Skip to main content
Journal of Digital Imaging logoLink to Journal of Digital Imaging
. 1997 May;10(2):57–64. doi: 10.1007/BF03168557

A computerized analysis system in chest radiography: Evaluation of interstitial lung abnormalities

Shoji Kido 1,2,3, Junpei Ikezoe 1,2,3, Shinichi Tamura 1,2,3, Hironobu Nakamura 1,2,3, Chikazumi Kuroda 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC3453003  PMID: 9165420

Abstract

We evaluated the usefulness of a computerized analysis system in the detection of interstitial lung abnormalities in digitized chest radiography. This system uses the processes of four-directional Laplacian-Gaussian filtering, linear opacity judgment, and linear opacity subtraction. For qualitative analysis, we employed a combined radiographic index, which was calculated from two normalized radiographic indices obtained by linear opacity judgment and subtraction of linear opacities. We selected 50 regions of interest (ROIs) in patients with mild interstitial lung abnormalities, 50 ROIs in patients with severe interstitial lung abnormalities, and 50 ROIs in individuals with normal lung parenchyma. High-resolution computed radiography (HRCT) findings were used as the standard of reference for this study. These ROIS were processed by our computerized analysis system, and radiographic indices were obtained from each ROI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) was used as the measure of performance. The combined radiographic index provided better results in the mild interstitial lung abnormality group (Az=0.94±0.02), but it also yielded good results in the severe interstitial lung abnormality group (Az=0.98±0.01). These results indicate that this system of combining radiographic indices has improved the detection performance over that with our previous system.

Key Words: computer-aided diagnosis, digital chest radiography, image processing, interstitial lung disease, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

References

  • 1.Mettler FA. Diagnostic radiology: Usage and trends in the United States, 1964–1980. Radiology. 1987;162:263–266. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.1.3786774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Genereux GP. Pattern recognition in diffuse lung disease. Med Radiogr Photogr. 1985;61:2–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sutton RN, Hall EL. Texture measures for automatic classification of pulmonary disease. IEEE Trans Comput. 1972;21:667–676. doi: 10.1109/T-C.1972.223572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Revesz J, Kundel HL. Feasibility of classifying disseminated diseases based on their Fourier spectra. Invest Radiol. 1973;8:345–349. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197309000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tully RJ, Conners RW, Harlow CA, et al. Toward computer analysis of pulmonary infiltration. Invest Radiol. 1978;13:298–305. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197807000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Katsuragawa S, Doi K, MacMahon H. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: Detection and characterization of interstitial lung disease in digital chest radiographs. Med Phys. 1988;15:311–319. doi: 10.1118/1.596224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Katsuragawa S, Doi K, MacMahon H. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: Classification of normal and abnormal lungs with interstitial disease in chest images. Med Phys. 1989;16:38–44. doi: 10.1118/1.596412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kido S, Ikezoe J, Naito H, et al. An image analyzing system for interstitial lung abnormalities in chest radiography: Detection and classification by Laplacian-Gaussian filtering and linear opacity judgment. Invest Radiol. 1994;29:172–177. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199402000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marr D, Hildreth E. Theory of edge detection. Proc. R Soc London. 1980;207:187–217. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1980.0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tamura S, Uga M, Ono T. Straight line extraction for wafer alignment. Proc IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1983;83:285–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dorfmann DD, Alf EE. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection and determination of confidence intervals: Rating method data. J Math Psychol. 1969;14:109–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Swets JA. Analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest Radiol. 1979;14:109–121. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197903000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol. 1986;21:720–733. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol. 1989;24:234–245. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198903000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shoji K, Ikezoe J, Tamura S, et al. Fractal Analysis of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities in Chest Radiography. Radiographics. 1995;15:1457–1464. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.15.6.8577968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Digital Imaging are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES