Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery logoLink to Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
. 2003 Mar;55(1):5–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02968744

Reconstruction of complex oral defects using bi-paddle pectoralis major flap - technical modifications and outcome in 54 cancer patients

S V S Deo 1,, Joydeep Purkayastha 1,, Diganta Kr Das 1,, Madhabananda Kar 1,, Guddanti Srinivas 1,, Sonal Asthana 1,, Shridhar D 1,, N K Shukla 1,2,
PMCID: PMC3450944  PMID: 23119926

Abstract

Objective

Reconstruction of locally advanced oral cancer presents a great challenge to the head and neck surgeon. The main goal of reconstruction is to provide intraoral lining and soft tissue cover. We discuss the use of Bipaddle pectoralis major myoculaneous flap (PMMF) and its modifications for reconstruction of complex oral defects following radical resection.

Study Design

Retrospective analysis of prospective oral cancer data base.

Setting

Tertiary Care Regional Cancer Center.

Patients

Three hundred and ten patients were operated for oral carcinoma in this unit between 1993 and 2001. The oral cancer patients who required soft tissue reconstruction for lining and cover were analyzed. Patients in whom bipaddle PMMF were utilised were studied in terms of surgical technique, morbidity, function and cosmetic outcome.

Results

Ninety-one (29.4 %) oral cancer patients required reconstruction for lining as well as cover. Of these, 54 (17.4 %) patients underwent a bipaddle PMMF flap reconstruction. Two horizontal skin islands were used in patients with lateral defects and two vertical islands in patients with central defects. There was no complication in 41 (76%) patients. Complete flap loss was seen in only one patient and differential flap loss in 2 patients (4 %) while seven (13 %) patients had only minor complication. All the patients received post-operative Radiotherapy. Good to average functional and cosmetic outcome was observed in 90% patients.

Conclusions

Bipaddle PMMF offers an effective and leliahle reconstructive option for complex oral defects. By using certain technical modifications, majority of complex oral defects can be managed successfully using a Bipaddle PMMF. In a developing country like India with a large oral cancer disease burden Bipaddle PMMF should he used routinely for complex oral defects in view of its simplicity, versatility and reliability.

Key Words: bipaddle pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, toral cancer

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (592.7 KB).

References

  • 1.Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. International Journal of Cancer. 1993;54:594–606. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mohanty BK, Bahadur S, Lal P, et al. Cancers Head and Neck. In: Rath GK, Mohanty BK, et al., editors. Textbook of Radiation Oncology Principles and Practice. B I: Churchill Livingstone Pvt Ltd; 2000. pp. 131–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bakamyan VY, Culf NK, Bales HW. Versatility of the deltopectoral flap in reconstructions following head and neck cancers. In: Sanvenero-Roselli C, Boggio-Robutu G, editors. Transactions of the Fourth International Congress of Plastic and reconstructive Surgery. Rome: Amsterdam Excerpta Medica; 1967. pp. 808–823. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anyan S. The pectorahs major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1979;63:73–81. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197901000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soutar DS, McGregor IA. The radial forearm flap in intraoral reconstruction experience of 60 consecutive cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1986;78:1–8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198607000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Magee WP, McGraw JB, Horton CE, et al. Pectorahs “paddle” myocutaneous flaps The workhorse of head and neck reconstruction. American Journal of Surgery. 1980;140:507–513. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90201-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moram WD, Geurkink NA. Split pectorahs major myocutaneous flap. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1980;5:358–361. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198011000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weaver AW, Vandenberg HJ, Atkinson DP, et al. Modified bilobular (‘gemim’) pectorahs major myocutaneous flap. American Journal of Surgery. 1982;144:482–488. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90429-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Freeman JL, Gullane PJ, Rotstein LM. The double paddle pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Journal of Otolaryngology. 1985;14((4)):237–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ord RA, Avery BS. Side-by-side double paddle pectorahs major flap for cheek defects. British Journal Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1989;27:177–185. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(89)90141-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bathena HM, Kavarna NM. The folded, bipaddled pectoralis major composite flap m oral cancer reconstruction. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1989;42:441–446. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(89)90011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jacob OJ. One stage reconstruction of large oral mucocutaneous defects with double paddled pectorahs major myocutaneous flap. Australia New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 1994;64:208–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haers PE, Gratz KW, Sailer HF. The bilobed myocutaneous pectoralis major flap in closure of combined intra- and extraoral defects. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1994;23:214–218. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80373-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES