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002;77(4):369–380. doi: 10.1002/bit.10176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayter P.M., Kirkby N.F., Spier R.E. Relationship between hybridoma growth and monoclonal antibody production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1992;14:454–461. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(92)90137-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heath C.A., Dilwith R., Belfort G. Methods for increasing monoclonal antibody production in suspension and entrapped cell cultures: biochemical and flow cytometric analysis as a function of medium serum content. J. Biotechnol. 1990;15:71–90. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(90)90052-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kromenaker S.J., Srienc F. Cell cycle kinetics of the accumulation of heavy and light chain immunoglobulin proteins in a mouse hybridoma cell line. Cytotechnology. 1994;14:205–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00749617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McKinney K.L., Belfort G. Use of flow cytometry for monitoring antibody productivity and isolating high-secreting hybridoma cells. In: Al-Rubeai M., Emery A.N., editors. Flow Cytometry Applications in Cell Culture. New York: Marcel Deckker Inc.; 1996. pp. 17–37. [Google Scholar]
  12. McKinney K.L., Dilwith R., Belfort G. Manipulation of heterogeneous hybridoma cultures for overproduction of monoclonal antibodies. Biotechnol. Prog. 1991;7:445–454. doi: 10.1021/bp00011a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meilhoc E., Wittrup K.D., Bailey J.E. Application of flow cytometric measurement of surface IgG in kinetic analysis of monoclonal antibody synthesis and secretion by murine hybridoma cells. J. Immunol. Methods. 1989;121(2):167–174. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(89)90157-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mikama T., Makishima F., Suzuki E. Enhancing in vitro antibody production rate per cell by applying mouse peritoneal factors. Biotechnol. Lett. 1991;13:255–260. [Google Scholar]
  15. Oh S.K.W., Chua F., Al-Rubeai M. Flow cytometric studies of osmotically stressed and sodium butyrate treated hybridoma cells. In: Al-Rubeai M., Emery A.N., editors. Flow Cytometry Applications in Cell Culture. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1996. pp. 101–119. [Google Scholar]
  16. Oh S.K.W., Chua F.K.F., Choo A.B.H. Intracellular responses of productive hybridomas subjected to high osmotic pressure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1995;46:525–535. doi: 10.1002/bit.260460605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ozturk S.S., Palsson B.O. Effect of medium osmolarity on hybridoma growthmetabolismand antibody production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1991;37:989–993. doi: 10.1002/bit.260371015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Park S.H., Ryu D.D. Cell cycle kinetics and monoclonal antibody productivity of hybridoma cells during perfusion culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994;44:361–367. doi: 10.1002/bit.260440314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pendse G.J., Bailey J.E. Effects of growth factors on cell proliferation and monoclonal antibody production of batch hybridoma cultures. Biotechnol. Lett. 1990;7:487–492. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pollice A.A., McCoy J.P., Jr., Shackney S.E., Smith C.A., Agarwal J., Burholt D.R., Janocko L.E., Hornicek F.J., Singh S.G., Hartsock R.J. Sequential paraformaldehyde and methanol fixation for simultaneous flow cytometric analysis of DNAcell surface proteins, and intracellular proteins. Cytometry. 1992;13(4):432–444. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990130414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reuveney S., Velez D., Miller L., Macmillan J.D. Factors affecting cell growth and monoclonal antibody production in stirred reactors. J. Immunol. Methods. 1986;86:53–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90264-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sen S., Hu W.S., Srienc F. Flow cytometric study of hybridoma cell-culture – correlation between cell-surface fluorescence and IgG production-rate. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1990;12(8):571–576. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(90)90129-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Simpson N.H., Singh R.P., Emery A.N., Al-Rubeai M. Bcl-2 over-expression reduces growth rate and prolongs G1 phase in continuous chemostat cultures of hybridoma cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999;64(2):174–186. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990720)64:2<174::AID-BIT6>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Simpson N.H., Singh R.P., Perani A., Goldenzon C., Al-Rubeai M. In hybridoma cultures, deprivation of any single amino acid leads to apoptotic deathwhich is suppressed by the expression of the bcl-2 gene. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998;59(1):90–98. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980705)59:1<90::AID-BIT12>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun Z., Zhou R., Liang S., McNeeley K.M., Sharfstein S.T. Hyperosmotic stress in murine hybridoma cells: effects on antibody transcription, translation, posttranslational processing, and the cell cycle. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004;20(2):576–589. doi: 10.1021/bp0342203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sureshkumar G.K., Mutharasan R. The influence of temperature on a mouse–mouse hybridoma growth and monoclonal antibody production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1991;37:292–295. doi: 10.1002/bit.260370313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Suzuki E., Ollis D.F. Enhanced antibody production at slowed growth rates: experimental demonstration and simple structured model. Biotechnol. Prog. 1990;6:231–236. doi: 10.1021/bp00003a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES