Skip to main content
PMC home page
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2009 Aug 12;49(3):223–229. doi: 10.1007/s12088-009-0042-9

Impact of commonly used agrochemicals on bacterial diversity in cultivated soils

J A Ampofo 1,✉, W Tetteh 1, M Bello 1
PMCID: PMC3450009  PMID: 23100773

Abstract

The effects of three selected agrochemicals on bacterial diversity in cultivated soil have been studied. The selected agrochemicals are Cerox (an insecticide), Ceresate and Paraquat (both herbicides). The effect on bacterial population was studied by looking at the total heterotrophic bacteria presence and the effect of the agrochemicals on some selected soil microbes. The soil type used was loamy with pH of 6.0–7.0. The soil was placed in opaque pots and bambara bean (Vigna subterranean) seeds cultivated in them. The agrochemicals were applied two weeks after germination of seeds at concentrations based on manufacturer’s recommendation. Plant growth was assessed by weekly measurement of plant height, foliage appearance and number of nodules formed after one month. The results indicated that the diversity index (Di) among the bacteria populations in untreated soil and that of Cerox-treated soils were high with mean diversity index above 0.95. Mean Di for Ceresate-treated soil was 0.88, and that for Paraquattreated soil was 0.85 indicating low bacterial populations in these treatment-type soils. The study also showed that application of the agrochemicals caused reduction in the number of total heterotrophic bacteria population sizes in the soil. Ceresate caused 82.50% reduction in bacteria number from a mean of 40 × 105 cfu g−1 of soil sample to 70 × 104 cfu g−1. Paraquat-treated soil showed 92.86% reduction, from a mean of 56 × 105 cfu g−1 to 40 × 104 cfu g−1. Application of Cerox to the soil did not have any remarkable reduction in bacterial population number. Total viable cell count studies using Congo red yeast-extract mannitol agar indicated reduction in the number of Rhizobium spp. after application of the agrochemicals. Mean number of Rhizobium population numbers per gram of soil was 180 × 104 for the untreated soil. Cerox-treated soil recorded mean number of 138 × 104 rhizobial cfu g−1 of soil, a 23.33% reduction. Ceresate- and Paraquat-treated soils recorded 20 × 104 and 12 × 104 cfu g−1 of soil, respectively, representing 88.89% and 93.33% reduction in Rhizobium population numbers. Correspondingly, the mean number of nodules per plant was 44 for the growth in untreated soil, 30 for the plant in the Cerox-treated soil, 8 for the plant in Paraquat-treated soil and 3 for the plant in Ceresate-treated soil. The study has confirmed detrimental effect of insecticide on bacterial populations in the soil. Total heterotrophic counts, rhizobial counts as well as the number of nodules of all samples taken from the chemically treated soils were all low as compared to values obtained for the untreated soil. However, the effect of the insecticide was minimal in all cases as compared to the effects of the herbicides on the soil fauna. Indiscriminate use of agrochemicals on farms can therefore affect soil flora and subsequently food production.

Keywords: Agrochemicals, Rhizobium, Diversity index

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (703.7 KB).

References

  • 1.Edwards L. Effects of pesticides on soil organisms. Soil Biol Biochem. 1975;12:285. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tu C.M. Effect of four experimental insecticides on enzyme activities and level of adenosine triphosphate in mineral and organic soils. J Health Environ Sci. 1990;B25(6):787–800. doi: 10.1080/03601239009372719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zulalian J. Study of the absorption, excretion, metabolism, and residues in tissues of rats treated with carbon-14-labeled pendimethalin, Prowl herbicide. J Agric Food Chem. 1990;38:1743–1754. doi: 10.1021/jf00098a025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.http://www.epa.gov. (2005) Pesticides
  • 5.Waiwright M. A review of the effect of pesticides on microbial activity in soil. J Soil Sci. 1978;29:287–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1978.tb00776.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moorman J.B. A review of pesticide effects on microorganisms and microbial processes related to soil fertility. J Prod Agric. 1989;21:14–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.De R. J., Colardyn F., Willems J. Fatal encephalopathy in acute poisoning with organophosphorus insecticides. A Clinicopathologic study of two cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1979;81(4):247–254. doi: 10.1016/0303-8467(79)90029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rueppel M.L., Brightwell B.B., Schaefer J., Marvel J.T. Metabolism and degradation of glyphosate in soil and water. Agric Food Chem. 1977;25:517–528. doi: 10.1021/jf60211a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McEwen FL and Stephenson GR (1979) Uses and Significance of Pesticides in the Environment. Wiley Interscience Publication, pp 229–252
  • 10.Eberbach P.L., Douglas L.A. Persistence of glyphosate in a sandy loam. Soil Biol Biochem. 1983;15:485–487. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(83)90016-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bohn W.R. The disappearance of dimethoate from soil. J Econ Entomol. 1964;57(6):798–799. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koppel C., Forycki Z., Ibe K. Hemoperfusion in severe Dimethoate poisoning. Intensive Care Med. 1986;12(2):110–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00254523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McErtensson A.M. Effects of agrochemicals and heavy metals on fast-growing rhizobia and their symbiosis with small-seeded legumes. Soil Biol Biochem. 1992;24:435–445. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(92)90206-D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alexander M (1979) Introduction to Soil Microbiology. Kreiger Publishing Company. pp 3, 6, 438
  • 15.http://www.soilhealth.segs.uwa.edu.au (2005) Soil habitat
  • 16.http://www.goggles.com (2005) Safety and health in the use of agrochemicals
  • 17.Hann N.J. The Congo Red reaction in bacteria and its usefulness in the identification of rhizobia. Canadian J Microbiol. 1966;12:725–733. doi: 10.1139/m66-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuhn I., Allestam G., Stenstrom T.A., Mollby R. Biochemical fingerprinting of water coliform bacteria - a new method for measuring the phenotypic diversity and for comparing different bacterial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57(11):3171–3177. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.11.3171-3177.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kuhn I., Mollby R. The PhP RS system — a simple microplate method for studying coliform bacterial populations. J Microbiol Meth. 1993;17:255–259. doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(93)90054-L. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.answer@manu.com (1999) Statgraphics Plus for Windows version 4.0
  • 21.Ampofo J.A., Clerk G.C. Diversity of bacteria in sewage treatment plant used as fish culture pond in southern Ghana. Aquaculture Res. 2003;34:1–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2003.00754.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sneath P.H.A., Sokal R.R. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman; 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gabrielson J., Kuhn I., Colque-Navarro P., Hart M., Iversen A., McKenzie D., Mollby R. Microplate-based microbial assay for risk assessment and (eco)toxic fingerprinting of chemicals. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2003;485:121–130. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00404-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES