Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Headache and Pain logoLink to The Journal of Headache and Pain
. 2010 May 28;11(5):391–397. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0222-3

Comparative analysis and diagnostic accuracy of the cervical flexion–rotation test

Toby M Hall 1,✉, Kathy Briffa 1, Diana Hopper 1, Kim Robinson 1
PMCID: PMC3452271  PMID: 20508964

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the findings of the cervical flexion–rotation test (FRT) between subjects with probable cervicogenic headache (CGH), migraine without aura (Migraine), and multiple headache forms (MHF). An additional aim was to identify the diagnostic accuracy of the FRT in CGH evaluation. Sixty subjects were evaluated: 20 with CGH, 20 with Migraine, and 20 with MHF. Subject and headache symptoms were evaluated by questionnaire. A single-blind examiner conducted the FRT, reporting the test state (positive or negative) before measuring range of motion using a goniometer. The average range of unilateral rotation to the most restricted side was 25°, 42° and 35° for groups CGH, Migraine and MHF, respectively. The difference between groups was significant (P < 0.001). Range of rotation was significantly reduced in the CGH group when compared to groups Migraine (P < 0.001) and MHF (P = 0.001), with an additional smaller significant difference between groups Migraine and MHF (P = 0.039). A receiver operating curve revealed that an experienced examiner using the FRT was able to make the correct diagnosis 85% of the time (P < 0.001), with a positive cut-off value of 30°. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that 44% of the variance in FRT range of motion was explained by the presence of two variables: neck movement or positions provoke headache, and neck symptoms precede headache, but not by other factors associated with migraine. These findings provide further evidence supporting the clinical utility of the FRT in CGH evaluation.

Keywords: Cervicogenic headache, Migraine, Neck, Sensitivity and specificity, Range of motion

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (214.7 KB).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher A, Steiner T, Zwart J. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:193–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diener I. The impact of cervicogenic headache on patients attending a private physiotherapy practice in Cape Town. S Afr J Physiother. 2001;57(1):35–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond ML, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache. 2001;41(7):646–657. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–349. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buzzi M, Moskowitz M. The pathophysiology of migraine: year 2005. J Headache Pain. 2005;6:105–111. doi: 10.1007/s10194-005-0165-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aurora SK, Barrodale PM, Tipton RL, Khodavirdi A. Brainstem dysfunction in chronic migraine as evidenced by neurophysiological and positron emission tomography studies. Headache. 2007;47(7):996–1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00853.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jull G (2002) Management of cervicogenic headache. In: Grant R (ed) Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine. Churchill–Livingstone, New York, pp 239–272
  • 8.Bogduk N, Govind J. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(10):959–968. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70209-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dodick DW. Pearls: Headache. Semin Neurol. 2010;30(1):74–81. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2004). The international classification of headache disorders, 2nd edn. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):9–160 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Sjaastad O, Fredriksen TA, Pfaffenrath V. Cervicogenic headache: diagnostic criteria. The Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group. Headache. 1998;38(6):442–445. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3806442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Calhoun AH, Ford S, Millen C, Finkel AG, Truong Y, Nie Y (2010). The Prevalence of Neck Pain in Migraine. Headache [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Henry P, Dartigues J, Puymirat C, Peytour P, Lucas J.The association cervicalgia-headaches: an epidemiologic study Cephalalgia 19877Suppl. 6189–190.3652201 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pfaffenrath V, Kaube H. Diagnostics of cervicogenic headache. Funct Neurol. 1990;5(2):159–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hall T, Ho Tak Chan B, Christensen L, Odenthal B, Wells C, Robinson K. Efficacy of a C1/2 self-SNAG (sustained natural apophyseal glide) in the management of cervicogenic headache. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(3):100–107. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jull G, Trott P, Potter H, Zito G, Neire K, Shirley D, Emberson J, Marschner I, Richardson C. A randomized controlled trial of exercise and manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache. Spine. 2002;27(17):1835–1843. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bronfort G, Nilsson N, Haas M, Evans R, Goldsmith CH, Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM (2004). Non-invasive physical treatments for chronic/recurrent headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD001878 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Blau J, MacGregor E. Migraine and the neck. Headache. 1994;34:88–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1994.hed3402088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zito G, Jull G, Story I. Clinical tests of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache. Man Ther. 2006;11(2):118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jull G, Amiri M, Bullock-Saxton J, Darnell R, Lander C. Cervical musculoskeletal impairment in frequent intermittent headache. Part 1: Subjects with single headaches. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(7):793–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hall T, Robinson K. The flexion–rotation test and active cervical mobility—a comparative measurement study in cervicogenic headache. Man Ther. 2004;9(4):197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hall TM, Briffa K, Hopper D. Clinical evaluation of cervicogenic headache. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):73–80. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hall TM, Briffa K, Hopper D, Robinson KW. Intratester reliability and minimal detectable change of the cervical flexion–rotation test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(4):225–229. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ogince M, Hall T, Robinson K, Blackmore AM. The diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion–rotation test in C1/2-related cervicogenic headache. Man Ther. 2007;12(3):256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Takasaki H, Hall T, Oshiro S, Kaneko S, Ikemoto Y, Jull G (2010). Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the flexion–rotation test—in vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging. (submitted) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Hall TM, Robinson KW, Fujinawa O, Akasaka K, Pyne EA. Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion–rotation test. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2008;31(4):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eliasziw M, Young S, Woodbury M, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther. 1994;74:777–788. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.8.777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Antonaci F, Ghirmai S, Bono G, Sandrini G, Nappi G. Cervicogenic headache: evaluation of the original diagnostic criteria. Cephalalgia. 2001;21(5):573–583. doi: 10.1046/j.0333-1024.2001.00207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Niere K, Robinson P. Determination of manipulative physiotherapy treatment outcome in headache patients. Man Ther. 1997;2(4):199–205. doi: 10.1054/math.1997.0300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hall TM, Briffa K, Hopper D (2010). The relationship between cervicogenic headache subjective features and impairment determined by the cervical flexion–rotation test. (submitted) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Smith K, Hall T, Robinson K. The influence of age, gender, lifestyle factors and sub-clinical neck pain on cervical range of motion. Man Ther. 2007;13:552–559. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zwart JA. Neck mobility in different headache disorders. Headache. 1997;37(1):6–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1997.3701006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Pegoretti KS, Goncalves MC, Speciali JG, Bordini CA, Bigal ME. Cervical mobility in women with migraine. Headache. 2009;49(5):726–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Robertson BA, Morris ME. The role of cervical dysfunction in migraine: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(5):474–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01545.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Niere K. Central nervous system processing in cervicogenic headache. In: Selvaratnam PJ, Niere K, Zuluaga M, editors. Headache orofacial pain and bruxism. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009. pp. 95–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bartsch T. Migraine and the neck: new insights from basic data. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005;9(3):191–196. doi: 10.1007/s11916-005-0061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sjaastad O, Bakketeig LS. Migraine without aura: comparison with cervicogenic headache Vaga study of headache epidemiology. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007;117(6):377–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Headache and Pain are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES