Abstract
The Radiology Department at the University of Arizona has been operating a teleradiology program for almost 2 years. The goal of this project was to characterize the types of cases reviewed, to assess radiologists’ satisfaction with the program, and to examine case turnaround times. On average, about 50 teleradiology cases are interpreted each month. Computed tomography (CT) cases are the most common type of case, constituting 65% of the total case volume. Average turnaround time (to generate a “wet read” once a case is received) is about 1.3 hours. Image quality was rated as generally good to excellent, and the user interface as generally good. Radiologists’ confidence in their diagnostic decisions is about the same as reading films in the clinical environment. The most common reason for not being able to read teleradiology images is poor image quality, followed by lack of clinical history and not enough images.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (583.9 KB).
Footnotes
Supported in part by Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan.
References
- 1.Jaffe C, Harle T. Handbook of Teleradiology Applications. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Franken EA, Whitten PS, Caldwell R, et al. et al. Impact of teleradiology on radiological consultations in rural areas. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al.et al., editors. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery CAR’98. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1998. pp. 478–483. [Google Scholar]
- 3.McNeill KM, Weinstein RS, Holcomb MJ, et al. Teleradiology in an integrated telemedicine environment. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., editors. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery CAR’98. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1998. pp. 484–489. [Google Scholar]
- 4.McNeill KM, Weinstein RS, Holcomb MJ. Arizona telemedicine program: Implementing a statewide health care network. JAMIA. 1998;5:441–277. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]