Skip to main content
The Indian Journal of Surgery logoLink to The Indian Journal of Surgery
. 2009 Jun 10;71(3):117–120. doi: 10.1007/s12262-009-0034-3

Varicose veins: clinical presentation and surgical management

Goutham Reddy Kompally 1,, R N Satish Bharadwaj 1, Gurjit Singh 1
PMCID: PMC3452481  PMID: 23133133

Abstract

Background

Varicose vein is a common surgical problem. We studied clinical presentation of varicose veins and its surgical treatment.

Material and methods

All patients with varicose veins presented to our hospital were included in the study. All patients in our study were assessed by clinico etiological Anatomical and pathological (CEAP) classification. Diagnosis was further confirmed by Duplex ultrasonography

Results

Surgery was prefered for 34 out of 40 patients. Remaining 6 patients were treated conservatively because 3 patients were pregnant and 3 had deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We have used Trendelenburg’s operation with stripping in 30 out of 34 cases. We find this method to be satisfactory.

Conclusion

Meticulous clinical examination and surgical technique followed by closely monitored post operative management is required to reduce morbidity of varicose veins. Trendelenburg’s operation with subfascial ligation has given good results in our set up.

Keywords: Varicose veins, Venous ulcer, Thrombophlebitis, Lipodermatosclerosis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (685.8 KB).

References

  • 1.Callam M.J. Epidemiology of varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1994;81(2):167–173. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Angle N., Freischlag J. A. Venous disease. Sabiston Text book of surgery. 17. India: Elsevier publishers; 2004. pp. 2053–2070. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bradbury A., Evans C., Allan P., et al. What are the symptoms of varicose veins? Edinburg vein study cross sectional population survey. Br M J. 1999;318(7180):353–356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7180.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Teruya T.H., Ballard J.L. New approach for the treatment of varicose veins. Surg Clin N Am. 2004;84:1397–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2004.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lurie F., Creton D., Eklof B., et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration versus ligation and stripping — EVOLVES Study. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:207–214. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00228-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lees T.A., Beard J.D., Ridler B.M., et al. A survey of the current management of varicose veins by members of the vascular society. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(6):407–417. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Perrin M.R., Guex J.J., Ruckley C.V., et al. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS) — a consensus document REVAS group. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8(4):233–245. doi: 10.1016/S0967-2109(00)00021-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Munasinghe A., Smith C., Kianifard B., et al. Strip track revascularisation after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Br J Surg. 2007;94:840–843. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim J., Richards S., Kent P.J. Clinical examination of varicose veins — a validation study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(3):171–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh S., Lee T.A., Donlon M., et al. Improving the preoperative assessment of varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1997;84(6):801–802. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES