Abstract
Background
Liver size is related to body surface area. The present study was conducted to assess liver size and to find its relationship with body parameters. Also, the external surface of liver was studied for presence of fissures, which may demarcate the vascular segments and the blood vessels beneath them and may help the surgeon for resection of liver segment.
Material and Methods
Apparently normal liver specimens were obtained from 50 cadavers aged 19–65 years. Measurements of liver diameters were taken with the help of Vernier Calipers. Volume of liver was taken by water displacement method. Means and standard deviation of data were calculated and liver dimensions were co-related with body parameters.
Results
The mean maximum transverse diameter was 199.4 + 24.5 mm and maximum vertical diameter was 149.5 + 18.7 mm. Significant correlations were observed between Maximum anteroposterior diameter and body mass index (p < 0.05);Vertical diameter at falciform ligament and body weight (p < 0.01);Highly significant correlation was seen between liver volume and body surface area (P < 0.001). The fissures showed underlying veins draining into the inferior vena cava in 40% cases.
Conclusions
A significant increase in the body parameters with a corresponding increase in the liver dimensions was found. Study of morphology of liver can help the surgeons to dissect in proper planes to make the resection safe. The surface of liver showed 1–3 fissures distributed on all lobes in 70% specimens demarcating the vascular segments, which may help the surgeon during resection of liver.
Keywords: Liver dimension, Fissure ressection, Vascular segments
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (214.3 KB).
References
- 1.Naftalis J., Leevy C.M. Clinical estimation of liver size. Am J Dig Dis. 1963;8:236–243. doi: 10.1007/BF02232322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walk L. Assessment of liver size. Digestion. 1968;1:289–295. doi: 10.1159/000196866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vij J.C., Tandon B.N. Evaluation of various prognostic factors in fulminant hepatic. J Assoc Physicians. 1979;27:199–203. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Singh K., Bhasin D.K., Reddy D.N., et al. Liver span in normal Indians. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1985;4:73–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singh V., Haldar N., Nain C.K., et al. Liver span: a comparative appraisal of various methods. Trop Gastroenterol. 1998;19:98–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jeffrey R.B., Moss A.A., Quivey J.M., et al. CT of radiation induced hepatic injury. MR. 1980;135:445–448. doi: 10.2214/ajr.135.3.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh V., Singh K., Singh D., et al. Liver span and weight in health and disease. Trop Gastroenterol. 1999;20:73–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Banerjee S., Sen R. A-nomogram for calculating the surface area of the body of Indians. 1957;45:33–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Synder W.S., Cook M.J., Karhausen L.R., et al. International Commission on Radiological protection. Oxford: Pergamon press; 1974. Report of the task group on Reference man. No. 23; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Harbin W.P., Robert N.J., Ferrucci J.T. Diagnosis of cirrhosis based on regional changes in hepatic morphology. Radiology. 1980;135:273–283. doi: 10.1148/radiology.135.2.7367613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sahni D., Jit I., Sodhi L., et al. Weight and surface area of the liver in northwest Indian adults. J Anat Soc India. 1997;46:67–76. [Google Scholar]
- 12.oore K.L., Dalley A.F. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1992. p. 276. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bismuth H. Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. Anatomy and Pathophysiology. World Journal of Surgery. 1982;6:3–9. doi: 10.1007/BF01656368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sahni D., Jit I., Sodhi L. Gross anatomy of the caudate lobe of the liver. J Anat Soc India. 2000;49:123–126. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Glasby M.A., Owen W.J., Krissmund S., et al. The Liver, Biliary system. In: Fananapazer K., et al., editors. Applied Surgical Anatomy. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1999. p. 114. [Google Scholar]