Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery logoLink to Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
. 2006 Jul;58(3):250–252. doi: 10.1007/BF03050832

Secretory otitis media: A school health survey

S P S Yadav 1, Sanjay Saxena 1, Harshini Sharma 1,, Ishwer Singh 1, Jagat Singh 1
PMCID: PMC3450403  PMID: 23120305

Abstract

The present study was carried out to find out prevalence of secretory otitis media in 200 school going children between the age group of 5–7 years by impedance audiometry besides clinical evaluation. 100 children were taken from two different schools catering to higher and lower socioeconomic strata of society. The overall prevalence of secretory otitis media came out to be 20.75%. It was 28.5% in lower socioeconomic group and, 13% in the other group. This high prevalence warrants routine screening for secretory otitis media. Further impedance audiometry was found to be very good method of screening secretory otitis media.

Key words: Glue ear, Impedence audiometry, Conductive deafness

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (371.5 KB).

References

  • 1.Lewis N. Otitis media and linguistic incompetence. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976;102:387–90. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780120035001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Holm VA, Kunze LH. Effects of chronic otitis media on language and speech development. Pediatrics. 1969;43:833–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kodam F. Educational status of hard of hearing children in classroom. J Speech Hear Disord. 1963;28:297–99. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2803.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sade J. Secretory otitis media and its sequalae. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1979. pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Melnick W, Eagles EL, Levine HS. Evaluation of a recommended program of identification audiometry with school children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1964;29:3–13. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2901.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92:311–24. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cantekin EI, Berry QC, Bluestone CD. Tympanometric patterns found in middle ear effusions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1977;86(suppl. 41):16–20. doi: 10.1177/00034894770864s202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brooks D. School screening for middle ear effusion. Ann Otol Rhinol. 1976;85(suppl. 25):223–29. doi: 10.1177/00034894760850S241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jorgen H, Sanad AF, Yaccob Q. prevalence of secretory otitis media among school children in Kuwait. J Laryngol Otol. 1987;101:116–19. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100101367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tos M, Stangerup SE. Secretory otitis media and pneumatization of the mastoid process. Sexual differences in the size of the mastoid air cell system. Ann J Otolaryngol. 1985;6:199–205. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0709(85)80085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fay TH, Hochberg I, Smith C, Rees N, Halpren H. Audiologic and otologic screening of disadvantaged children. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91:366–70. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040524012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wehrs RE, Proud G. Conductive deafness in children. Arch Otolaryngol. 1958;67:16–19. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1958.00730010020003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Renvalt V, Lideu G, Jungert S, Nilsson E. Long term observations of ears with reduced middle ear pressure. Acta Otolaryngol. 1978;86:104–104. doi: 10.3109/00016487809124725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brooks DN. The use of electroacoustic impedance bridge in the assessment of middle ear function. Int Audiol. 1969;8:563–563. doi: 10.3109/05384916909070226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bluestone CD, Berry QC, Paradise JL. Audiometry and tympanometry in relation to middle ear effusion in children. Laryngoscope. 1973;83:594–604. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197304000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lous J, Fiellay NM. Epidemiology of middle ear effusion and tubal dysfunction. A one year prospective study comparing monthly tympanometry in 387 nonselected seven years old children. Int J Paed Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981;3:303–17. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(81)90055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Silvia PA, Kirkland C, Simpson A, Stewart IA, Williams SM. Some development and behavioural characteristics associated with bilateral secretory otitis media. J Learn Disable. 1982;15:417–25. doi: 10.1177/002221948201500709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tos M, Holm Vensen S, Sorensen CH. Spontaneous course and frequency of secretory otitis media in 4 year old children. Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108:4–10. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1982.00790490006002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harker LA, Wagoner R. Application of impedance audiometry as a screening instrument. Acta Otolaryngol. 1974;77:198–201. doi: 10.3109/00016487409124617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ogisi FO. Impedance screening for otitis media with effusion in Nigerian children. J Laryngol Otol. 1988;102:986–88. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100107078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES