Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Indian Journal of Surgery logoLink to The Indian Journal of Surgery
. 2010 Aug 26;72(3):185–188. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0060-1

Open common bile duct exploration without T-tube insertion- two decade experience from a limited resource setting in the Caribbean

Vijay Naraynsingh 1,✉, Seetharaman Hariharan 1, Michael J Ramdass 1, Dilip Dan 1, Parul Shukla 2, Ravi Maharaj 2
PMCID: PMC3452659  PMID: 23133244

Abstract

Purpose

Despite advancements in gallbladder surgery with the introduction of endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques, many surgeons, especially in the developing world, still perform open cholecystectomy with common bile duct (CBD) exploration for choledocholithiasis. The purpose of the study is to report the outcomes of a case series of open CBD exploration without the use of T-tubes.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review of all consecutive open CBD exploration done by the first author over a period of 23 years was conducted. Demographic data, preoperative investigations, the surgical techniques and perioperative outcomes were recorded.

Results

Of 690 open cholecystectomies performed during the study period, 108 had common bile duct exploration. In 94 cases this was done via a supraduodenal choledochotomy, in 10 cases via a transduodenal sphincteroplasty and in 4 cases via the cystic duct. In 90 cases, a simple choledochotomy and primary closure was done while in 4 cases choledocho-duodenostomy was required. Eighty-seven percent of surgeries were done on elective basis and 13% on an emergency basis and no T-tubes were used in any patients. The mean hospital length of stay was 3.2 days and the perioperative morbidity was negligible.

Conclusions

In a limited resource setting, there is still a role for open CBD exploration and primary closure without the necessity of T-tubes and stents as evidenced by a good perioperative patient outcome.

Keywords: Common bile duct exploration, Open surgery, Limited resources setting, T-tubes

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.6 KB).

References

  • 1.Bingener J., Schwesinger W.H. Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States: results of a survey. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:577–579. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0322-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jameel M., Darmas B., Baker A.L. Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:29–35. doi: 10.1308/003588408X242295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sawyers J.L., Herrington J.L., Edwards W.H. Primary closure of the common bile duct. Am J Surg. 1965;109:107. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(65)80111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Walrond E.R. Bile duct surgery without tubes or stents. West Indian Med J. 1982;31:34–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005640 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005641 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Gharaibeh K.I., Heiss H.A. Biliary leakage following T-tube removal. Int Surg. 2000;85:57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sikic N., Tutek Z., Strikic N. Primary suture vs. T-tube after common bile duct exploration (our 25 years of experience) Przegl Lek. 2000;57:143–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haq A., Morris J., Goddard C., Mahmud S., Nassar A.H. Delayed cholangitis resulting from a retained T-tube fragment encased within a stone: a rare complication. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:714. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-4235-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003327 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Boerma D., Schwartz M.P. Gallstone disease. Management of common bile-duct stones and associated gallbladder stones: Surgical aspects. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:1103–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seale A.K., Ledet W.P., Jr Primary common bile duct closure. Arch Surg. 1999;134:22–24. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.1.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sorensen V.J., Buck J.R., Chung S.K., Fath J.J., Horst H.M., Obeid F.N. Primary common bile duct closure following exploration: an effective alternative to routine biliary drainage. Am J Surg. 1994;60:451–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ha J.P., Tang C.N., Siu W.T., Chau C.H., Li M.K. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1605–1608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Williams J.A., Treacy P.J., Sidey P., Worthley C.S., Townsend N.C., Russell E.A. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct. ANZ J Surg. 1994;64:823–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang L.D., Bie P., Chen P., Wang S.G., Ma K.S., Dong J.H. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic choledochotomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004;42:520–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Watanabe H., Iwase H., Sugitani M. Inflammatory polyps in common bile duct caused by T-tube. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:894–896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lygidakis N.J. Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube drainage or primary closure. Effects on postoperative bacteremia and T-tube bile infection. Am J Surg. 1983;146:254–256. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90385-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wills V.L., Gibson K., Karihaloot C., Jorgensen J.O. Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:177–180. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cheung M.T. Postoperative choledochoscopic removal of intrahepatic stones via a T-tube tract. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1224–1228. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cheung M.T., Wai S.H., Kwok P.C. Percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic removal of intrahepatic stones. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1409–1415. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alhamdani A., Mahmud S., Jameel M., Baker A. Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2190–2195. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0021-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Csendes A., Csendes P., Burdiles P., Diaz J.C., Maluenda F., Burgos A.M. Behavior of the common bile duct diameter before and 12 years after choledochostomy for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. A prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1294–1297. doi: 10.1007/s11605-006-0078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chung R.S., Wojtasik L., Pham Q., Chari V., Chen P. The decline of training in open biliary surgery: effect on the residents’ attitude toward bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:338–340. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8621-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES