Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1984 Mar;81(6):1764–1767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.6.1764

Mitochondrial gene flow.

N Takahata, M Slatkin
PMCID: PMC345000  PMID: 6584909

Abstract

To account for the transmission of mitochondrial DNA between conspecific species Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis in sympatry reported by J.R. Powell [Powell, J.R. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 492-495], a simple model of gene flow and selection in infinite populations is analyzed. The model assumes two alleles at each of two loci, one of which is coded by an autosome and the other by mitochondrial DNA. Viability selection is presumed to be underdominant--i.e., heterozygous inferiority to the homozygotes--at an autosomal locus, and neutral or deleterious at a mitochondrial locus, with the combined action being multiplicative. Extremely strong selection against heterozygotes may prevent the transmission of mitochondrial DNA between two species, but otherwise the transmission can easily occur over species boundaries. The rate of approach to equilibrium is determined by the level of gene flow and is not affected much by selection against an autosomal locus. The divergence of the nuclear genomes of the two species is reexamined. Based on published data on enzyme loci, we conclude that there has been mitochondrial gene flow between these species for a long enough time that several nuclear loci examined could diverge because of accumulation of neutral mutations.

Full text

PDF
1764

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coyne J. A. Lack of genic similarity between two sibling species of drosophila as revealed by varied techniques. Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):593–607. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.3.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ferris S. D., Sage R. D., Huang C. M., Nielsen J. T., Ritte U., Wilson A. C. Flow of mitochondrial DNA across a species boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(8):2290–2294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nei M., Feldman M. W. Identity of genes by descent within and between populations under mutation and migration pressures. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Dec;3(4):460–465. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Powell J. R. Interspecific cytoplasmic gene flow in the absence of nuclear gene flow: evidence from Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jan;80(2):492–495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.2.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wallace D. C. Structure and evolution of organelle genomes. Microbiol Rev. 1982 Jun;46(2):208–240. doi: 10.1128/mr.46.2.208-240.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES