Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1984 Apr;81(8):2364–2368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.8.2364

X-ray evidence for two structural states of the actomyosin cross-bridge in muscle fibers.

T Matsuda, R J Podolsky
PMCID: PMC345060  PMID: 6585803

Abstract

Biochemical data, stiffness measurements, and equatorial x-ray diffraction patterns provide evidence that actomyosin cross-bridges form in relaxed skinned rabbit fibers at low ionic strength (20 mM). In the present study we examined the structure of these cross-bridges by using two-dimensional x-ray diffraction. In contrast to rigor cross-bridges, which significantly weaken the myosin-based reflections characteristic of relaxed fibers at 120 mM ionic strength (notably the 86-A and 108-A layer lines and the 72-A and 143-A meridionals), the formation of low ionic strength cross-bridges produced only small changes in these reflections. In addition, these cross-bridges did not produce the additional intensity on the 59-A actin-based layer line near the meridian that is associated with rigor cross-bridges. However, the formation of low ionic strength cross-bridges caused the 215-A meridional reflection to decrease in intensity, as is also the case when rigor cross-bridges are formed. These observations show that the structure of the low ionic strength cross-bridge is significantly different from that of the rigor cross-bridge, and they raise the possibility that contractile force may be generated by a transition between these two actomyosin configurations.

Full text

PDF
2364

Images in this article

2365Image
on p.2365
2366Image
on p.2366

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner B., Schoenberg M., Chalovich J. M., Greene L. E., Eisenberg E. Evidence for cross-bridge attachment in relaxed muscle at low ionic strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7288–7291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chalovich J. M., Eisenberg E. Inhibition of actomyosin ATPase activity by troponin-tropomyosin without blocking the binding of myosin to actin. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 10;257(5):2432–2437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eastwood A. B., Wood D. S., Bock K. L., Sorenson M. M. Chemically skinned mammalian skeletal muscle. I. The structure of skinned rabbit psoas. Tissue Cell. 1979;11(3):553–566. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(79)90062-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eisenberg E., Greene L. E. The relation of muscle biochemistry to muscle physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 1980;42:293–309. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.42.030180.001453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L. A cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1978;33(1):55–82. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(79)90025-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greene L. E. Comparison of the binding of heavy meromyosin and myosin subfragment 1 in F-actin. Biochemistry. 1981 Apr 14;20(8):2120–2126. doi: 10.1021/bi00511a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haselgrove J. C. X-ray evidence for conformational changes in the myosin filaments of vertebrate striated muscle. J Mol Biol. 1975 Feb 15;92(1):113–143. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90094-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huxley H. E., Brown W. The low-angle x-ray diagram of vertebrate striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor. J Mol Biol. 1967 Dec 14;30(2):383–434. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huxley H. E., Faruqi A. R., Kress M., Bordas J., Koch M. H. Time-resolved X-ray diffraction studies of the myosin layer-line reflections during muscle contraction. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jul 15;158(4):637–684. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90253-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lednev V. V., Srebnitskaia L. K., Kornev A. N., Malinchik S. B. Dokazatel'stvo sushchestvovaniia Ca2+-indutsiruemogo strukturnogo perekhoda v stvolakh miozinsoderzhashchikh nitei skeletnykh myshts pozvonochnykh. Biofizika. 1982 May-Jun;27(3):493–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lymn R. W. Low-angle x-ray diagrams from skeletal muscle: the effect of AMP-PNP, a non-hydrolyzed analogue of ATP. J Mol Biol. 1975 Dec 25;99(4):567–582. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80172-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lymn R. W., Taylor E. W. Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by actomyosin. Biochemistry. 1971 Dec 7;10(25):4617–4624. doi: 10.1021/bi00801a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Magid A., Reedy M. K. X-ray diffraction observations of chemically skinned frog skeletal muscle processed by an improved method. Biophys J. 1980 Apr;30(1):27–40. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85074-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marston S. B. The rates of formation and dissociation of actin-myosin complexes. Effects of solvent, temperature, nucleotide binding and head-head interactions. Biochem J. 1982 May 1;203(2):453–460. doi: 10.1042/bj2030453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller A., Tregear R. T. Structure of insect fibrillar flight muscle in the presence and absence of ATP. J Mol Biol. 1972 Sep 14;70(1):85–104. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90165-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mornet D., Bertrand R., Pantel P., Audemard E., Kassab R. Structure of the actin-myosin interface. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):301–306. doi: 10.1038/292301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Podolsky R. J., St Onge H., Yu L., Lymn R. W. X-ray diffraction of actively shortening muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):813–817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rome E. Relaxation of glycerinated muscle: low-angle x-ray diffraction studies. J Mol Biol. 1972 Mar 28;65(2):331–345. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90285-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schoenberg M., Brenner B., Chalovich J. M., Greene L. E., Eisenberg E. Cross-bridge attachment in relaxed muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1984;170:269–284. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4703-3_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stein L. A., Schwarz R. P., Jr, Chock P. B., Eisenberg E. Mechanism of actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase. Evidence that adenosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis can occur without dissociation of the actomyosin complex. Biochemistry. 1979 Sep 4;18(18):3895–3909. doi: 10.1021/bi00585a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wray J. S., Vibert P. J., Cohen C. Cross-bridge arrangements in Limulus muscle. J Mol Biol. 1974 Sep 15;88(2):343–348. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90486-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yagi N., O'Brien E. J., Matsubara I. Changes of thick filament structure during contraction of frog striated muscle. Biophys J. 1981 Jan;33(1):121–137. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84876-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES