Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2007 Jun 14;47(1):77–80. doi: 10.1007/s12088-007-0014-x

Antagonistic and antimicrobial activities of some bacterial isolates collected from soil samples

S Ghai 1, S S Sood 1, R K Jain 1,
PMCID: PMC3450220  PMID: 23100644

Abstract

Thirty seven bacterial cultures isolated from soil samples obtained from different locations were tested for their antagonistic activity against some fungal pathogens, viz., Sclerotium rolfsii, Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani, causal agents of collar rot of sunflower, wilts and root rots, respectively. Among them, 5 bacterial strains, viz., A1 6 (Bacillus sphaericus), K1 24 (Pseudomonas fluorescens), M1 42 (Bacillus circulans), M1 66 (Bacillus brevis) and T1 22 (Bacillus brevis) showed positive antagonistic activity. M1 66 was the most effective in inhibiting mycelial growth of S. rolfsii in vitro followed by M1 42, T1 22, K1 24 and A1 6. Only one bacterial strain i.e. M1 42 exhibited antagonistic activity against F. oxysporum, and none of the bacterial strains gave positive activity against R. solani. Furthermore, antimicrobial activities of all the 5 strains were checked against different test organisms. These strains showed their extensive inhibition effect particularly against gram-positive test bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis) and the test fungal strain (Candida albicans). On the other hand, B. brevis M1 66 and B. brevis T1 22 strains had an inhibitory effect against gram positive and gram-negative test bacteria (Escherichia coli and Proteus vulgaris) as well as the test fungal strain.

Key words: Biocontrol, Sclerotium rolfsii, Antagonism, Bacillus, Pseudomonas

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (201.0 KB).

References

  • 1.Whipps J.M. Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot. 2001;52:487–511. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Punja Z.K. Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii, a pathogen of many plant species. In: Sidhu G.S., editor. Advances in Plant Pathology. London: Academic Press; 1988. pp. 523–524. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smith I.M., Dunez J., Phillips D.H., Lelliott R.A., Archer S.A. European handbook of plant diseases. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1988. p. 583. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sneh B, Lee B & Akira O (1991) Identification of Rhizoctonia species. The American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. 129p. ISBN 089054123x
  • 5.Krieg R.N., Holt J.G. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 1 & 2. New York: Springer; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Skidmore A.M., Dickinson C.H. Colony interaction and hyphal interference between Septoria nodorum and phylloplane fungi. Trans Brit Mycol Soc. 1976;66:57–74. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(76)80092-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yilmaz M., Soran H., Beyatli Y. Antimicrobial activities of some Bacillus spp. Isolated from the soil. Microbiol Res. 2006;161:127–131. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2005.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morikawa M., Ito M., Imanaka T. Isolation of a new surfactin producer Bacillus pumilus A-1, and cloning and nucleotide sequence of the regulator gene, psf-1. Ferment Bioeng. 1992;74:255–161. doi: 10.1016/0922-338X(92)90055-Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perez C., Suarez C., Castro G.R. Production of antimicrobials by Bacillus subtilis MIR 15. J Biotechnol. 1992;26:331–336. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(92)90017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perez C., Suarez C., Castro G.R. Antimic-robial activity determined in strains of Bacillus circulans cluster. Folia Microbiol. 1993;38:25–28. doi: 10.1007/BF02814544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES