Skip to main content
PMC home page
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2007 Oct 4;47(3):251–258. doi: 10.1007/s12088-007-0046-2

Evaluation of an indigenous ELISA for diagnosis of Johne’s disease and its comparison with commercial kits

S V Singh 1,✉, A V Singh 1, P K Singh 1, J S Sohal 1, N P Singh 1
PMCID: PMC3450340  PMID: 23100673

Abstract

Country lacks sensitive and indigenous diagnostic kits for the screening of goats and sheep against Johne’s disease. Therefore an indigenous ELISA kit was developed using protoplasmic antigen from native Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis ‘Bison Type’ strain of goat origin (Kit 1). In the present study, kit 1 and two commercial kits (kit 2 and 3) were evaluated with respect to ‘Gold Standard’ fecal culture in 71 animals (55 goats and 16 sheep). Kit 1 using indigenous antigen (protoplasmic antigen) was sensitive at very low concentration (0.1 μgm / well) as compared to purified commercial protoplasmic antigen (4 μgm / well) used in kit 2, in the Type 1 reactors (strong positive as positive). Screening of 71 animals by fecal culture detected 38.0% animals (goats-40.0%, sheep-31.2%) as positive (clinical shedders of bacilli) from these farm animals. Of the farm animals located at Central Institute for Research on Goats, herds of goat were endemic whereas, sheep flocks were comparatively resistant to Johne’s disease. The 29.5 and 61.9, 15.4 and 57.7 and 4.2 and 14.0% animals (goats and sheep) were in the category of sero-reactors type 1 and 2 of the ELISA kits 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In the type 1 sero-reactors, sensitivity and specificity of kit 1, 2 and 3 was 53.7 and 86.0, 17.8 and 86.0 and 3.5 and 94.7%, respectively. Indigenous ELISA test (kit 1) was significantly superior for the screening of goatherds and sheep flocks against JD as compared to commercial ELISA kits (Kit 2 and 3). In comparison to kit 2 and 3, kit 1 had highest sensitivity, comparable specificity and substantial to nearly perfect proportional agreement (Kappa Scores) with respect to ‘Gold standard’ fecal culture in goats and sheep. Disease being endemic in herds and flocks screened using ELISA kits, Type I sero-rectors had better correlation with fecal culture in comparison to Type II sero-reactors therefore, used for estimation of sero-prevalence. Newly developed Indigenous ELISA kit was simple, inexpensive, sensitive and reliable for screening of goats and sheep population against Johne’s disease. The study reports high prevalence of Johne’s disease in farm goatherds and sheep flocks, using sensitive tests (fecal culture and ELISA kit). Results of Type 1 reaction in kit 1 were optimally correlated with culture and were good for estimating the sero-prevalence. For controlling Johne’s disease in endemic herds initial removal of the animals in strong positive category (Tyep 1 reactors), may help to remove heavy shedders.

KeyWords: Johne’s disease, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, Protoplasmic antigen, Diagnosis, Fecal culture, ELISA kit

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.1 KB).

References

  • 1.Manning E.J.B., Collins M.T. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: pathogen, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 2001;20:133–150. doi: 10.20506/rst.20.1.1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh S.V., Singh N. Effect of climate on Johne’s disease incidence in goatherds. Ind J Anim Sci. 2000;70:492–493. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goswami T.K., Tewari V., Gupta A., Mall R., Ram G.C. Sero-prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in an organized Pashmina goat farm. Ind J Comp Microbiol Immunol Infect Dis. 2000;21:132–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumar P, Singh SV, Bhatiya AK, Sevilla I, Singh AV, Whittington RJ, Juste RA, Gupta VK, Singh PK, Sohal JS & Vihan VS (2007) Juvenile Capri-Paratuberculosis (JCP) in India: Incidence and characterization by six diagnostic tests. Small Rumin. Res. (2006) doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006. 10.023, In press.
  • 5.Vihan V.S., Singh N., Singh S.V. Preliminary observations on fecal culture test for the detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in goats. Ind J Anim Sci. 1989;59:1522–1524. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Singh N., Singh S.V., Gupta V.K., Sharma V.D., Sharma R.K., Katoch V.M. Isolation and identification of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from naturally infected goatherds in India. Ind J Vet Pathol. 1996;20:104–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kumar V. Identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in sheep and goats and prospective evaluation of an ELISA and AGID test for the diagnosis of Johne’s Disease. Kanpur: Veterinary Microbiology & Virology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Mathura (UP) submitted to CSA University; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Collins M.T., Wells S.J., Petrini K.R., Collins J.E., Schultz R.D., Whitlock R.H. Evaluation of five-antibody detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:685–692. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.6.685-692.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Whitlock R.H., Rosenberger A.E. Fecal culture protocol for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis a recommended procedure. Proc. Annual Meeting U.S. Animal Health Association. 1990;94:280–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Merkal R.S. Paratuberculosis: advances in cultural, serologic and vaccination methods. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984;184:939–943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Merkal R.S., Curran B.J. Growth and metabolic characteristics of mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Appl. Microbiol. 1974;28:276–279. doi: 10.1128/am.28.2.276-279.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Whittington RJ (2002) Personal communication
  • 13.Sevilla I., Singh S.V., Garrido J.M., Aduriz G., Rodriguez S., Geijo M.V., Whittington R.J., Saunders V., Whitlock R.H., Juste R.A. Molecular typing of Paratuberculosis strains from different hosts and regions. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 2005;24:1061–1066. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. Protein measurement with Folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Milner A.R., Lepper A.W.D., Symonds W.N., Gruner E. Analysis by ELISA and Western blotting of antibody reactivities in cattle infected with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis after absorption of serum with Mxxx.phlei. Res Vet Sci. 1987;42:140–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singh S.V., Singh A.V., Singh P.K., Gupta V.K., Kumar S., Vohra J. Sero-prevalence of paratuberculosis in young kids using “Bison type’, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis antigen in plate ELISA. Small Rumin Res. 2007;70:89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.11.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collins M.T. Interpretation of a commercial bovine paratuberculosis Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood ratio. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002;9:1367–1371. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1367-1371.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arizmendi F., Grimes J.E. Comparison of Gimenez staining method and antigen detection ELISA with culture for detecting Chlamydia in bird. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1995;7:400–401. doi: 10.1177/104063879500700320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Landis R.J., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Corpa J.M., Perez V., Marin J.F.G. Differences in the immune responses in lambs and kids vaccinated against paratuberculosis, according to the age of vaccination. Vet Microbiol. 2000;77:475–485. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00332-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Singh SV, Singh AV, Singh R, Sandhu KS, Gupta VK & Misra S (2005) Survey of ruminant population of Northern India for the incidence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection. In: Neilsen, S.S. (eds) 8th ICP. Copenhagen, Denmark. p 60
  • 22.Salgado M., Manning E.J.B., Collins M.T. Performance of a Johne’s disease enzyme linked immunosorbent assay adapted for milk samples from goats. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2005;17:350–354. doi: 10.1177/104063870501700408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tripathi B.N., Parihar N.S. Status of paratuberculosis in goats: A 5 years study based on post-mortem cases. Indian J Vet Pathol. 1999;23:79–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Singh S.V., Vihan V.S. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in goat milk. Small Rumin Res. 2004;54:231–235. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Singh N., Vihan V.S., Singh S.V., Gupta V.K. Prevalence of Johne’s disease in organized goatherds. Indian J Anim Sci. 1998;68:41–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gupta V.K., Singh N., Singh S.V., Shankar H. Faecal microscopic examination — A tool for diagnosis of Johne’s disease in small ruminants. Indian Vet Med J. 1996;20:213–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Singh S.V., Vihan V.S. Incidence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in clinically suspected small ruminants. The Indian J. Small Rumin. 2004;9:56–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singh S.V., Singh P.P., Singh N., Gupta V.K. Characterization of lipid pattern of M. paratuberculosis isolated from goats and sheep. Indian J. Ani Sci. 2000;70:899–903. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES