Skip to main content
Journal of Digital Imaging logoLink to Journal of Digital Imaging
. 1999 May;12(Suppl 1):152–154. doi: 10.1007/BF03168786

Evaluating the impact of workstation usage on radiology report times in the initial 6 months following installation

Eric P Tamm 1,, Bharat Raval 1, O Clark West 1, Stephen Dinwiddie 1, Richard Holmes 1
PMCID: PMC3452909  PMID: 10342197

Abstract

Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) workstations are reported to improve workflow by making studies immediately available for review upon their completion. This study tested the hypothesis that a workstation would decrease the time from completion of a study to dictation of results (report time). A four-monitor, 2K × 2K workstation (Imation Cemax-Icon, Fremont, CA), was installed in a body imaging computed tomography (CT) reading room. Use of the workstation by the staff radiologists was voluntary. Images were also printed on film and films continued to be hung at the routine hanging times. To evaluate the workstation’s maximum impact, data were collected for report times for studies completed during the routine day shift of the staff radiologist (Monday to Friday, 8am to 5pm). Data were collected before workstation installation (August 1997 to November 1997) and for the subsequent 6 months. Histograms of the number of studies (743v 103) versus report time (mean, 11.7v 7.4 hours) showed a bimodal distribution, with peaks at approximately 6 and 24 hours, both before (8/97-11/97) and after (6/98) the workstation’s installation. However, the number of studies dictated greater than 60 hours (25.2%v 20.4%) and the percentage of studies in the second peak (16 to 48 hours; 4.4%v 0%) both decreased. In conclusion, the workstation decreased the mean (11.7v 7.4 hours) and standard deviation (19.8v 9.1 hours) for report times. This was due to a decrease in both the number of cases dictated the day following their completion and the number of outliers (markedly delayed dictations). The decrease in outliers is probably due to a decrease in the number of “lost” film-based studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (591.6 KB).

References

  • 1.Shaw M, Donnelly J, Anderson Q. Is PACS a “WAMI” in your institution? It should be! J Digit Imaging. 1998;11:99–105. doi: 10.1007/BF03168272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel EL. Economic and clinical impact of filmless operation in a multifacility environment. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11:42–47. doi: 10.1007/BF03168177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Digital Imaging are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES