Abstract
Background and objectives
Audit dates back to as early as 1750 BC when king Hammurabi of Babylon instigated audit for clinicians with regard to outcome. Clinical audit is a way of fi nding out whether we are doing what we should be doing. It also verifi es whether we are applying the best practice.
Methods
An audit cycle involves setting-up of standards, measuring current practice, comparing results with standards (criteria), changing practice and re-auditing to make sure practice has improved
Results and interpretations
A ‘clinical audit’ is a quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and clinical outcomes through a systematic review of care against explicit criteria, and the implementation of change. Changes are implemented at an individual, team or service level and a subsequent re-audit is done to confi rm improvement in health care delivery.
Conclusion
The importance of audit in healthcare sector needs to be appreciated by the relevant authorities. The most frequently cited barrier to successful audit is the failure of organizations to provide suffi cient fund and protected time for healthcare teams.
Keywords: Audit, Clinical practice
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (675.6 KB).
References
- 1.Lowe D., Meulen J., Cromwell D., Lewsey J., Copley L., Browne J. Key messages from the National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:717–724. doi: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e318031f0b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Principles for best practice in clinical audit (2002, NICE/CHI) Available from: www.nice.org.uk/pdf/BestPracticeClinicalAudit.pdf
- 3.NICE Interim guidance on the use of diathermy in tonsillectomy (Cited 2004 March 24). Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk