Abstract
Background
Although the diagnosis of breast cancer is suggested on clinical examination, the degree of suspicion is variable. Currently a combination of three tests, i.e. clinical examination, radiological imaging (mammography, ultrasonography) and pathology called as triple assessment test is used to accurately diagnose all palpable breast lumps. Together they give sensitivity of 99%. The triple assessment is taken as positive if any of the three components is positive and negative only if all of its components are negative for malignancy.
Materials and methods
This study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir over a period of 3 years from June 2005 to May 2008. A total of 200 patients with a breast lump were selected irrespective of age. A detailed history, focused clinical examination, radiological imaging and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) were used as diagnostic tools for screening of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy of triple assessment in the preoperative diagnosis of patients with breast carcinoma.
Results
The sensitivity and specificity of all the modalities used in triple assessment when combined together was 100% and 99.3%, respectively. The concordance for the triple assessment was 99.3%, positive predictive value was 93.3%, negative predictive value was 100%, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 99.3%. p value was significant (0.000).
Conclusion
We conclude that triple assessment is a very useful diagnostic tool to evaluate patients with breast lumps and to detect patients with breast cancers with an overall accuracy of 99.3%.
Keywords: Clinical examination, Mammography, Ultrasonography, Fine-needle aspiration cytology, Carcinoma
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (267.0 KB).
References
- 1.Bland K.I., Beenken S., Copeland E.M., III The Breast. Schwartz’s Princip Surg. 2005;16:454. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Iglehart J.D., Kaelin C.M. Diseases of the breast. Sabiston Text Book of Surgery. 2004;1:877. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang W.T., Mok C.O., King W., Tang, Metreweli C. Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses in Chinese women: Alternative to mammography. J Ultrasound Med. 1996;15(9):637–644. doi: 10.7863/jum.1996.15.9.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pande A.R., Lohani B., Sayami P., Pradhan Predictive value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2003;1(2):78–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shetty M.K., Shah Y.P., Sharman R.S. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and Sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(3):263–268. doi: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.3.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martelli G., Pilotti S., Coopmans de Yoldi G., Viganotti G., Fariselli G., Lepera P., Moglia D. Diagnostic efficacy of physical examination, mammography, fine needle aspiration cytology (Triple test) in solid breast lumps: An analysis of 1708 consecutive cases. Tumouri. 1990;76(5):476–479. doi: 10.1177/030089169007600512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaufman Z., Shpitz B., Shapiro M., Rona R., Lew S., Dinbar A. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: Combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration. J Surg Oncol. 1994;56(4):254–257. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930560413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Steinberg J.L., Trudeau M.E., Ryder D.E., Fishell E., Chapman J.A., McCready D.R., Fish E.B., Hiraki G.Y., Ross T.M., Lickley L.A. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer. Can J Surg. 1996;39(4):302–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reinikainen H.T., Rissanen T.J., Piippo U.K., Päivänsalo M.J. Contribution of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology to the differential diagnosis of palpable solid breast lesions. Acta Radiol. 1998;40(4):383–389. doi: 10.3109/02841859909177751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ariga R., Bloom K., Reddy V.B., Kluskens L., Francescatti D., Dowlat K., Siziopikou P., Gattuso P. Fine-needle as0piration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation. Am J Surg. 2002;184(5):41–43. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mohammed A.Z., Edino S.T., Ochicha O., Alhassan S.U. Value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of palpable breast lumps. Ann Afric Medi. 2005;4(1):19–222. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ahmed I., Nazir R., Chaudhary M.Y., Kundi S. Triple assessment of breast lumps. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007;17(9):535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]