Abstract
Introduction
Facial nerve is the longest nerve in a bony canal. Three dimensional anatomical knowledge provides the foundation for safe and skillful dissection of the very complex temporal bone and tortuous facial nerve.
Objective
A small surgical area and a fair incidence of anatomical variations makes the facial nerve prone to injury. Inspite of the problems presented, the nerve serves as an excellent landmark and guide to the competent otological surgeon who studies it deligently, the neophyte on the other hand lives in constant fear of finding the nerve inadvertently. The present study was undertaken to explore the microanatomy of tympano-mastoid segment of facial nerve.
Materials and methods
The current study was conducted at Dept of E.N.T, temporal bone lab, J.N.M.C Sawangi, Wardha. 25 temporal bones were dissected to study the various parameters of the tympano-mastoid segments of the facial nerve, its relations with the important middle ear structures and their anomalies.
Results
Mean length of tympanic segment was 9.28mm and that of the mastoid segment was 13.7mm. Mean depth of second genu from the cortex was 19.72mm. Amongst the variations noted commonest were the variations in the tympanic segment of about 12 %. An overhang in the region of oval window and a hump at the second genu was noted in one specimen each.
Conclusion
The variations in the tympanomastoid segment occur with sufficient frequency showing not much racial and geographical variance.
Keywords: Facial nerve, Temporal bone, Anomalies
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (578.6 KB).
Refrences
- 1.Agarwal (1993) Thesis for M.S Examination, unpublished, personal communication
- 2.Anson B.J., et al. Surgical anatomy of the facial canal and facial nerve. Annal otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1963;72:713–734. doi: 10.1177/000348946307200309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baxter A. Dehiscence of the fallopian canal an anatomical study. JLO. 1971;85:587–594. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100073849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beddard D., Saunders W.H. Congenital defects in the fallopian canal. Laryngoscope. 1962;72:112–115. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196201000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Belsare BD (1981) Thesis for M.S Examination, unpublished, personal communication
- 6.Botmann J.W., Jonkees L.B. Endotemporal branching of the facial nerve. Acta Otolaryngologica. 1955;2:111–114. doi: 10.3109/00016485509125408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fowler EP (1961) Cited by Nager GT and Procter B. ref no. 10
- 8.Leonard J.R., Alexander D.W. Anatomic variations in the area of the oval window. Arch. Otolaryngology. 1968;87:48–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nager G.T., Procter B. Anatomic variations and anomalies involving the facial canal. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America. 1991;24:531–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Proctor B. The anatomy of the facial nerve. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America. 1991;24:479–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rulon J.T., Hallberg O.E. Operative injury to the facial nerve. Arch Otolaryngol. 1962;76:131–139. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1962.00740050137006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wase. Thesis for M.S Examination, unpublished, personal communication, 1979
- 13.Yadav S.P., et al. Surgical anatomy of tympano mastoid segment of facial nerve. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2006;58:27–30. doi: 10.1007/BF02907734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]