Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery logoLink to Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
. 2009 Mar 31;61(1):23–26. doi: 10.1007/s12070-009-0028-2

Neonatal screening for hearing loss: pilot study from a tertiary care centre

M John 1,, A Balraj 1, M Kurien 1
PMCID: PMC3450133  PMID: 23120598

Abstract

Many developed countries have well established universal neonatal hearing screening programs. In India, the viability of such a program, in an already overburdened health system is indeed a challenge. This cross sectional study was undertaken to evaluate the possible burden of hearing loss among neonates born at a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. Five hundred neonates were screened with automated distortion product otoacoustic emission (aDPOAE) for hearing loss, 9.2% of whom had one or more high risk factors. Although 6.4% had hearing loss at initial assessment, only 1.6% had hearing loss on retesting with aDPOAE. Retesting with OAE before an automated Auditory brainstem response (aABR) helped to exclude patients without hearing loss. The frequency of moderate to moderately severe hearing loss in this study was 0.6%. This pilot study underscores the importance of the introduction of screening for congenital deafness in specialized centers in India, despite its challenges.

Keywords: Neonatal hearing loss, Screening, Otoacou stic emission, Auditory brainstem response

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (447.1 KB).

References

  • 1.Mauk G.W., Behrens T.R. Historical, political and technological context associated with early identification of hearing loss. Seminars in Hearing. 1993;14:1–17. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1085101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Northern J.L., Hayes D.H. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: necessary, beneficial and justifiable. Audiology Today. 1994;6:10–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parving A. Congenital hearing disability: epidemiology and identification: a comparison between two healthy authority districts. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;27:29–46. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(93)90034-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Watkins P., Baldwin M., Mc Enery G. Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:1130–1135. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.10_Spec_No.1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim S.Y., Bothwell N.E., Backousn D.D. The expanding role of the otolaryngologist in managing infants and children with hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2002;35:699. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6665(02)00049-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Michele AM De. (2004) Newborn hearing screening. eMedicine 1–14
  • 7.White K.R., Vohr B.R., Behrens T.R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Seminars in Hearing. 1993;14:18–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Isaacson G. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention. Advances in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2001;15:1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.White K., Maxon A. Universal screening for the hearing impairment: simple, beneficial and presently justified. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;32(3):201–211. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(95)01165-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mehl A., Thompson V. Newborn hearing screening: The Great omission. Pediatrics. 1998;101:1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.1.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Norton S.J., Gorga M.P., Widen J.E. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Summary and Recommendations. Ear & Hearing. 2000;21:529–535. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Joint Committee on infant hearing Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JICH)1994 position statement. Pediatrics. 1994;95:152–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES