Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (581.3 KB).
References
- 1.Goldberg MA, et al. New high-resolution teleradiology system: Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in 685 transmitted clinical cases. Radiology. 1993;186:429–434. doi: 10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wilson AJ, et al. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: Comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette. Radiology. 1994;193:419–422. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Franken EA, et al. Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:732–737. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199209000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jonsson A, et al. Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. An ROC analysis. Acta Radiol. 1994;35:311–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jonsson A, et al. Computed vs. film-screen magnification radiography of fingers in hyperparathyroidism. An ROC analysis Acta Radiol 199536290–294.10.3109/02841859509177637 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kido S, et al. Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: Conventional versus film-digitized radiography. Radiology. 1994;192:171–176. doi: 10.1148/radiology.192.1.8208932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kido S, et al. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm. Radiology. 1995;194:407–412. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Langen HJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of digital radiography versus conventional radiography of fractured skulls. Invest Radiol. 1993;28:686–689. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199308000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scott WW, et al. Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: Teleradiology workstation versus radiograph, readings. Radiology. 1995;195:223–229. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thaete FL, et al. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: A comparison of observer performance. AJR. 1994;162:575–581. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wilson AJ, Hodge JC. Digitized radiographs in skeletal trauma: A performance comparison between a digital workstation and the original film images. Radiology. 1995;196:565–568. doi: 10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kimme-Smith C, et al. Effects of, reduced exposure on computed radiography: Comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. AJR. 1995;165:269–273. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mosser H, et al. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom. Invest Radiol. 1995;30:186–191. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199503000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Don S, et al. Volume detection threshold: Quantitative comparison of computed radiography and screen-film radiography in detection of pneumothoraces in an animal model that simulates the neonate. Radiology. 1995;194:727–730. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scott WW, et al. Subtle orthopedic fractures: Teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology. 1993;187:811–815. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Halpern EJ, et al. Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms. J Digit Imaging. 1992;5:101–106. doi: 10.1007/BF03167834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dawood RM, et al. Clinical diagnosis from digital displays: Results and conclusions from the St Mary’s evaluation project. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:1–10. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-793-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yoshino MT, et al. Diagnostic performance of teleradiology in cervical spine fracture detection. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:55–59. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199201000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goldberg MA, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:463–468. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]