Abstract
The authors developed a temporal subtraction scheme based on a nonlinear geometric warping technique to assist radiologists in the detection of interval changes in chest radiographs obtained on different occasions. The performance of the current temporal subtraction scheme is reasonably good; however, severe misregistration can occur in some cases. The authors evaluated the quality of 100 chest temporal subtraction images selected from their clinical image database. Severe misregistration was mainly attributable to initial incorrect global matching. Therefore, they attempted to improve the quality of the subtraction images by applying a new initial image matching technique to determine the global shift value between the current and the previous chest images. A cross-correlation method was employed for the initial image matching by use of blurred low-resolution chest images. Nineteen cases (40.4%) among 47 poor registered subtraction images were improved. These results show that the new initial image matching technique is very effective for improving the quality of chest temporal subtraction images, which can greatly enhance subtle changes in chest radiographs.
Key Words: computer-aided diagnosis, digital image subtraction, image matching, interval change, chest radiograph
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.5 MB).
Footnotes
Supported by USPHS Grants CA62625 and CA64370. K. Doi and H. MacMahon are shareholders of R2 Technology, Inc, Los Altos, CA. (It is the policy of the University of Chicago that investigators disclose publicly actual or potential significant financial interests that may appear to be affected by research activities.)
References
- 1.Kano A, Doi K, MacMahon H, et al. Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. Med Phys. 1994;21:453–461. doi: 10.1118/1.597308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Difazio MC, MacMahon H, Xu XW, et al. Digital chest radiography: Effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy. Radiology. 1977;202:447–452. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yoshimura H, Xu XW, Doi K, et al. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: Comparison with computed radiography. Med Phys. 1993;20:179–186. doi: 10.1118/1.597061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, et al. Computed-radiography utilizing scanning stimulated luminescence. Radiology. 1983;148:833–838. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Takeo H, Nakajima N, Ishida M, et al. Improved automatic adjustment of density and contrast in FCR system using neural network. Proc SPIE. 1994;2163:98–109. doi: 10.1117/12.174245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xu XW, Doi K. Image feature analysis for computer-aided diagnosis: Accurate determination of ribcage boundary in chest radiographs. Med Phys. 1995;22:617–626. doi: 10.1118/1.597549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]