Abstract
The development and acceptance of the digital communication in medicine (DICOM) standard has become a basic requirement for the implementation of electronic imaging in radiology. DICOM is now evolving to provide a standard for electronic communication between radiology and other parts of the hospital enterprise. In a completely integrated filmless radiology department, there are 3 core computer systems, the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), the hospital or radiology information system (HIS, RIS), and the acquisition modality. Ideally, each would have bidirectional communication with the other 2 systems. At a minimum, a PACS must be able to receive and acknowledge receipt of image and demographic data from the modalities. Similarly, the modalities must be able to send images and demographic data to the PACS. Now that basic DICOM communication protocols for query or retrieval, storage, and print classes have become established through both conformance statements and intervendor testing, there has been an increase in interest in enhancing the functionality of communication between the 3 computers. Historically, demographic data passed to the PACS have been generated manually at the modality despite the existence of the same data on the HIS or RIS. In more current sophisticated implementations, acquisition modalities are able to receive patient and study-related data from the HIS or RIS. DICOM Modality Worklist is the missing electronic link that transfers this critical information between the acquisition modalities and the HIS or RIS. This report describes the concepts, issues, and impact of DICOM Modality Worklist implementation in a PACS environment.
Key Words: DICOM, PACS, worklist
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).
References
- 1.Behlen F. A DICOM document-oriented approach to PACS infrastructure. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11(suppl 1):35–38. doi: 10.1007/BF03168255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carrino JA, Unkel PJ, Miller ID, et al. Large-Scale PACS implementation. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11(suppl 1):3–7. doi: 10.1007/BF03168246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Levine BA, Cleary KR, Norton GS, et al. Experience implementing a DICOM 3.0 multivendor teleradiology network. Telemedicine J. 1998;4:167–175. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kuzmak PM, Dayhoff RE. The Department of Veterans Affairs integration of imaging into the healthcare enterprise using the VistA hospital information system and digital imaging and communications in medicine. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11:53–64. doi: 10.1007/BF03168727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lou SL, Hoogstrate DR, Huang HK. An automated PACS image acquisition and recovery scheme for image integrity based on the DICOM standard. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 1997;21:209–218. doi: 10.1016/S0895-6111(97)00011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gale D, Gale ME, Schwartz RKS, et al. An automated picture archiving and communication system workstation interface: A timesaving enhancement. AJR. 2000;174:33–36. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oosterwijk H. DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11(suppl 1):39–41. doi: 10.1007/BF03168256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]