Skip to main content
Journal of Digital Imaging logoLink to Journal of Digital Imaging
. 1999 May;12(2):68–76. doi: 10.1007/BF03168845

Application of the Advanced Communications Technology Satellite to teleradiology and real-time compressed ultrasound video telemedicine

Brent K Stewart 1,, Stephen J Carter 1, Jay N Cook 1, Brian S Abbe 1, Deborah Pinck 1, Alan H Rowberg 1
PMCID: PMC3452490  PMID: 10342249

Abstract

The authors have investigated the application of the NASA Advanced Communications Technology Satellite (ACTS) to teleradiology and telemedicine using the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)-developed ACTS Mobile Terminal (AMT) uplink. In this experiment, bidirectional 128, 256, and 384 kbps satellite links were established between the ACTS/AMT, the ACTS in geosynchronous orbit, and the downlink terrestrial terminal at JPL. A terrestrial Integrated Digital Services Network (ISDN) link was established from JPL to the University of Washington Department of Radiology to complete the bidirectional connection. Ultrasound video imagery was compressed in real-time using video codecs adhering to the International Telecommunication Union—Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) Recommendation H.261. A 16 kbps in-band audio channel was used throughout. A five-point Likert scale was used to evaluate the quality of the compressed ultrasound imagery at the three transmission bandwidths (128, 256, and 384 kbps). The central question involved determination of the bandwidth requirements to provide sufficient spatial and contrast resolution for the remote visualization of fine- and low-contrast objects. The 384 kbps bandwidth resulted in only slight tiling artifact and fuzziness owing to the quantizer step size; however, these motion artifacts were rapidly resolved in time at this bandwidth. These experiments have demonstrated that real-time compressed ultrasound video imagery can be transmitted over multiple ISDN line bandwidth links with sufficient temporal, contrast, and spatial resolution for clinical diagnosis of multiple disease and pathology states to provide subspecialty consultation and education at a distance.

Key Words: image compression, medical images, satellite, telemedicine, teleradiology, ultrasonography, video compression

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Footnotes

This project was supported by the NASA ACTS Experiments Program, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Communications Systems Research Section, General Electric Medical Systems, and an ARPA Advanced Biomedical Technology Program Contract (DAMD17-97-1-7258).

References

  • 1.NASA: Space Communications Program Outreach and Public Relations Department
  • 2.Stewart BK, Carter SJ, Rowberg AH. Application of the advanced communications technology satellite for teleradiology and telemedicine. Proc SPIE. 1995;2435:210–219. doi: 10.1117/12.208776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sturza MA: The Teledesic satellite system, in Hoffman MI (ed): 1994 IEEE National Telesystems Conference, 1994, pp 123–126
  • 4.Leopold RJ, Miller A. The Iridium communications system. IEEE MTT-S Int Microwave Symp Digest. 1993;2:575–578. doi: 10.1109/MWSYM.1993.276872. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Welch TA. A technique for high-performance data compression. Computer. 1984;17:8–19. doi: 10.1109/MC.1984.1659158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wallace GK. The JPEG still picture compression standard. Comm. ACM. 1991;34:30–44. doi: 10.1145/103085.103089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dallal I, Mustillo P: CCITT audiographics standards, in Ed: Phillips D, Desrochers P (eds): Proceedings of the Multimedia Communications '93, 1993, pp 213–215
  • 8.Liou ML. Overview of the p × 64 k bits/s video coding standard. Comm ACM. 1991;34:59–63. doi: 10.1145/103085.103091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stallings W. Handbook of Computer Communication Standards, vol 3, The TCP/IP Protocol Suite. Carmel, IN: Howard W. Sams & Co; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gold RH, Kangarloo H, Grant EG, et al. Teleconferencing for cost-effective sharing of radiology educational resources: Potential and technical development. AJR. 1993;160:1309–1311. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.6.8498240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meetz HK, Bebeau MJ, Thoma SJ. The validity and reliability of a clinical performance rating scale. J Dent Educ. 1988;52:290–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Merrill JM, Camacho Z, Laux LF, et al. Uncertainties and ambiguities: Measuring how medical students cope. Med Educ. 1994;28:316–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02719.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Digital Imaging are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES