Skip to main content
PMC home page
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2010 Mar 5;50(2):172–178. doi: 10.1007/s12088-010-0003-3

Evaluation of PCR, DNA hybridization and immunomagnetic separation — PCR for detection of Burkholderia mallei in artificially inoculated environmental samples

S Merwyn 1, S Kumar 2, G S Agarwal 1, G P Rai 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3450331  PMID: 23100824

Abstract

Glanders is highly contagious disease of equines, caused by Burkholderia mallei. The disease though rare, can be transmitted to humans. Here, we report a strategy for rapid detection of B. mallei from environmental samples. Different bacteriological media were evaluated and brain heart infusion broth medium with selective supplements (BHIB-SS) of penicillin (200 U/ml) and crystal violet (1:10,00000) was found to support the maximum growth of B. mallei even in the presence of other bacteria like Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and a DNA hybridization method was standardized for 823 bp specific dNA sequence of B. mallei. To enable the quicker and direct enrichment of B. mallei bacteria from environmental samples, an immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method was also standardized. Water, husk, grass and gram samples were artificially contaminated by B. mallei bacteria and after enrichment of B. mallei in BHIB-SS, detection was carried out by PCR and DNA hybridization. PCR was found to be a better method of the two with a detection limit of 104–106 CFU/ml (6 h enrichment in BHIB-SS) in water and other particulate matrices. Detection by PCR in the above samples without enrichment in BHIBSS was carried out following IMS where the detection limit was about 1–2 log higher than PCR following enrichment in BHIB-SS. We recommend PCR for 823 bp for detection of B. mallei from environmental samples either following enrichment in BHIB-SS or IMS. IMS-PCR method may be preferred in situations where numbers of B. mallei bacteria are expected to be high and results are required in short time.

Keywords: Burkholderia mallei, DNA hybridization, Immunomagnetic separation, PCR, Rapid detection

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (264.4 KB).

References

  • 1.Fritz D.L., Vogel P., Brown D.R., Deshazer D., Wagg D.M. Mouse model for sublethal and lethal intraperitoneal glanders (B. mallei) Vet Pathol. 2000;37:626–636. doi: 10.1354/vp.37-6-626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Quinn P.J., Markey B.K., Carter M.E., Donnelly W.T.C., Leonard F.C., editors. Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Disease. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Publication; 2002. pp. 237–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Srinivasan A., Kraus C.N., DeShazer D., Becker P.M., Dick J.D., Spacek L., Bartlett J.G., Byrne W.R., Thomas D.L. Glanders in a military research microbiologist. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:256–258. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107263450404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zijderveld F.G., Bongers J. Manual for Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. 4th edition. Paris: Office International des Epizootics; 2000. Glanders; pp. 576–591. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arun S., Neubauer H., Gurel A., Ayyildiz G., Kuscu B., Yesildere T., Meyet H., Hermanns W. Equine glanders in Turkey. Vet Rec. 1999;144:255–258. doi: 10.1136/vr.144.10.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Krishna L., Gupta V.K., Masand M.R. Pathomorphological study of possible glanders in solipeds in Himachal Pradesh. Ind Vet J. 1992;69:211–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muhammad G., Khan M.Z., Athar M. Clinicomicrobiological and therapeutic aspects of glanders in equines. J Equine Sci. 1998;9:93–96. doi: 10.1294/jes.9.93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sanford J.P. Pseudomonas species (including malioidosis and glanders) In: Mandell G.L., Bennett J.E., Dolin R., editors. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 4th edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. pp. 2003–2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heine H.S., England M.J., Wagg D.M., Byrne W.R. In vitro antibiotic susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei (causative agent of glanders) determined by broth microdilution and E-test. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:2119–2121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2119-2121.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wheelis M. First shots fired in biological warfare. Nature. 1998;395:213. doi: 10.1038/26089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Verma RD and Mishra VC (1989) Research on epizootic diagnosis and control of glanders with a view to eradicate the disease from India. Project closure reported submitted ICAR, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi, pp 1–54
  • 12.Hutyra F., Marek J., Manninger R. Special pathology and therapeutics of the diseases of domestic animals. 5th Eng Edn. London: Balliere Tindall and Cox; 1949. pp. 722–773. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boyden S.V. Absorption by erythrocytes of antigens of Pf. mallei and Pf. whitmori. Proc Sac Exp Biol Med. 1950;73:289–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sen G.P., Singh G., Joshi T.P. Comparative efficacy of serological tests in the diagnosis of glanders. Ind Vet J. 1968;45:286–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jana A.M., Gupta A.K., Pandya G., Verma R.D., Rao K.M. Rapid diagnosis of glanders in equines by counterimmuno-electrophoresis. Ind Vet J. 1982;59:5–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Howe C., Miller W.R. Human glanders: report of six cases. Ann Intern Med. 1947;26:93–115. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-26-1-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Palermo D., Puccini V., Sobrero L. Experimental studies of glanderd diagnosis. I. Identification of Actinobacillus mallei by immunofluoresence. Acta Med Vet Napoli. 1974;20:177–181. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Verma R.D., Sharma J.K., Venkateswaran K.S., Batra H.V. Development of an avidin-biotin dot enzymelinked immunosorbent assay and its comparision with other serological tests for diagnosis of glanders in equines. Vet Microbial. 1990;25:77–85. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90095-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tomaso H., Scholz H.C., Dahouk S., Pitt T.L., Treu T.M., Neubauer H. Development of 5′ nuclease real-time PCR assays for the rapid identification of the Burkholderia mallei/Burkholderia pseudomallei complex. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2004;13:247–253. doi: 10.1097/01.pdm.0000137099.36618.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Scholz H.C., Joseph M., Tomaso H., Dahouk S., Witte A., Kinne J., Hagen R.M., Wernery U., Neubauer H. Detection of the reemerging agent Burkholderia mallei in a recent outbreak of glanders in United Arab Emirates by a newly developed fliP-based polymerase chain reaction assay. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;54:241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumar S., Balakrishna K., Singh G.P., Batra H.V. Rapid detection of Salmonella typhi in foods by combination of immunomagnetic separation and Polymerase chain reaction. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;21:625–628. doi: 10.1007/s11274-004-3553-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bergeron MG, Boissinot M, Huletsky A, Menard C, Ovellette M, Picard FJ and Roy PH (2002) Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms. Patent no:WO/2001/023604
  • 23.Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gupta S.K. Antisera — techniques of immunization, use of adjuvants. In: Talwar G.P., editor. A Hand Book of Practical Immunology. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.; 1993. pp. 32–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Batra H.V., Chand P., Ganju L., Mukherjee R., Sadana J.R. Dot-ELISA for the detection of antibodies in bovine brucellosis. Res Vet Sci. 1989;46:143–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES