Abstract
Microscopic evaluation of a peripheral blood smear is one of the most beneficial test. But anticoagulant induced artefacts could lead to misinterpretation of the smears. The present study was undertaken to identify the anticoagulant induced artefacts and avoid misinterpretation of peripheral blood smears. The blood samples were collected using Ethylene Diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and Sodium citrate, mixed thoroughly and smears were made immediately as well as 1hr apart for 6 hrs, stained and examined under oil immersion microscope. Direct smears were used as controls. Significant morphological artefacts were observed in our study. Artefacts were marked at the end of 2 hrs with EDTA but seen almost immediately with citrate blood. At 6 hrs, artefacts were marked but more severe with citrates than EDTA. Thus the practice of making blood smears before addition of anticoagulant is recommended and a delay up to 1hr is permissible with EDTA blood but not beyond.
Keywords: EDTA, Sodium Citrate, Artefacts, Blood smears
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (892.8 KB).
References
- 1.Mills J.N. Interpreting blood smears (or what blood smears are trying to tell you!) Aust Vet J. 1998;596:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1998.tb10235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Perkin S.L. Examination of Blood and Bone Marrow. In: Green J.P., Foerster J., Lukens J.N., Rodgers G.M., Paraskevas Paraskevas F., Glader B., editors. Wintrobe’s Clinical Haematology. 11th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. pp. 4–12. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Raphael S.S. Principles of Haematology. In: Raphael S.S., editor. Lynch’s Medical Laboratory Technology. 4th Edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1983. p. 126. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sacker L.S. Specimen Collection. In: Lewis S.M., Coster J.F., editors. Quality Control in Haematology. New York: Academic Press; 1975. p. 211. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vajpayee N., Graham S.S., Bem S. Basic Examination of Blood and Bone Marrow. In: Mc Pherson R.A., Pincus M.R., editors. Henry’s Clinical Diagnosis and Management By Laboratory Methods. 21st Edition. India: Saunders; 2007. p. 476. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eastham R.D. Peripheral White Blood Cells. In: Eastham R.D., editor. Clinical Haematology. 6th Edition. England: John Wright & Sons Ltd; 1985. p. 178. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lewis S.M., Tatsumi N. Collection and Handling of Blood. In: Lewis S.M., Bain B.J., Bates I., editors. Dacie And Lewis Practical Haematology. 10th Edition. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 8. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gossett K.A., Carakostas M.C. Effect of EDTA on morphology of neutrophils of healthy dogs and dogs with inflammation. Vet Clin Pathol. 1984;3(2):22–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.1984.tb00835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zeigler Z., Murphy S., Gardner F.H. Microscopic platelet size and morphology in various hematologic disorders. Blood. 1978;51:479–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shimasaki A., Kato T., Ozaki Y. Studies of platelet aggregation in six cases of EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia. Rinsho. Ketsueki. 1994;35(6):529–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lippi U., Schinella M., Nicoli M., Modena N., Lippi G. EDTA-induced platelet aggregation can be avoided by a new anticoagulant also suitable for automated complete blood count. Haematologica. 1990;75(1):38–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]