Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1984 Jun;81(12):3796–3800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.12.3796

Evolution of multigene families under interchromosomal gene conversion.

T Nagylaki
PMCID: PMC345307  PMID: 6587395

Abstract

A model for the evolution of the probabilities of genetic identity within and between loci of a multigene family in a finite population is formulated and investigated. Unbiased interchromosomal gene conversion, equal crossing-over between tandemly repeated genes, random genetic drift, and mutation to new alleles are incorporated. Generations are discrete and nonoverlapping; the diploid, monoecious population mates at random. Formulae for the equilibrium values of the probabilities of identity and for the rate of convergence are deduced. At equilibrium, the amount of intralocus homology, f, always exceeds the amount of interlocus homology, ĝ. The equilibrium homologies f and ĝ and the characteristic convergence time T are independent of the crossover rate. As the population size and the number of repeats increase, f and ĝ decrease and T increases; as the rate of gene conversion increases, f and T decrease whereas ĝ increases. The time T can be sufficiently short to imply that interchromosomal gene conversion may be an important mechanism for maintaining sequence homogeneity among repeated genes.

Full text

PDF
3796

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nagylaki T. Evolution of a large population under gene conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(19):5941–5945. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.19.5941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nagylaki T., Petes T. D. Intrachromosomal gene conversion and the maintenance of sequence homogeneity among repeated genes. Genetics. 1982 Feb;100(2):315–337. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nagylaki T. The evolution of multigene families under intrachromosomal gene conversion. Genetics. 1984 Mar;106(3):529–548. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ohta T. Allelic and nonallelic homology of a supergene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 May;79(10):3251–3254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.10.3251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ohta T. Some models of gene conversion for treating the evolution of multigene families. Genetics. 1984 Mar;106(3):517–528. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES