Abstract
Objective
The purpose of the study was to analyze the patient’s satisfaction following nasal septal surgery based on their subjective opinion and to study whether the SNOT-22 can be used as a reliable outcome measure for successful septal surgery.
Study design
Between Oct 2005–July 2007, sixty consecutive adult patients who underwent nasal septal surgery and met the study criterion were enrolled. The patients were asked to fill in the SNOT-22 questionnaire both prior to and at regular follow up periods after the surgery.
Results
The mean total preoperative SNOT score (of all 22 items) was 20.67 and the mean total postoperative SNOT-22 score was 10.48 (t = 8.8135, p < 0.001 highly significant). On further analysis, improvement was seen in subcategories of Nasal Symptoms (t = 8.0825, p < 0.001 highly significant), Non Nasal Symptoms (t = 3.0913, p < 0.0025 significant), General health symptoms (t = 4.8602, p < 0.001 highly significant) and Nasal Obstruction (t = 7.7652, p < 0.001 highly significant).
Conclusion
The SNOT-22 score is a useful and reliable tool in nasal septal surgery in that it combines both nasal specific and quality of life related questions, which can be assessed individually and together both pre and post operatively.
Keywords: Quality of life (QOL), Sino nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT 22), Nasal septal surgery
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (605.0 KB).
References
- 1.Sipila J., Suonjaa J. A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 1997;254:387–390. doi: 10.1007/BF01642556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shermen L., Hamburg R. Preoperative and postoperative nasal septal surgery assessment with acoustic rhinometry. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 1997;117:338–342. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70123-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reber M., Rahm F., Monnier P. The role of acoustic rhinometry in the pre and postoperative evaluation of results for nasal obstruction. Rhinology. 1998;36(4):184–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arunachalam P.S., Kitcher E., Gray J., Wilson J.A. Nasal septal surgery: Evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2001;26:367–370. doi: 10.1046/j.0307-7772.2001.00481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anderson F.R., Murphy M.P., Weymuller E.R. Clinimetric evaluation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 1999;14:702–707. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a100114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Buckland J.R., Thomas S., Harries P.G. Can the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) be used as a reliable outcome measure for successful septal surgery? Clinical Otolaryngology. 2003;28:43–47. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dinis P.B., Haider H. Septoplasty: Long term evaluation of results. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2002;23(2):85–90. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2002.30987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stewart M.G., Smith T.L., Weaver E.M., Witsell D.L., Yueh B., Hannley M.T., et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) Study. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2004;130:283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Robinson K., Gatehouse S., Browning G. Measuring patient benefits from Otolaryngological surgery and therapy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 1996;105:415–422. doi: 10.1177/000348949610500601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Denholm S.W., Sim D.W., Sanderson R.J. Otolaryngological indicator operations: One year’s experience. Journal of Royal College of Surgeons (Edinburgh) 1993;38(1):1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Samad I., Stevens H.E., Maloney A. The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. Journal of Otolaryngology. 1992;21(2):88–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haraldson P.O., Nordemar H., Anggard A. Long term results after septal surgery. Submucous resection versus septoplasty. Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and its Related Specialities. 1987;49:218–222. doi: 10.1159/000275939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matthias F., Rasp G., Kastenbaurer E. Health-related quality of life in Rhino Surgery. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2003;24:97–105. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2003.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jesses M., Ivaesson A., Malm L. Nasal airway resistance and symptoms after functional septoplasty: comparison of findings at 9 months and 9 years. Clinical Otolaryngology. 1989;14:231–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1989.tb00366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bohlin L., Dahlqvist A. Nasal airway, resistance and complications following functional septoplasty: a ten year follow-up study. Rhinology. 1994;32(4):195–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wai-Kuen H.O., Anthony P., Yuen W., Tang K.-C., William I., Paul K., Lam Y. Time course in the relief of nasal blockage after septal and turbinate surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2004;130:324–328. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.3.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]